Final2025 Week 3
Nissan Stadium, Nashville, TN|
Indianapolis Colts vs Tennessee Titans, Week 3 2025
Indianapolis Colts
AwayWon
41
Tennessee Titans
Home
20
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colts | 17 | 3 | 14 | 7 | 41 |
| Titans | 3 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 20 |
IND 41 · TEN 20 Final
Passing leader
IND · QB
15.8PPR pts
18/25, 228 YDS, 1 TD
Top fantasy scorer
IND · RB
32.8PPR pts
17 ATT, 102 YDS, 3 TD, 3 REC, 16 REC YDS
Titans leader
TEN · RB
13.9PPR pts
16 ATT, 45 YDS, 1 TD, 2 REC, 14 REC YDS
Defensive playmaker
Kenny Moore II
IND
1 INT, 1 TD, 2 TKL
Colts 41, Titans 20: Indianapolis leads from start to finish
Indianapolis led 20–6 at halftime and outscored Tennessee 21–14 after the break to win 41–20. The Colts finished with a 365–282 edge in total offense and averaged 6.9 yards per play.
The Titans went 5-for-14 on third down and committed one turnover, while the Colts finished without a giveaway.
The two teams meet again in Week 6 of 2026. If you roster anyone from either side, run the start/sit call in Redraft Command and it will weigh your lineup, your opponent and your league scoring, not only the player rankings.
Key advantages
- +2.6 yards/play IND 6.9 · TEN 4.3
- +1 turnover margin IND 0 turnovers
- +83 total yards IND 365 · TEN 282
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Colt or Titan on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Colts Won
Indianapolis won the efficiency and turnover battles.
| Colts | Stat | Titans |
|---|---|---|
| 6.9 | Yards per play | 4.3 |
| 0 | Turnovers | 1 |
| 365 | Total yards | 282 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 53 | Plays | 65 |
| 25% | Third-down conversion | 36% |
| 28:41 | Time of possession | 31:19 |
Scoring Summary
The Colts scored five touchdowns and two field goals; the Titans scored two touchdowns and two field goals.
| Time | Team | Play | IND | TEN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 14:11 | IND | Kenny Moore II 32-yard interception return TD Takes leadSpencer Shrader XP | 7 | 0 |
| 12:40 | TEN | Joey Slye 57-yard FG | 7 | 3 |
| 7:37 | IND | Spencer Shrader 24-yard FG Extends lead | 10 | 3 |
| 1:07 | IND | Jonathan Taylor 1-yard TD run Extends leadSpencer Shrader XP | 17 | 3 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 10:50 | TEN | Joey Slye 42-yard FG | 17 | 6 |
| 0:00 | IND | Spencer Shrader 36-yard FG Extends lead | 20 | 6 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 11:08 | IND | Daniel Jones → Michael Pittman Jr., 20-yard TD Extends leadSpencer Shrader XP | 27 | 6 |
| 5:09 | TEN | Tony Pollard 1-yard TD runJoey Slye XP | 27 | 13 |
| 1:27 | IND | Jonathan Taylor 46-yard TD run Extends leadSpencer Shrader XP | 34 | 13 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 8:40 | TEN | Cam Ward → Elic Ayomanor, 8-yard TDJoey Slye XP | 34 | 20 |
| 5:53 | IND | Jonathan Taylor 1-yard TD run Extends leadSpencer Shrader XP | 41 | 20 |
Fantasy Points: Colts vs Titans, Week 3 2025
Fantasy leaders
- Jonathan TaylorIND · RB32.8 PTSRB1
- Michael PittmanIND · WR19.3 PTSWR13
- Daniel JonesIND · QB15.8 PTSQB11
- Tony PollardTEN · RB13.9 PTSRB15
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15.8 | QB11 | 18/25 | 228 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 27 | 0 | 113.4 | Start/Sit → | |
| 13.0 | QB21 | 23/38 | 219 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 74.3 | Start/Sit → | |
| -0.1 | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | -1 | 0 | — |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32.8 | RB1 | RB | 17 | 102 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 16 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 19.3 | WR13 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 6 | 73 | 1 | ||
| 13.9 | RB15 | RB | 16 | 45 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 14 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 13.8 | WR27 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 4 | 38 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 11.6 | TE8 | TE | — | — | — | 6 | 5 | 66 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 10.7 | WR34 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 4 | 67 | 0 | ||
