Final2022 Week 18
Soldier Field, Chicago, IL|
Minnesota Vikings vs Chicago Bears, Week 18 2022
Minnesota Vikings
AwayWon
29
Chicago Bears
Home
13
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vikings | 6 | 10 | 7 | 6 | 29 |
| Bears | 0 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 13 |
MIN 29 · CHI 13 Final
Passing leader
MIN · QB
13.0PPR pts
17/20, 225 YDS, 1 TD
Top fantasy scorer
Alexander Mattison
MIN · RB
19.0PPR pts
10 ATT, 54 YDS, 2 TD, 1 REC, 6 REC YDS
Bears leader
CHI · TE
15.7PPR pts
4 REC, 57 YDS, 1 TD
Defensive playmaker
Greg Stroman Jr.
CHI
1 INT, 8 TKL
Vikings 29, Bears 13: Minnesota leads from start to finish
Minnesota led 16–6 at halftime and outscored Chicago 13–7 after the break to win 29–13. The Vikings finished with a 482–259 edge in total offense and averaged 6.8 yards per play.
The Bears went 2-for-9 on third down and committed two turnovers, while the Vikings kept the ball for 36:36.
The two teams meet again in Week 18 of 2026. If you roster anyone from either side, run the start/sit call in Redraft Command and it will weigh your lineup, your opponent and your league scoring, not only the player rankings.
Key advantages
- +1.6 yards/play MIN 6.8 · CHI 5.2
- +223 total yards MIN 482 · CHI 259
- +33% third-down rate MIN 55% · CHI 22%
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Viking or Bear on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Vikings Won
Minnesota won the efficiency, third-down, and time of possession battles.
| Vikings | Stat | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 6.8 | Yards per play | 5.2 |
| 482 | Total yards | 259 |
| 55% | Third-down conversion | 22% |
| Other team stats | ||
| 71 | Plays | 50 |
| 2 | Turnovers | 2 |
| 36:36 | Time of possession | 23:24 |
Scoring Summary
The Vikings scored three touchdowns and three field goals; the Bears scored two touchdowns.
| Time | Team | Play | MIN | CHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 10:12 | MIN | Kirk Cousins → Adam Thielen, 4-yard TD Takes leadXP missed | 6 | 0 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 9:20 | MIN | Alexander Mattison 1-yard TD run Extends leadGreg Joseph XP | 13 | 0 |
| 4:57 | MIN | Greg Joseph 28-yard FG Extends lead | 16 | 0 |
| 3:31 | CHI | Velus Jones Jr. 42-yard TD run2-pt try failed | 16 | 6 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 9:25 | MIN | Alexander Mattison 1-yard TD run Extends leadGreg Joseph XP | 23 | 6 |
| 4:07 | CHI | Nathan Peterman → Cole Kmet, 11-yard TDCairo Santos XP | 23 | 13 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 14:55 | MIN | Greg Joseph 50-yard FG Extends lead | 26 | 13 |
| 3:39 | MIN | Greg Joseph 41-yard FG Extends lead | 29 | 13 |
Fantasy Points: Vikings vs Bears, Week 18 2022
Fantasy leaders
- Alexander MattisonMIN · RB19.0 PTSRB4
- K.J. OsbornMIN · WR16.7 PTSWR12
- Cole KmetCHI · TE15.7 PTSTE4
- Velus JonesCHI · WR14.0 PTSWR20
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13.0 | QB16 | 17/20 | 225 | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | 130.2 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.4 | QB34 | 11/13 | 116 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 71.8 | Start/Sit → | |
| 9.3 | QB25 | 11/19 | 114 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 92.9 | ||
| -0.9 | — | 2/8 | 33 | 0 | 2 | 2 | -2 | 0 | 4.7 |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19.0 | RB4 | RB | 10 | 54 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | ||
| 16.7 | WR12 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 5 | 117 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 15.7 | TE4 | TE | — | — | — | 5 | 4 | 57 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 14.0 | WR20 | WR | 1 | 42 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 28 | 0 | ||
| 10.2 | WR38 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 4 | 62 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 9.2 | WR43 | WR | 1 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 1 | ||
