Final2022 Week 4
Levi's Stadium, Santa Clara, CA|
Los Angeles Rams vs San Francisco 49ers, Week 4 2022
Los Angeles Rams
Away
9
San Francisco 49ers
HomeWon
24
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rams | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 9 |
| 49ers | 7 | 7 | 0 | 10 | 24 |
LAR 9 · SF 24 Final
Passing leader
LAR · QB
7.8PPR pts
32/48, 254 YDS, 1 INT
Top fantasy scorer
LAR · WR
26.2PPR pts
14 REC, 122 YDS
Rams leader
LAR · TE
17.3PPR pts
10 REC, 73 YDS
Defensive playmaker
Talanoa Hufanga
SF
1 INT, 1 TD, 4 TKL
49ers 24, Rams 9: San Francisco leads from start to finish
San Francisco led 14–6 at halftime and outscored Los Angeles 10–3 after the break to win 24–9. The 49ers finished with a 327–257 edge in total offense and averaged 6.7 yards per play.
The gap showed up everywhere. The Rams went 5-for-15 on third down and committed two turnovers, while the 49ers finished without a giveaway.
The two teams meet again in Week 14 of 2026. If you roster anyone from either side, run the start/sit call in Redraft Command and it will weigh your lineup, your opponent and your league scoring, not only the player rankings.
Key advantages
- +3.2 yards/play SF 6.7 · LAR 3.5
- +2 turnover margin SF 0 turnovers
- +70 total yards SF 327 · LAR 257
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Ram or 49er on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the 49ers Won
San Francisco won the efficiency, turnover, and third-down battles.
| Rams | Stat | 49ers |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5 | Yards per play | 6.7 |
| 2 | Turnovers | 0 |
| 257 | Total yards | 327 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 73 | Plays | 49 |
| 33% | Third-down conversion | 42% |
| 34:34 | Time of possession | 25:26 |
Scoring Summary
The 49ers scored three touchdowns and one field goal; the Rams scored three field goals.
| Time | Team | Play | LAR | SF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 6:48 | LAR | Matt Gay 39-yard FG Takes lead | 3 | 0 |
| 2:46 | SF | Jeff Wilson Jr. 32-yard TD run Takes leadRobbie Gould XP | 3 | 7 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 6:22 | LAR | Matt Gay 29-yard FG | 6 | 7 |
| 2:46 | SF | Jimmy Garoppolo → Deebo Samuel, 57-yard TD Extends leadRobbie Gould XP | 6 | 14 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 4:25 | LAR | Matt Gay 26-yard FG | 9 | 14 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 14:53 | SF | Robbie Gould 25-yard FG Extends lead | 9 | 17 |
| 6:27 | SF | Talanoa Hufanga 52-yard interception return TD Extends leadRobbie Gould XP | 9 | 24 |
Fantasy Points: Rams vs 49ers, Week 4 2022
Fantasy leaders
- Cooper KuppLAR · WR26.2 PTSWR3
- Deebo SamuelSF · WR23.7 PTSWR6
- Tyler HigbeeLAR · TE17.3 PTSTE4
- Jimmy GaroppoloSF · QB13.9 PTSQB22
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.8 | QB29 | 32/48 | 254 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 71.0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 13.9 | QB22 | 16/27 | 239 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 100.7 |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26.2 | WR3 | WR | — | — | — | 19 | 14 | 122 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 23.7 | WR6 | WR | 2 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 6 | 115 | 1 | ||
| 17.3 | TE4 | TE | — | — | — | 14 | 10 | 73 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 13.4 | RB21 | RB | 18 | 74 | 1 | — | — | — | — | ||
| 7.7 | WR50 | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | 37 | 0 | ||
| 6.9 | RB43 | RB | 7 | 27 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 12 | 0 | ||
| 5.3 | WR66 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 33 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.4 | TE37 | TE | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 24 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.2 | WR75 | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 22 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.7 | WR85 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 2 | 7 | 0 | ||
| 1.7 | TE51 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | ||
| 1.6 | WR95 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 6 | 0 | ||
| 1.3 | RB68 | RB | 8 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 1.1 | WR103 | WR | 1 | 11 | 0 | — | — | — | — | ||
| 0.0 | — | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0.0 | — | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
Fantasy Usage
Los Angeles Rams
Snap Share
Cooper KuppWR74 snaps100%
