Final2026 Week 1
Melbourne Cricket Ground, Melbourne, VIC|
San Francisco 49ers vs Los Angeles Rams, Week 1 2026
San Francisco 49ers
Won
27
Los Angeles Rams
7
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49ers | 3 | 7 | 7 | 10 | 27 |
| Rams | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
SF 27 · LAR 7 Final
Passing leader
SF · QB
22.1PPR pts
25/34, 205 YDS, 3 TD, 1 INT
Top fantasy scorer
Deebo Samuel Sr.
SF · WR
18.0PPR pts
6 REC, 48 YDS, 1 TD
Rams leader
LAR · RB
15.5PPR pts
11 ATT, 41 YDS, 1 TD, 3 REC, 24 REC YDS
Defensive playmaker
Quentin Lake
LAR
1 INT, 10 TKL
49ers 27, Rams 7: San Francisco leads from start to finish
San Francisco led 10–7 at halftime and outscored Los Angeles 17–0 after the break to win 27–7. The 49ers finished with a 379–290 edge in total offense and averaged 5.9 yards per play.
The gap showed up everywhere. The Rams went 2-for-9 on third down and committed two turnovers, while the 49ers kept the ball for 33:50.
The two teams meet again in Week 14 of 2026. If you roster anyone from either side, run the start/sit call in Redraft Command and it will weigh your lineup, your opponent and your league scoring, not only the player rankings.
Key advantages
- +0.8 yards/play SF 5.9 · LAR 5.1
- +1 turnover margin SF 1 · LAR 2 turnovers
- +89 total yards SF 379 · LAR 290
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a 49er or Ram on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the 49ers Won
San Francisco won the efficiency, turnover, third-down, and time of possession battles.
| 49ers | Stat | Rams |
|---|---|---|
| 5.9 | Yards per play | 5.1 |
| 1 | Turnovers | 2 |
| 379 | Total yards | 290 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 64 | Plays | 57 |
| 58% | Third-down conversion | 22% |
| 33:50 | Time of possession | 26:10 |
Scoring Summary
The 49ers scored three touchdowns and two field goals; the Rams scored one touchdown.
| Time | Team | Play | SF | LAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 6:15 | SF | Eddy Pineiro 20-yard FG Takes lead | 3 | 0 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 14:57 | LAR | Kyren Williams 5-yard TD run Takes leadHarrison Mevis XP | 3 | 7 |
| 4:28 | SF | Brock Purdy → Demarcus Robinson, 39-yard TD Takes leadEddy Pineiro XP | 10 | 7 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 11:03 | SF | Brock Purdy → Mike Evans, 2-yard TD Extends leadEddy Pineiro XP | 17 | 7 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 12:57 | SF | Brock Purdy → Deebo Samuel Sr., 15-yard TD Extends leadEddy Pineiro XP | 24 | 7 |
| 9:43 | SF | Eddy Pineiro 56-yard FG Extends lead | 27 | 7 |
Fantasy Points: 49ers vs Rams, Week 1 2026
Fantasy leaders
- Brock PurdySF · QB22.1 PTSQB10
- Deebo SamuelSF · WR18.0 PTSWR13
- Mike EvansSF · WR16.9 PTSWR14
- Kyren WilliamsLAR · RB15.5 PTSRB15
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22.1 | QB10 | 25/34 | 205 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 29 | 0 | 105.6 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.1 | QB32 | 15/25 | 155 | 0 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 61.2 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.4 | QB34 | 2/3 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 75.7 |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18.0 | WR13 | WR | 1 | 12 | 0 | 7 | 6 | 48 | 1 | ||
| 16.9 | WR14 | WR | — | — | — | 7 | 6 | 49 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 15.5 | RB15 | RB | 11 | 41 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 24 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 13.8 | RB19 | RB | 10 | 68 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 20 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 13.0 | WR25 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 50 | 1 | ||
| 12.4 | WR27 | WR | — | — | — | 9 | 5 | 74 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 8.0 | RB36 | RB | 14 | 65 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.6 | WR66 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 3 | 26 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.4 | RB41 | RB | 10 | 54 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.9 | TE33 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.4 | RB54 | RB | 5 | 19 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | ||
| 3.2 | TE41 | TE | — | — | — | 5 | 2 | 12 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.3 | TE46 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.8 | WR98 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.6 | TE56 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 6 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.2 | TE62 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
