Final2024 Week 4
Lucas Oil Stadium, Indianapolis, IN|
Pittsburgh Steelers vs Indianapolis Colts, Week 4 2024
Pittsburgh Steelers
Away
24
Indianapolis Colts
HomeWon
27
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steelers | 0 | 3 | 7 | 14 | 24 |
| Colts | 14 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 27 |
PIT 24 · IND 27 Final
Passing leader
PIT · QB
32.0PPR pts
22/34, 312 YDS, 1 TD, 2 RUSH TD
Top fantasy scorer
IND · WR
22.2PPR pts
8 REC, 82 YDS, 1 TD
Steelers leader
PIT · TE
16.7PPR pts
5 REC, 57 YDS, 1 TD
Defensive playmaker
Dayo Odeyingbo
IND
1.5 SACK, 3 TKL
Colts 27, Steelers 24: Indianapolis holds off Pittsburgh
Indianapolis led 17–3 at halftime and won 27–24, though Pittsburgh took the second half 21–10. Pittsburgh outgained the Colts 404–358.
The Steelers went 6-for-13 on third down and committed two turnovers, while the Colts finished without a giveaway.
The two teams meet again in Week 5 of 2026. If you roster anyone from either side, run the start/sit call in Redraft Command and it will weigh your lineup, your opponent and your league scoring, not only the player rankings.
Key advantages
- +2 turnover margin IND 0 turnovers
- +7% third-down rate IND 53% · PIT 46%
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Steeler or Colt on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Colts Won
Indianapolis won the turnover and third-down battles.
| Steelers | Stat | Colts |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Turnovers | 0 |
| 46% | Third-down conversion | 53% |
| Other team stats | ||
| 404 | Total yards | 358 |
| 5.9 | Yards per play | 5.6 |
| 68 | Plays | 64 |
| 31:07 | Time of possession | 28:53 |
Scoring Summary
The Colts scored three touchdowns and two field goals; the Steelers scored three touchdowns and one field goal.
| Time | Team | Play | PIT | IND |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 12:01 | IND | Jonathan Taylor 2-yard TD run Takes leadMatt Gay XP | 0 | 7 |
| 2:34 | IND | Joe Flacco → Josh Downs, 4-yard TD Extends leadMatt Gay XP | 0 | 14 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 12:31 | IND | Matt Gay 33-yard FG Extends lead | 0 | 17 |
| 0:00 | PIT | Chris Boswell 50-yard FG | 3 | 17 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 2:53 | PIT | Justin Fields 5-yard TD runChris Boswell XP | 10 | 17 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 14:43 | IND | Joe Flacco → Drew Ogletree, 15-yard TD Extends leadMatt Gay XP | 10 | 24 |
| 11:23 | PIT | Justin Fields 2-yard TD runChris Boswell XP | 17 | 24 |
| 6:03 | IND | Matt Gay 35-yard FG Extends lead | 17 | 27 |
| 3:40 | PIT | Justin Fields → Pat Freiermuth, 8-yard TDChris Boswell XP | 24 | 27 |
Fantasy Points: Steelers vs Colts, Week 4 2024
Fantasy leaders
- Justin FieldsPIT · QB32.0 PTSQB1
- Josh DownsIND · WR22.2 PTSWR8
- Jonathan TaylorIND · RB19.8 PTSRB12
- Michael PittmanIND · WR17.3 PTSWR20
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32.0 | QB1 | 22/34 | 312 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 55 | 2 | 104.0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 15.0 | QB15 | 16/26 | 168 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 105.9 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.2 | QB31 | 3/4 | 71 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 24 | 0 | 116.7 |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22.2 | WR8 | WR | — | — | — | 9 | 8 | 82 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 19.8 | RB12 | RB | 21 | 88 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 20 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 17.3 | WR20 | WR | — | — | — | 9 | 6 | 113 | 0 | ||
