Final/OT2025 Week 16
Soldier Field, Chicago, IL|
Green Bay Packers vs Chicago Bears, Week 16 2025
Green Bay Packers
Away
16
Chicago Bears
HomeWon
22
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | OT | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Packers | 0 | 6 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 16 |
| Bears | 0 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 6 | 22 |
GB 16 · CHI 22 Final/OT
Passing leader
CHI · QB
21.0PPR pts
19/34, 250 YDS, 2 TD
Top fantasy scorer
CHI · WR
21.9PPR pts
5 REC, 97 YDS, 1 TD
Packers leader
GB · WR
19.4PPR pts
5 REC, 84 YDS, 1 TD
Defensive playmaker
Montez Sweat
CHI
1 SACK, 5 TKL
Bears 22, Packers 16: Chicago wins it in overtime
Chicago trailed 6–0 at halftime, regulation ended 16–16, and the Bears won it 22–16 in overtime. The Bears finished with a narrow 400–384 edge in total offense and averaged 6.7 yards per play.
The Packers went 6-for-12 on third down and committed one turnover, while the Bears finished without a giveaway.
The two teams meet again in Week 5 of 2026. If you roster anyone from either side, run the start/sit call in Redraft Command and it will weigh your lineup, your opponent and your league scoring, not only the player rankings.
Key advantages
- +1.2 yards/play CHI 6.7 · GB 5.5
- +1 turnover margin CHI 0 turnovers
- +16 total yards CHI 400 · GB 384
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Packer or Bear on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Bears Won
Chicago won the efficiency and turnover battles.
| Packers | Stat | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 5.5 | Yards per play | 6.7 |
| 1 | Turnovers | 0 |
| 384 | Total yards | 400 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 70 | Plays | 60 |
| 50% | Third-down conversion | 18% |
| 38:57 | Time of possession | 26:13 |
Scoring Summary
The Bears scored two touchdowns and three field goals; the Packers scored one touchdown and three field goals.
| Time | Team | Play | GB | CHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| No scoring | ||||
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 12:45 | GB | Brandon McManus 26-yard FG Takes lead | 3 | 0 |
| 1:41 | GB | Brandon McManus 22-yard FG Extends lead | 6 | 0 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 12:12 | CHI | Cairo Santos 46-yard FG | 6 | 3 |
| 0:33 | GB | Malik Willis → Romeo Doubs, 33-yard TD Extends leadBrandon McManus XP | 13 | 3 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 10:52 | CHI | Cairo Santos 51-yard FG | 13 | 6 |
| 5:03 | GB | Brandon McManus 28-yard FG Extends lead | 16 | 6 |
| 1:59 | CHI | Cairo Santos 43-yard FG | 16 | 9 |
| 0:24 | CHI | Caleb Williams → Jahdae Walker, 6-yard TD Ties gameCairo Santos XP | 16 | 16 |
| Overtime | ||||
| 4:50 | CHI | Caleb Williams → DJ Moore, 46-yard TD Game winner | 16 | 22 |
Fantasy Points: Packers vs Bears, Week 16 2025
Fantasy leaders
- DJ MooreCHI · WR21.9 PTSWR8
- Caleb WilliamsCHI · QB21.0 PTSQB9
- Romeo DoubsGB · WR19.4 PTSWR13
- Malik WillisGB · QB13.2 PTSQB21
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21.0 | QB9 | 19/34 | 250 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 30 | 0 | 98.9 | Start/Sit → | |