Fantasy Usage
San Francisco 49ers
Snap Share
Mike EvansWR49 snaps75%
Luke FarrellTE46 snaps71%
Demarcus RobinsonWR41 snaps63%
Christian McCaffreyRB36 snaps55%
Kyle JuszczykRB33 snaps51%
Target Share33 targets
- Christian McCaffrey24%, 8 targets
- Mike Evans21%, 7 targets
- Deebo Samuel21%, 7 targets
- George Kittle15%, 5 targets
- Demarcus Robinson9%, 3 targets
- Other9%, 3 targets
Carry Share30 carries
- Kaelon Black47%, 14 carries
- Christian McCaffrey33%, 10 carries
- Brock Purdy17%, 5 carries
- Deebo Samuel3%, 1 carries
Los Angeles Rams
Snap Share
Colby ParkinsonTE47 snaps77%
Puka NacuaWR43 snaps70%
Kyren WilliamsRB39 snaps64%
Davante AdamsWR33 snaps54%
Terrance FergusonTE31 snaps51%
Target Share27 targets
- Puka Nacua33%, 9 targets
- Davante Adams22%, 6 targets
- Kyren Williams11%, 3 targets
- Tyler Higbee7%, 2 targets
- Colby Parkinson7%, 2 targets
- Other19%, 5 targets
Carry Share29 carries
- Kyren Williams38%, 11 carries
- Blake Corum34%, 10 carries
- Ronnie Rivers17%, 5 carries
- Matthew Stafford7%, 2 carries
- Stetson Bennett3%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47 | 77% | 2 | 7% | 0 | |
| 49 | 75% | 7 | 21% | 0 | |
| 46 | 71% | 2 | 6% | 0 | |
| 43 | 70% | 9 | 33% | 0 | |
| 39 | 64% | 3 | 11% | 11 | |
| 41 | 63% | 3 | 9% | 0 | |
| 36 | 55% | 8 | 24% | 10 | |
| 33 | 54% | 6 | 22% | 0 | |
| 31 | 51% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 33 | 51% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 30 | 46% | 5 | 15% | 0 | |
| 28 | 43% | 1 | 3% | 14 | |
| 27 | 42% | 7 | 21% | 1 | |
| 25 | 41% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 21 | 34% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 21 | 32% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 16 | 26% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 16 | 26% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 14 | 23% | 0 | 0% | 10 | |
| 12 | 20% | 2 | 7% | 0 | |
| 8 | 13% | 1 | 4% | 5 | |
| 8 | 12% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 5 | 8% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 1 | 2% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+7.8Demarcus Robinson13.0 PTS vs 5.2 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−7.8Matthew Stafford5.1 PTS vs 12.9 xFP
- Highest expected volume20.0 xFPChristian McCaffrey13.8 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christian McCaffreySF · RB | 13.8 | 20.0 | −6.2 | 55% | 33% car | — | 0 | 10 | 33% | 8 | 24% |
| Brock PurdySF · QB | 22.1 | 18.9 | +3.2 | 100% | 34 att | — | 34 | 5 | 17% | 0 | 0% |
| Puka NacuaLAR · WR | 12.4 | 15.7 | −3.3 | 70% | 33% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 9 | 33% |
| Matthew StaffordLAR · QB | 5.1 | 12.9 | −7.8 | 84% | 25 att | — | 25 | 2 | 7% | 0 | 0% |
| Deebo Samuel Sr.SF · WR | 18.0 | 12.8 | +5.2 | 42% | 21% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 7 | 21% |
| Mike EvansSF · WR | 16.9 | 12.2 | +4.7 | 75% | 21% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 21% |
| Kyren WilliamsLAR · RB | 15.5 | 11.9 | +3.6 | 64% | 38% car | — | 0 | 11 | 38% | 3 | 11% |
| Davante AdamsLAR · WR | 5.6 | 10.5 | −4.9 | 54% | 22% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 22% |
| Kaelon BlackSF · RB | 8.0 | 10.2 | −2.2 | 43% | 47% car | — | 0 | 14 | 47% | 1 | 3% |
| George KittleSF · TE | 3.2 | 8.7 | −5.5 | 46% | 15% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 15% |
| Blake CorumLAR · RB | 5.4 | 6.0 | −0.6 | 23% | 34% car | — | 0 | 10 | 34% | 0 | 0% |
| Demarcus RobinsonSF · WR | 13.0 | 5.2 | +7.8 | 63% | 9% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 9% |
| Ronnie RiversLAR · RB | 3.4 | 4.8 | −1.4 | 13% | 17% car | — | 0 | 5 | 17% | 1 | 4% |
| Colby ParkinsonLAR · TE | 1.6 | 3.5 | −1.9 | 77% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 7% |
| Luke FarrellSF · TE | 3.9 | 3.5 | +0.4 | 71% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 6% |
| Tyler HigbeeLAR · TE | 1.2 | 3.5 | −2.3 | 20% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 7% |
| Stetson Bennett IVLAR · QB | 1.4 | 2.0 | −0.6 | 16% | 3 att | — | 3 | 1 | 3% | 0 | 0% |
| Davis AllenLAR · TE | 2.3 | 1.7 | +0.6 | 34% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Jake BrendelSF · — | 1.2 | 1.7 | −0.5 | — | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Jordan WhittingtonLAR · WR | 1.8 | 1.7 | +0.1 | 41% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Konata MumpfieldLAR · WR | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 26% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Terrance FergusonLAR · TE | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 51% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