| 16.7 | TE2 | TE | — | — | — | 7 | 5 | 57 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 16.3 | WR22 | WR | — | — | — | 11 | 7 | 113 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 10.3 | RB31 | RB | 13 | 19 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 54 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 8.5 | TE15 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 15 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 8.2 | RB37 | RB | 6 | 43 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 | ||
| 5.1 | TE23 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 31 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.1 | WR77 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 21 | 0 | ||
| 2.7 | WR85 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 17 | 0 | ||
| 1.9 | WR98 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 9 | 0 | ||
| 1.0 | WR111 | WR | 1 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.8 | RB69 | RB | 5 | 8 | 0 | — | — | — | — | ||
| 0.5 | RB70 | RB | 1 | 5 | 0 | — | — | — | — |
Fantasy Usage
Pittsburgh Steelers
Snap Share
Van JeffersonWR60 snaps86%
George PickensWR60 snaps86%
Pat FreiermuthTE53 snaps76%
Najee HarrisRB48 snaps69%
Darnell WashingtonTE40 snaps57%
Target Share32 targets
- George Pickens34%, 11 targets
- Pat Freiermuth22%, 7 targets
- Najee Harris19%, 6 targets
- Van Jefferson9%, 3 targets
- Cordarrelle Patterson6%, 2 targets
- Other9%, 3 targets
Carry Share30 carries
- Najee Harris43%, 13 carries
- Justin Fields33%, 10 carries
- Cordarrelle Patterson20%, 6 carries
- Aaron Shampklin3%, 1 carries
Indianapolis Colts
Snap Share
Michael PittmanWR58 snaps88%
Alec PierceWR55 snaps83%
Jonathan TaylorRB48 snaps73%
Josh DownsWR41 snaps62%
Mo Alie-CoxTE31 snaps47%
Target Share28 targets
- Michael Pittman32%, 9 targets
- Josh Downs32%, 9 targets
- Jonathan Taylor14%, 4 targets
- Adonai Mitchell11%, 3 targets
- Alec Pierce7%, 2 targets
- Other4%, 1 targets
Carry Share32 carries
- Jonathan Taylor66%, 21 carries
- Trey Sermon16%, 5 carries
- Anthony Richardson9%, 3 carries
- Joe Flacco6%, 2 carries
- Adonai Mitchell3%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 58 | 88% | 9 | 32% | 0 | |
| 60 | 86% | 3 | 9% | 0 | |
| 60 | 86% | 11 | 34% | 0 | |
| 55 | 83% | 2 | 7% | 0 | |
| 53 | 76% | 7 | 22% | 0 | |
| 48 | 73% | 4 | 14% | 21 | |
| 48 | 69% | 6 | 19% | 13 | |
| 41 | 62% | 9 | 32% | 0 | |
| 40 | 57% | 2 | 6% | 0 | |
| 39 | 56% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 31 | 47% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 24 | 36% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 20 | 30% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 17 | 26% | 0 | 0% | 5 | |
| 18 | 26% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 13 | 20% | 3 | 11% | 1 | |
| 13 | 19% | 0 | 0% | 1 | |
| 11 | 17% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 11 | 17% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 9 | 13% | 2 | 6% | 6 | |
| 9 | 13% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 1 | 2% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+10.4Justin Fields32.0 PTS vs 21.6 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−8.5Najee Harris10.3 PTS vs 18.8 xFP
- Highest expected volume21.6 xFPJustin Fields32.0 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin FieldsPIT · QB | 32.0 | 21.6 | +10.4 | 100% | 34 att | — | 34 | 10 | 33% | 0 | 0% |
| Jonathan TaylorIND · RB | 19.8 | 20.5 | −0.7 | 73% | 66% car | — | 0 | 21 | 66% | 4 | 14% |
| George PickensPIT · WR | 16.3 | 18.9 | −2.6 | 86% | 34% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 11 | 34% |
| Najee HarrisPIT · RB | 10.3 | 18.8 | −8.5 | 69% | 43% car | — | 0 | 13 | 43% | 6 | 19% |
| Josh DownsIND · WR | 22.2 | 15.4 | +6.8 | 62% | 32% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 9 | 32% |
| Michael Pittman Jr.IND · WR | 17.3 | 15.4 | +1.9 | 88% | 32% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 9 | 32% |
| Joe FlaccoIND · QB | 15.0 | 12.9 | +2.1 | 80% | 26 att | — | 26 | 2 | 6% | 0 | 0% |
