Final2025 Week 14
Lambeau Field, Green Bay, WI|
Chicago Bears vs Green Bay Packers, Week 14 2025
Chicago Bears
Away
21
Green Bay Packers
HomeWon
28
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bears | 0 | 3 | 11 | 7 | 21 |
| Packers | 0 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 28 |
CHI 21 · GB 28 Final
Passing leader
GB · QB
20.3PPR pts
17/25, 234 YDS, 3 TD, 1 INT
Top fantasy scorer
GB · WR
24.9PPR pts
4 REC, 89 YDS, 2 TD
Bears leader
CHI · QB
15.9PPR pts
19/35, 186 YDS, 2 TD, 1 INT
Defensive playmaker
C.J. Gardner-Johnson
CHI
1 INT, 10 TKL
Packers 28, Bears 21: Green Bay beats Chicago
Green Bay led 14–3 at halftime after a 14-point second quarter and won 28–21, though Chicago took the second half 18–14. The Packers finished with a narrow 337–315 edge in total offense and averaged 6.5 yards per play.
The Bears went 8-for-16 on third down and committed one turnover.
The two teams meet again in Week 5 of 2026. If you roster anyone from either side, run the start/sit call in Redraft Command and it will weigh your lineup, your opponent and your league scoring, not only the player rankings.
Key advantages
- +1.9 yards/play GB 6.5 · CHI 4.6
- +22 total yards GB 337 · CHI 315
- +17% third-down rate GB 67% · CHI 50%
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Bear or Packer on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Packers Won
Green Bay won the efficiency and third-down battles.
| Bears | Stat | Packers |
|---|---|---|
| 4.6 | Yards per play | 6.5 |
| 315 | Total yards | 337 |
| 50% | Third-down conversion | 67% |
| Other team stats | ||
| 68 | Plays | 52 |
| 1 | Turnovers | 1 |
| 33:29 | Time of possession | 26:31 |
Scoring Summary
The Packers scored four touchdowns; the Bears scored two touchdowns and two field goals.
| Time | Team | Play | CHI | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| No scoring | ||||
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 9:19 | GB | Jordan Love → Christian Watson, 23-yard TD Takes leadBrandon McManus XP | 0 | 7 |
| 1:14 | CHI | Cairo Santos 33-yard FG | 3 | 7 |
| 0:38 | GB | Jordan Love → Bo Melton, 45-yard TD Extends leadBrandon McManus XP | 3 | 14 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 8:20 | CHI | Caleb Williams → Olamide Zaccheaus, 1-yard TDKyle Monangai 2-pt run | 11 | 14 |
| 6:10 | GB | Jordan Love → Christian Watson, 41-yard TD Extends leadBrandon McManus XP | 11 | 21 |
| 3:15 | CHI | Cairo Santos 41-yard FG | 14 | 21 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 8:00 | CHI | Caleb Williams → Colston Loveland, 1-yard TD Ties gameCairo Santos XP | 21 | 21 |
| 3:32 | GB | Josh Jacobs 2-yard TD run Game winnerBrandon McManus XP | 21 | 28 |
Fantasy Points: Bears vs Packers, Week 14 2025
Fantasy leaders
- Christian WatsonGB · WR24.9 PTSWR6
- Jordan LoveGB · QB20.3 PTSQB11
- Josh JacobsGB · RB17.2 PTSRB10
- Caleb WilliamsCHI · QB15.9 PTSQB16
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20.3 | QB11 | 17/25 | 234 | 3 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 120.7 | Start/Sit → | |
| 15.9 | QB16 | 19/35 | 186 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 15 | 0 | 76.6 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24.9 | WR6 | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | 89 | 2 | Start/Sit → | |
| 17.2 | RB10 | RB | 20 | 86 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 12.9 | TE9 | TE | — | — | — | 5 | 4 | 29 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 11.5 | WR25 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 45 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 11.2 | RB23 | RB | 13 | 63 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 19 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 11.0 | WR27 | WR | 1 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 67 | 0 | ||
| 9.3 | WR35 | WR | 2 | 22 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 31 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 8.7 | RB32 | RB | 14 | 57 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 8.7 | WR36 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 7 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.2 | TE20 | TE | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 42 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.2 | TE25 | TE | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 22 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.4 | WR72 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 24 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.4 | TE32 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 14 | 0 | ||