| 13.2 | QB21 | 9/11 | 121 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 44 | 0 | 142.8 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.8 | QB31 | 8/13 | 77 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 78.0 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21.9 | WR8 | WR | 1 | 12 | 0 | 7 | 5 | 97 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 19.4 | WR13 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 5 | 84 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 12.3 | RB24 | RB | 9 | 50 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 43 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 10.1 | WR35 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 21 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 9.0 | RB35 | RB | 13 | 58 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 8.2 | RB40 | RB | 14 | 82 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 7.1 | WR57 | WR | 1 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 35 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.8 | TE20 | TE | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 38 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.0 | TE23 | TE | — | — | — | 5 | 3 | 30 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.3 | WR69 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 2 | 33 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.8 | RB53 | RB | 12 | 36 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.7 | WR85 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 2 | 17 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.4 | TE41 | TE | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 14 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.2 | WR88 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.9 | WR115 | WR | 2 | 9 | 0 | — | — | — | — | ||
| 0.4 | WR117 | WR | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.4 | RB75 | RB | 1 | 4 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fantasy Usage
Green Bay Packers
Snap Share
Luke MusgraveTE55 snaps76%
Jayden ReedWR46 snaps64%
Romeo DoubsWR45 snaps63%
Christian WatsonWR45 snaps63%
Emanuel WilsonRB33 snaps46%
Target Share24 targets
- Romeo Doubs25%, 6 targets
- Christian Watson25%, 6 targets
- Luke Musgrave13%, 3 targets
- Jayden Reed13%, 3 targets
- Josh Jacobs8%, 2 targets
- Other17%, 4 targets
Carry Share44 carries
- Emanuel Wilson32%, 14 carries
- Josh Jacobs27%, 12 carries
- Malik Willis23%, 10 carries
- Jordan Love5%, 2 carries
- Savion Williams5%, 2 carries
- Other9%, 4 carries
Chicago Bears
Snap Share
DJ MooreWR61 snaps95%
Olamide ZaccheausWR55 snaps86%
Colston LovelandTE53 snaps83%
Cole KmetTE49 snaps77%
D'Andre SwiftRB35 snaps55%
Target Share29 targets
- DJ Moore24%, 7 targets
- Olamide Zaccheaus17%, 5 targets
- Colston Loveland17%, 5 targets
- Kyle Monangai14%, 4 targets
- Cole Kmet10%, 3 targets
- Other17%, 5 targets
Carry Share26 carries
- D'Andre Swift50%, 13 carries
- Kyle Monangai35%, 9 carries
- Caleb Williams12%, 3 carries
- DJ Moore4%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 61 | 95% | 7 | 24% | 1 | |
| 55 | 86% | 5 | 17% | 0 | |
| 53 | 83% | 5 | 17% | 0 | |
| 49 | 77% | 3 | 10% | 0 | |
| 55 | 76% | 3 | 13% | 0 | |
| 46 | 64% | 3 | 13% | 1 | |
| 45 | 63% | 6 | 25% | 0 | |
| 45 | 63% | 6 | 25% | 0 | |
| 35 | 55% | 2 | 7% | 13 | |
| 33 | 46% | 0 | 0% | 14 | |
| 29 | 45% | 4 | 14% | 9 | |
| 30 | 42% | 2 | 8% | 0 | |
| 28 | 39% | 2 | 8% | 12 | |
| 26 | 36% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 22 | 31% | 1 | 4% | 2 | |
| 17 | 27% | 3 | 10% | 0 | |
| 15 | 21% | 0 | 0% | 1 | |
| 12 | 19% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 6 | 9% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 3 | 4% | 0 | 0% | 2 | |
| 1 | 2% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 1 | 1% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+9.3DJ Moore21.9 PTS vs 12.6 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−6.5Christian Watson3.7 PTS vs 10.2 xFP
- Highest expected volume17.0 xFPCaleb Williams21.0 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caleb WilliamsCHI · QB | 21.0 | 17.0 | +4.0 | 100% | 34 att | — | 34 | 3 | 12% | 0 | 0% |
