Final2025 NFC Wild Card
Soldier Field, Chicago, IL|
Green Bay Packers vs Chicago Bears, Wild Card 2025
Green Bay Packers
Away
27
Chicago Bears
HomeWon, advanced
31
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Packers | 7 | 14 | 0 | 6 | 27 |
| Bears | 3 | 0 | 3 | 25 | 31 |
GB 27 · CHI 31 Final
Passing leader
CHI · QB
24.4PPR pts
24/48, 361 YDS, 2 TD, 2 INT
Top fantasy scorer
GB · WR
26.4PPR pts
8 REC, 124 YDS, 1 TD
Packers leader
GB · QB
30.0PPR pts
24/46, 323 YDS, 4 TD
Defensive playmaker
Carrington Valentine
GB
1 INT, 3 TKL
Bears 31, Packers 27: Chicago rallies from 18 down at halftime in the 2025 Wild Card
Chicago erased a 21–3 halftime deficit, outscoring Green Bay 28–6 after the break to win 31–27. The Bears finished with a narrow 445–421 edge in total offense.
The Packers went 6-for-15 on third down, while the Bears kept the ball for 32:41.
The Bears' run ended in the Divisional Round, a 20–17 loss to the Rams.
The two teams meet again in Week 5 of 2026. If you roster anyone from either side, run the start/sit call in Redraft Command and it will weigh your lineup, your opponent and your league scoring, not only the player rankings.
Key advantages
- +24 total yards CHI 445 · GB 421
- +13% third-down rate CHI 53% · GB 40%
- +5:22 time of possession CHI 32:41 · GB 27:19
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Packer or Bear on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Bears Won
Chicago won the third-down and time of possession battles.
| Packers | Stat | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 421 | Total yards | 445 |
| 40% | Third-down conversion | 53% |
| 27:19 | Time of possession | 32:41 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 6.0 | Yards per play | 5.8 |
| 70 | Plays | 77 |
| 0 | Turnovers | 2 |
Scoring Summary
The Bears scored three touchdowns and three field goals; the Packers scored four touchdowns.
| Time | Team | Play | GB | CHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 7:02 | CHI | Cairo Santos 27-yard FG Takes lead | 0 | 3 |
| 2:06 | GB | Jordan Love → Christian Watson, 7-yard TD Takes leadBrandon McManus XP | 7 | 3 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 6:46 | GB | Jordan Love → Jayden Reed, 18-yard TD Extends leadBrandon McManus XP | 14 | 3 |
| 1:56 | GB | Jordan Love → Romeo Doubs, 1-yard TD Extends leadBrandon McManus XP | 21 | 3 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 10:07 | CHI | Cairo Santos 34-yard FG | 21 | 6 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 13:29 | CHI | Cairo Santos 51-yard FG | 21 | 9 |
| 10:08 | CHI | D'Andre Swift 6-yard TD runCairo Santos XP | 21 | 16 |
| 6:36 | GB | Jordan Love → Matthew Golden, 23-yard TD Extends leadXP missed | 27 | 16 |
| 4:18 | CHI | Caleb Williams → Olamide Zaccheaus, 8-yard TDCaleb Williams → Colston Loveland, 2-pt conversion | 27 | 24 |
| 1:43 | CHI | Caleb Williams → DJ Moore, 25-yard TD Game winnerCairo Santos XP | 27 | 31 |
Playoff game: these points don't count in most season-long fantasy leagues.