| Pat FreiermuthPIT · TE | 16.7 | 12.0 | +4.7 | 76% | 22% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 22% |
| Cordarrelle PattersonPIT · RB | 8.2 | 7.3 | +0.9 | 13% | 20% car | — | 0 | 6 | 20% | 2 | 6% |
| Adonai MitchellIND · WR | 1.0 | 5.8 | −4.8 | 20% | 11% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 3 | 11% |
| Van JeffersonPIT · WR | 4.1 | 5.1 | −1.0 | 86% | 9% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 9% |
| Anthony Richardson Sr.IND · QB | 5.2 | 3.7 | +1.5 | 20% | 4 att | — | 4 | 3 | 9% | 0 | 0% |
| Alec PierceIND · WR | 1.9 | 3.4 | −1.5 | 83% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 7% |
| Darnell WashingtonPIT · TE | 5.1 | 3.4 | +1.7 | 57% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 6% |
| Trey SermonIND · RB | 0.8 | 3.3 | −2.5 | 26% | 16% car | — | 0 | 5 | 16% | 0 | 0% |
| Calvin Austin IIIPIT · WR | 2.7 | 1.7 | +1.0 | 56% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Drew OgletreeIND · TE | 8.5 | 1.7 | +6.8 | 36% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Aaron ShampklinPIT · RB | 0.5 | 0.7 | −0.2 | 19% | 3% car | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 0 | 0% |
Team totals: Steelers 32 targets and 30 carries; Colts 28 targets and 32 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2024 season: 1.71 PPR points per target (68% catch rate), 0.65 per carry and 0.44 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Justin Fields Ran hot
PIT · QB · 32.0 pts on 21.6 expected
22 of 34 passing for 312 yards, 1 touchdown; 10 carries for 55 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 21.6 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 3 games + this one (PPR): 11.9, 11.4, 19.4, 32.0
W1W2W3W4
Best fantasy game of the season.
Joe Flacco
IND · QB · 15.0 pts on 12.9 expected
16 of 26 passing for 168 yards, 2 touchdowns; 2 carries for 3 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 12.9 expected.
Start/Sit: Joe Flacco →George Pickens Volume, no payoff
PIT · WR · 16.3 pts on 18.9 expected
11 targets (34% of the team's), 7 catches for 113 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 18.9 expected.
Last 3 games + this one (PPR): 13.5, 4.9, 10.7, 16.3
W1W2W3W4
Season high in targets (11). Best fantasy game of the season.
Najee Harris Unlucky
PIT · RB · 10.3 pts on 18.8 expected
6 targets (19% of the team's), 3 catches for 54 yards; 13 carries (43% of the team's) for 19 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 18.8 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 3 games + this one (PPR): 8.9, 8.4, 13.6, 10.3
W1W2W3W4
Season high in targets (6).
Jonathan Taylor Volume, no payoff
IND · RB · 19.8 pts on 20.5 expected
4 targets (14% of the team's), 3 catches for 20 yards; 21 carries (66% of the team's) for 88 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 20.5 expected.
Last 3 games + this one (PPR): 10.8, 15.5, 26.5, 19.8
W1W2W3W4
Josh Downs Ran hot
IND · WR · 22.2 pts on 15.4 expected
9 targets (32% of the team's), 8 catches for 82 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 15.4 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Trend: Season high in targets (9).
Drew Ogletree Ran hot
IND · TE · 8.5 pts on 1.7 expected
1 target (4% of the team's), 1 catch for 15 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 1.7 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 3 games + this one (PPR): 0.0, 2.2, 0.0, 8.5
W1W2W3W4
Best fantasy game of the season.
Van Jefferson
PIT · WR · 4.1 pts on 5.1 expected
3 targets (9% of the team's), 2 catches for 21 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 5.1 expected.
Last 3 games + this one (PPR): 1.1, 3.4, 0.0, 4.1
W1W2W3W4
Best fantasy game of the season.
Stock Up, Stock Down
Pittsburgh Steelers
- ▲Stock up: Najee Harris played 69% of the snaps, up from a 53% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Van Jefferson played 86% of the snaps, up from a 57% season average.