| DJ MooreCHI · WR | 21.9 | 12.6 | +9.3 | 95% | 24% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 4% | 7 | 24% |
| Kyle MonangaiCHI · RB | 12.3 | 12.6 | −0.3 | 45% | 35% car | — | 0 | 9 | 35% | 4 | 14% |
| D'Andre SwiftCHI · RB | 9.0 | 11.8 | −2.8 | 55% | 50% car | — | 0 | 13 | 50% | 2 | 7% |
| Malik WillisGB · QB | 13.2 | 11.3 | +1.9 | 64% | 11 att | — | 11 | 10 | 23% | 0 | 0% |
| Josh JacobsGB · RB | 4.8 | 11.2 | −6.4 | 39% | 27% car | — | 0 | 12 | 27% | 2 | 8% |
| Christian WatsonGB · WR | 3.7 | 10.2 | −6.5 | 63% | 25% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 25% |
| Romeo DoubsGB · WR | 19.4 | 10.2 | +9.2 | 63% | 25% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 25% |
| Emanuel WilsonGB · RB | 8.2 | 9.0 | −0.8 | 46% | 32% car | — | 0 | 14 | 32% | 0 | 0% |
| Colston LovelandCHI · TE | 6.0 | 8.5 | −2.5 | 83% | 17% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 17% |
| Olamide ZaccheausCHI · WR | 5.3 | 8.5 | −3.2 | 86% | 17% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 17% |
| Jordan LoveGB · QB | 3.8 | 7.1 | −3.3 | 36% | 13 att | — | 13 | 2 | 5% | 0 | 0% |
| Jayden ReedGB · WR | 7.1 | 5.8 | +1.3 | 64% | 13% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 2% | 3 | 13% |
| Cole KmetCHI · TE | 3.4 | 5.1 | −1.7 | 77% | 10% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 10% |
| Jahdae WalkerCHI · WR | 10.1 | 5.1 | +5.0 | 27% | 10% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 10% |
| Luke MusgraveGB · TE | 6.8 | 5.1 | +1.7 | 76% | 13% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 13% |
| Dontayvion WicksGB · WR | 3.2 | 3.4 | −0.2 | 42% | 8% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 8% |
| Matthew GoldenGB · WR | 0.4 | 3.0 | −2.6 | 31% | 5% car | — | 0 | 2 | 5% | 1 | 4% |
| John FitzPatrickGB · TE | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 36% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Savion WilliamsGB · WR | 0.9 | 1.3 | −0.4 | 4% | 5% car | — | 0 | 2 | 5% | 0 | 0% |
| Chris BrooksGB · RB | 0.4 | 0.6 | −0.2 | 21% | 2% car | — | 0 | 1 | 2% | 0 | 0% |
Team totals: Packers 24 targets and 44 carries; Bears 29 targets and 26 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2025 season: 1.70 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.65 per carry and 0.44 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Jordan Love
GB · QB · 3.8 pts on 7.1 expected
8 of 13 passing for 77 yards; 2 carries for 7 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 7.1 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 17.7, 7.1, 25.8, 20.3, 15.9, 3.8
W11W12W13W14W15W16
Lowest-scoring game of the season.
Caleb Williams
CHI · QB · 21.0 pts on 17.0 expected
19 of 34 passing for 250 yards, 2 touchdowns; 3 carries for 30 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 17.0 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 10.3, 21.7, 10.5, 15.9, 19.0, 21.0
W11W12W13W14W15W16
Best score since Week 12.
Josh Jacobs Unlucky
GB · RB · 4.8 pts on 11.2 expected
2 targets (8% of the team's), 2 catches for 12 yards; 12 carries (27% of the team's) for 36 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 11.2 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 19.7, 4.0, 10.1, 17.2, 23.2, 4.8
W10W11W13W14W15W16
Fewest points since Week 11. A touchdown in 5 of the last 8 games.
Christian Watson Unlucky
GB · WR · 3.7 pts on 10.2 expected
6 targets (25% of the team's), 2 catches for 17 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 10.2 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 20.6, 9.9, 18.3, 24.9, 5.9, 3.7
W11W12W13W14W15W16
Lowest-scoring game of the season.