| 3.1 | TE33 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 21 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.6 | RB61 | RB | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.2 | TE55 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.0 | RB66 | RB | 3 | 10 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.6 | WR99 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | -4 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
Fantasy Usage
Chicago Bears
Snap Share
DJ MooreWR58 snaps83%
Olamide ZaccheausWR55 snaps79%
Cole KmetTE53 snaps76%
Luther BurdenWR50 snaps71%
Colston LovelandTE41 snaps59%
Target Share28 targets
- Luther Burden21%, 6 targets
- Colston Loveland18%, 5 targets
- D'Andre Swift14%, 4 targets
- DJ Moore11%, 3 targets
- Olamide Zaccheaus11%, 3 targets
- Other25%, 7 targets
Carry Share32 carries
- Kyle Monangai44%, 14 carries
- D'Andre Swift41%, 13 carries
- Caleb Williams13%, 4 carries
- Luther Burden3%, 1 carries
Green Bay Packers
Snap Share
Christian WatsonWR44 snaps83%
Romeo DoubsWR43 snaps81%
Josh JacobsRB38 snaps72%
John FitzPatrickTE30 snaps57%
Jayden ReedWR25 snaps47%
Target Share23 targets
- Christian Watson17%, 4 targets
- Luke Musgrave17%, 4 targets
- Jayden Reed17%, 4 targets
- Josh Jacobs9%, 2 targets
- Romeo Doubs9%, 2 targets
- Other30%, 7 targets
Carry Share26 carries
- Josh Jacobs77%, 20 carries
- Emanuel Wilson12%, 3 carries
- Jayden Reed8%, 2 carries
- Jordan Love4%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44 | 83% | 4 | 17% | 0 | |
| 58 | 83% | 3 | 11% | 0 | |
| 43 | 81% | 2 | 9% | 0 | |
| 55 | 79% | 3 | 11% | 0 | |
| 53 | 76% | 3 | 11% | 0 | |
| 38 | 72% | 2 | 9% | 20 | |
| 50 | 71% | 6 | 21% | 1 | |
| 41 | 59% | 5 | 18% | 0 | |
| 40 | 57% | 4 | 14% | 13 | |
| 30 | 57% | 2 | 9% | 0 | |
| 25 | 47% | 4 | 17% | 2 | |
| 22 | 42% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 29 | 41% | 2 | 7% | 14 | |
| 21 | 40% | 4 | 17% | 0 | |
| 20 | 29% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 9 | 17% | 2 | 9% | 0 | |
| 8 | 15% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 8 | 15% | 0 | 0% | 3 | |
| 6 | 11% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 5 | 9% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 2 | 3% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 1 | 1% | 1 | 4% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+18.1Christian Watson24.9 PTS vs 6.8 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−4.5DJ Moore0.6 PTS vs 5.1 xFP
- Highest expected volume18.1 xFPCaleb Williams15.9 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caleb WilliamsCHI · QB | 15.9 | 18.1 | −2.2 | 100% | 35 att | — | 35 | 4 | 13% | 0 | 0% |
| Josh JacobsGB · RB | 17.2 | 16.3 | +0.9 | 72% | 77% car | — | 0 | 20 | 77% | 2 | 9% |
| D'Andre SwiftCHI · RB | 11.2 | 15.2 | −4.0 | 57% | 41% car | — | 0 | 13 | 41% | 4 | 14% |
| Kyle MonangaiCHI · RB | 8.7 | 12.4 | −3.7 | 41% | 44% car | — | 0 | 14 | 44% | 2 | 7% |
| Jordan LoveGB · QB | 20.3 | 11.7 | +8.6 | 100% | 25 att | — | 25 | 1 | 4% | 0 | 0% |
| Luther Burden IIICHI · WR | 11.0 | 10.9 | +0.1 | 71% | 21% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 6 | 21% |
| Colston LovelandCHI · TE | 12.9 | 8.5 | +4.4 | 59% | 18% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 18% |
| Jayden ReedGB · WR | 9.3 | 8.1 | +1.2 | 47% | 17% tgt | — | 0 | 2 | 8% | 4 | 17% |
| Christian WatsonGB · WR | 24.9 | 6.8 | +18.1 | 83% | 17% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 17% |
| Luke MusgraveGB · TE | 4.2 | 6.8 | −2.6 | 40% | 17% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 17% |
| Cole KmetCHI · TE | 6.2 | 5.1 | +1.1 | 76% | 11% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 11% |
| DJ MooreCHI · WR | 0.6 | 5.1 | −4.5 | 83% | 11% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 11% |
| Olamide ZaccheausCHI · WR | 8.7 | 5.1 | +3.6 | 79% | 11% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 11% |
| Bo MeltonGB · WR | 11.5 | 3.4 | +8.1 | 17% | 9% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 9% |
| John FitzPatrickGB · TE | 3.4 | 3.4 | 0.0 | 57% | 9% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 9% |
