Final2024 Week 10
Soldier Field, Chicago, IL|
New England Patriots vs Chicago Bears, Week 10 2024
New England Patriots
AwayWon
19
Chicago Bears
Home
3
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patriots | 3 | 10 | 0 | 6 | 19 |
| Bears | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
NE 19 · CHI 3 Final
Passing leader
NE · QB
12.8PPR pts
15/25, 184 YDS, 1 TD, 1 INT
Top fantasy scorer
NE · TE
9.4PPR pts
3 REC, 64 YDS
Bears leader
CHI · WR
9.4PPR pts
5 REC, 44 YDS
Defensive playmaker
T.J. Edwards
CHI
1 INT, 12 TKL
Patriots 19, Bears 3: New England leads from start to finish
New England led 13–3 at halftime and outscored Chicago 6–0 after the break to win 19–3. The Patriots finished with a 328–142 edge in total offense and averaged 5.4 yards per play.
The Bears went 1-for-14 on third down, while the Patriots kept the ball for 32:28.
The two teams meet again in Week 7 of 2026. If you roster anyone from either side, run the start/sit call in Redraft Command and it will weigh your lineup, your opponent and your league scoring, not only the player rankings.
Key advantages
- +3.0 yards/play NE 5.4 · CHI 2.4
- +186 total yards NE 328 · CHI 142
- +29% third-down rate NE 36% · CHI 7%
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Patriot or Bear on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Patriots Won
New England won the efficiency, third-down, and time of possession battles.
| Patriots | Stat | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 5.4 | Yards per play | 2.4 |
| 328 | Total yards | 142 |
| 36% | Third-down conversion | 7% |
| Other team stats | ||
| 61 | Plays | 59 |
| 1 | Turnovers | 0 |
| 32:28 | Time of possession | 27:32 |
Scoring Summary
The Patriots scored one touchdown and four field goals; the Bears scored one field goal.
| Time | Team | Play | NE | CHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 6:19 | NE | Joey Slye 30-yard FG Takes lead | 3 | 0 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 7:17 | CHI | Cairo Santos 33-yard FG Ties game | 3 | 3 |
| 1:46 | NE | Drake Maye → Ja'Lynn Polk, 2-yard TD Takes leadJoey Slye XP | 10 | 3 |
| 0:00 | NE | Joey Slye 37-yard FG Extends lead | 13 | 3 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| No scoring | ||||
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 7:30 | NE | Joey Slye 25-yard FG Extends lead | 16 | 3 |
| 2:17 | NE | Joey Slye 33-yard FG Extends lead | 19 | 3 |
Fantasy Points: Patriots vs Bears, Week 10 2024
Fantasy leaders
- Drake MayeNE · QB12.8 PTSQB16
- Keenan AllenCHI · WR9.4 PTSWR34
- Austin HooperNE · TE9.4 PTSTE13
- DeMario DouglasNE · WR9.0 PTSWR37
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.8 | QB16 | 15/25 | 184 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 24 | 0 | 79.4 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.3 | QB26 | 16/30 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 63.2 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.4 | TE13 | TE | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 64 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 9.4 | WR34 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 5 | 44 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 9.0 | WR37 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 4 | 50 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 8.7 | RB28 | RB | 20 | 74 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 8.7 | WR38 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 4 | 47 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 7.5 | RB32 | RB | 16 | 59 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 7.2 | WR48 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | ||
