Chicago Bears vs Green Bay Packers, Week 14 2021
Chicago Bears
Away
30
Green Bay Packers
HomeWon
45
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bears | 3 | 24 | 0 | 3 | 30 |
| Packers | 0 | 21 | 17 | 7 | 45 |
CHI 30GB 45 Final
Passing leader
29.6PPR pts
29/37, 341 YDS, 4 TD
Top fantasy scorer
34.1PPR pts
10 REC, 121 YDS, 2 TD
Bears leader
20.4PPR pts
18/33, 224 YDS, 2 TD, 2 INT
Defensive playmaker
Rasul Douglas
1 INT, 1 TD, 2 TKL
Packers 45, Bears 30: Green Bay rallies from 6 down at halftime
Green Bay erased a 27–21 halftime deficit, outscoring Chicago 24–3 after the break to win 45–30. The Packers finished with a 439–347 edge in total offense and averaged 6.9 yards per play.
The gap showed up everywhere. The Bears went 5-for-13 on third down and committed three turnovers, while the Packers kept the ball for 35:00 and finished without a giveaway.
The two teams meet again in Week 5 of 2026. If you roster anyone from either side, run the start/sit call in Redraft Command and it will weigh your lineup, your opponent and your league scoring, not only the player rankings.
Key advantages
- +0.9 yards/play GB 6.9 · CHI 6.0
- +3 turnover margin GB 0 turnovers
- +92 total yards GB 439 · CHI 347
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Bear or Packer on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Packers Won
Green Bay won the efficiency, turnover, third-down, and time of possession battles.
| Bears | Stat | Packers |
|---|---|---|
| 6.0 | Yards per play | 6.9 |
| 3 | Turnovers | 0 |
| 347 | Total yards | 439 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 58 | Plays | 64 |
| 38% | Third-down conversion | 40% |
| 25:00 | Time of possession | 35:00 |
Scoring Summary
The Packers scored six touchdowns and one field goal; the Bears scored three touchdowns and three field goals.
| Time | Team | Play | CHI | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 4:21 | CHI | Cairo Santos 23-yard FG Takes lead | 3 | 0 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 11:09 | CHI | Justin Fields → Jakeem Grant Sr., 46-yard TD Extends leadCairo Santos XP | 10 | 0 |
| 6:02 | GB | Aaron Rodgers → Allen Lazard, 2-yard TDMason Crosby XP | 10 | 7 |
| 4:59 | GB | Rasul Douglas 55-yard interception return TD Takes leadMason Crosby XP | 10 | 14 |
| 3:21 | CHI | Justin Fields → Damiere Byrd, 54-yard TD Takes leadCairo Santos XP | 17 | 14 |
| 1:32 | CHI | Jakeem Grant Sr. 97-yard punt return TD Extends leadCairo Santos XP | 24 | 14 |
| 0:44 | GB | Aaron Rodgers → Davante Adams, 38-yard TDMason Crosby XP | 24 | 21 |
| 0:00 | CHI | Cairo Santos 44-yard FG Extends lead | 27 | 21 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 9:24 | GB | Aaron Jones 3-yard TD run Takes leadMason Crosby XP | 27 | 28 |
| 8:24 | GB | Aaron Rodgers → Aaron Jones, 23-yard TD Extends leadMason Crosby XP | 27 | 35 |
| 2:52 | GB | Mason Crosby 20-yard FG Extends lead | 27 | 38 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 4:33 | GB | Aaron Rodgers → Davante Adams, 3-yard TD Extends leadMason Crosby XP | 27 | 45 |
| 1:22 | CHI | Cairo Santos 43-yard FG | 30 | 45 |
Fantasy Points: Bears vs Packers, Week 14 2021
Fantasy leaders
- Davante Adams34.1 PTSWR1
- Aaron Rodgers28.6 PTSQB3
- Aaron Jones21.5 PTSRB8
- Allen Lazard20.9 PTSWR8
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aaron Rodgers | 28.6 | QB3 | 29/37 | 341 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 141.1 | Start/Sit → |
