Final2023 Week 9
Lambeau Field, Green Bay, WI|
Los Angeles Rams vs Green Bay Packers, Week 9 2023
Los Angeles Rams
Away
3
Green Bay Packers
HomeWon
20
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rams | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Packers | 0 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 20 |
LAR 3 · GB 20 Final
Passing leader
GB · QB
13.8PPR pts
20/26, 228 YDS, 1 TD
Top fantasy scorer
Aaron Jones Sr.
GB · RB
17.9PPR pts
20 ATT, 73 YDS, 1 TD, 4 REC, 26 REC YDS
Rams leader
LAR · WR
6.8PPR pts
2 REC, 48 YDS
Defensive playmaker
Anthony Johnson Jr.
GB · WR
1 INT, 1 TKL
Packers 20, Rams 3: Green Bay pulls away from Los Angeles
Green Bay led 7–3 at halftime and outscored Los Angeles 13–0 after the break to win 20–3. The Packers finished with a 391–187 edge in total offense and averaged 5.8 yards per play.
The Rams went 5-for-14 on third down and committed two turnovers, while the Packers kept the ball for 35:16.
The two teams meet again in Week 12 of 2026. If you roster anyone from either side, run the start/sit call in Redraft Command and it will weigh your lineup, your opponent and your league scoring, not only the player rankings.
Key advantages
- +2.4 yards/play GB 5.8 · LAR 3.4
- +204 total yards GB 391 · LAR 187
- +14% third-down rate GB 50% · LAR 36%
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Ram or Packer on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Packers Won
Green Bay won the efficiency, third-down, and time of possession battles.
| Rams | Stat | Packers |
|---|---|---|
| 3.4 | Yards per play | 5.8 |
| 187 | Total yards | 391 |
| 36% | Third-down conversion | 50% |
| Other team stats | ||
| 55 | Plays | 68 |
| 2 | Turnovers | 2 |
| 24:44 | Time of possession | 35:16 |
Scoring Summary
The Packers scored two touchdowns and two field goals; the Rams scored one field goal.
| Time | Team | Play | LAR | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| No scoring | ||||
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 14:19 | GB | Aaron Jones 3-yard TD run Takes leadAnders Carlson XP | 0 | 7 |
| 1:42 | LAR | Lucas Havrisik 52-yard FG | 3 | 7 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 2:10 | GB | Anders Carlson 26-yard FG Extends lead | 3 | 10 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 9:08 | GB | Anders Carlson 34-yard FG Extends lead | 3 | 13 |
| 3:41 | GB | Jordan Love → Luke Musgrave, 20-yard TD Extends leadAnders Carlson XP | 3 | 20 |
Fantasy Points: Rams vs Packers, Week 9 2023
Fantasy leaders
- Aaron JonesGB · RB17.9 PTSRB7
- Luke MusgraveGB · TE14.1 PTSTE9
- Jordan LoveGB · QB13.8 PTSQB14
- Jayden ReedGB · WR7.0 PTSWR46
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13.8 | QB14 | 20/26 | 228 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 115.5 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.1 | QB28 | 13/28 | 130 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 19 | 0 | 45.2 |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17.9 | RB7 | RB | 20 | 73 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 26 | 0 | ||
| 14.1 | TE9 | TE | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 51 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 7.0 | WR46 | WR | 1 | 21 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.9 | WR48 | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | 49 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.8 | WR49 | WR | — | — | — | 7 | 2 | 48 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.6 | WR51 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 36 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.2 | WR55 | WR | — | — | — | 7 | 3 | 32 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.5 | RB38 | RB | 10 | 19 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 0 | ||