| 5.7 | WR56 | WR | 1 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 24 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.3 | WR60 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 3 | 23 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.4 | RB46 | RB | 6 | 20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | ||
| 3.3 | TE35 | TE | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 13 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.6 | RB49 | RB | 5 | 26 | 0 | — | — | — | — | ||
| 2.4 | TE37 | TE | — | — | — | 4 | 1 | 14 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.5 | WR91 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | ||
| 1.1 | RB60 | RB | 1 | -4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
Fantasy Usage
New England Patriots
Snap Share
Kayshon BoutteWR62 snaps97%
Hunter HenryTE57 snaps89%
Rhamondre StevensonRB45 snaps70%
Austin HooperTE41 snaps64%
K.J. OsbornWR29 snaps45%
Target Share23 targets
- Kayshon Boutte26%, 6 targets
- DeMario Douglas22%, 5 targets
- Austin Hooper17%, 4 targets
- Hunter Henry17%, 4 targets
- JaMycal Hasty4%, 1 targets
- Other13%, 3 targets
Carry Share35 carries
- Rhamondre Stevenson57%, 20 carries
- JaMycal Hasty17%, 6 carries
- Antonio Gibson14%, 5 carries
- Drake Maye11%, 4 carries
Chicago Bears
Snap Share
DJ MooreWR58 snaps97%
Keenan AllenWR56 snaps93%
Cole KmetTE56 snaps93%
Rome OdunzeWR41 snaps68%
D'Andre SwiftRB40 snaps67%
Target Share26 targets
- Keenan Allen23%, 6 targets
- DJ Moore23%, 6 targets
- Rome Odunze23%, 6 targets
- Cole Kmet15%, 4 targets
- Roschon Johnson8%, 2 targets
- Other8%, 2 targets
Carry Share20 carries
- D'Andre Swift80%, 16 carries
- Caleb Williams10%, 2 carries
- DJ Moore5%, 1 carries
- Roschon Johnson5%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 62 | 97% | 6 | 26% | 0 | |
| 58 | 97% | 6 | 23% | 1 | |
| 56 | 93% | 6 | 23% | 0 | |
| 56 | 93% | 4 | 15% | 0 | |
| 57 | 89% | 4 | 17% | 0 | |
| 45 | 70% | 1 | 4% | 20 | |
| 41 | 68% | 6 | 23% | 0 | |
| 40 | 67% | 1 | 4% | 16 | |
| 41 | 64% | 4 | 17% | 0 | |
| 29 | 45% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 27 | 42% | 5 | 22% | 0 | |
| 26 | 41% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 20 | 33% | 2 | 8% | 1 | |
| 14 | 23% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 14 | 23% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 12 | 19% | 1 | 4% | 6 | |
| 7 | 11% | 0 | 0% | 5 | |
| 4 | 6% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 2 | 3% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 1 | 2% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 1 | 2% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+5.5Ja'Lynn Polk7.2 PTS vs 1.7 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−8.3Caleb Williams6.3 PTS vs 14.6 xFP
- Highest expected volume14.8 xFPRhamondre Stevenson8.7 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rhamondre StevensonNE · RB | 8.7 | 14.8 | −6.1 | 70% | 57% car | — | 0 | 20 | 57% | 1 | 4% |
| Caleb WilliamsCHI · QB | 6.3 | 14.6 | −8.3 | 100% | 30 att | — | 30 | 2 | 10% | 0 | 0% |
| Drake MayeNE · QB | 12.8 | 13.7 | −0.9 | 100% | 25 att | — | 25 | 4 | 11% | 0 | 0% |
| D'Andre SwiftCHI · RB | 7.5 | 12.1 | −4.6 | 67% | 80% car | — | 0 | 16 | 80% | 1 | 4% |
| DJ MooreCHI · WR | 5.7 | 10.9 | −5.2 | 97% | 23% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 5% | 6 | 23% |
| Kayshon BoutteNE · WR | 8.7 | 10.3 | −1.6 | 97% | 26% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 26% |
| Keenan AllenCHI · WR | 9.4 | 10.3 | −0.9 | 93% | 23% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 23% |
| Rome OdunzeCHI · WR | 5.3 | 10.3 | −5.0 | 68% | 23% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 23% |
| DeMario DouglasNE · WR | 9.0 | 8.6 | +0.4 | 42% | 22% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 22% |
| Austin HooperNE · TE | 9.4 | 6.9 | +2.5 | 64% | 17% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 17% |