| Justin Fields | 19.4 | QB9 | 18/33 | 224 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 74 | 0 | 70.8 | Start/Sit → |
| Kurt Benkert | -0.1 | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | -1 | 0 | — |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davante Adams | 34.1 | WR1 | WR | — | — | — | 13 | 10 | 121 | 2 | Start/Sit → |
| Aaron Jones | 21.5 | RB8 | RB | 5 | 35 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 30 | 1 | |
| Allen Lazard | 20.9 | WR8 | WR | 1 | 14 | 0 | 7 | 6 | 75 | 1 | |
| Jakeem Grant | 18.1 | WR14 | WR | 1 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 46 | 1 | |
| Damiere Byrd | 15.6 | WR25 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 76 | 1 | |
| David Montgomery | 14.1 | RB16 | RB | 10 | 42 | 0 | 7 | 6 | 39 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Marcedes Lewis | 9.1 | TE14 | TE | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | 51 | 0 | |
| Josiah Deguara | 7.4 | TE21 | TE | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 44 | 0 | |
| AJ Dillon | 7.1 | RB35 | RB | 15 | 71 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → |
| Marquez Valdes-Scantling | 5.0 | WR66 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 3 | 20 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Cole Kmet | 4.7 | TE29 | TE | — | — | — | 5 | 3 | 17 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Allen Robinson | 3.4 | WR82 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 2 | 14 | 0 | |
| Darnell Mooney | 2.9 | WR85 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 1 | 19 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
| Jimmy Graham | 2.9 | TE36 | TE | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 9 | 0 | |
| Damien Williams | 2.7 | RB51 | RB | 2 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | |
| Khalil Herbert | -0.7 | — | RB | 1 | 3 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → |
Fantasy Usage
Chicago Bears
Snap Share
Target Share32 targets
- David Montgomery22%, 7 targets
- Allen Robinson19%, 6 targets
- Cole Kmet16%, 5 targets
- Darnell Mooney16%, 5 targets
- Jimmy Graham9%, 3 targets
- Other19%, 6 targets
Carry Share23 carries
- , 10 carries
- , 9 carries
- , 2 carries
- , 1 carries
- , 1 carries
Green Bay Packers
Snap Share
Target Share35 targets
- Davante Adams37%, 13 targets
- Allen Lazard20%, 7 targets
- Marquez Valdes-Scantling14%, 5 targets
- Marcedes Lewis11%, 4 targets
- Aaron Jones9%, 3 targets
- Other9%, 3 targets
Carry Share24 carries
- , 15 carries
- , 5 carries
- , 2 carries
- , 1 carries
- , 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darnell Mooney | 57 | 92% | 5 | 16% | 0 |
| Davante Adams | 58 | 89% | 13 | 37% | 0 |
| David Montgomery | 52 | 84% | 7 | 22% | 10 |
| Allen Lazard | 53 | 82% | 7 | 20% | 1 |
| Allen Robinson | 48 | 77% | 6 | 19% | 0 |
| Cole Kmet | 46 | 74% | 5 | 16% | 0 |
| Marquez Valdes-Scantling | 43 | 66% | 5 | 14% | 0 |
| Damiere Byrd | 36 | 58% | 2 | 6% | 0 |
| Josiah Deguara | 37 | 57% | 3 | 9% | 0 |
| Marcedes Lewis | 36 | 55% | 4 | 11% | 0 |
| AJ Dillon | 35 | 54% | 0 | 0% | 15 |
| Jakeem Grant | 29 | 47% | 3 | 9% | 1 |
| Aaron Jones | 29 | 45% | 3 | 9% | 5 |
| Jesse James | 15 | 24% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
| Jimmy Graham | 12 | 19% | 3 | 9% | 0 |
| Amari Rodgers | 10 | 15% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
| Tyler Davis | 9 | 14% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
| Damien Williams | 7 | 11% | 1 | 3% | 2 |