| 5.3 | RB39 | RB | 9 | 40 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.3 | WR59 | WR | — | — | — | 7 | 4 | 13 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.7 | WR66 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 37 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.3 | RB42 | RB | 4 | 43 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.2 | RB48 | RB | 12 | 32 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 2.5 | WR84 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 | ||
| 1.7 | TE41 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | ||
| 1.6 | WR100 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | ||
| 0.0 | — | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| -0.2 | — | WR | 1 | -2 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → |
Fantasy Usage
Los Angeles Rams
Snap Share
Tyler HigbeeTE53 snaps91%
Cooper KuppWR49 snaps84%
Puka NacuaWR47 snaps81%
Tutu AtwellWR39 snaps67%
Darrell HendersonRB34 snaps59%
Target Share27 targets
- Cooper Kupp26%, 7 targets
- Tutu Atwell26%, 7 targets
- Puka Nacua26%, 7 targets
- Darrell Henderson7%, 2 targets
- Tyler Higbee4%, 1 targets
- Other11%, 3 targets
Carry Share26 carries
- Royce Freeman46%, 12 carries
- Darrell Henderson38%, 10 carries
- Brett Rypien12%, 3 carries
- Ben Skowronek4%, 1 carries
Green Bay Packers
Snap Share
Romeo DoubsWR62 snaps86%
Luke MusgraveTE60 snaps83%
Christian WatsonWR56 snaps78%
Aaron JonesRB41 snaps57%
AJ DillonRB29 snaps40%
Target Share25 targets
- Aaron Jones24%, 6 targets
- Luke Musgrave16%, 4 targets
- Dontayvion Wicks16%, 4 targets
- Romeo Doubs12%, 3 targets
- Jayden Reed12%, 3 targets
- Other20%, 5 targets
Carry Share38 carries
- Aaron Jones53%, 20 carries
- AJ Dillon24%, 9 carries
- Jordan Love11%, 4 carries
- Emanuel Wilson11%, 4 carries
- Jayden Reed3%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53 | 91% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 62 | 86% | 3 | 12% | 0 | |
| 49 | 84% | 7 | 26% | 0 | |
| 60 | 83% | 4 | 16% | 0 | |
| 47 | 81% | 7 | 26% | 0 | |
| 56 | 78% | 2 | 8% | 0 | |
| 39 | 67% | 7 | 26% | 0 | |
| 34 | 59% | 2 | 7% | 10 | |
| 41 | 57% | 6 | 24% | 20 | |
| 24 | 41% | 1 | 4% | 12 | |
| 29 | 40% | 1 | 4% | 9 | |
| 28 | 39% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 28 | 39% | 3 | 12% | 1 | |
| 23 | 32% | 4 | 16% | 0 | |
| 15 | 26% | 0 | 0% | 1 | |
| 11 | 19% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 13 | 18% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 9 | 16% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 8 | 11% | 0 | 0% | 4 | |
| 6 | 10% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 7 | 10% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 5 | 7% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 3 | 5% | 1 | 4% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+7.4Luke Musgrave14.1 PTS vs 6.7 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−9.5Brett Rypien4.1 PTS vs 13.6 xFP
- Highest expected volume22.3 xFPAaron Jones Sr.17.9 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aaron Jones Sr.GB · RB | 17.9 | 22.3 | −4.4 | 57% | 53% car | — | 0 | 20 | 53% | 6 | 24% |
| Brett RypienLAR · QB | 4.1 | 13.6 | −9.5 | 100% | 28 att | — | 28 | 3 | 12% | 0 | 0% |
| Jordan LoveGB · QB | 13.8 | 13.4 | +0.4 | 100% | 26 att | — | 26 | 4 | 11% | 0 | 0% |
| Cooper KuppLAR · WR | 6.8 | 11.7 | −4.9 | 84% | 26% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 26% |
| Puka NacuaLAR · WR | 6.2 | 11.7 | −5.5 | 81% | 26% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 26% |
| Tutu AtwellLAR · WR | 5.3 | 11.7 | −6.4 | 67% | 26% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 26% |
| Darrell Henderson Jr.LAR · RB | 5.5 | 9.5 | −4.0 | 59% | 38% car | — | 0 | 10 | 38% | 2 | 7% |
| Royce FreemanLAR · RB | 3.2 | 9.0 | −5.8 | 41% | 46% car | — | 0 | 12 | 46% | 1 | 4% |
| AJ DillonGB · RB | 5.3 | 7.2 | −1.9 | 40% | 24% car | — | 0 | 9 | 24% | 1 | 4% |
| Dontayvion WicksGB · WR | 6.9 | 6.7 | +0.2 | 32% | 16% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 16% |