Allen RobinsonWR73 snaps99%
Tyler HigbeeTE69 snaps93%
Ben SkowronekWR65 snaps88%
Darrell HendersonRB44 snaps59%
Target Share48 targets
- Cooper Kupp40%, 19 targets
- Tyler Higbee29%, 14 targets
- Allen Robinson13%, 6 targets
- Darrell Henderson8%, 4 targets
- Ben Skowronek6%, 3 targets
- Other4%, 2 targets
Carry Share18 carries
- Cam Akers44%, 8 carries
- Darrell Henderson39%, 7 carries
- Matthew Stafford11%, 2 carries
- Brandon Powell6%, 1 carries
San Francisco 49ers
Snap Share
George KittleTE47 snaps94%
Brandon AiyukWR46 snaps92%
Deebo SamuelWR40 snaps80%
Jeff WilsonRB33 snaps66%
Charlie WoernerTE19 snaps38%
Target Share24 targets
- Deebo Samuel29%, 7 targets
- George Kittle17%, 4 targets
- Brandon Aiyuk17%, 4 targets
- Jauan Jennings17%, 4 targets
- Ray-Ray McCloud13%, 3 targets
- Other8%, 2 targets
Carry Share21 carries
- Jeff Wilson86%, 18 carries
- Deebo Samuel10%, 2 carries
- Jimmy Garoppolo5%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 74 | 100% | 19 | 40% | 0 | |
| 73 | 99% | 6 | 13% | 0 | |
| 47 | 94% | 4 | 17% | 0 | |
| 69 | 93% | 14 | 29% | 0 | |
| 46 | 92% | 4 | 17% | 0 | |
| 65 | 88% | 3 | 6% | 0 | |
| 40 | 80% | 7 | 29% | 2 | |
| 33 | 66% | 0 | 0% | 18 | |
| 44 | 59% | 4 | 8% | 7 | |
| 19 | 38% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 28 | 38% | 1 | 2% | 8 | |
| 18 | 36% | 4 | 17% | 0 | |
| 9 | 18% | 3 | 13% | 0 | |
| 8 | 11% | 1 | 2% | 0 | |
| 5 | 10% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 6 | 8% | 0 | 0% | 1 | |
| 2 | 3% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 1 | 2% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 1 | 1% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+10.8Deebo Samuel Sr.23.7 PTS vs 12.9 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−13.8Matthew Stafford7.8 PTS vs 21.6 xFP
- Highest expected volume31.6 xFPCooper Kupp26.2 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooper KuppLAR · WR | 26.2 | 31.6 | −5.4 | 100% | 40% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 19 | 40% |
| Tyler HigbeeLAR · TE | 17.3 | 23.3 | −6.0 | 93% | 29% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 14 | 29% |
| Matthew StaffordLAR · QB | 7.8 | 21.6 | −13.8 | 100% | 48 att | — | 48 | 2 | 11% | 0 | 0% |
| Deebo Samuel Sr.SF · WR | 23.7 | 12.9 | +10.8 | 80% | 28% tgt | — | 0 | 2 | 9% | 7 | 28% |
| Jimmy GaroppoloSF · QB | 13.9 | 12.1 | +1.8 | 100% | 27 att | — | 27 | 1 | 5% | 0 | 0% |
| Jeff Wilson Jr.SF · RB | 13.4 | 11.6 | +1.8 | 66% | 82% car | — | 0 | 18 | 82% | 0 | 0% |
| Darrell Henderson Jr.LAR · RB | 6.9 | 11.2 | −4.3 | 59% | 39% car | — | 0 | 7 | 39% | 4 | 8% |
| Allen RobinsonLAR · WR | 2.7 | 10.0 | −7.3 | 99% | 13% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 13% |
| Cam AkersLAR · RB | 1.3 | 6.8 | −5.5 | 38% | 44% car | — | 0 | 8 | 44% | 1 | 2% |
| Brandon AiyukSF · WR | 7.7 | 6.7 | +1.0 | 92% | 16% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 16% |
| George KittleSF · TE | 4.4 | 6.7 | −2.3 | 94% | 16% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 16% |
| Jauan JenningsSF · WR | 4.2 | 6.7 | −2.5 | 36% | 16% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 16% |
| Ben SkowronekLAR · WR | 5.3 | 5.0 | +0.3 | 88% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 6% |
| Ray-Ray McCloud IIISF · WR | 1.6 | 5.0 | −3.4 | 18% | 12% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 12% |
| Kyle JuszczykSF · RB | 5.4 | 2.3 | +3.1 | — | 5% car | — | 0 | 1 | 5% | 1 | 4% |
| Charlie WoernerSF · TE | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 38% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Kendall BlantonLAR · TE | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 11% | 2% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 2% |
| Ross DwelleySF · TE | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 10% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Brandon PowellLAR · WR | 1.1 | 0.6 | +0.5 | 8% | 6% car | — | 0 | 1 | 6% | 0 | 0% |
Team totals: Rams 48 targets and 18 carries; 49ers 25 targets and 22 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2022 season: 1.67 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.64 per carry and 0.42 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Matthew Stafford Unlucky
LAR · QB · 7.8 pts on 21.6 expected
32 of 48 passing for 254 yards, 1 interception; 2 carries for 6 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 21.6 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 3 games + this one (PPR): 9.8, 20.9, 10.2, 7.8
W1W2W3W4
Lowest-scoring game of the season.