| Cole KmetCHI · TE | 3.3 | 6.9 | −3.6 | 93% | 15% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 15% |
| Hunter HenryNE · TE | 2.4 | 6.9 | −4.5 | 89% | 17% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 17% |
| JaMycal HastyNE · RB | 3.4 | 5.6 | −2.2 | 19% | 17% car | — | 0 | 6 | 17% | 1 | 4% |
| Roschon JohnsonCHI · RB | 1.1 | 4.1 | −3.0 | 33% | 8% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 5% | 2 | 8% |
| Antonio GibsonNE · RB | 2.6 | 3.3 | −0.7 | 11% | 14% car | — | 0 | 5 | 14% | 0 | 0% |
| DeAndre CarterCHI · WR | 1.5 | 1.7 | −0.2 | 2% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Ja'Lynn PolkNE · WR | 7.2 | 1.7 | +5.5 | 41% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| K.J. OsbornNE · WR | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 45% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
Team totals: Patriots 23 targets and 35 carries; Bears 26 targets and 20 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2024 season: 1.71 PPR points per target (68% catch rate), 0.65 per carry and 0.44 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Drake Maye
NE · QB · 12.8 pts on 13.7 expected
15 of 25 passing for 184 yards, 1 touchdown, 1 interception; 4 carries for 24 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 13.7 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 2.1, 21.5, 20.8, 11.5, 17.7, 12.8
W3W6W7W8W9W10
Caleb Williams Unlucky
CHI · QB · 6.3 pts on 14.6 expected
16 of 30 passing for 120 yards; 2 carries for 15 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 14.6 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 11.5, 23.6, 29.6, 9.9, 9.2, 6.3
W4W5W6W8W9W10
Lowest-scoring game of the season.
Rhamondre Stevenson Unlucky
NE · RB · 8.7 pts on 14.8 expected
1 target (4% of the team's), 1 catch for 3 yards; 20 carries (57% of the team's) for 74 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 14.8 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 8.2, 19.2, 4.5, 23.5, 22.4, 8.7
W4W5W7W8W9W10
Kayshon Boutte
NE · WR · 8.7 pts on 10.3 expected
6 targets (26% of the team's), 4 catches for 47 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 10.3 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 5.4, 14.9, 4.3, 7.6, 3.8, 8.7
W5W6W7W8W9W10
Best score since Week 6.
D'Andre Swift Volume, no payoff
CHI · RB · 7.5 pts on 12.1 expected
1 target (4% of the team's), 1 catch for 6 yards; 16 carries (80% of the team's) for 59 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 12.1 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 29.5, 20.0, 21.9, 18.9, 14.2, 7.5
W4W5W6W8W9W10
Fewest points since Week 3.
DJ Moore Unlucky
CHI · WR · 5.7 pts on 10.9 expected
6 targets (23% of the team's), 3 catches for 24 yards; 1 carry (5% of the team's) for 3 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 10.9 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 11.2, 27.5, 6.0, 5.4, 7.3, 5.7
W4W5W6W8W9W10
Rome Odunze Unlucky
CHI · WR · 5.3 pts on 10.3 expected
6 targets (23% of the team's), 3 catches for 23 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 10.3 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 2.0, 9.0, 6.0, 8.4, 15.4, 5.3
W4W5W6W8W9W10
Fewest points since Week 4.
Ja'Lynn Polk Ran hot
NE · WR · 7.2 pts on 1.7 expected
1 target (4% of the team's), 1 catch for 2 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 1.7 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 6.0, 2.3, 1.4, 0.0, 0.0, 7.2
W4W5W6W7W9W10
Best score since Week 2.
Stock Up, Stock Down
New England Patriots
- ▲Stock up: Kayshon Boutte played 97% of the snaps, up from a 67% season average.
- ▼Stock down: DeMario Douglas played 42% of the snaps, down from a 61% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Antonio Gibson played 11% of the snaps, down from a 29% season average.