| Luke MusgraveGB · TE | 14.1 | 6.7 | +7.4 | 83% | 16% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 16% |
| Jayden ReedGB · WR | 7.0 | 5.6 | +1.4 | 39% | 12% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 3 | 12% |
| Romeo DoubsGB · WR | 6.6 | 5.0 | +1.6 | 86% | 12% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 12% |
| Christian WatsonGB · WR | 4.7 | 3.3 | +1.4 | 78% | 8% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 8% |
| Emanuel WilsonGB · RB | 4.3 | 2.5 | +1.8 | 11% | 11% car | — | 0 | 4 | 11% | 0 | 0% |
| Austin TrammellLAR · WR | 1.6 | 1.7 | −0.1 | 5% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Demarcus RobinsonLAR · WR | 2.5 | 1.7 | +0.8 | 16% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Josiah DeguaraGB · TE | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 18% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Malik HeathGB · WR | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 10% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Tyler HigbeeLAR · TE | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 91% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Ben SkowronekLAR · WR | -0.2 | 0.6 | −0.8 | 26% | 4% car | — | 0 | 1 | 4% | 0 | 0% |
Team totals: Rams 27 targets and 26 carries; Packers 25 targets and 38 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2023 season: 1.67 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.61 per carry and 0.42 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Brett Rypien Unlucky
LAR · QB · 4.1 pts on 13.6 expected
13 of 28 passing for 130 yards, 1 interception; 3 carries for 19 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 13.6 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Jordan Love
GB · QB · 13.8 pts on 13.4 expected
20 of 26 passing for 228 yards, 1 touchdown; 4 carries for 7 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 13.4 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 25.3, 19.6, 8.0, 16.3, 15.6, 13.8
W3W4W5W7W8W9
No interceptions after 7 in the previous four games.
Cooper Kupp
LAR · WR · 6.8 pts on 11.7 expected
7 targets (26% of the team's), 2 catches for 48 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 11.7 expected.
Last 4 games + this one (PPR): 19.8, 27.8, 6.9, 6.1, 6.8
W5W6W7W8W9
Puka Nacua Unlucky
LAR · WR · 6.2 pts on 11.7 expected
7 targets (26% of the team's), 3 catches for 32 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 11.7 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 31.3, 20.1, 6.6, 23.4, 7.3, 6.2
W4W5W6W7W8W9
Lowest-scoring game of the season.
Aaron Jones Sr.
GB · RB · 17.9 pts on 22.3 expected
6 targets (24% of the team's), 4 catches for 26 yards; 20 carries (53% of the team's) for 73 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 22.3 expected.
Last 4 games + this one (PPR): 26.7, 2.4, 8.7, 8.6, 17.9
W1W4W7W8W9
Season high in targets (6). Season high in carries (20).
AJ Dillon
GB · RB · 5.3 pts on 7.2 expected
1 target (4% of the team's), 1 catch for 3 yards; 9 carries (24% of the team's) for 40 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 7.2 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 3.3, 1.1, 13.6, 11.5, 10.2, 5.3
W3W4W5W7W8W9
Fewest points since Week 4.
Tutu Atwell Unlucky
LAR · WR · 5.3 pts on 11.7 expected
7 targets (26% of the team's), 4 catches for 13 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 11.7 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 7.4, 8.9, 4.0, 10.1, 6.9, 5.3
W4W5W6W7W8W9
Royce Freeman Unlucky
LAR · RB · 3.2 pts on 9.0 expected
1 target (4% of the team's), 0 catches for 0 yards; 12 carries (46% of the team's) for 32 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 9.0 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Stock Up, Stock Down
Los Angeles Rams
- ▼Stock down: Tutu Atwell played 67% of the snaps, down from a 86% season average.
Green Bay Packers
- ▲Stock up: Aaron Jones Sr. led the backfield with 57% of the snaps after trailing AJ Dillon before this game.