| Dominique Dafney | 7 | 11% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
| Khalil Herbert | 5 | 8% | 0 | 0% | 1 |
| Equanimeous St. Brown | 5 | 8% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
| J.P. Holtz | 2 | 3% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
| Patrick Taylor | 2 | 3% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
| Malik Taylor | 1 | 2% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+13.2Aaron Jones Sr.21.5 PTS vs 8.3 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−6.7Allen Robinson3.4 PTS vs 10.1 xFP
- Highest expected volume21.9 xFPDavante Adams34.1 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davante AdamsGB · WR | 34.1 | 21.9 | +12.2 | 89% | 37% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 13 | 37% |
| Justin FieldsCHI · QB | 20.4 | 20.3 | +0.1 | 100% | 33 att | — | 33 | 9 | 39% | 0 | 0% |
| David MontgomeryCHI · RB | 14.1 | 18.2 | −4.1 | 84% | 43% car | — | 0 | 10 | 43% | 7 | 22% |
| Aaron RodgersGB · QB | 29.6 | 16.9 | +12.7 | 97% | 37 att | — | 37 | 1 | 4% | 0 | 0% |
| Allen LazardGB · WR | 20.9 | 12.4 | +8.5 | 82% | 20% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 4% | 7 | 20% |
| Allen RobinsonCHI · WR | 3.4 | 10.1 | −6.7 | 77% | 19% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 19% |
| AJ DillonGB · RB | 7.1 | 9.6 | −2.5 | 54% | 63% car | — | 0 | 15 | 63% | 0 | 0% |
| Cole KmetCHI · TE | 4.7 | 8.4 | −3.7 | 74% | 16% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 16% |
| Darnell MooneyCHI · WR | 2.9 | 8.4 | −5.5 | 92% | 16% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 16% |
| Marquez Valdes-ScantlingGB · WR | 5.0 | 8.4 | −3.4 | 66% | 14% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 14% |
| Aaron Jones Sr.GB · RB | 21.5 | 8.3 | +13.2 | 45% | 21% car | — | 0 | 5 | 21% | 3 | 9% |
| Marcedes LewisGB · TE | 9.1 | 6.7 | +2.4 | 55% | 11% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 11% |
| Jakeem Grant Sr.CHI · WR | 12.1 | 5.7 | +6.4 | 47% | 9% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 4% | 3 | 9% |
| Jimmy GrahamCHI · TE | 2.9 | 5.1 | −2.2 | 19% | 9% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 9% |
| Josiah DeguaraGB · TE | 7.4 | 5.1 | +2.3 | 57% | 9% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 9% |
| Damiere ByrdCHI · WR | 15.6 | 3.4 | +12.2 | 58% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 6% |
| Damien WilliamsCHI · RB | 2.7 | 3.0 | −0.3 | 11% | 9% car | — | 0 | 2 | 9% | 1 | 3% |
| Kurt BenkertGB · QB | -0.1 | 1.3 | −1.4 | 3% | 0 att | — | 0 | 2 | 8% | 0 | 0% |
| Khalil HerbertCHI · RB | 0.3 | 0.6 | −0.3 | 8% | 4% car | — | 0 | 1 | 4% | 0 | 0% |
Team totals: Bears 32 targets and 23 carries; Packers 35 targets and 24 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2021 season: 1.68 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.64 per carry and 0.44 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Justin Fields
18 of 33 passing for 224 yards, 2 touchdowns, 2 interceptions; 9 carries for 74 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 20.3 expected.
Aaron Rodgers Ran hot
29 of 37 passing for 341 yards, 4 touchdowns; 1 carry for 0 yards.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 16.9 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
David Montgomery
7 targets (22% of the team's), 6 catches for 39 yards; 10 carries (43% of the team's) for 42 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 18.2 expected.