Chicago Bears
- ▼Stock down: Rome Odunze played 68% of the snaps, down from a 84% season average.
- ▼Stock down: DeAndre Carter played 2% of the snaps, down from a 34% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2024 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Patriots D | Bears D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 16.5 | 13.8 |
| RBs | 24.4 | 25.2 |
| WRs | 32.0 | 28.9 |
| TEs | 11.8 | 12.3 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Chicago opened at 50% win probability and fell below 2% in the fourth quarter.
Bears win probability
Key Swings
- −9Slye 30-yd FG50% → 41%Q1 6:19
- +11Santos 33-yd FG39% → 50%Q2 7:17
- −26Maye → Polk, 2-yd TD50% → 24%Q2 1:46
- −8Slye 37-yd FG23% → 15%Q2 0:00
- −1Slye 25-yd FG2% → <1%Q4 7:30
Swing in Bears win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| New England Patriots | Measure | Chicago Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 61 | Plays | 59 |
| 43% | Pass rate | 66% |
| 7.1 | Yds / dropback | 1.8 |
| 4.1 | Yds / carry | 3.6 |
| 5/14 | Third downs | 1/14 |
Efficiency edge New England ran 2 more plays and gained 5.3 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- NE Boutte 26% · Douglas 22% · Hooper 17%
- CHI Moore 23% · Allen 23% · Odunze 23%
Possession Results
| Result | NE | CHI |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 1 | 0 |
| Field goals | 4 | 1 |
| Punts | 5 | 8 |
| Turnovers | 1 | 0 |
| Turnovers on downs | 0 | 2 |
CHI turnover edge: +1
- The Patriots opened the scoring on their second possession, a 11-play, 54-yard drive that ended in a field goal.
- The Patriots drained the clock with two second-half drives of four to seven minutes.
All 23 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NE | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 6 | 1:32 | Punt |
| CHI | Q1 13:28 | 3 | 0 | 1:43 | Punt |
| NE | Q1 11:45 | 11 | 54 | 5:26 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q1 6:19 | 7 | 21 | 4:35 | Punt |
| NE | Q1 1:44 | 3 | 25 | 1:11 | Interception |
| CHI | Q1 0:33 | 3 | 5 | 2:03 | Punt |
| NE | Q2 13:30 | 3 | 3 | 1:32 | Punt |
| CHI | Q2 11:58 | 12 | 50 | 4:41 | Field goal |
| NE | Q2 7:17 | 10 | 70 | 5:31 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q2 1:46 | 5 | 6 | 1:11 | Punt |
| NE | Q2 0:35 | 5 | 41 | 0:35 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q3 15:00 | 4 | 20 | 2:53 | Punt |
| NE | Q3 12:07 | 6 | 25 | 4:17 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 7:50 | 6 | 7 | 3:01 | Punt |
| NE | Q3 4:49 | 3 | 4 | 2:07 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 2:42 | 3 | 4 | 1:35 | Punt |
| NE | Q3 1:07 | 3 | 3 | 1:02 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 0:05 | 3 | -6 | 1:32 | Punt |
| NE | Q4 13:33 | 10 | 47 | 6:03 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q4 7:30 | 8 | 12 | 2:36 | Downs |
| NE | Q4 4:54 | 7 | 31 | 2:37 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q4 2:17 | 6 | 18 | 1:42 | Downs |
| NE | Q4 0:35 | 1 | -1 | 0:35 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Patriots vs Bears Head-to-Head
The Patriots and Bears first met in 1973 and have played 16 times since.
- All-time series
- 11–5Patriots lead, 16 meetings since 1973
- Postseason
- 1–0Bears won in 1985
- Largest Patriots win
- 36–72010
- Largest Bears win
- 46–101985
Since 2021
1–1 Series tied
2 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- B
- P
Oldest to newest. P = Patriots win, B = Bears win, outlined = this game.