| 7.7 | WR49 | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | 37 | 0 | ||
| 6.8 | TE24 | TE | — | — | — | 5 | 3 | 38 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.7 | TE28 | TE | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 27 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.4 | WR65 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 34 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.7 | WR82 | WR | — | — | — | 7 | 1 | 27 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.5 | WR86 | WR | 2 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.6 | RB58 | RB | 2 | 26 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.8 | WR108 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | ||
| 0.6 | RB71 | RB | 2 | 6 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.3 | RB72 | RB | 1 | 3 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
Fantasy Usage
Indianapolis Colts
Snap Share
Michael PittmanWR46 snaps81%
Jonathan TaylorRB45 snaps79%
Tyler WarrenTE39 snaps68%
Alec PierceWR31 snaps54%
Josh DownsWR29 snaps51%
Target Share25 targets
- Michael Pittman24%, 6 targets
- Alec Pierce20%, 5 targets
- Tyler Warren20%, 5 targets
- Jonathan Taylor16%, 4 targets
- Josh Downs12%, 3 targets
- Other8%, 2 targets
Carry Share28 carries
- Jonathan Taylor61%, 17 carries
- Daniel Jones14%, 4 carries
- Anthony Richardson14%, 4 carries
- Tyler Goodson7%, 2 carries
- DJ Giddens4%, 1 carries
Tennessee Titans
Snap Share
Tony PollardRB64 snaps91%
Calvin RidleyWR61 snaps87%
Elic AyomanorWR52 snaps74%
Chig OkonkwoTE46 snaps66%
Tyler LockettWR38 snaps54%
Target Share34 targets
- Calvin Ridley21%, 7 targets
- Chig Okonkwo18%, 6 targets
- Elic Ayomanor15%, 5 targets
- Tyler Lockett12%, 4 targets
- Tony Pollard12%, 4 targets
- Other24%, 8 targets
Carry Share23 carries
- Tony Pollard70%, 16 carries
- Cam Ward13%, 3 carries
- Julius Chestnut9%, 2 carries
- Chimere Dike9%, 2 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 64 | 91% | 4 | 12% | 16 | |
| 61 | 87% | 7 | 21% | 0 | |
| 46 | 81% | 6 | 24% | 0 | |
| 45 | 79% | 4 | 16% | 17 | |
| 52 | 74% | 5 | 15% | 0 | |
| 39 | 68% | 5 | 20% | 0 | |
| 46 | 66% | 6 | 18% | 0 | |
| 31 | 54% | 5 | 20% | 0 | |
| 38 | 54% | 4 | 12% | 0 | |
| 29 | 51% | 3 | 12% | 0 | |
| 28 | 49% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 24 | 42% | 2 | 8% | 0 | |
| 29 | 41% | 4 | 12% | 2 | |
| 27 | 39% | 3 | 9% | 0 | |
| 24 | 34% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 19 | 33% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 9 | 16% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 8 | 14% | 0 | 0% | 1 | |
| 6 | 9% | 0 | 0% | 2 | |
| 4 | 7% | 0 | 0% | 2 | |
| 3 | 5% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 1 | 1% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+15.0Jonathan Taylor32.8 PTS vs 17.8 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−8.2Calvin Ridley3.7 PTS vs 11.9 xFP
- Highest expected volume18.8 xFPCam Ward13.0 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cam WardTEN · QB | 13.0 | 18.8 | −5.8 | 100% | 38 att | — | 38 | 3 | 13% | 0 | 0% |
| Jonathan TaylorIND · RB | 32.8 | 17.8 | +15.0 | 79% | 61% car | — | 0 | 17 | 61% | 4 | 16% |
| Tony PollardTEN · RB | 13.9 | 17.1 | −3.2 | 91% | 70% car | — | 0 | 16 | 70% | 4 | 12% |
| Daniel JonesIND · QB | 15.8 | 13.7 | +2.1 | 88% | 25 att | — | 25 | 4 | 14% | 0 | 0% |
| Calvin RidleyTEN · WR | 3.7 | 11.9 | −8.2 | 87% | 21% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 21% |
| Chig OkonkwoTEN · TE | 11.6 | 10.2 | +1.4 | 66% | 18% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 18% |
| Michael Pittman Jr.IND · WR | 19.3 | 10.2 | +9.1 | 81% | 24% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 24% |
| Alec PierceIND · WR | 10.7 | 8.5 | +2.2 | 54% | 20% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 20% |
| Elic AyomanorTEN · WR | 13.8 | 8.5 | +5.3 | 74% | 15% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 15% |