Allen Robinson Unlucky
6 targets (19% of the team's), 2 catches for 14 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 10.1 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Lowest-scoring game of the season.
Davante Adams Ran hot
13 targets (37% of the team's), 10 catches for 121 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 21.9 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Best score since Week 5.
Allen Lazard Ran hot
7 targets (20% of the team's), 6 catches for 75 yards and 1 touchdown; 1 carry (4% of the team's) for 14 yards.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 12.4 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Season high in targets (7). Best fantasy game of the season.
Darnell Mooney Unlucky
5 targets (16% of the team's), 1 catch for 19 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 8.4 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Fewest points since Week 3.
Aaron Jones Sr. Ran hot
3 targets (9% of the team's), 3 catches for 30 yards and 1 touchdown; 5 carries (21% of the team's) for 35 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 8.3 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Best score since Week 8.
Stock Up, Stock Down
Chicago Bears
- Stock up: Jakeem Grant Sr. played 47% of the snaps, up from a 13% season average.
- Stock down: Damien Williams played 11% of the snaps, down from a 27% season average.
- Stock down: Khalil Herbert played 8% of the snaps, down from a 36% season average.
Green Bay Packers
- Stock up: AJ Dillon led the backfield with 54% of the snaps after trailing Aaron Jones Sr. before this game.
- Stock up: Josiah Deguara played 57% of the snaps, up from a 27% season average.
- Stock down: Aaron Jones Sr. lost the backfield lead: 45% of the snaps to AJ Dillon's 54%.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2021 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Bears D | Packers D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 17.7 | 18.3 |
| RBs | 21.5 | 20.8 |
| WRs | 34.4 | 33.4 |
| TEs | 8.7 | 13.2 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Green Bay opened at 80% win probability and passed 98% in the fourth quarter on the way to the win.
Packers win probability
Key Swings
- −24Fields → Grant, 46-yd TD67% → 43%Q2 11:09
- +26Rodgers → Lazard, 2-yd TD38% → 65%Q2 6:02
- −28Grant 97-yd TD62% → 34%Q2 1:32
- +28Rodgers → Adams, 38-yd TD34% → 62%Q2 0:44
- +31Jones 3-yd TD run44% → 75%Q3 9:24
Swing in Packers win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Chicago Bears | Measure | Green Bay Packers |
|---|---|---|
| 58 | Plays | 64 |
| 60% | Pass rate | 63% |
| 6.0 | Yds / dropback | 8.0 |
| 6.0 | Yds / carry | 5.0 |
| 5/13 | Third downs | 4/10 |
Efficiency edge Green Bay ran 6 more plays and gained 2.0 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- CHI Montgomery 22% · Robinson 19% · Kmet 16%
- GB Adams 37% · Lazard 20% · Valdes-Scantling 14%
Possession Results
| Result | CHI | GB |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 2 | 5 |
| Field goals | 3 | 1 |
| Punts | 4 | 4 |
| Turnovers | 3 | 0 |
GB turnover edge: +3
- The Bears opened the scoring on their second possession, a 10-play, 39-yard drive that ended in a field goal.
- The Packers drained the clock with two second-half drives of five to nine minutes.