Team totals: 49ers 34 targets and 30 carries; Rams 27 targets and 29 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2026 season: 1.75 PPR points per target (68% catch rate), 0.60 per carry and 0.47 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Brock Purdy
SF · QB · 22.1 pts on 18.9 expected
25 of 34 passing for 205 yards, 3 touchdowns, 1 interception; 5 carries for 29 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 18.9 expected. Next up: Week 4 against the Broncos. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Brock Purdy →Matthew Stafford Unlucky
LAR · QB · 5.1 pts on 12.9 expected
15 of 25 passing for 155 yards, 1 interception; 2 carries for -1 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 12.9 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't. Next up: Week 4 against the Eagles. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Matthew Stafford →Christian McCaffrey Unlucky
SF · RB · 13.8 pts on 20.0 expected
8 targets (24% of the team's), 5 catches for 20 yards; 10 carries (33% of the team's) for 68 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 20.0 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't. Next up: Week 4 against the Broncos. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Christian McCaffrey →Deebo Samuel Sr. Ran hot
SF · WR · 18.0 pts on 12.8 expected
7 targets (21% of the team's), 6 catches for 48 yards and 1 touchdown; 1 carry (3% of the team's) for 12 yards.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 12.8 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat. Next up: Week 4 against the Broncos. Bet on the role more than the result.
Puka Nacua Volume, no payoff
LAR · WR · 12.4 pts on 15.7 expected
9 targets (33% of the team's), 5 catches for 74 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 15.7 expected. Next up: Week 4 against the Eagles. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Puka Nacua →Kyren Williams
LAR · RB · 15.5 pts on 11.9 expected
3 targets (11% of the team's), 3 catches for 24 yards; 11 carries (38% of the team's) for 41 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 11.9 expected. Next up: Week 4 against the Eagles. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Kyren Williams →George Kittle Unlucky
SF · TE · 3.2 pts on 8.7 expected
5 targets (15% of the team's), 2 catches for 12 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 8.7 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't. Next up: Week 4 against the Broncos. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: George Kittle →Demarcus Robinson Ran hot
SF · WR · 13.0 pts on 5.2 expected
3 targets (9% of the team's), 2 catches for 50 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 5.2 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat. Next up: Week 4 against the Broncos. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit Decisions
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2026 through Week 3.
| Points allowed to | 49ers D | Rams D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 14.9 | 15.8 |
| RBs | 22.7 | 17.4 |
| WRs | 28.1 | 29.4 |
| TEs | 11.1 | 7.7 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Los Angeles opened at 60% win probability and fell below 2% in the fourth quarter.
Rams win probability
Key Swings
- −10Pineiro 20-yd FG59% → 50%Q1 6:15
- +23Williams 5-yd TD run49% → 71%Q2 14:57
- −26Purdy → Robinson, 39-yd TD72% → 46%Q2 4:28
- −26Purdy → Evans, 2-yd TD43% → 17%Q3 11:03
- −7Purdy → Samuel, 15-yd TD7% → <1%Q4 12:57
Swing in Rams win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| San Francisco 49ers | Measure | Los Angeles Rams |
|---|---|---|
| 64 | Plays | 57 |
| 53% | Pass rate | 49% |
| 6.0 | Yds / dropback | 6.0 |
| 5.8 | Yds / carry | 4.2 |
| 7/12 | Third downs | 2/9 |
Efficiency edge San Francisco ran 7 more plays and gained 1.6 more yards per carry.
- Top targets
- SF McCaffrey 24% · Samuel 21% · Evans 21%
- LAR Nacua 33% · Adams 22% · Williams 11%
Possession Results
| Result | SF | LAR |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 3 | 1 |
| Field goals | 2 | 0 |
| Punts | 2 | 3 |
| Turnovers | 1 | 2 |
| Turnovers on downs | 0 | 2 |
| Missed field goals | 1 | 0 |
SF turnover edge: +1
- The 49ers opened the scoring on their first possession, a 15-play, 65-yard drive that ended in a field goal.