DJ Moore Ran hot
CHI · WR · 21.9 pts on 12.6 expected
7 targets (24% of the team's), 5 catches for 97 yards and 1 touchdown; 1 carry (4% of the team's) for 12 yards.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 12.6 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 3.1, 23.4, 4.7, 0.6, 22.9, 21.9
W11W12W13W14W15W16
Kyle Monangai
CHI · RB · 12.3 pts on 12.6 expected
4 targets (14% of the team's), 3 catches for 43 yards; 9 carries (35% of the team's) for 50 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 12.6 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 10.7, 10.8, 19.0, 8.7, 3.3, 12.3
W11W12W13W14W15W16
Romeo Doubs Ran hot
GB · WR · 19.4 pts on 10.2 expected
6 targets (25% of the team's), 5 catches for 84 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 10.2 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 9.3, 4.3, 12.0, 0.0, 5.6, 19.4
W11W12W13W14W15W16
Best score since Week 4.
Jahdae Walker Ran hot
CHI · WR · 10.1 pts on 5.1 expected
3 targets (10% of the team's), 2 catches for 21 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 5.1 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 4 games + this one (PPR): 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 10.1
W4W8W9W14W16
Best fantasy game of the season.
Stock Up, Stock Down
Green Bay Packers
- ▲Stock up: Emanuel Wilson led the backfield with 46% of the snaps after trailing Josh Jacobs before this game.
- ▲Stock up: Jayden Reed played 64% of the snaps, up from a 39% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Luke Musgrave played 76% of the snaps, up from a 40% season average.
Chicago Bears
- ▲Stock up: Colston Loveland played 83% of the snaps, up from a 60% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Olamide Zaccheaus played 86% of the snaps, up from a 54% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Jahdae Walker played 27% of the snaps, up from a 3% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2025 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Packers D | Bears D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 15.2 | 19.1 |
| RBs | 21.1 | 21.7 |
| WRs | 31.0 | 35.5 |
| TEs | 12.1 | 13.1 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Chicago opened at 54% win probability, fell as low as <1%, then rallied to win.
Bears win probability
Key Swings
- −11McManus 22-yd FG41% → 30%Q2 1:41
- +12Santos 46-yd FG28% → 40%Q3 12:12
- −27Willis → Doubs, 33-yd TD35% → 8%Q3 0:33
- +50Williams → Walker, 6-yd TD<1% → 50%Q4 0:24
- +50Williams → Moore, 46-yd TD50% → >99%OT 4:50
Swing in Bears win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Green Bay Packers | Measure | Chicago Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Plays | 60 |
| 37% | Pass rate | 57% |
| 7.4 | Yds / dropback | 7.4 |
| 4.4 | Yds / carry | 5.8 |
| 6/12 | Third downs | 2/11 |
Efficiency edge Chicago ran 10 fewer plays but gained 1.4 more yards per carry.
- Top targets
- GB Watson 25% · Doubs 25% · Reed 13%
- CHI Moore 24% · Loveland 17% · Zaccheaus 17%
Possession Results
| Result | GB | CHI |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 1 | 2 |
| Field goals | 3 | 3 |
| Punts | 0 | 3 |
| Turnovers | 1 | 0 |
| Turnovers on downs | 2 | 1 |
CHI turnover edge: +1
- The Packers opened the scoring on their second possession, a 14-play, 70-yard drive that ended in a field goal.