Indianapolis Colts
- ▼Stock down: Adonai Mitchell played 20% of the snaps, down from a 45% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2024 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Steelers D | Colts D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 15.5 | 18.0 |
| RBs | 20.2 | 23.8 |
| WRs | 31.9 | 33.1 |
| TEs | 14.2 | 14.9 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Indianapolis opened at 50% win probability and passed 98% in the fourth quarter on the way to the win.
Colts win probability
Key Swings
- +20Taylor 2-yd TD run50% → 70%Q1 12:01
- +16Flacco → Downs, 4-yd TD72% → 88%Q1 2:34
- −14Fields 5-yd TD run97% → 83%Q3 2:53
- +13Flacco → Ogletree, 15-yd TD85% → 98%Q4 14:43
- −18Fields → Freiermuth, 8-yd TD>99% → 82%Q4 3:40
Swing in Colts win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Pittsburgh Steelers | Measure | Indianapolis Colts |
|---|---|---|
| 68 | Plays | 64 |
| 56% | Pass rate | 50% |
| 7.4 | Yds / dropback | 7.0 |
| 4.1 | Yds / carry | 4.2 |
| 6/13 | Third downs | 8/15 |
Efficiency edge Indianapolis ran 4 fewer plays than Pittsburgh.
- Top targets
- PIT Pickens 34% · Freiermuth 22% · Harris 19%
- IND Downs 32% · Pittman 32% · Taylor 14%
Possession Results
| Result | PIT | IND |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 3 | 3 |
| Field goals | 1 | 2 |
| Punts | 3 | 4 |
| Turnovers | 2 | 0 |
| Turnovers on downs | 2 | 0 |
| Missed field goals | 0 | 1 |
IND turnover edge: +2
- The Colts opened the scoring on their first possession, a 8-play, 70-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
- The Colts scored touchdowns on two of their first three drives.
All 22 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IND | Q1 15:00 | 8 | 70 | 2:59 | Touchdown |
| PIT | Q1 12:01 | 8 | 29 | 4:42 | Punt |
| IND | Q1 7:19 | 9 | 86 | 4:45 | Touchdown |
| PIT | Q1 2:34 | 4 | 9 | 2:06 | Downs |
| IND | Q1 0:28 | 9 | 25 | 2:57 | Field goal |
| PIT | Q2 12:31 | 3 | 7 | 1:33 | Punt |
| IND | Q2 10:58 | 4 | 29 | 2:44 | Punt |
| PIT | Q2 8:14 | 9 | 91 | 5:10 | Fumble |
| IND | Q2 3:04 | 6 | 38 | 1:50 | Punt |
| PIT | Q2 1:14 | 8 | 44 | 1:14 | Field goal |
| PIT | Q3 15:00 | 6 | 22 | 4:35 | Punt |
| IND | Q3 10:25 | 3 | 9 | 1:39 | Punt |
| PIT | Q3 8:46 | 3 | -22 | 0:58 | Fumble |
| IND | Q3 7:48 | 4 | 6 | 1:59 | Missed FG |
| PIT | Q3 5:49 | 6 | 56 | 2:56 | Touchdown |
| IND | Q3 2:53 | 10 | 70 | 3:10 | Touchdown |
| PIT | Q4 14:43 | 8 | 70 | 3:20 | Touchdown |
| IND | Q4 11:23 | 10 | 54 | 5:20 | Field goal |
| PIT | Q4 6:03 | 7 | 70 | 2:23 | Touchdown |
| IND | Q4 3:40 | 3 | -5 | 1:01 | Punt |
| PIT | Q4 2:39 | 7 | 24 | 2:10 | Downs |
| IND | Q4 0:29 | 1 | -1 | 0:29 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Steelers vs Colts Head-to-Head
The Steelers and Colts first met in 1957 and have played 35 times since.
- All-time series
- 27–8Steelers lead, 35 meetings since 1957
- Postseason
- 5–0Steelers won all 5, most recently in 2005
- Largest Steelers win
- 45–31985
- Largest Colts win
- 41–71968
Since 2021
2–2 Series tied
4 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- S
- C
- C
- S
Oldest to newest. S = Steelers win, C = Colts win, outlined = this game.