- The 49ers drained the clock with two second-half drives of four to six minutes.
All 19 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAR | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 9 | 1:32 | Punt |
| SF | Q1 13:28 | 15 | 65 | 7:13 | Field goal |
| LAR | Q1 6:15 | 6 | 15 | 2:57 | Punt |
| SF | Q1 3:18 | 3 | 8 | 1:26 | Punt |
| LAR | Q1 1:52 | 4 | 57 | 1:55 | Touchdown |
| SF | Q2 14:57 | 6 | 23 | 2:53 | Interception |
| LAR | Q2 12:04 | 7 | 34 | 3:12 | Interception |
| SF | Q2 8:52 | 9 | 86 | 4:24 | Touchdown |
| LAR | Q2 4:28 | 4 | 13 | 1:45 | Punt |
| SF | Q2 2:43 | 5 | 41 | 2:23 | Punt |
| LAR | Q2 0:20 | 1 | -1 | 0:20 | End of half |
| SF | Q3 15:00 | 7 | 51 | 3:57 | Touchdown |
| LAR | Q3 11:03 | 12 | 72 | 7:22 | Downs |
| SF | Q3 3:41 | 11 | 99 | 5:44 | Touchdown |
| LAR | Q4 12:57 | 4 | 20 | 1:49 | Fumble |
| SF | Q4 11:08 | 4 | 5 | 1:25 | Field goal |
| LAR | Q4 9:43 | 6 | 19 | 1:49 | Downs |
| SF | Q4 7:54 | 7 | 16 | 4:25 | Missed FG |
| LAR | Q4 3:29 | 10 | 45 | 3:29 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
49ers vs Rams Head-to-Head
The 49ers and Rams first met in 1950 and have played 155 times since. They have been NFC West rivals since 1970.
- All-time series
- 80–72–349ers lead, 155 meetings since 1950
- Postseason
- 1–149ers won in 1989; Rams won in 2021
- Largest 49ers win
- 48–01987
- Largest Rams win
- 56–71958
Since 2021
7–5 49ers lead
12 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- 4
- 4
- R
- 4
- 4
- 4
- R
- R
- R
- 4
- R
- 4
Oldest to newest. 4 = 49ers win, R = Rams win, outlined = this game.
2026 Meetings
- Week 14 Rams at 49ers Upcoming
Recent Meetings
- 2026 Wk 1 49ers vs Rams SF 27 LAR 7 SF W
- 2025 Wk 10 Rams at 49ers, 2025 Wk 10 recap LAR 42 SF 26 LAR W
- 2025 Wk 5 49ers at Rams, 2025 Wk 5 recap SF 26 LAR 23 SF W
- 2024 Wk 15 Rams at 49ers, 2024 Wk 15 recap LAR 12 SF 6 LAR W
- 2024 Wk 3 49ers at Rams, 2024 Wk 3 recap LAR 27 SF 24 LAR W
- 2023 Wk 18 Rams at 49ers, 2023 Wk 18 recap LAR 21 SF 20 LAR W
- 2023 Wk 2 49ers at Rams, 2023 Wk 2 recap SF 30 LAR 23 SF W
- 2022 Wk 8 49ers at Rams, 2022 Wk 8 recap SF 31 LAR 14 SF W
- 2022 Wk 4 Rams at 49ers, 2022 Wk 4 recap SF 24 LAR 9 SF W
- 2021 Conference Championship 49ers at Rams, 2021 Conference Championship recap LAR 20 SF 17 LAR W
- 2021 Wk 18 49ers at Rams, 2021 Wk 18 recap SF 27 LAR 24 SF W
- 2021 Wk 10 Rams at 49ers, 2021 Wk 10 recap SF 31 LAR 10 SF W
Season to Date (Through Week 3)
The 2026 regular season, from each game's box score.
| 49ers | Stat | Rams |
|---|---|---|
| 3-0 | Record | 1-2 |
| 32.7 | Points per game | 20.3 |
| 399.3 | Yards per game | 417.7 |
| 7.3 | Yards per play | 6.3 |
| 16.7 | Points allowed per game | 21.0 |
| 313.0 | Yards allowed per game | 272.7 |
49ers vs Rams Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- LAR −3.5Rams failed to cover by 23.5
- Total
- 47.5Under: 34 points scored (by 13.5)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rams | 25.5 | 7 | −18.5 |
| 49ers | 22.0 | 27 | +5.0 |
The 49ers beat their implied total and the Rams fell short of theirs; the Fantasy tab has the player lines behind it.