| Romeo DoubsGB · WR | 0.0 | 3.4 | −3.4 | 81% | 9% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 9% |
| Emanuel WilsonGB · RB | 1.0 | 1.9 | −0.9 | 15% | 12% car | — | 0 | 3 | 12% | 0 | 0% |
| Chris BrooksGB · RB | 1.6 | 1.7 | −0.1 | 15% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Devin DuvernayCHI · WR | 3.4 | 1.7 | +1.7 | 1% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Durham SmytheCHI · TE | 1.2 | 1.7 | −0.5 | 29% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Josh WhyleGB · TE | 3.1 | 1.7 | +1.4 | 42% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Matthew GoldenGB · WR | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 9% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
Team totals: Bears 28 targets and 32 carries; Packers 23 targets and 26 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2025 season: 1.70 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.65 per carry and 0.44 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Caleb Williams
CHI · QB · 15.9 pts on 18.1 expected
19 of 35 passing for 186 yards, 2 touchdowns, 1 interception; 4 carries for 15 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 18.1 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 38.7, 25.1, 10.3, 21.7, 10.5, 15.9
W9W10W11W12W13W14
Jordan Love Ran hot
GB · QB · 20.3 pts on 11.7 expected
17 of 25 passing for 234 yards, 3 touchdowns, 1 interception; 1 carry for -1 yards.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 11.7 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 10.0, 7.8, 17.7, 7.1, 25.8, 20.3
W9W10W11W12W13W14
D'Andre Swift
CHI · RB · 11.2 pts on 15.2 expected
4 targets (14% of the team's), 3 catches for 19 yards; 13 carries (41% of the team's) for 63 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 15.2 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 15.1, 14.8, 9.0, 1.9, 20.8, 11.2
W8W10W11W12W13W14
Kyle Monangai
CHI · RB · 8.7 pts on 12.4 expected
2 targets (7% of the team's), 1 catch for 0 yards; 14 carries (44% of the team's) for 57 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 12.4 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 22.8, 8.8, 10.7, 10.8, 19.0, 8.7
W9W10W11W12W13W14
Fewest points since Week 8. A touchdown in 5 of the last 8 games.
Josh Jacobs Strong role
GB · RB · 17.2 pts on 16.3 expected
2 targets (9% of the team's), 2 catches for 6 yards; 20 carries (77% of the team's) for 86 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 16.3 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 13.5, 20.0, 19.7, 4.0, 10.1, 17.2
W8W9W10W11W13W14
A touchdown in 6 of the last 8 games.
Jayden Reed
GB · WR · 9.3 pts on 8.1 expected
4 targets (17% of the team's), 4 catches for 31 yards; 2 carries (8% of the team's) for 22 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 8.1 expected.
Start/Sit: Jayden Reed →Christian Watson Ran hot
GB · WR · 24.9 pts on 6.8 expected
4 targets (17% of the team's), 4 catches for 89 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 6.8 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 7.8, 6.5, 20.6, 9.9, 18.3, 24.9
W9W10W11W12W13W14
Best fantasy game of the season.
Bo Melton Ran hot
GB · WR · 11.5 pts on 3.4 expected
2 targets (9% of the team's), 1 catch for 45 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 3.4 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 0.0, 4.8, 1.7, 0.0, 1.5, 11.5
W9W10W11W12W13W14
Best fantasy game of the season.
Stock Up, Stock Down
Chicago Bears
- ▲Stock up: Luther Burden III played 71% of the snaps, up from a 33% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Olamide Zaccheaus played 79% of the snaps, up from a 50% season average.
Green Bay Packers
- ▲Stock up: Jayden Reed played 47% of the snaps, up from a 22% season average.
- ▲Stock up: John FitzPatrick played 57% of the snaps, up from a 31% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Matthew Golden played 9% of the snaps, down from a 57% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2025 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Bears D | Packers D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 19.1 | 15.2 |
| RBs | 21.7 | 21.1 |
| WRs | 35.5 | 31.0 |
| TEs | 13.1 | 12.1 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Green Bay opened at 68% win probability and passed 98% in the fourth quarter on the way to the win.