All 23 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | Q1 15:00 | 7 | 35 | 3:32 | Punt |
| GB | Q1 11:28 | 3 | 1 | 2:20 | Punt |
| CHI | Q1 9:08 | 10 | 39 | 4:47 | Field goal |
| GB | Q1 4:21 | 7 | 39 | 4:31 | Punt |
| CHI | Q2 14:50 | 6 | 89 | 3:41 | Touchdown |
| GB | Q2 11:09 | 11 | 75 | 5:07 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q2 6:02 | 3 | 7 | 1:03 | Interception |
| CHI | Q2 4:59 | 3 | 60 | 1:38 | Touchdown |
| GB | Q2 3:21 | 5 | 26 | 1:49 | Punt |
| GB | Q2 1:32 | 4 | 75 | 0:48 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q2 0:44 | 6 | 32 | 0:44 | Field goal |
| GB | Q3 15:00 | 9 | 75 | 5:36 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q3 9:24 | 2 | -1 | 0:52 | Fumble |
| GB | Q3 8:32 | 1 | 23 | 0:08 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q3 8:24 | 3 | 4 | 1:47 | Punt |
| GB | Q3 6:37 | 7 | 46 | 3:45 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q3 2:52 | 3 | -1 | 1:20 | Punt |
| GB | Q3 1:32 | 3 | 5 | 1:32 | Punt |
| CHI | Q4 15:00 | 3 | 5 | 1:49 | Punt |
| GB | Q4 13:11 | 13 | 71 | 8:38 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q4 4:33 | 10 | 54 | 3:11 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q4 1:22 | 5 | 19 | 0:36 | Interception |
| GB | Q4 0:46 | 2 | -1 | 0:46 | End of game |
About these numbers
The Packers' interception touchdown is counted as a Bears interception, not as a Packers possession. Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Bears vs Packers Head-to-Head
The Bears and Packers first met in 1921 and have played 213 times since. They have been NFC North rivals since 1970.
- All-time series
- 109–98–6Packers lead, 213 meetings since 1921
- Postseason
- 2–1Bears won in 1941 and 2025; Packers won in 2010
- Largest Bears win
- 61–71980
- Largest Packers win
- 49–01962
Since 2021
8–3 Packers lead
11 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
Oldest to newest. P = Packers win, B = Bears win, outlined = this game.
2026 Meetings
- Week 5 Bears at Packers Upcoming
- Week 16 Packers at Bears Upcoming
Recent Meetings
- 2025 Wild Card Packers at Bears, 2025 Wild Card recap CHI 31 GB 27 CHI W
- 2025 Wk 16 Packers at Bears, 2025 Wk 16 recap CHI 22 GB 16 CHI W
- 2025 Wk 14 Bears at Packers, 2025 Wk 14 recap GB 28 CHI 21 GB W
- 2024 Wk 18 Bears at Packers, 2024 Wk 18 recap CHI 24 GB 22 CHI W
- 2024 Wk 11 Packers at Bears, 2024 Wk 11 recap GB 20 CHI 19 GB W
- 2023 Wk 18 Bears at Packers, 2023 Wk 18 recap GB 17 CHI 9 GB W
- 2023 Wk 1 Packers at Bears, 2023 Wk 1 recap GB 38 CHI 20 GB W
- 2022 Wk 13 Packers at Bears, 2022 Wk 13 recap GB 28 CHI 19 GB W
- 2022 Wk 2 Bears at Packers, 2022 Wk 2 recap GB 27 CHI 10 GB W
- 2021 Wk 14 Bears at Packers GB 45 CHI 30 GB W
- 2021 Wk 6 Packers at Bears, 2021 Wk 6 recap GB 24 CHI 14 GB W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2021 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Bears | Stat | Packers |
|---|---|---|
| 6-11 | Record | 13-4 |
| 18.3 | Points per game | 26.5 |
| 307.4 | Yards per game | 365.6 |
| 4.9 | Yards per play | 5.8 |
| 23.9 | Points allowed per game | 21.8 |
| 316.7 | Yards allowed per game | 328.2 |
Bears vs Packers Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- GB −11.5Packers covered by 3.5
- Total
- 43Over: 75 points scored (by 32)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Packers | 27.3 | 45 | +17.8 |
| Bears | 15.8 | 30 | +14.3 |
Both offenses beat the market's expectation, and the Fantasy tab shows who cashed in.
Betting Trends
Last 2 meetings: Packers 2–0 ATS, overs and unders 1–1.