| Tyler WarrenIND · TE | 6.8 | 8.5 | −1.7 | 68% | 20% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 20% |
| Chimere DikeTEN · WR | 3.5 | 8.1 | −4.6 | 41% | 12% tgt | — | 0 | 2 | 9% | 4 | 12% |
| Tyler LockettTEN · WR | 7.7 | 6.8 | +0.9 | 54% | 12% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 12% |
| Gunnar HelmTEN · TE | 5.7 | 5.1 | +0.6 | 39% | 9% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 9% |
| Josh DownsIND · WR | 5.4 | 5.1 | +0.3 | 51% | 12% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 12% |
| Adonai MitchellIND · WR | 0.0 | 3.4 | −3.4 | 42% | 8% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 8% |
| Anthony Richardson Sr.IND · QB | -0.1 | 2.6 | −2.7 | 12% | 0 att | — | 0 | 4 | 14% | 0 | 0% |
| Van JeffersonTEN · WR | 1.8 | 1.7 | +0.1 | 34% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Julius ChestnutTEN · RB | 2.6 | 1.3 | +1.3 | 9% | 9% car | — | 0 | 2 | 9% | 0 | 0% |
| Tyler GoodsonIND · RB | 0.6 | 1.3 | −0.7 | 7% | 7% car | — | 0 | 2 | 7% | 0 | 0% |
| DJ GiddensIND · RB | 0.3 | 0.6 | −0.3 | 14% | 4% car | — | 0 | 1 | 4% | 0 | 0% |
Team totals: Colts 25 targets and 28 carries; Titans 34 targets and 23 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2025 season: 1.70 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.65 per carry and 0.44 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Daniel Jones
IND · QB · 15.8 pts on 13.7 expected
18 of 25 passing for 228 yards, 1 touchdown; 4 carries for 27 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 13.7 expected.
Start/Sit: Daniel Jones →Cam Ward Unlucky
TEN · QB · 13.0 pts on 18.8 expected
23 of 38 passing for 219 yards, 1 touchdown, 1 interception; 3 carries for 12 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 18.8 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Start/Sit: Cam Ward →Jonathan Taylor Ran hot
IND · RB · 32.8 pts on 17.8 expected
4 targets (16% of the team's), 3 catches for 16 yards; 17 carries (61% of the team's) for 102 yards and 3 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 17.8 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Start/Sit: Jonathan Taylor →Michael Pittman Jr. Ran hot
IND · WR · 19.3 pts on 10.2 expected
6 targets (24% of the team's), 6 catches for 73 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 10.2 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Tony Pollard Volume, no payoff
TEN · RB · 13.9 pts on 17.1 expected
4 targets (12% of the team's), 2 catches for 14 yards; 16 carries (70% of the team's) for 45 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 17.1 expected.
Start/Sit: Tony Pollard →Calvin Ridley Unlucky
TEN · WR · 3.7 pts on 11.9 expected
7 targets (21% of the team's), 1 catch for 27 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 11.9 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Start/Sit: Calvin Ridley →Elic Ayomanor Ran hot
TEN · WR · 13.8 pts on 8.5 expected
5 targets (15% of the team's), 4 catches for 38 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 8.5 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Start/Sit: Elic Ayomanor →Adonai Mitchell
IND · WR · 0.0 pts on 3.4 expected
2 targets (8% of the team's), 0 catches for 0 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 3.4 expected.
Start/Sit: Adonai Mitchell →Stock Up, Stock Down
Indianapolis Colts
- ▲Stock up: Adonai Mitchell played 42% of the snaps, up from a 15% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Alec Pierce played 54% of the snaps, down from a 85% season average.
Tennessee Titans
- ▲Stock up: Van Jefferson played 34% of the snaps, up from a 19% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Chig Okonkwo played 66% of the snaps, down from a 82% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2025 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Colts D | Titans D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 17.4 | 19.3 |
| RBs | 19.1 | 20.3 |
| WRs | 35.8 | 35.2 |
| TEs | 15.1 | 14.2 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Tennessee opened at 50% win probability and fell below 2% in the third quarter.
