Final2022 Week 13
Soldier Field, Chicago, IL|
Green Bay Packers vs Chicago Bears, Week 13 2022
Green Bay Packers
AwayWon
28
Chicago Bears
Home
19
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Packers | 0 | 10 | 0 | 18 | 28 |
| Bears | 10 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 19 |
GB 28 · CHI 19 Final
Passing leader
CHI · QB
21.3PPR pts
20/25, 254 YDS, 2 INT, 1 RUSH TD
Top fantasy scorer
GB · WR
24.4PPR pts
3 REC, 48 YDS, 1 TD, 1 RUSH TD
Bears leader
CHI · RB
16.7PPR pts
14 ATT, 61 YDS, 1 TD, 4 REC, 6 REC YDS
Defensive playmaker
Jaire Alexander
GB
1 INT, 7 TKL
Packers 28, Bears 19: Green Bay rallies from 6 down at halftime
Green Bay erased a 16–10 halftime deficit, outscoring Chicago 18–3 after the break to win 28–19. Chicago outgained the Packers 409–357.
The Bears went 6-for-11 on third down and committed three turnovers, while the Packers kept the ball for 32:28 and finished without a giveaway.
The two teams meet again in Week 5 of 2026. If you roster anyone from either side, run the start/sit call in Redraft Command and it will weigh your lineup, your opponent and your league scoring, not only the player rankings.
Key advantages
- +3 turnover margin GB 0 turnovers
- +4:56 time of possession GB 32:28 · CHI 27:32
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Packer or Bear on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Packers Won
Green Bay won the turnover and time of possession battles.
| Packers | Stat | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Turnovers | 3 |
| 32:28 | Time of possession | 27:32 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 357 | Total yards | 409 |
| 5.7 | Yards per play | 8.2 |
| 63 | Plays | 50 |
| 46% | Third-down conversion | 55% |
Scoring Summary
The Packers scored three touchdowns and two field goals; the Bears scored two touchdowns and two field goals.
| Time | Team | Play | GB | CHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 9:23 | CHI | Cairo Santos 40-yard FG Takes lead | 0 | 3 |
| 3:00 | CHI | Justin Fields 55-yard TD run Extends leadCairo Santos XP | 0 | 10 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 10:22 | GB | Mason Crosby 24-yard FG | 3 | 10 |
| 6:09 | CHI | David Montgomery 7-yard TD run Extends leadXP missed | 3 | 16 |
| 0:17 | GB | Aaron Rodgers → Christian Watson, 14-yard TDMason Crosby XP | 10 | 16 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 1:50 | CHI | Cairo Santos 28-yard FG Extends lead | 10 | 19 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 14:41 | GB | AJ Dillon 21-yard TD runMason Crosby XP | 17 | 19 |
| 4:49 | GB | Mason Crosby 32-yard FG Game winner | 20 | 19 |
| 1:51 | GB | Christian Watson 46-yard TD run Extends leadAaron Rodgers → Marcedes Lewis, 2-pt conversion | 28 | 19 |
Fantasy Points: Packers vs Bears, Week 13 2022
Fantasy leaders
- Christian WatsonGB · WR24.4 PTSWR8
- Justin FieldsCHI · QB21.3 PTSQB5
- AJ DillonGB · RB20.9 PTSRB6
- David MontgomeryCHI · RB16.7 PTSRB12
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21.3 | QB5 | 20/25 | 254 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 71 | 1 | 75.7 | Start/Sit → | |
| 13.7 | QB19 | 18/31 | 182 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 85.7 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24.4 | WR8 | WR | 1 | 46 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 48 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 20.9 | RB6 | RB | 18 | 93 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 26 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 16.7 | RB12 | RB | 14 | 61 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 13.2 | TE6 | TE | — | — | — | 7 | 6 | 72 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 11.7 | WR34 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 5 | 67 | 0 | ||
| 11.6 | WR35 | WR | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 85 | 0 | ||
| 10.0 | RB28 | RB | 9 | 26 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 24 | 0 | ||
| 5.9 | TE18 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 49 | 0 | ||
| 5.8 | WR59 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 5 | 28 | 0 | ||
| 2.4 | WR89 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 14 | 0 | ||
| 2.1 | RB60 | RB | 3 | 21 | 0 | — | — | — | — | ||
| 2.0 | TE50 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 10 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.0 | TE49 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 1.7 | WR101 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | ||
| 0.6 | RB69 | RB | 1 | 6 | 0 | — | — | — | — | ||
| 0.1 | WR112 | WR | 1 | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | — | ||
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0.0 | — | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fantasy Usage
Green Bay Packers
Snap Share
Allen LazardWR62 snaps94%
Christian WatsonWR61 snaps92%
AJ DillonRB45 snaps68%
Robert TonyanTE34 snaps52%
Randall CobbWR33 snaps50%