Betting Trends
Last 6 meetings: 49ers 6–0 ATS, unders 4–2.
Each team's 2026 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
San Francisco 49ers
- Against the spread
- 1–0
- Over/under
- 0–1
- ATS as underdog
- 1–0
- ATS on the road
- 1–0
Los Angeles Rams
- Against the spread
- 0–1
- Over/under
- 0–1
- ATS as favorite
- 0–1
- ATS at home
- 0–1
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
49ers vs Rams Fantasy Outlook for 2026
One meeting is left on the 2026 schedule: Week 14 in San Francisco. Here's how to decide who to play in your league.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your 49ers or Rams player start in Week 14? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for 49ers and Rams players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the 49ers and Rams defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere this matchup falls in each team's fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2026 Game Logs for Players in This Game
49ers vs Rams Game FAQ
Who won the 2026 49ers vs Rams Week 1 game?
The San Francisco 49ers beat the Los Angeles Rams 27–7 in Week 1 of the 2026 season. The game was played at Melbourne Cricket Ground in Melbourne, VIC, on September 10, 2026. See the 49ers' 2026 schedule.
What was the final score of 49ers vs Rams?
The final score was 49ers 27, Rams 7. The 49ers led 10–7 at halftime, and the second half went 49ers 17, Rams 0.
What happened in the 49ers vs Rams game?
San Francisco led 10–7 at halftime and outscored Los Angeles 17–0 after the break to win 27–7. The 49ers finished with a 379–290 edge in total offense and averaged 5.9 yards per play. Brock Purdy led all players with 25 of 34 passing for 205 yards and 3 touchdowns, plus 5 carries for 29 rushing yards. The Rams committed 2 turnovers, the 49ers 1.
Who scored the most fantasy points in 49ers vs Rams?
Brock Purdy led the game with 22.1 PPR fantasy points, the QB10 of Week 1, on 25 of 34 passing for 205 yards and 3 touchdowns, plus 5 carries for 29 rushing yards. Deebo Samuel was next with 18.0 (WR13). See Brock Purdy's 2026 game log.
Who led 49ers vs Rams in passing, rushing and receiving?
Brock Purdy (SF) led all passers with 25 of 34 for 205 yards, 3 touchdowns and an interception. Christian McCaffrey (SF) led in rushing with 10 carries for 68 yards. Puka Nacua (LAR) led in receiving with 5 catches for 74 yards.
How many fantasy points did Brock Purdy score against the Rams?
Brock Purdy scored 22.1 fantasy points against the Rams in Week 1 of the 2026 season, the same in PPR, half-PPR and standard scoring because he had no catches, on 25 of 34 passing for 205 yards and 3 touchdowns, plus 5 carries for 29 rushing yards.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in 49ers vs Rams?
Demarcus Robinson outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 13.0 PPR points on 5.2 xFP (+7.8). Matthew Stafford fell furthest short, with 5.1 points on 12.9 xFP (−7.8). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
How did the 49ers beat the Rams?
The 49ers beat the Rams 27–7 because they averaged 5.9 yards per play to 5.1, won the turnover battle 2–1, and outgained them 379–290.
Which team won the turnover battle in 49ers vs Rams?
The 49ers won the turnover battle 2–1: the Rams gave the ball away 2 times and the 49ers 1 time. The 49ers won the game.
What is the all-time 49ers vs Rams record?
The 49ers lead the all-time series 80–72–3 across 155 meetings since 1950, including a 1–1 record in the postseason.
When did the 49ers and Rams last play before this game?
Before Week 1 of 2026, they last met in the 2025 season on November 9, 2025, when the Rams beat the 49ers 42–26.
Have the 49ers and Rams met in the playoffs?
Yes, 2 times, most recently in the 2021 playoffs. The 49ers are 1–1 against the Rams in the postseason.
What was the closing spread for 49ers vs Rams?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Rams −3.5, making the Los Angeles Rams 3.5-point favorites, with a closing total of 47.5. That implied about 25.5 points for the Rams and 22.0 for the 49ers.
Did 49ers vs Rams go over or under the total?
The game went under. The consensus closing total was 47.5, and the teams combined for 34 points, 13.5 under the number.
Who covered the spread in 49ers vs Rams?
The 49ers covered as 3.5-point underdogs against the closing line of Rams −3.5. The final margin was 20 points.