- ▼Stock down: AJ Dillon lost the backfield lead: 40% of the snaps to Aaron Jones Sr.'s 57%.
- ▼Stock down: Jayden Reed played 39% of the snaps, down from a 60% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2023 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Rams D | Packers D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 18.9 | 15.3 |
| RBs | 16.0 | 21.2 |
| WRs | 34.5 | 31.7 |
| TEs | 13.2 | 11.5 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Green Bay opened at 50% win probability and passed 98% in the fourth quarter on the way to the win.
Packers win probability
Key Swings
- +23Jones 3-yd TD run50% → 73%Q2 14:19
- −10Havrisik 52-yd FG76% → 66%Q2 1:42
- +12Carlson 26-yd FG71% → 83%Q3 2:10
- +6Carlson 34-yd FG91% → 97%Q4 9:08
Swing in Packers win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Los Angeles Rams | Measure | Green Bay Packers |
|---|---|---|
| 55 | Plays | 68 |
| 53% | Pass rate | 44% |
| 4.1 | Yds / dropback | 6.9 |
| 2.6 | Yds / carry | 4.8 |
| 5/14 | Third downs | 7/14 |
Efficiency edge Green Bay ran 13 more plays and gained 2.8 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- LAR Kupp 26% · Nacua 26% · Atwell 26%
- GB Jones 24% · Wicks 16% · Musgrave 16%
Possession Results
| Result | LAR | GB |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 0 | 2 |
| Field goals | 1 | 2 |
| Punts | 5 | 4 |
| Turnovers | 2 | 2 |
| Turnovers on downs | 2 | 0 |
| Missed field goals | 1 | 1 |
- The Packers opened the scoring on their second possession, a 7-play, 41-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
- The Packers drained the clock with three second-half drives of four to five minutes.
All 23 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAR | Q1 15:00 | 6 | 22 | 3:33 | Punt |
| GB | Q1 11:27 | 9 | 28 | 5:36 | Punt |
| LAR | Q1 5:51 | 4 | 18 | 2:27 | Fumble |
| GB | Q1 3:24 | 7 | 41 | 4:05 | Touchdown |
| LAR | Q2 14:19 | 3 | 1 | 1:26 | Punt |
| GB | Q2 12:53 | 4 | 19 | 1:48 | Punt |
| LAR | Q2 11:05 | 3 | 4 | 1:33 | Punt |
| GB | Q2 9:32 | 3 | 5 | 2:04 | Punt |
| LAR | Q2 7:28 | 13 | 56 | 5:46 | Field goal |
| GB | Q2 1:42 | 10 | 45 | 1:42 | Missed FG |
| GB | Q3 15:00 | 1 | 11 | 0:15 | Fumble |
| LAR | Q3 14:45 | 6 | 22 | 4:02 | Punt |
| GB | Q3 10:43 | 4 | 20 | 2:34 | Fumble |
| LAR | Q3 8:09 | 4 | 5 | 1:40 | Missed FG |
| GB | Q3 6:29 | 7 | 53 | 4:19 | Field goal |
| LAR | Q3 2:10 | 7 | 28 | 2:14 | Downs |
| GB | Q4 14:56 | 3 | -6 | 1:21 | Punt |
| LAR | Q4 13:35 | 2 | 0 | 0:12 | Interception |
| GB | Q4 13:23 | 7 | 34 | 4:15 | Field goal |
| LAR | Q4 9:08 | 3 | 4 | 0:42 | Punt |
| GB | Q4 8:26 | 8 | 72 | 4:45 | Touchdown |
| LAR | Q4 3:41 | 6 | 27 | 1:09 | Downs |
| GB | Q4 2:32 | 8 | 46 | 2:32 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Rams vs Packers Head-to-Head
The Rams and Packers first met in 1937 and have played 100 times since.
- All-time series
- 51–47–2Packers lead, 100 meetings since 1937
- Postseason
- 2–1Packers won in 1967 and 2020; Rams won in 2001
- Largest Rams win
- 48–71949
- Largest Packers win
- 42–71944
Since 2021
4–0 Packers lead
4 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- P
- P
- P
- P
Oldest to newest. P = Packers win, R = Rams win, outlined = this game.