Packers win probability
Key Swings
- +20Love → Watson, 23-yd TD65% → 85%Q2 9:19
- −20Williams → Zaccheaus, 1-yd TD95% → 74%Q3 8:20
- +19Love → Watson, 41-yd TD75% → 94%Q3 6:10
- −37Williams → Loveland, 1-yd TD94% → 57%Q4 8:00
- +44Jacobs 2-yd TD run55% → 99%Q4 3:32
Swing in Packers win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Chicago Bears | Measure | Green Bay Packers |
|---|---|---|
| 68 | Plays | 52 |
| 53% | Pass rate | 50% |
| 4.9 | Yds / dropback | 8.5 |
| 4.3 | Yds / carry | 4.5 |
| 8/16 | Third downs | 8/12 |
Efficiency edge Green Bay ran 16 fewer plays but gained 3.6 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- CHI Burden 21% · Loveland 18% · Swift 14%
- GB Watson 17% · Reed 17% · Musgrave 17%
Possession Results
| Result | CHI | GB |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 2 | 4 |
| Field goals | 2 | 0 |
| Punts | 4 | 3 |
| Turnovers | 1 | 1 |
- The Packers opened the scoring on their third possession, a 11-play, 80-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
All 18 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | Q1 15:00 | 3 | -5 | 1:18 | Punt |
| GB | Q1 13:42 | 13 | 37 | 7:55 | Interception |
| CHI | Q1 5:47 | 3 | -5 | 0:23 | Punt |
| GB | Q1 5:24 | 5 | 15 | 2:23 | Punt |
| CHI | Q1 3:01 | 5 | 15 | 2:52 | Punt |
| GB | Q1 0:09 | 11 | 80 | 5:50 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q2 9:19 | 14 | 59 | 8:05 | Field goal |
| GB | Q2 1:14 | 4 | 60 | 0:36 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q2 0:38 | 4 | 12 | 0:38 | Punt |
| GB | Q3 15:00 | 3 | -11 | 1:04 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 13:56 | 10 | 64 | 5:36 | Touchdown |
| GB | Q3 8:20 | 4 | 63 | 2:10 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q3 6:10 | 7 | 37 | 2:55 | Field goal |
| GB | Q3 3:15 | 3 | 6 | 1:43 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 1:32 | 17 | 83 | 8:32 | Touchdown |
| GB | Q4 8:00 | 8 | 65 | 4:28 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q4 3:32 | 7 | 60 | 3:10 | Interception |
| GB | Q4 0:22 | 1 | -1 | 0:22 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Bears vs Packers Head-to-Head
The Bears and Packers first met in 1921 and have played 213 times since. They have been NFC North rivals since 1970.
- All-time series
- 109–98–6Packers lead, 213 meetings since 1921
- Postseason
- 2–1Bears won in 1941 and 2025; Packers won in 2010
- Largest Bears win
- 61–71980
- Largest Packers win
- 49–01962
Since 2021
8–3 Packers lead
11 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- P
- P
- P
- P
- P
- P
- P
- B
- P
- B
- B
Oldest to newest. P = Packers win, B = Bears win, outlined = this game.
2026 Meetings
- Week 5 Bears at Packers Upcoming
- Week 16 Packers at Bears Upcoming
Recent Meetings
- 2025 Wild Card Packers at Bears, 2025 Wild Card recap CHI 31 GB 27 CHI W
- 2025 Wk 16 Packers at Bears, 2025 Wk 16 recap CHI 22 GB 16 CHI W
- 2025 Wk 14 Bears at Packers GB 28 CHI 21 GB W
- 2024 Wk 18 Bears at Packers, 2024 Wk 18 recap CHI 24 GB 22 CHI W
- 2024 Wk 11 Packers at Bears, 2024 Wk 11 recap GB 20 CHI 19 GB W
- 2023 Wk 18 Bears at Packers, 2023 Wk 18 recap GB 17 CHI 9 GB W
- 2023 Wk 1 Packers at Bears, 2023 Wk 1 recap GB 38 CHI 20 GB W
- 2022 Wk 13 Packers at Bears, 2022 Wk 13 recap GB 28 CHI 19 GB W
- 2022 Wk 2 Bears at Packers, 2022 Wk 2 recap GB 27 CHI 10 GB W
- 2021 Wk 14 Bears at Packers, 2021 Wk 14 recap GB 45 CHI 30 GB W
- 2021 Wk 6 Packers at Bears, 2021 Wk 6 recap GB 24 CHI 14 GB W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2025 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Bears | Stat | Packers |
|---|---|---|
| 11-6 | Record | 9-7-1 |
| 25.9 | Points per game | 23.0 |
| 369.5 | Yards per game | 332.6 |
| 5.7 | Yards per play | 5.6 |
| 24.4 | Points allowed per game | 21.2 |
| 361.8 | Yards allowed per game | 311.8 |
Bears vs Packers Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- GB −6.5Packers covered by 0.5
- Total
- 44.5Over: 49 points scored (by 4.5)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Packers | 25.5 | 28 | +2.5 |
| Bears | 19.0 | 21 | +2.0 |
Both offenses beat the market's expectation, and the Fantasy tab shows who cashed in.