All 18 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GB | Q1 15:00 | 9 | 46 | 5:13 | Downs |
| CHI | Q1 9:47 | 10 | 70 | 5:56 | Downs |
| GB | Q1 3:51 | 14 | 70 | 6:06 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q2 12:45 | 6 | 18 | 3:11 | Punt |
| GB | Q2 9:34 | 16 | 91 | 7:53 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q2 1:41 | 4 | 15 | 0:56 | Punt |
| GB | Q2 0:45 | 2 | -2 | 0:45 | End of half |
| CHI | Q3 15:00 | 6 | 38 | 2:48 | Field goal |
| GB | Q3 12:12 | 9 | 62 | 5:15 | Fumble |
| CHI | Q3 6:57 | 4 | 19 | 2:42 | Punt |
| GB | Q3 4:15 | 6 | 64 | 3:42 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q3 0:33 | 10 | 47 | 4:41 | Field goal |
| GB | Q4 10:52 | 10 | 53 | 5:49 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q4 5:03 | 11 | 43 | 3:04 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q4 1:59 | 8 | 53 | 1:35 | Touchdown |
| GB | Q4 0:24 | 1 | -6 | 0:24 | End of half |
| GB | OT 10:00 | 6 | 43 | 3:50 | Downs |
| CHI | OT 6:10 | 4 | 64 | 1:20 | Touchdown |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Packers vs Bears Head-to-Head
The Packers and Bears first met in 1921 and have played 213 times since. They have been NFC North rivals since 1970.
- All-time series
- 109–98–6Packers lead, 213 meetings since 1921
- Postseason
- 2–1Bears won in 1941 and 2025; Packers won in 2010
- Largest Packers win
- 49–01962
- Largest Bears win
- 61–71980
Since 2021
8–3 Packers lead
11 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- P
- P
- P
- P
- P
- P
- P
- B
- P
- B
- B
Oldest to newest. P = Packers win, B = Bears win, outlined = this game.
2026 Meetings
- Week 5 Bears at Packers Upcoming
- Week 16 Packers at Bears Upcoming
Recent Meetings
- 2025 Wild Card Packers at Bears, 2025 Wild Card recap CHI 31 GB 27 CHI W
- 2025 Wk 16 Packers at Bears CHI 22 GB 16 CHI W
- 2025 Wk 14 Bears at Packers, 2025 Wk 14 recap GB 28 CHI 21 GB W
- 2024 Wk 18 Bears at Packers, 2024 Wk 18 recap CHI 24 GB 22 CHI W
- 2024 Wk 11 Packers at Bears, 2024 Wk 11 recap GB 20 CHI 19 GB W
- 2023 Wk 18 Bears at Packers, 2023 Wk 18 recap GB 17 CHI 9 GB W
- 2023 Wk 1 Packers at Bears, 2023 Wk 1 recap GB 38 CHI 20 GB W
- 2022 Wk 13 Packers at Bears, 2022 Wk 13 recap GB 28 CHI 19 GB W
- 2022 Wk 2 Bears at Packers, 2022 Wk 2 recap GB 27 CHI 10 GB W
- 2021 Wk 14 Bears at Packers, 2021 Wk 14 recap GB 45 CHI 30 GB W
- 2021 Wk 6 Packers at Bears, 2021 Wk 6 recap GB 24 CHI 14 GB W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2025 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Packers | Stat | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 9-7-1 | Record | 11-6 |
| 23.0 | Points per game | 25.9 |
| 332.6 | Yards per game | 369.5 |
| 5.6 | Yards per play | 5.7 |
| 21.2 | Points allowed per game | 24.4 |
| 311.8 | Yards allowed per game | 361.8 |
Packers vs Bears Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- CHI −1.5Bears covered by 4.5
- Total
- 44.5Under: 38 points scored (by 6.5)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bears | 23.0 | 22 | −1.0 |
| Packers | 21.5 | 16 | −5.5 |
Both offenses finished under the market's expectation, which matches the low fantasy output in the Fantasy tab.
Betting Trends
Last 6 meetings: Packers 5–1 ATS, overs 4–2.