2026 Meetings
- Week 12 Packers at Rams Upcoming
Recent Meetings
- 2024 Wk 5 Packers at Rams, 2024 Wk 5 recap GB 24 LAR 19 GB W
- 2023 Wk 9 Rams at Packers GB 20 LAR 3 GB W
- 2022 Wk 15 Rams at Packers, 2022 Wk 15 recap GB 24 LAR 12 GB W
- 2021 Wk 12 Rams at Packers, 2021 Wk 12 recap GB 36 LAR 28 GB W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2023 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Rams | Stat | Packers |
|---|---|---|
| 10-7 | Record | 9-8 |
| 23.8 | Points per game | 22.5 |
| 359.3 | Yards per game | 345.5 |
| 5.6 | Yards per play | 5.6 |
| 22.2 | Points allowed per game | 20.6 |
| 337.9 | Yards allowed per game | 335.1 |
Rams vs Packers Fantasy Outlook for 2026
One meeting is left on the 2026 schedule: Week 12 in Los Angeles. Here's how to decide who to play in your league.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Rams or Packers player start in Week 12? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Rams and Packers players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Rams and Packers defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere this matchup falls in each team's fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2023 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Rams vs Packers Game FAQ
Who won the 2023 Rams vs Packers Week 9 game?
The Green Bay Packers beat the Los Angeles Rams 20–3 in Week 9 of the 2023 season. The game was played at Lambeau Field in Green Bay, WI, on November 5, 2023. See the Packers' 2023 schedule.
What was the final score of Rams vs Packers?
The final score was Packers 20, Rams 3. The Packers led 7–3 at halftime, and the second half went Rams 0, Packers 13.
What happened in the Rams vs Packers game?
Green Bay led 7–3 at halftime and outscored Los Angeles 13–0 after the break to win 20–3. The Packers finished with a 391–187 edge in total offense and averaged 5.8 yards per play. Aaron Jones led all players with 4 catches for 26 yards, plus 20 carries for 73 rushing yards and a touchdown.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Rams vs Packers?
Aaron Jones led the game with 17.9 PPR fantasy points, the RB7 of Week 9, on 4 catches for 26 yards, plus 20 carries for 73 rushing yards and a touchdown. Luke Musgrave was next with 14.1 (TE9). See Aaron Jones's 2023 game log.
Who led Rams vs Packers in passing, rushing and receiving?
Jordan Love (GB) led all passers with 20 of 26 for 228 yards and a touchdown. Aaron Jones (GB) led in rushing with 20 carries for 73 yards and a touchdown. Luke Musgrave (GB) led in receiving with 3 catches for 51 yards and a touchdown.
How many fantasy points did Aaron Jones score against the Rams?
Aaron Jones scored 17.9 points in PPR leagues, 15.9 in half-PPR and 13.9 in standard scoring against the Rams in Week 9 of the 2023 season, on 4 catches for 26 yards, plus 20 carries for 73 rushing yards and a touchdown.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Rams vs Packers?
Luke Musgrave outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 14.1 PPR points on 6.7 xFP (+7.4). Brett Rypien fell furthest short, with 4.1 points on 13.6 xFP (−9.5). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Rams vs Packers?
Aaron Jones Sr. had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 22.3 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 17.9. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the Packers beat the Rams?
The Packers beat the Rams 20–3 because they averaged 5.8 yards per play to 3.4 and outgained them 391–187.
What is the all-time Rams vs Packers record?
The Packers lead the all-time series 51–47–2 across 100 meetings since 1937, including a 2–1 record in the postseason.
When did the Rams and Packers last play before this game?
Before Week 9 of 2023, they last met in the 2022 season on December 19, 2022, when the Packers beat the Rams 24–12.
Have the Rams and Packers met in the playoffs?
Yes, 3 times, most recently in the 2020 playoffs. The Rams are 1–2 against the Packers in the postseason.
What is the Rams vs Packers record since 2021?
The Packers lead 4–0 across 4 meetings since the 2021 season, including this game.