Target Share30 targets
- Christian Watson23%, 7 targets
- Allen Lazard20%, 6 targets
- Aaron Jones17%, 5 targets
- Randall Cobb13%, 4 targets
- AJ Dillon10%, 3 targets
- Other17%, 5 targets
Carry Share32 carries
- AJ Dillon56%, 18 carries
- Aaron Jones28%, 9 carries
- Aaron Rodgers9%, 3 carries
- Patrick Taylor3%, 1 carries
- Christian Watson3%, 1 carries
Chicago Bears
Snap Share
Cole KmetTE52 snaps100%
David MontgomeryRB40 snaps77%
Dante PettisWR34 snaps65%
Chase ClaypoolWR33 snaps63%
Equanimeous St. BrownWR30 snaps58%
Target Share25 targets
- Cole Kmet28%, 7 targets
- Chase Claypool24%, 6 targets
- David Montgomery20%, 5 targets
- Equanimeous St. Brown16%, 4 targets
- Dante Pettis8%, 2 targets
- Other4%, 1 targets
Carry Share25 carries
- David Montgomery56%, 14 carries
- Justin Fields24%, 6 carries
- Darrynton Evans12%, 3 carries
- Equanimeous St. Brown4%, 1 carries
- Velus Jones4%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52 | 100% | 7 | 28% | 0 | |
| 62 | 94% | 6 | 20% | 0 | |
| 61 | 92% | 7 | 23% | 1 | |
| 40 | 77% | 5 | 20% | 14 | |
| 45 | 68% | 3 | 10% | 18 | |
| 34 | 65% | 2 | 8% | 0 | |
| 33 | 63% | 6 | 24% | 0 | |
| 30 | 58% | 4 | 16% | 1 | |
| 34 | 52% | 2 | 7% | 0 | |
| 33 | 50% | 4 | 13% | 0 | |
| 28 | 42% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 20 | 38% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 25 | 38% | 5 | 17% | 9 | |
| 16 | 31% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 13 | 25% | 0 | 0% | 3 | |
| 12 | 23% | 0 | 0% | 1 | |
| 12 | 18% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 10 | 15% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 7 | 11% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 7 | 11% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 5 | 10% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 6 | 9% | 0 | 0% | 1 | |
| 2 | 4% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 1 | 2% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+12.1Christian Watson24.4 PTS vs 12.3 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−6.7Randall Cobb0.0 PTS vs 6.7 xFP
- Highest expected volume17.3 xFPDavid Montgomery16.7 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David MontgomeryCHI · RB | 16.7 | 17.3 | −0.6 | 77% | 56% car | — | 0 | 14 | 56% | 5 | 20% |
| AJ DillonGB · RB | 20.9 | 16.6 | +4.3 | 68% | 56% car | — | 0 | 18 | 56% | 3 | 10% |
| Aaron RodgersGB · QB | 13.7 | 15.1 | −1.4 | 100% | 31 att | — | 31 | 3 | 9% | 0 | 0% |
| Justin FieldsCHI · QB | 21.3 | 14.4 | +6.9 | 100% | 25 att | — | 25 | 6 | 24% | 0 | 0% |
| Aaron Jones Sr.GB · RB | 10.0 | 14.1 | −4.1 | 38% | 28% car | — | 0 | 9 | 28% | 5 | 17% |
| Christian WatsonGB · WR | 24.4 | 12.3 | +12.1 | 92% | 23% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 7 | 23% |
| Cole KmetCHI · TE | 13.2 | 11.7 | +1.5 | 100% | 28% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 28% |
| Allen LazardGB · WR | 11.7 | 10.0 | +1.7 | 94% | 20% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 20% |
| Chase ClaypoolCHI · WR | 5.8 | 10.0 | −4.2 | 63% | 24% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 24% |
| Equanimeous St. BrownCHI · WR | 11.6 | 7.3 | +4.3 | 58% | 16% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 4% | 4 | 16% |
| Randall CobbGB · WR | 0.0 | 6.7 | −6.7 | 50% | 13% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 13% |
| Dante PettisCHI · WR | 2.4 | 3.3 | −0.9 | 65% | 8% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 8% |
| Robert TonyanGB · TE | 2.0 | 3.3 | −1.3 | 52% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 7% |
| Darrynton EvansCHI · RB | 2.1 | 1.9 | +0.2 | 25% | 12% car | — | 0 | 3 | 12% | 0 | 0% |
| Josiah DeguaraGB · TE | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 15% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Marcedes LewisGB · TE | 2.0 | 1.7 | +0.3 | 42% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| N'Keal HarryCHI · TE | 5.9 | 1.7 | +4.2 | 10% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Samori ToureGB · WR | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 18% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Patrick Taylor Jr.GB · RB | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 9% | 3% car | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 0 | 0% |
| Velus Jones Jr.CHI · WR | 0.1 | 0.6 | −0.5 | 23% | 4% car | — | 0 | 1 | 4% | 0 | 0% |
Team totals: Packers 30 targets and 32 carries; Bears 25 targets and 25 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2022 season: 1.67 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.64 per carry and 0.42 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Aaron Rodgers
GB · QB · 13.7 pts on 15.1 expected
18 of 31 passing for 182 yards, 1 touchdown; 3 carries for 4 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 15.1 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 16.2, 16.6, 19.4, 19.1, 11.5, 13.7
W8W9W10W11W12W13
No interceptions after 5 in the previous four games.