Each team's 2025 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
Green Bay Packers
- Against the spread
- 2–2
- Over/under
- 3–1
- ATS as favorite
- 1–1
- ATS as underdog
- 0–1
- ATS on the road
- 1–2
Chicago Bears
- Against the spread
- 3–1
- Over/under
- 1–3
- ATS as favorite
- 2–0
- ATS as underdog
- 1–1
- ATS at home
- 2–0
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Packers vs Bears Fantasy Outlook for 2026
Two meetings are left on the 2026 schedule: Week 5 in Green Bay and Week 16 in Chicago. Here's how to decide who to play in your league.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Packers or Bears player start in Week 5? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Packers and Bears players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Packers and Bears defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere these two matchups fall in each team's fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2025 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Packers vs Bears Game FAQ
Who won the 2025 Packers vs Bears Week 16 game?
The Chicago Bears beat the Green Bay Packers 22–16 in Week 16 of the 2025 season. The game was played at Soldier Field in Chicago, IL, on December 20, 2025. See the Bears' 2025 schedule.
What was the final score of Packers vs Bears?
The final score was Bears 22, Packers 16 in overtime. The Packers led 6–0 at halftime, and the second half went Packers 10, Bears 16 before overtime.
What happened in the Packers vs Bears game?
Chicago trailed 6–0 at halftime, regulation ended 16–16, and the Bears won it 22–16 in overtime. The Bears finished with a narrow 400–384 edge in total offense and averaged 6.7 yards per play. DJ Moore led all players with 5 catches for 97 yards and a touchdown, plus a carry for 12 rushing yards. The Packers committed 1 turnover, the Bears none.
What was the game-winning score in Packers vs Bears?
Caleb Williams' 46-yard touchdown pass to DJ Moore with 4:50 left in the overtime gave the Bears a 22–16 lead they never gave up. It was the final score of the game.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Packers vs Bears?
DJ Moore led the game with 21.9 PPR fantasy points, the WR8 of Week 16, on 5 catches for 97 yards and a touchdown, plus a carry for 12 rushing yards. Caleb Williams was next with 21.0 (QB9). See DJ Moore's 2025 game log.
Who led Packers vs Bears in passing, rushing and receiving?
Caleb Williams (CHI) led all passers with 19 of 34 for 250 yards and 2 touchdowns. Emanuel Wilson (GB) led in rushing with 14 carries for 82 yards. DJ Moore (CHI) led in receiving with 5 catches for 97 yards and a touchdown.
How many fantasy points did DJ Moore score against the Packers?
DJ Moore scored 21.9 points in PPR leagues, 19.4 in half-PPR and 16.9 in standard scoring against the Packers in Week 16 of the 2025 season, on 5 catches for 97 yards and a touchdown, plus a carry for 12 rushing yards. He drew 24% of his team's targets.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Packers vs Bears?
DJ Moore outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 21.9 PPR points on 12.6 xFP (+9.3). Christian Watson fell furthest short, with 3.7 points on 10.2 xFP (−6.5). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
How did the Bears come back to beat the Packers?
The Bears' chances of winning fell as low as <1% in the fourth quarter. Caleb Williams' 6-yard touchdown pass to Jahdae Walker in the fourth quarter was the biggest swing of the game. Caleb Williams' 46-yard touchdown pass to DJ Moore then put them ahead for good.
What is the all-time Packers vs Bears record?
The Packers lead the all-time series 109–98–6 across 213 meetings since 1921, including a 1–2 record in the postseason.
When did the Packers and Bears last play before this game?
Before Week 16 of 2025, they last met in the 2025 season on December 7, 2025, when the Packers beat the Bears 28–21.
Have the Packers and Bears met in the playoffs?
Yes, 3 times, most recently in the 2025 playoffs. The Packers are 1–2 against the Bears in the postseason.
What was the closing spread for Packers vs Bears?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Bears −1.5, making the Chicago Bears 1.5-point favorites, with a closing total of 44.5. That implied about 23.0 points for the Bears and 21.5 for the Packers.
Did Packers vs Bears go over or under the total?
The game went under. The consensus closing total was 44.5, and the teams combined for 38 points, 6.5 under the number.
Who covered the spread in Packers vs Bears?
The Bears covered by 4.5 against the closing line of Bears −1.5. The final margin was 6 points.