Titans win probability
Key Swings
- −20Moore 32-yd pick-six50% → 30%Q1 14:11
- +8Slye 57-yd FG30% → 38%Q1 12:40
- −9Shrader 24-yd FG38% → 29%Q1 7:37
- −16Taylor 1-yd TD run28% → 12%Q1 1:07
- +6Slye 42-yd FG10% → 16%Q2 10:50
Swing in Titans win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Indianapolis Colts | Measure | Tennessee Titans |
|---|---|---|
| 53 | Plays | 65 |
| 47% | Pass rate | 65% |
| 9.1 | Yds / dropback | 4.7 |
| 4.9 | Yds / carry | 3.7 |
| 2/8 | Third downs | 5/14 |
Efficiency edge Indianapolis ran 12 fewer plays but gained 4.4 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- IND Pittman 24% · Pierce 20% · Warren 20%
- TEN Ridley 21% · Okonkwo 18% · Ayomanor 15%
Possession Results
| Result | IND | TEN |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 4 | 2 |
| Field goals | 2 | 2 |
| Punts | 1 | 1 |
| Turnovers | 0 | 1 |
| Turnovers on downs | 0 | 1 |
| Missed field goals | 1 | 2 |
IND turnover edge: +1
- The Titans opened the scoring on their second possession, a 5-play, 21-yard drive that ended in a field goal.
All 18 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEN | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 1 | 0:49 | Interception |
| TEN | Q1 14:11 | 5 | 21 | 1:31 | Field goal |
| IND | Q1 12:40 | 9 | 59 | 5:03 | Field goal |
| TEN | Q1 7:37 | 3 | -9 | 2:21 | Punt |
| IND | Q1 5:16 | 9 | 77 | 4:09 | Touchdown |
| TEN | Q1 1:07 | 11 | 54 | 5:17 | Field goal |
| IND | Q2 10:50 | 3 | 5 | 1:37 | Punt |
| TEN | Q2 9:13 | 8 | 44 | 3:39 | Missed FG |
| IND | Q2 5:34 | 5 | 14 | 2:19 | Missed FG |
| TEN | Q2 3:15 | 6 | 15 | 2:38 | Missed FG |
| IND | Q2 0:37 | 5 | 30 | 0:37 | Field goal |
| IND | Q3 15:00 | 6 | 67 | 3:52 | Touchdown |
| TEN | Q3 11:08 | 13 | 73 | 5:59 | Touchdown |
| IND | Q3 5:09 | 7 | 80 | 3:42 | Touchdown |
| TEN | Q3 1:27 | 16 | 77 | 7:47 | Touchdown |
| IND | Q4 8:40 | 5 | 58 | 2:47 | Touchdown |
| TEN | Q4 5:53 | 4 | -1 | 1:18 | Downs |
| IND | Q4 4:35 | 7 | 8 | 4:35 | End of game |
About these numbers
The Colts' interception touchdown is counted as a Titans interception, not as a Colts possession. Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Colts vs Titans Head-to-Head
The Colts and Titans first met in 1970 and have played 63 times since. They have been AFC South rivals since 2002.
- All-time series
- 41–22Colts lead, 63 meetings since 1970
- Postseason
- 1–0Titans won in 1999
- Largest Colts win
- 35–32005
- Largest Titans win
- 45–262020
Since 2021
6–4 Colts lead
10 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- T
- T
- T
- T
- C
- C
- C
- C
- C
- C
Oldest to newest. C = Colts win, T = Titans win, outlined = this game.