Justin Fields Ran hot
CHI · QB · 21.3 pts on 14.4 expected
20 of 25 passing for 254 yards, 2 interceptions; 6 carries for 71 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 14.4 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 24.4, 26.0, 42.7, 40.4, 23.6, 21.3
W7W8W9W10W11W13
Fewest points since Week 6.
AJ Dillon
GB · RB · 20.9 pts on 16.6 expected
3 targets (10% of the team's), 3 catches for 26 yards; 18 carries (56% of the team's) for 93 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 16.6 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 7.3, 6.4, 6.5, 3.3, 17.8, 20.9
W8W9W10W11W12W13
Best fantasy game of the season.
Aaron Jones Sr.
GB · RB · 10.0 pts on 14.1 expected
5 targets (17% of the team's), 5 catches for 24 yards; 9 carries (28% of the team's) for 26 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 14.1 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 19.7, 6.5, 23.6, 14.0, 18.9, 10.0
W8W9W10W11W12W13
Fewest points since Week 9.
David Montgomery
CHI · RB · 16.7 pts on 17.3 expected
5 targets (20% of the team's), 4 catches for 6 yards; 14 carries (56% of the team's) for 61 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 17.3 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 8.5, 5.4, 5.4, 21.1, 14.3, 16.7
W8W9W10W11W12W13
Cole Kmet
CHI · TE · 13.2 pts on 11.7 expected
7 targets (28% of the team's), 6 catches for 72 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 11.7 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 9.1, 22.0, 23.4, 6.5, 5.7, 13.2
W8W9W10W11W12W13
Christian Watson Ran hot
GB · WR · 24.4 pts on 12.3 expected
7 targets (23% of the team's), 3 catches for 48 yards and 1 touchdown; 1 carry (3% of the team's) for 46 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 12.3 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 2.2, 4.4, 32.7, 21.1, 21.0, 24.4
W8W9W10W11W12W13
A touchdown in 5 of the last 8 games.
Randall Cobb Unlucky
GB · WR · 0.0 pts on 6.7 expected
4 targets (13% of the team's), 0 catches for 0 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 6.7 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 7.2, 16.9, 1.8, 13.3, 9.9, 0.0
W4W5W6W11W12W13
Lowest-scoring game of the season.
Stock Up, Stock Down
Green Bay Packers
- ▲Stock up: AJ Dillon led the backfield with 68% of the snaps after trailing Aaron Jones Sr. before this game.
- ▲Stock up: Christian Watson played 92% of the snaps, up from a 49% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Aaron Jones Sr. lost the backfield lead: 38% of the snaps to AJ Dillon's 68%.
Chicago Bears
- ▲Stock up: Dante Pettis played 65% of the snaps, up from a 47% season average.
- ▼Stock down: N'Keal Harry played 10% of the snaps, down from a 45% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2022 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Packers D | Bears D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 15.0 | 18.5 |
| RBs | 23.7 | 27.3 |
| WRs | 30.5 | 32.7 |
| TEs | 9.8 | 9.0 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Chicago opened at 40% win probability, climbed as high as 89%, then lost.
Bears win probability
Key Swings
- +22Fields 55-yd TD run51% → 72%Q1 3:00
- −21Rodgers → Watson, 14-yd TD88% → 67%Q2 0:17
- −32Dillon 21-yd TD run89% → 57%Q4 14:41
- −30Crosby 32-yd FG67% → 37%Q4 4:49
- −32Watson 46-yd TD run32% → <1%Q4 1:51
Swing in Bears win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Green Bay Packers | Measure | Chicago Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 63 | Plays | 50 |
| 49% | Pass rate | 50% |
| 5.9 | Yds / dropback | 10.2 |
| 5.5 | Yds / carry | 6.2 |
| 6/13 | Third downs | 6/11 |
Efficiency edge Green Bay ran 13 more plays than Chicago.