Jimmy Garoppolo
SF · QB · 13.9 pts on 12.1 expected
16 of 27 passing for 239 yards, 1 touchdown; 1 carry for 3 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 12.1 expected.
Cooper Kupp Volume, no payoff
LAR · WR · 26.2 pts on 31.6 expected
19 targets (40% of the team's), 14 catches for 122 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 31.6 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 3 games + this one (PPR): 31.8, 30.8, 16.4, 26.2
W1W2W3W4
Season high in targets (19).
Tyler Higbee Unlucky
LAR · TE · 17.3 pts on 23.3 expected
14 targets (29% of the team's), 10 catches for 73 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 23.3 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 3 games + this one (PPR): 8.9, 14.1, 10.1, 17.3
W1W2W3W4
Season high in targets (14). Best fantasy game of the season.
Deebo Samuel Sr. Ran hot
SF · WR · 23.7 pts on 12.9 expected
7 targets (28% of the team's), 6 catches for 115 yards and 1 touchdown; 2 carries (9% of the team's) for 2 yards.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 12.9 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 3 games + this one (PPR): 11.6, 13.7, 12.9, 23.7
W1W2W3W4
Best fantasy game of the season.
Jeff Wilson Jr. Strong role
SF · RB · 13.4 pts on 11.6 expected
18 carries (82% of the team's) for 74 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 11.6 expected.
Last 3 games + this one (PPR): 5.0, 12.3, 10.6, 13.4
W1W2W3W4
Best fantasy game of the season.
Allen Robinson Unlucky
LAR · WR · 2.7 pts on 10.0 expected
6 targets (13% of the team's), 2 catches for 7 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 10.0 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 3 games + this one (PPR): 2.2, 15.3, 4.3, 2.7
W1W2W3W4
Season high in targets (6).
Cam Akers Unlucky
LAR · RB · 1.3 pts on 6.8 expected
1 target (2% of the team's), 0 catches for 0 yards; 8 carries (44% of the team's) for 13 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 6.8 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 3 games + this one (PPR): 0.0, 8.2, 9.1, 1.3
W1W2W3W4
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2022 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Rams D | 49ers D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 14.9 | 14.6 |
| RBs | 21.1 | 15.5 |
| WRs | 31.8 | 36.4 |
| TEs | 11.1 | 10.2 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
San Francisco opened at 56% win probability and passed 98% in the fourth quarter on the way to the win.
49ers win probability
Key Swings
- −10Gay 39-yd FG55% → 46%Q1 6:48
- +23Wilson 32-yd TD run45% → 68%Q1 2:46
- −11Gay 29-yd FG69% → 58%Q2 6:22
- +24Garoppolo → Samuel, 57-yd TD58% → 82%Q2 2:46
- −10Gay 26-yd FG87% → 77%Q3 4:25
Swing in 49ers win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Los Angeles Rams | Measure | San Francisco 49ers |
|---|---|---|
| 73 | Plays | 49 |
| 75% | Pass rate | 55% |
| 3.6 | Yds / dropback | 8.9 |
| 3.2 | Yds / carry | 4.0 |
| 5/15 | Third downs | 5/12 |
Efficiency edge San Francisco ran 24 fewer plays but gained 5.3 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- LAR Kupp 40% · Higbee 29% · Robinson 13%
- SF Samuel 28% · Aiyuk 16% · Kittle 16%
Possession Results
| Result | LAR | SF |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 0 | 2 |
| Field goals | 3 | 1 |
| Punts | 4 | 4 |
| Turnovers | 2 | 0 |
| Turnovers on downs | 0 | 1 |
| Missed field goals | 0 | 1 |
SF turnover edge: +2
- The Rams opened the scoring on their first possession, a 14-play, 54-yard drive that ended in a field goal.