Each team's 2021 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
Chicago Bears
- Against the spread
- 4–9
- Over/under
- 5–8
- ATS as favorite
- 2–1
- ATS as underdog
- 2–8
- ATS on the road
- 2–5
Green Bay Packers
- Against the spread
- 11–2
- Over/under
- 5–8
- ATS as favorite
- 7–2
- ATS as underdog
- 4–0
- ATS at home
- 6–0
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Bears vs Packers Fantasy Outlook for 2026
Two meetings are left on the 2026 schedule: Week 5 in Green Bay and Week 16 in Chicago. Here's how to decide who to play in your league.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Bears or Packers player start in Week 5? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Bears and Packers players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Bears and Packers defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere these two matchups fall in each team's fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2021 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Bears vs Packers Game FAQ
Who won the 2021 Bears vs Packers Week 14 game?
The Green Bay Packers beat the Chicago Bears 45–30 in Week 14 of the 2021 season. The game was played at Lambeau Field in Green Bay, WI, on December 12, 2021. See the Packers' 2021 schedule.
What was the final score of Bears vs Packers?
The final score was Packers 45, Bears 30. The Bears led 27–21 at halftime, and the second half went Bears 3, Packers 24.
What happened in the Bears vs Packers game?
Green Bay erased a 27–21 halftime deficit, outscoring Chicago 24–3 after the break to win 45–30. The Packers finished with a 439–347 edge in total offense and averaged 6.9 yards per play. Davante Adams led all players with 10 catches for 121 yards and 2 touchdowns. The Bears committed 3 turnovers, the Packers none.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Bears vs Packers?
Davante Adams led the game with 34.1 PPR fantasy points, the WR1 of Week 14, on 10 catches for 121 yards and 2 touchdowns. Aaron Rodgers was next with 28.6 (QB3). See Davante Adams's 2021 game log.
Who led Bears vs Packers in passing, rushing and receiving?
Aaron Rodgers (GB) led all passers with 29 of 37 for 341 yards and 4 touchdowns. Justin Fields (CHI) led in rushing with 9 carries for 74 yards. Davante Adams (GB) led in receiving with 10 catches for 121 yards and 2 touchdowns.
How many fantasy points did Davante Adams score against the Bears?
Davante Adams scored 34.1 points in PPR leagues, 29.1 in half-PPR and 24.1 in standard scoring against the Bears in Week 14 of the 2021 season, on 10 catches for 121 yards and 2 touchdowns. He drew 37% of his team's targets.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Bears vs Packers?
Aaron Jones Sr. outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 21.5 PPR points on 8.3 xFP (+13.2). Allen Robinson fell furthest short, with 3.4 points on 10.1 xFP (−6.7). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
How did the Packers beat the Bears?
The Packers beat the Bears 45–30 because they averaged 6.9 yards per play to 6.0, won the turnover battle 3–0, and outgained them 439–347.
Which team won the turnover battle in Bears vs Packers?
The Packers won the turnover battle 3–0: the Bears gave the ball away 3 times and the Packers not at all. The Packers won the game.
What is the all-time Bears vs Packers record?
The Packers lead the all-time series 109–98–6 across 213 meetings since 1921, including a 1–2 record in the postseason.
When did the Bears and Packers last play before this game?
Before Week 14 of 2021, they last met in the 2021 season on October 17, 2021, when the Packers beat the Bears 24–14.
Have the Bears and Packers met in the playoffs?
Yes, 3 times, most recently in the 2025 playoffs. The Bears are 2–1 against the Packers in the postseason.
What was the closing spread for Bears vs Packers?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Packers −11.5, making the Green Bay Packers 11.5-point favorites, with a closing total of 43. That implied about 27.3 points for the Packers and 15.8 for the Bears.
Did Bears vs Packers go over or under the total?
The game went over. The consensus closing total was 43, and the teams combined for 75 points, 32 over the number.
Who covered the spread in Bears vs Packers?
The Packers covered by 3.5 against the closing line of Packers −11.5. The final margin was 15 points.