2026 Meetings
- Week 6 Titans at Colts Upcoming
- Week 15 Colts at Titans Upcoming
Recent Meetings
- 2025 Wk 8 Titans at Colts, 2025 Wk 8 recap IND 38 TEN 14 IND W
- 2025 Wk 3 Colts at Titans IND 41 TEN 20 IND W
- 2024 Wk 16 Titans at Colts, 2024 Wk 16 recap IND 38 TEN 30 IND W
- 2024 Wk 6 Colts at Titans, 2024 Wk 6 recap IND 20 TEN 17 IND W
- 2023 Wk 13 Colts at Titans, 2023 Wk 13 recap IND 31 TEN 28 IND W
- 2023 Wk 5 Titans at Colts, 2023 Wk 5 recap IND 23 TEN 16 IND W
- 2022 Wk 7 Colts at Titans, 2022 Wk 7 recap TEN 19 IND 10 TEN W
- 2022 Wk 4 Titans at Colts, 2022 Wk 4 recap TEN 24 IND 17 TEN W
- 2021 Wk 8 Titans at Colts, 2021 Wk 8 recap TEN 34 IND 31 TEN W
- 2021 Wk 3 Colts at Titans, 2021 Wk 3 recap TEN 25 IND 16 TEN W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2025 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Colts | Stat | Titans |
|---|---|---|
| 8-9 | Record | 3-14 |
| 27.4 | Points per game | 16.7 |
| 345.9 | Yards per game | 259.6 |
| 5.8 | Yards per play | 4.4 |
| 24.2 | Points allowed per game | 28.1 |
| 349.8 | Yards allowed per game | 345.1 |
Colts vs Titans Fantasy Outlook for 2026
Two meetings are left on the 2026 schedule: Week 6 in Indianapolis and Week 15 in Tennessee. Here's how to decide who to play in your league.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Colts or Titans player start in Week 6? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Colts and Titans players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Colts and Titans defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere these two matchups fall in each team's fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2025 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Colts vs Titans Game FAQ
Who won the 2025 Colts vs Titans Week 3 game?
The Indianapolis Colts beat the Tennessee Titans 41–20 in Week 3 of the 2025 season. The game was played at Nissan Stadium in Nashville, TN, on September 21, 2025. See the Colts' 2025 schedule.
What was the final score of Colts vs Titans?
The final score was Colts 41, Titans 20. The Colts led 20–6 at halftime, and the second half went Colts 21, Titans 14.
What happened in the Colts vs Titans game?
Indianapolis led 20–6 at halftime and outscored Tennessee 21–14 after the break to win 41–20. The Colts finished with a 365–282 edge in total offense and averaged 6.9 yards per play. Jonathan Taylor led all players with 3 catches for 16 yards, plus 17 carries for 102 rushing yards and 3 touchdowns. The Titans committed 1 turnover, the Colts none.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Colts vs Titans?
Jonathan Taylor led the game with 32.8 PPR fantasy points, the RB1 of Week 3, on 3 catches for 16 yards, plus 17 carries for 102 rushing yards and 3 touchdowns. Michael Pittman was next with 19.3 (WR13). See Jonathan Taylor's 2025 game log.
Who led Colts vs Titans in passing, rushing and receiving?
Daniel Jones (IND) led all passers with 18 of 25 for 228 yards and a touchdown. Jonathan Taylor (IND) led in rushing with 17 carries for 102 yards and 3 touchdowns. Michael Pittman (IND) led in receiving with 6 catches for 73 yards and a touchdown.
How many fantasy points did Jonathan Taylor score against the Titans?
Jonathan Taylor scored 32.8 points in PPR leagues, 31.3 in half-PPR and 29.8 in standard scoring against the Titans in Week 3 of the 2025 season, on 3 catches for 16 yards, plus 17 carries for 102 rushing yards and 3 touchdowns. He handled 61% of his team's carries.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Colts vs Titans?
Jonathan Taylor outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 32.8 PPR points on 17.8 xFP (+15.0). Calvin Ridley fell furthest short, with 3.7 points on 11.9 xFP (−8.2). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Colts vs Titans?
Cam Ward had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 18.8 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 13.0. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the Colts beat the Titans?
The Colts beat the Titans 41–20 because they averaged 6.9 yards per play to 4.3, won the turnover battle 1–0, and outgained them 365–282.
Which team won the turnover battle in Colts vs Titans?
The Colts won the turnover battle 1–0: the Titans gave the ball away 1 time and the Colts not at all. The Colts won the game.
What is the all-time Colts vs Titans record?
The Colts lead the all-time series 41–22 across 63 meetings since 1970, including a 0–1 record in the postseason.
When did the Colts and Titans last play before this game?
Before Week 3 of 2025, they last met in the 2024 season on December 22, 2024, when the Colts beat the Titans 38–30.
Have the Colts and Titans met in the playoffs?
Yes, 1 time, most recently in the 1999 playoffs. The Colts are 0–1 against the Titans in the postseason.
What is the Colts vs Titans record since 2021?
The Colts lead 6–4 across 10 meetings since the 2021 season, including this game.