- Top targets
- GB Watson 23% · Lazard 20% · Jones 17%
- CHI Kmet 28% · Claypool 24% · Montgomery 20%
Possession Results
| Result | GB | CHI |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 3 | 2 |
| Field goals | 2 | 2 |
| Punts | 3 | 1 |
| Turnovers | 0 | 3 |
| Turnovers on downs | 1 | 0 |
| Missed field goals | 0 | 1 |
GB turnover edge: +3
- The Bears opened the scoring on their first possession, a 11-play, 53-yard drive that ended in a field goal.
All 20 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | Q1 15:00 | 11 | 53 | 5:37 | Field goal |
| GB | Q1 9:23 | 6 | 14 | 3:44 | Punt |
| CHI | Q1 5:39 | 5 | 70 | 2:39 | Touchdown |
| GB | Q1 3:00 | 13 | 64 | 7:38 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q2 10:22 | 4 | 35 | 1:31 | Fumble |
| GB | Q2 8:51 | 5 | 24 | 1:45 | Downs |
| CHI | Q2 7:06 | 2 | 63 | 0:57 | Touchdown |
| GB | Q2 6:09 | 13 | 75 | 5:52 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q2 0:17 | 1 | -1 | 0:17 | End of half |
| GB | Q3 15:00 | 3 | 9 | 1:44 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 13:16 | 3 | 1 | 2:25 | Punt |
| GB | Q3 10:51 | 3 | 5 | 1:00 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 9:51 | 12 | 62 | 8:01 | Field goal |
| GB | Q3 1:50 | 4 | 82 | 2:09 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q4 14:41 | 5 | 55 | 3:01 | Missed FG |
| GB | Q4 11:40 | 13 | 56 | 6:51 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q4 4:49 | 5 | 26 | 1:57 | Interception |
| GB | Q4 2:52 | 3 | 68 | 1:01 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q4 1:51 | 5 | 25 | 1:07 | Interception |
| GB | Q4 0:44 | 2 | -2 | 0:44 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Packers vs Bears Head-to-Head
The Packers and Bears first met in 1921 and have played 213 times since. They have been NFC North rivals since 1970.
- All-time series
- 109–98–6Packers lead, 213 meetings since 1921
- Postseason
- 2–1Bears won in 1941 and 2025; Packers won in 2010
- Largest Packers win
- 49–01962
- Largest Bears win
- 61–71980
Since 2021
8–3 Packers lead
11 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- P
- P
- P
- P
- P
- P
- P
- B
- P
- B
- B
Oldest to newest. P = Packers win, B = Bears win, outlined = this game.
2026 Meetings
- Week 5 Bears at Packers Upcoming
- Week 16 Packers at Bears Upcoming
Recent Meetings
- 2025 Wild Card Packers at Bears, 2025 Wild Card recap CHI 31 GB 27 CHI W
- 2025 Wk 16 Packers at Bears, 2025 Wk 16 recap CHI 22 GB 16 CHI W
- 2025 Wk 14 Bears at Packers, 2025 Wk 14 recap GB 28 CHI 21 GB W
- 2024 Wk 18 Bears at Packers, 2024 Wk 18 recap CHI 24 GB 22 CHI W
- 2024 Wk 11 Packers at Bears, 2024 Wk 11 recap GB 20 CHI 19 GB W
- 2023 Wk 18 Bears at Packers, 2023 Wk 18 recap GB 17 CHI 9 GB W
- 2023 Wk 1 Packers at Bears, 2023 Wk 1 recap GB 38 CHI 20 GB W
- 2022 Wk 13 Packers at Bears GB 28 CHI 19 GB W
- 2022 Wk 2 Bears at Packers, 2022 Wk 2 recap GB 27 CHI 10 GB W
- 2021 Wk 14 Bears at Packers, 2021 Wk 14 recap GB 45 CHI 30 GB W
- 2021 Wk 6 Packers at Bears, 2021 Wk 6 recap GB 24 CHI 14 GB W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2022 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Packers | Stat | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 8-9 | Record | 3-14 |
| 21.8 | Points per game | 19.2 |
| 337.9 | Yards per game | 307.8 |
| 5.5 | Yards per play | 5.3 |
| 21.8 | Points allowed per game | 27.2 |
| 336.5 | Yards allowed per game | 375.9 |
Packers vs Bears Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- GB −3.5Packers covered by 5.5
- Total
- 45Over: 47 points scored (by 2)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Packers | 24.3 | 28 | +3.8 |
| Bears | 20.8 | 19 | −1.8 |
The Packers beat their implied total and the Bears fell short of theirs; the Fantasy tab has the player lines behind it.