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+9.9Matthew Golden18.4 PTS vs 8.5 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−10.6Josh Jacobs6.8 PTS vs 17.4 xFP
- Highest expected volume25.6 xFPColston Loveland23.7 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colston LovelandCHI · TE | 23.7 | 25.6 | −1.9 | — | 33% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 15 | 33% |
| Caleb WilliamsCHI · QB | 24.4 | 23.9 | +0.5 | — | 48 att | — | 48 | 4 | 14% | 0 | 0% |
| Jordan LoveGB · QB | 30.0 | 21.1 | +8.9 | — | 46 att | — | 46 | 1 | 4% | 0 | 0% |
| Romeo DoubsGB · WR | 26.4 | 18.8 | +7.6 | — | 29% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 11 | 29% |
| Josh JacobsGB · RB | 6.8 | 17.4 | −10.6 | — | 83% car | — | 0 | 19 | 83% | 3 | 8% |
| DJ MooreCHI · WR | 17.9 | 12.6 | +5.3 | — | 15% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 4% | 7 | 15% |
| Jayden ReedGB · WR | 15.7 | 12.6 | +3.1 | — | 18% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 4% | 7 | 18% |
| Luther Burden IIICHI · WR | 6.8 | 12.6 | −5.8 | — | 15% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 4% | 7 | 15% |
| Christian WatsonGB · WR | 12.6 | 11.9 | +0.7 | — | 18% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 18% |
| D'Andre SwiftCHI · RB | 17.2 | 11.8 | +5.4 | — | 46% car | — | 0 | 13 | 46% | 2 | 4% |
| Kyle MonangaiCHI · RB | 5.9 | 10.3 | −4.4 | — | 29% car | — | 0 | 8 | 29% | 3 | 7% |
| Rome OdunzeCHI · WR | 6.4 | 10.2 | −3.8 | — | 13% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 13% |
| Matthew GoldenGB · WR | 18.4 | 8.5 | +9.9 | — | 13% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 13% |
| Cole KmetCHI · TE | 0.1 | 4.1 | −4.0 | — | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 4% | 2 | 4% |
| Durham SmytheCHI · TE | 1.6 | 3.4 | −1.8 | — | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 4% |
| Luke MusgraveGB · TE | 1.9 | 3.4 | −1.5 | — | 5% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 5% |
| Olamide ZaccheausCHI · WR | 7.8 | 3.4 | +4.4 | — | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 4% |
| Chris BrooksGB · RB | 3.7 | 2.4 | +1.3 | — | 4% car | — | 0 | 1 | 4% | 1 | 3% |
| Darian KinnardGB · — | 1.6 | 1.7 | −0.1 | — | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Josh WhyleGB · TE | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0.0 | — | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Emanuel WilsonGB · RB | 0.3 | 0.6 | −0.3 | — | 4% car | — | 0 | 1 | 4% | 0 | 0% |
Team totals: Packers 38 targets and 23 carries; Bears 46 targets and 28 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts aren't available for this game. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2025 season: 1.70 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.65 per carry and 0.44 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Jordan Love Ran hot
GB · QB · 30.0 pts on 21.1 expected
24 of 46 passing for 323 yards, 4 touchdowns; 1 carry for 11 yards.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 21.1 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 7.1, 25.8, 20.3, 15.9, 3.8, 30.0
W12W13W14W15W16WC
Best fantasy game of the season.
Caleb Williams
CHI · QB · 24.4 pts on 23.9 expected
24 of 48 passing for 361 yards, 2 touchdowns, 2 interceptions; 4 carries for 20 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 23.9 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 15.9, 19.0, 21.0, 23.0, 17.6, 24.4
W14W15W16W17W18WC
Best score since Week 10.
Romeo Doubs Ran hot
GB · WR · 26.4 pts on 18.8 expected
11 targets (29% of the team's), 8 catches for 124 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 18.8 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 12.0, 0.0, 5.6, 19.4, 9.2, 26.4
W13W14W15W16W17WC
Season high in targets (11). Best score since Week 4.
Josh Jacobs Volume, no payoff
GB · RB · 6.8 pts on 17.4 expected
3 targets (8% of the team's), 1 catch for 3 yards; 19 carries (83% of the team's) for 55 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 17.4 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 10.1, 17.2, 23.2, 4.8, 1.3, 6.8
W13W14W15W16W17WC
Colston Loveland Volume, no payoff
CHI · TE · 23.7 pts on 25.6 expected
15 targets (33% of the team's), 8 catches for 137 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 25.6 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 12.9, 10.1, 6.0, 21.4, 25.1, 23.7
W14W15W16W17W18WC
Season high in targets (15).
DJ Moore Ran hot
CHI · WR · 17.9 pts on 12.6 expected
7 targets (15% of the team's), 6 catches for 64 yards and 1 touchdown; 1 carry (4% of the team's) for -5 yards.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 12.6 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 0.6, 22.9, 21.9, 1.7, 2.1, 17.9
W14W15W16W17W18WC
Luther Burden III Unlucky
CHI · WR · 6.8 pts on 12.6 expected
7 targets (15% of the team's), 3 catches for 42 yards; 1 carry (4% of the team's) for -4 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 12.6 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 7.6, 11.0, 14.4, 27.8, 7.5, 6.8
W13W14W15W17W18WC
Fewest points since Week 11.
D'Andre Swift Ran hot
CHI · RB · 17.2 pts on 11.8 expected
2 targets (4% of the team's), 2 catches for 38 yards; 13 carries (46% of the team's) for 54 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 11.8 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 11.2, 22.6, 9.0, 21.9, 5.8, 17.2
W14W15W16W17W18WC
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2025 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Packers D | Bears D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 15.2 | 19.1 |
| RBs | 21.1 | 21.7 |
| WRs | 31.0 | 35.5 |
| TEs | 12.1 | 13.1 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Chicago opened at 46% win probability, fell as low as <1%, then rallied to win.