- The 49ers drained the clock with two second-half drives of four to five minutes.
All 19 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAR | Q1 15:00 | 14 | 54 | 8:12 | Field goal |
| SF | Q1 6:48 | 8 | 75 | 4:02 | Touchdown |
| LAR | Q1 2:46 | 3 | -7 | 1:19 | Punt |
| SF | Q1 1:27 | 6 | 31 | 3:47 | Punt |
| LAR | Q2 12:40 | 3 | 1 | 0:49 | Punt |
| SF | Q2 11:51 | 3 | 0 | 0:21 | Punt |
| LAR | Q2 11:30 | 10 | 54 | 5:08 | Field goal |
| SF | Q2 6:22 | 6 | 75 | 3:36 | Touchdown |
| LAR | Q2 2:46 | 6 | 0 | 2:15 | Punt |
| SF | Q2 0:31 | 4 | 6 | 0:31 | Downs |
| SF | Q3 15:00 | 5 | 26 | 2:52 | Punt |
| LAR | Q3 12:08 | 16 | 75 | 7:43 | Field goal |
| SF | Q3 4:25 | 9 | 67 | 4:32 | Field goal |
| LAR | Q4 14:53 | 3 | 0 | 1:34 | Punt |
| SF | Q4 13:19 | 7 | 31 | 4:41 | Missed FG |
| LAR | Q4 8:38 | 5 | 23 | 2:11 | Interception |
| LAR | Q4 6:27 | 13 | 44 | 4:38 | Fumble |
| SF | Q4 1:49 | 3 | 1 | 1:04 | Punt |
| LAR | Q4 0:45 | 3 | 18 | 0:45 | End of game |
About these numbers
The 49ers' interception touchdown is counted as a Rams interception, not as a 49ers possession. Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Rams vs 49ers Head-to-Head
The Rams and 49ers first met in 1950 and have played 155 times since. They have been NFC West rivals since 1970.
- All-time series
- 80–72–349ers lead, 155 meetings since 1950
- Postseason
- 1–1Rams won in 2021; 49ers won in 1989
- Largest Rams win
- 56–71958
- Largest 49ers win
- 48–01987
Since 2021
7–5 49ers lead
12 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- 4
- 4
- R
- 4
- 4
- 4
- R
- R
- R
- 4
- R
- 4
Oldest to newest. 4 = 49ers win, R = Rams win, outlined = this game.
2026 Meetings
- Week 14 Rams at 49ers Upcoming
Recent Meetings
- 2026 Wk 1 49ers vs Rams, 2026 Wk 1 recap SF 27 LAR 7 SF W
- 2025 Wk 10 Rams at 49ers, 2025 Wk 10 recap LAR 42 SF 26 LAR W
- 2025 Wk 5 49ers at Rams, 2025 Wk 5 recap SF 26 LAR 23 SF W
- 2024 Wk 15 Rams at 49ers, 2024 Wk 15 recap LAR 12 SF 6 LAR W
- 2024 Wk 3 49ers at Rams, 2024 Wk 3 recap LAR 27 SF 24 LAR W
- 2023 Wk 18 Rams at 49ers, 2023 Wk 18 recap LAR 21 SF 20 LAR W
- 2023 Wk 2 49ers at Rams, 2023 Wk 2 recap SF 30 LAR 23 SF W
- 2022 Wk 8 49ers at Rams, 2022 Wk 8 recap SF 31 LAR 14 SF W
- 2022 Wk 4 Rams at 49ers SF 24 LAR 9 SF W
- 2021 Conference Championship 49ers at Rams, 2021 Conference Championship recap LAR 20 SF 17 LAR W
- 2021 Wk 18 49ers at Rams, 2021 Wk 18 recap SF 27 LAR 24 SF W
- 2021 Wk 10 Rams at 49ers, 2021 Wk 10 recap SF 31 LAR 10 SF W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2022 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Rams | Stat | 49ers |
|---|---|---|
| 5-12 | Record | 13-4 |
| 18.1 | Points per game | 26.5 |
| 280.5 | Yards per game | 365.6 |
| 4.8 | Yards per play | 5.9 |
| 22.6 | Points allowed per game | 16.3 |
| 341.1 | Yards allowed per game | 300.6 |
Rams vs 49ers Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- SF −249ers covered by 13
- Total
- 42Under: 33 points scored (by 9)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 49ers | 22.0 | 24 | +2.0 |
| Rams | 20.0 | 9 | −11.0 |
The 49ers beat their implied total and the Rams fell short of theirs; the Fantasy tab has the player lines behind it.