Betting Trends
Last 6 meetings: Packers 6–0 ATS, overs 4–2.
Each team's 2025 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
Chicago Bears
- Against the spread
- 1–1
- Over/under
- 1–1
- ATS as underdog
- 1–1
- ATS on the road
- 1–1
Green Bay Packers
- Against the spread
- 2–0
- Over/under
- 2–0
- ATS as favorite
- 1–0
- ATS at home
- 1–0
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Bears vs Packers Fantasy Outlook for 2026
Two meetings are left on the 2026 schedule: Week 5 in Green Bay and Week 16 in Chicago. Here's how to decide who to play in your league.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Bears or Packers player start in Week 5? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Bears and Packers players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Bears and Packers defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere these two matchups fall in each team's fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2025 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Bears vs Packers Game FAQ
Who won the 2025 Bears vs Packers Week 14 game?
The Green Bay Packers beat the Chicago Bears 28–21 in Week 14 of the 2025 season. The game was played at Lambeau Field in Green Bay, WI, on December 7, 2025. See the Packers' 2025 schedule.
What was the final score of Bears vs Packers?
The final score was Packers 28, Bears 21. The Packers led 14–3 at halftime, and the second half went Bears 18, Packers 14.
What happened in the Bears vs Packers game?
Green Bay led 14–3 at halftime after a 14-point second quarter and won 28–21, though Chicago took the second half 18–14. The Packers finished with a narrow 337–315 edge in total offense and averaged 6.5 yards per play. Christian Watson led all players with 4 catches for 89 yards and 2 touchdowns.
What was the game-winning score in Bears vs Packers?
Josh Jacobs' 2-yard touchdown run with 3:32 left in the fourth quarter gave the Packers a 28–21 lead they never gave up. It was the final score of the game.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Bears vs Packers?
Christian Watson led the game with 24.9 PPR fantasy points, the WR6 of Week 14, on 4 catches for 89 yards and 2 touchdowns. Jordan Love was next with 20.3 (QB11). See Christian Watson's 2025 game log.
Who led Bears vs Packers in passing, rushing and receiving?
Jordan Love (GB) led all passers with 17 of 25 for 234 yards, 3 touchdowns and an interception. Josh Jacobs (GB) led in rushing with 20 carries for 86 yards and a touchdown. Christian Watson (GB) led in receiving with 4 catches for 89 yards and 2 touchdowns.
How many fantasy points did Christian Watson score against the Bears?
Christian Watson scored 24.9 points in PPR leagues, 22.9 in half-PPR and 20.9 in standard scoring against the Bears in Week 14 of the 2025 season, on 4 catches for 89 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Bears vs Packers?
Christian Watson outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 24.9 PPR points on 6.8 xFP (+18.1). DJ Moore fell furthest short, with 0.6 points on 5.1 xFP (−4.5). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
How did the Packers beat the Bears?
The Packers beat the Bears 28–21 because they averaged 6.5 yards per play to 4.6 and outgained them 337–315. Josh Jacobs' 2-yard touchdown run put them ahead for good.
What is the all-time Bears vs Packers record?
The Packers lead the all-time series 109–98–6 across 213 meetings since 1921, including a 1–2 record in the postseason.
When did the Bears and Packers last play before this game?
Before Week 14 of 2025, they last met in the 2024 season on January 5, 2025, when the Bears beat the Packers 24–22.
Have the Bears and Packers met in the playoffs?
Yes, 3 times, most recently in the 2025 playoffs. The Bears are 2–1 against the Packers in the postseason.
What was the closing spread for Bears vs Packers?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Packers −6.5, making the Green Bay Packers 6.5-point favorites, with a closing total of 44.5. That implied about 25.5 points for the Packers and 19.0 for the Bears.
Did Bears vs Packers go over or under the total?
The game went over. The consensus closing total was 44.5, and the teams combined for 49 points, 4.5 over the number.
Who covered the spread in Bears vs Packers?
The Packers covered by 0.5 against the closing line of Packers −6.5. The final margin was 7 points.