Bears win probability
Key Swings
- −23Love → Watson, 7-yd TD56% → 33%Q1 2:06
- −19Love → Reed, 18-yd TD32% → 13%Q2 6:46
- +16Swift 6-yd TD run1% → 17%Q4 10:08
- +19Williams → Zaccheaus, 8-yd TD<1% → 19%Q4 4:18
- +87Williams → Moore, 25-yd TD9% → 96%Q4 1:43
Swing in Bears win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Green Bay Packers | Measure | Chicago Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Plays | 77 |
| 67% | Pass rate | 64% |
| 6.9 | Yds / dropback | 7.2 |
| 4.3 | Yds / carry | 3.3 |
| 6/15 | Third downs | 10/19 |
Efficiency edge Chicago ran 7 more plays than Green Bay.
- Top targets
- GB Doubs 29% · Watson 18% · Reed 18%
- CHI Loveland 33% · Moore 15% · Burden 15%
Possession Results
| Result | GB | CHI |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 4 | 3 |
| Field goals | 0 | 3 |
| Punts | 4 | 0 |
| Turnovers | 0 | 2 |
| Turnovers on downs | 0 | 2 |
| Missed field goals | 2 | 0 |
GB turnover edge: +2
- The Bears opened the scoring on their first possession, a 16-play, 59-yard drive that ended in a field goal.
All 21 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | Q1 15:00 | 16 | 59 | 7:58 | Field goal |
| GB | Q1 7:02 | 9 | 85 | 4:56 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q1 2:06 | 8 | 30 | 4:43 | Interception |
| GB | Q2 12:23 | 10 | 87 | 5:37 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q2 6:46 | 4 | 5 | 1:31 | Downs |
| GB | Q2 5:15 | 8 | 32 | 3:19 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q2 1:56 | 5 | 28 | 1:24 | Downs |
| GB | Q2 0:32 | 6 | 27 | 0:32 | Missed FG |
| GB | Q3 15:00 | 3 | -2 | 1:07 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 13:53 | 8 | 47 | 3:46 | Field goal |
| GB | Q3 10:07 | 3 | 8 | 1:39 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 8:28 | 9 | 76 | 5:17 | Interception |
| GB | Q3 3:11 | 5 | 13 | 2:36 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 0:35 | 7 | 2 | 2:06 | Field goal |
| GB | Q4 13:29 | 3 | -10 | 0:51 | Punt |
| CHI | Q4 12:38 | 7 | 66 | 2:30 | Touchdown |
| GB | Q4 10:08 | 6 | 54 | 3:32 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q4 6:36 | 10 | 76 | 2:18 | Touchdown |
| GB | Q4 4:18 | 8 | 43 | 1:27 | Missed FG |
| CHI | Q4 2:51 | 6 | 66 | 1:08 | Touchdown |
| GB | Q4 1:43 | 11 | 44 | 1:43 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Packers vs Bears Head-to-Head
The Packers and Bears first met in 1921 and have played 213 times since. They have been NFC North rivals since 1970.
- All-time series
- 109–98–6Packers lead, 213 meetings since 1921
- Postseason
- 2–1Bears won in 1941 and 2025; Packers won in 2010
- Largest Packers win
- 49–01962
- Largest Bears win
- 61–71980
Since 2021
8–3 Packers lead
11 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- P
- P
- P
- P
- P
- P
- P
- B
- P
- B
- B
Oldest to newest. P = Packers win, B = Bears win, outlined = this game.
2026 Meetings
- Week 5 Bears at Packers Upcoming
- Week 16 Packers at Bears Upcoming
Recent Meetings
- 2025 Wild Card Packers at Bears CHI 31 GB 27 CHI W
- 2025 Wk 16 Packers at Bears, 2025 Wk 16 recap CHI 22 GB 16 CHI W
- 2025 Wk 14 Bears at Packers, 2025 Wk 14 recap GB 28 CHI 21 GB W
- 2024 Wk 18 Bears at Packers, 2024 Wk 18 recap CHI 24 GB 22 CHI W
- 2024 Wk 11 Packers at Bears, 2024 Wk 11 recap GB 20 CHI 19 GB W
- 2023 Wk 18 Bears at Packers, 2023 Wk 18 recap GB 17 CHI 9 GB W
- 2023 Wk 1 Packers at Bears, 2023 Wk 1 recap GB 38 CHI 20 GB W
- 2022 Wk 13 Packers at Bears, 2022 Wk 13 recap GB 28 CHI 19 GB W
- 2022 Wk 2 Bears at Packers, 2022 Wk 2 recap GB 27 CHI 10 GB W
- 2021 Wk 14 Bears at Packers, 2021 Wk 14 recap GB 45 CHI 30 GB W
- 2021 Wk 6 Packers at Bears, 2021 Wk 6 recap GB 24 CHI 14 GB W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2025 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Packers | Stat | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 9-7-1 | Record | 11-6 |
| 23.0 | Points per game | 25.9 |
| 332.6 | Yards per game | 369.5 |
| 5.6 | Yards per play | 5.7 |
| 21.2 | Points allowed per game | 24.4 |
| 311.8 | Yards allowed per game | 361.8 |
Packers vs Bears Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- GB −1.5Packers failed to cover by 5.5
- Total
- 46.5Over: 58 points scored (by 11.5)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Packers | 24.0 | 27 | +3.0 |
| Bears | 22.5 | 31 | +8.5 |
Both offenses beat the market's expectation, and the Fantasy tab shows who cashed in.