Betting Trends
Last 4 meetings: 49ers 4–0 ATS, unders 3–1.
Each team's 2022 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
Los Angeles Rams
- Against the spread
- 1–3
- Over/under
- 1–3
- ATS as favorite
- 1–1
- ATS as underdog
- 0–2
- ATS on the road
- 1–1
San Francisco 49ers
- Against the spread
- 2–2
- Over/under
- 0–4
- ATS as favorite
- 2–2
- ATS at home
- 2–0
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Rams vs 49ers Fantasy Outlook for 2026
One meeting is left on the 2026 schedule: Week 14 in San Francisco. Here's how to decide who to play in your league.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Rams or 49ers player start in Week 14? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Rams and 49ers players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Rams and 49ers defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere this matchup falls in each team's fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2022 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Rams vs 49ers Game FAQ
Who won the 2022 Rams vs 49ers Week 4 game?
The San Francisco 49ers beat the Los Angeles Rams 24–9 in Week 4 of the 2022 season. The game was played at Levi's Stadium in Santa Clara, CA, on October 3, 2022. See the 49ers' 2022 schedule.
What was the final score of Rams vs 49ers?
The final score was 49ers 24, Rams 9. The 49ers led 14–6 at halftime, and the second half went Rams 3, 49ers 10.
What happened in the Rams vs 49ers game?
San Francisco led 14–6 at halftime and outscored Los Angeles 10–3 after the break to win 24–9. The 49ers finished with a 327–257 edge in total offense and averaged 6.7 yards per play. Cooper Kupp led all players with 14 catches for 122 yards. The Rams committed 2 turnovers, the 49ers none.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Rams vs 49ers?
Cooper Kupp led the game with 26.2 PPR fantasy points, the WR3 of Week 4, on 14 catches for 122 yards. Deebo Samuel was next with 23.7 (WR6). See Cooper Kupp's 2022 game log.
Who led Rams vs 49ers in passing, rushing and receiving?
Matthew Stafford (LAR) led all passers with 32 of 48 for 254 yards and an interception. Jeff Wilson (SF) led in rushing with 18 carries for 74 yards and a touchdown. Cooper Kupp (LAR) led in receiving with 14 catches for 122 yards.
How many fantasy points did Cooper Kupp score against the 49ers?
Cooper Kupp scored 26.2 points in PPR leagues, 19.2 in half-PPR and 12.2 in standard scoring against the 49ers in Week 4 of the 2022 season, on 14 catches for 122 yards. He drew 40% of his team's targets.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Rams vs 49ers?
Deebo Samuel Sr. outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 23.7 PPR points on 12.9 xFP (+10.8). Matthew Stafford fell furthest short, with 7.8 points on 21.6 xFP (−13.8). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
How did the 49ers beat the Rams?
The 49ers beat the Rams 24–9 because they averaged 6.7 yards per play to 3.5, won the turnover battle 2–0, and outgained them 327–257.
Which team won the turnover battle in Rams vs 49ers?
The 49ers won the turnover battle 2–0: the Rams gave the ball away 2 times and the 49ers not at all. The 49ers won the game.
What is the all-time Rams vs 49ers record?
The 49ers lead the all-time series 80–72–3 across 155 meetings since 1950, including a 1–1 record in the postseason.
When did the Rams and 49ers last play before this game?
Before Week 4 of 2022, they last met in the 2021 playoffs on January 30, 2022, when the Rams beat the 49ers 20–17.
Have the Rams and 49ers met in the playoffs?
Yes, 2 times, most recently in the 2021 playoffs. The Rams are 1–1 against the 49ers in the postseason.
What was the closing spread for Rams vs 49ers?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was 49ers −2, making the San Francisco 49ers 2-point favorites, with a closing total of 42. That implied about 22.0 points for the 49ers and 20.0 for the Rams.
Did Rams vs 49ers go over or under the total?
The game went under. The consensus closing total was 42, and the teams combined for 33 points, 9 under the number.
Who covered the spread in Rams vs 49ers?
The 49ers covered by 13 against the closing line of 49ers −2. The final margin was 15 points.