2026 Meetings
- Week 5 Colts at Steelers Upcoming
Recent Meetings
- 2025 Wk 9 Colts at Steelers, 2025 Wk 9 recap PIT 27 IND 20 PIT W
- 2024 Wk 4 Steelers at Colts IND 27 PIT 24 IND W
- 2023 Wk 15 Steelers at Colts, 2023 Wk 15 recap IND 30 PIT 13 IND W
- 2022 Wk 12 Steelers at Colts, 2022 Wk 12 recap PIT 24 IND 17 PIT W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2024 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Steelers | Stat | Colts |
|---|---|---|
| 10-7 | Record | 8-9 |
| 22.4 | Points per game | 22.2 |
| 319.4 | Yards per game | 334.8 |
| 5.0 | Yards per play | 5.5 |
| 20.4 | Points allowed per game | 25.1 |
| 326.7 | Yards allowed per game | 361.2 |
Steelers vs Colts Fantasy Outlook for 2026
One meeting is left on the 2026 schedule: Week 5 in Pittsburgh. Here's how to decide who to play in your league.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Steelers or Colts player start in Week 5? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Steelers and Colts players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Steelers and Colts defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere this matchup falls in each team's fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2024 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Steelers vs Colts Game FAQ
Who won the 2024 Steelers vs Colts Week 4 game?
The Indianapolis Colts beat the Pittsburgh Steelers 27–24 in Week 4 of the 2024 season. The game was played at Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis, IN, on September 29, 2024. See the Colts' 2024 schedule.
What was the final score of Steelers vs Colts?
The final score was Colts 27, Steelers 24. The Colts led 17–3 at halftime, and the second half went Steelers 21, Colts 10.
What happened in the Steelers vs Colts game?
Indianapolis led 17–3 at halftime and won 27–24, though Pittsburgh took the second half 21–10. Pittsburgh outgained the Colts 404–358. Justin Fields led all players with 22 of 34 passing for 312 yards and a touchdown, plus 10 carries for 55 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns. The Steelers committed 2 turnovers, the Colts none.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Steelers vs Colts?
Justin Fields led the game with 32.0 PPR fantasy points, the QB1 of Week 4, on 22 of 34 passing for 312 yards and a touchdown, plus 10 carries for 55 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns. Josh Downs was next with 22.2 (WR8). See Justin Fields's 2024 game log.
Who led Steelers vs Colts in passing, rushing and receiving?
Justin Fields (PIT) led all passers with 22 of 34 for 312 yards and a touchdown. Jonathan Taylor (IND) led in rushing with 21 carries for 88 yards and a touchdown. George Pickens (PIT) led in receiving with 7 catches for 113 yards.
How many fantasy points did Justin Fields score against the Colts?
Justin Fields scored 32.0 fantasy points against the Colts in Week 4 of the 2024 season, the same in PPR, half-PPR and standard scoring because he had no catches, on 22 of 34 passing for 312 yards and a touchdown, plus 10 carries for 55 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Steelers vs Colts?
Justin Fields outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 32.0 PPR points on 21.6 xFP (+10.4). Najee Harris fell furthest short, with 10.3 points on 18.8 xFP (−8.5). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Steelers vs Colts?
Justin Fields had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 21.6 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 32.0. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the Colts beat the Steelers?
The Colts beat the Steelers 27–24 because they won the turnover battle 2–0.
Which team won the turnover battle in Steelers vs Colts?
The Colts won the turnover battle 2–0: the Steelers gave the ball away 2 times and the Colts not at all. The Colts won the game.
What is the all-time Steelers vs Colts record?
The Steelers lead the all-time series 27–8 across 35 meetings since 1957, including a 5–0 record in the postseason.
When did the Steelers and Colts last play before this game?
Before Week 4 of 2024, they last met in the 2023 season on December 16, 2023, when the Colts beat the Steelers 30–13.
Have the Steelers and Colts met in the playoffs?
Yes, 5 times, most recently in the 2005 playoffs. The Steelers are 5–0 against the Colts in the postseason.
What is the Steelers vs Colts record since 2021?
The series is tied 2–2 across 4 meetings since the 2021 season, including this game.