Betting Trends
Last 6 meetings: Packers 4–2 ATS, overs 4–2.
Each team's 2025 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
Green Bay Packers
- Against the spread
- 3–4
- Over/under
- 5–2
- ATS as favorite
- 1–3
- ATS as underdog
- 1–1
- ATS on the road
- 2–3
Chicago Bears
- Against the spread
- 5–2
- Over/under
- 3–4
- ATS as favorite
- 2–1
- ATS as underdog
- 3–1
- ATS at home
- 3–1
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Packers vs Bears Fantasy Outlook for 2026
Two meetings are left on the 2026 schedule: Week 5 in Green Bay and Week 16 in Chicago. Here's how to decide who to play in your league.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Packers or Bears player start in Week 5? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Packers and Bears players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Packers and Bears defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere these two matchups fall in each team's fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2025 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Packers vs Bears Game FAQ
Who won the 2025 Packers vs Bears Wild Card game?
The Chicago Bears beat the Green Bay Packers 31–27 in the Wild Card round of the 2025 playoffs. The game was played at Soldier Field in Chicago, IL, on January 10, 2026. See the Bears' 2025 schedule.
What was the final score of Packers vs Bears?
The final score was Bears 31, Packers 27. The Packers led 21–3 at halftime, and the second half went Packers 6, Bears 28.
What happened in the Packers vs Bears game?
Chicago erased a 21–3 halftime deficit, outscoring Green Bay 28–6 after the break to win 31–27. The Bears finished with a narrow 445–421 edge in total offense. The Bears committed 2 turnovers, the Packers none.
What was the game-winning score in Packers vs Bears?
Caleb Williams' 25-yard touchdown pass to DJ Moore with 1:43 left in the fourth quarter gave the Bears a 31–27 lead they never gave up. It was the final score of the game.
How did the Bears come back to beat the Packers?
The Bears' chances of winning fell as low as <1% in the fourth quarter. Caleb Williams' 25-yard touchdown pass to DJ Moore in the fourth quarter was the biggest swing of the game. Caleb Williams' 25-yard touchdown pass to DJ Moore then put them ahead for good.
Which team won the turnover battle in Packers vs Bears?
The Packers won the turnover battle 2–0: the Bears gave the ball away 2 times and the Packers not at all. The Bears won the game anyway.
What was the turning point of Packers vs Bears?
Caleb Williams' 25-yard touchdown pass to DJ Moore with 1:43 left in the fourth quarter was the biggest swing of the game, moving the Bears' win probability from 9% to 96%.
What is the all-time Packers vs Bears record?
The Packers lead the all-time series 109–98–6 across 213 meetings since 1921, including a 1–2 record in the postseason.
When did the Packers and Bears last play before this game?
Before the 2025 Wild Card round, they last met in the 2025 season on December 20, 2025, when the Bears beat the Packers 22–16.
Have the Packers and Bears met in the playoffs?
Yes, 3 times, most recently in the 2025 playoffs. The Packers are 1–2 against the Bears in the postseason.
What is the Packers vs Bears record since 2021?
The Packers lead 8–3 across 11 meetings since the 2021 season, including this game.
What was the closing spread for Packers vs Bears?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Packers −1.5, making the Green Bay Packers 1.5-point favorites, with a closing total of 46.5. That implied about 24.0 points for the Packers and 22.5 for the Bears.
Did Packers vs Bears go over or under the total?
The game went over. The consensus closing total was 46.5, and the teams combined for 58 points, 11.5 over the number.
Who covered the spread in Packers vs Bears?
The Bears covered as 1.5-point underdogs against the closing line of Packers −1.5. The final margin was 4 points.