2026 Meetings
- Week 7 Patriots at Bears Upcoming
Recent Meetings
- 2024 Wk 10 Patriots at Bears NE 19 CHI 3 NE W
- 2022 Wk 7 Bears at Patriots, 2022 Wk 7 recap CHI 33 NE 14 CHI W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2024 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Patriots | Stat | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 4-13 | Record | 5-12 |
| 17.0 | Points per game | 18.2 |
| 291.9 | Yards per game | 283.5 |
| 4.8 | Yards per play | 4.5 |
| 24.5 | Points allowed per game | 21.8 |
| 342.9 | Yards allowed per game | 354.2 |
Patriots vs Bears Fantasy Outlook for 2026
One meeting is left on the 2026 schedule: Week 7 in Chicago. Here's how to decide who to play in your league.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Patriots or Bears player start in Week 7? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Patriots and Bears players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Patriots and Bears defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere this matchup falls in each team's fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2024 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Patriots vs Bears Game FAQ
Who won the 2024 Patriots vs Bears Week 10 game?
The New England Patriots beat the Chicago Bears 19–3 in Week 10 of the 2024 season. The game was played at Soldier Field in Chicago, IL, on November 10, 2024. See the Patriots' 2024 schedule.
What was the final score of Patriots vs Bears?
The final score was Patriots 19, Bears 3. The Patriots led 13–3 at halftime, and the second half went Patriots 6, Bears 0.
What happened in the Patriots vs Bears game?
New England led 13–3 at halftime and outscored Chicago 6–0 after the break to win 19–3. The Patriots finished with a 328–142 edge in total offense and averaged 5.4 yards per play. Drake Maye led all players with 15 of 25 passing for 184 yards and a touchdown, plus 4 carries for 24 rushing yards. The Patriots committed 1 turnover, the Bears none.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Patriots vs Bears?
Drake Maye led the game with 12.8 PPR fantasy points, the QB16 of Week 10, on 15 of 25 passing for 184 yards and a touchdown, plus 4 carries for 24 rushing yards. Keenan Allen was next with 9.4 (WR34). See Drake Maye's 2024 game log.
Who led Patriots vs Bears in passing, rushing and receiving?
Drake Maye (NE) led all passers with 15 of 25 for 184 yards, a touchdown and an interception. Rhamondre Stevenson (NE) led in rushing with 20 carries for 74 yards. Austin Hooper (NE) led in receiving with 3 catches for 64 yards.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Patriots vs Bears?
Ja'Lynn Polk outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 7.2 PPR points on 1.7 xFP (+5.5). Caleb Williams fell furthest short, with 6.3 points on 14.6 xFP (−8.3). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Patriots vs Bears?
Rhamondre Stevenson had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 14.8 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 8.7. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the Patriots beat the Bears?
The Patriots beat the Bears 19–3 because they averaged 5.4 yards per play to 2.4 and outgained them 328–142.
Which team won the turnover battle in Patriots vs Bears?
The Bears won the turnover battle 1–0: the Patriots gave the ball away 1 time and the Bears not at all. The Patriots won the game anyway.
What was the turning point of Patriots vs Bears?
Drake Maye's 2-yard touchdown pass to Ja'Lynn Polk with 1:46 left in the second quarter was the biggest swing of the game, moving the Bears' win probability from 50% to 24%.
What is the all-time Patriots vs Bears record?
The Patriots lead the all-time series 11–5 across 16 meetings since 1973, including a 0–1 record in the postseason.
Have the Patriots and Bears played in the Super Bowl?
Yes, once: the Bears won Super Bowl XX 46–10 over the Patriots after the 1985 season.
When did the Patriots and Bears last play before this game?
Before Week 10 of 2024, they last met in the 2022 season on October 24, 2022, when the Bears beat the Patriots 33–14.
What is the Patriots vs Bears record since 2021?
The series is tied 1–1 across 2 meetings since the 2021 season, including this game.