Betting Trends
Last 4 meetings: Packers 4–0 ATS, overs and unders 2–2.
Each team's 2022 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
Green Bay Packers
- Against the spread
- 5–8
- Over/under
- 7–6
- ATS as favorite
- 2–6
- ATS as underdog
- 3–2
- ATS on the road
- 3–4
Chicago Bears
- Against the spread
- 4–8–1
- Over/under
- 9–4
- ATS as favorite
- 0–1–1
- ATS as underdog
- 4–7
- ATS at home
- 2–3–1
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Packers vs Bears Fantasy Outlook for 2026
Two meetings are left on the 2026 schedule: Week 5 in Green Bay and Week 16 in Chicago. Here's how to decide who to play in your league.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Packers or Bears player start in Week 5? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Packers and Bears players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Packers and Bears defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere these two matchups fall in each team's fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2022 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Packers vs Bears Game FAQ
Who won the 2022 Packers vs Bears Week 13 game?
The Green Bay Packers beat the Chicago Bears 28–19 in Week 13 of the 2022 season. The game was played at Soldier Field in Chicago, IL, on December 4, 2022. See the Packers' 2022 schedule.
What was the final score of Packers vs Bears?
The final score was Packers 28, Bears 19. The Bears led 16–10 at halftime, and the second half went Packers 18, Bears 3.
What happened in the Packers vs Bears game?
Green Bay erased a 16–10 halftime deficit, outscoring Chicago 18–3 after the break to win 28–19. Chicago outgained the Packers 409–357. Christian Watson led all players with 3 catches for 48 yards and a touchdown, plus a carry for 46 rushing yards and a touchdown. The Bears committed 3 turnovers, the Packers none.
What was the game-winning score in Packers vs Bears?
Mason Crosby's 32-yard field goal with 4:49 left in the fourth quarter gave the Packers a 20–19 lead they never gave up.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Packers vs Bears?
Christian Watson led the game with 24.4 PPR fantasy points, the WR8 of Week 13, on 3 catches for 48 yards and a touchdown, plus a carry for 46 rushing yards and a touchdown. Justin Fields was next with 21.3 (QB5). See Christian Watson's 2022 game log.
Who led Packers vs Bears in passing, rushing and receiving?
Justin Fields (CHI) led all passers with 20 of 25 for 254 yards and 2 interceptions. AJ Dillon (GB) led in rushing with 18 carries for 93 yards and a touchdown. Equanimeous St. Brown (CHI) led in receiving with 3 catches for 85 yards.
How many fantasy points did Christian Watson score against the Bears?
Christian Watson scored 24.4 points in PPR leagues, 22.9 in half-PPR and 21.4 in standard scoring against the Bears in Week 13 of the 2022 season, on 3 catches for 48 yards and a touchdown, plus a carry for 46 rushing yards and a touchdown. He drew 23% of his team's targets.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Packers vs Bears?
Christian Watson outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 24.4 PPR points on 12.3 xFP (+12.1). Randall Cobb fell furthest short, with 0.0 points on 6.7 xFP (−6.7). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
How did the Packers come back to beat the Bears?
The Packers' chances of winning fell as low as 11% in the fourth quarter. AJ Dillon's 21-yard touchdown run in the fourth quarter was the biggest swing of the game. Mason Crosby's 32-yard field goal then put them ahead for good.
What is the all-time Packers vs Bears record?
The Packers lead the all-time series 109–98–6 across 213 meetings since 1921, including a 1–2 record in the postseason.
When did the Packers and Bears last play before this game?
Before Week 13 of 2022, they last met in the 2022 season on September 18, 2022, when the Packers beat the Bears 27–10.
Have the Packers and Bears met in the playoffs?
Yes, 3 times, most recently in the 2025 playoffs. The Packers are 1–2 against the Bears in the postseason.
What was the closing spread for Packers vs Bears?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Packers −3.5, making the Green Bay Packers 3.5-point favorites, with a closing total of 45. That implied about 24.3 points for the Packers and 20.8 for the Bears.
Did Packers vs Bears go over or under the total?
The game went over. The consensus closing total was 45, and the teams combined for 47 points, 2 over the number.
Who covered the spread in Packers vs Bears?
The Packers covered by 5.5 against the closing line of Packers −3.5. The final margin was 9 points.