| 7.8 | WR51 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 4 | 38 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.9 | RB43 | RB | 10 | 50 | 0 | 2 | 1 | -1 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.9 | WR69 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 2 | 29 | 0 | ||
| 4.4 | TE32 | TE | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 14 | 0 | ||
| 4.2 | WR76 | WR | 1 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 17 | 0 | ||
| 3.9 | RB52 | RB | 5 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.9 | WR81 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 2 | 19 | 0 | ||
| 2.7 | RB61 | RB | 11 | 37 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 2.6 | TE41 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 16 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.1 | RB68 | RB | 7 | 21 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.0 | RB70 | RB | 6 | 20 | 0 | — | — | — | — | ||
| 1.7 | TE48 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 7 | 0 | ||
| 1.5 | WR111 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | ||
| 1.3 | WR112 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | ||
| 0.0 | — | RB | — | — | — | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fantasy Usage
Minnesota Vikings
Snap Share
K.J. OsbornWR55 snaps77%
Adam ThielenWR37 snaps52%
Justin JeffersonWR36 snaps51%
T.J. HockensonTE33 snaps46%
Jalen NailorWR33 snaps46%
Target Share28 targets
- K.J. Osborn21%, 6 targets
- Justin Jefferson18%, 5 targets
- Jalen Nailor18%, 5 targets
- Adam Thielen11%, 3 targets
- Irv Smith11%, 3 targets
- Other21%, 6 targets
Carry Share38 carries
- Dalvin Cook29%, 11 carries
- Alexander Mattison26%, 10 carries
- Ty Chandler16%, 6 carries
- Kene Nwangwu13%, 5 carries
- Nick Mullens11%, 4 carries
- Other5%, 2 carries
Chicago Bears
Snap Share
Cole KmetTE48 snaps94%
Chase ClaypoolWR36 snaps71%
Dante PettisWR32 snaps63%
Byron PringleWR28 snaps55%
David MontgomeryRB24 snaps47%
Target Share27 targets
- Dante Pettis22%, 6 targets
- Chase Claypool22%, 6 targets
- Cole Kmet19%, 5 targets
- N'Keal Harry7%, 2 targets
- Khalil Herbert7%, 2 targets
- Other22%, 6 targets
Carry Share22 carries
- Khalil Herbert45%, 10 carries
- David Montgomery32%, 7 carries
- Nathan Peterman9%, 2 carries
- Tim Boyle9%, 2 carries
- Velus Jones5%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48 | 94% | 5 | 19% | 0 | |
| 55 | 77% | 6 | 21% | 0 | |
| 36 | 71% | 6 | 22% | 0 | |
| 32 | 63% | 6 | 22% | 0 | |
| 28 | 55% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 37 | 52% | 3 | 11% | 1 | |
| 36 | 51% | 5 | 18% | 0 | |
| 24 | 47% | 0 | 0% | 7 | |
| 33 | 46% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 33 | 46% | 5 | 18% | 0 | |
| 32 | 45% | 3 | 11% | 0 | |
| 19 | 37% | 2 | 7% | 10 | |
| 26 | 37% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 25 | 35% | 1 | 4% | 10 | |
| 24 | 34% | 1 | 4% | 11 | |
| 17 | 33% | 2 | 7% | 0 | |
| 12 | 24% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 16 | 23% | 2 | 7% | 1 | |
| 10 | 20% | 2 | 7% | 1 | |
| 12 | 17% | 0 | 0% | 6 | |
| 8 | 16% | 2 | 7% | 0 | |
| 10 | 14% | 1 | 4% | 5 | |
| 4 | 8% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 3 | 6% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+10.9Alexander Mattison19.0 PTS vs 8.1 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−6.1Dante Pettis3.9 PTS vs 10.0 xFP
- Highest expected volume10.0 xFPChase Claypool4.9 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chase ClaypoolCHI · WR | 4.9 | 10.0 | −5.1 | 71% | 22% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 22% |
| Dante PettisCHI · WR | 3.9 | 10.0 | −6.1 | 63% | 22% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 22% |
| K.J. OsbornMIN · WR | 16.7 | 10.0 | +6.7 | 77% | 19% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 19% |
| Khalil HerbertCHI · RB | 5.9 | 9.8 | −3.9 | 37% | 45% car | — | 0 | 10 | 45% | 2 | 7% |
| Nathan PetermanCHI · QB | 9.3 | 9.3 | 0.0 | 75% | 19 att | — | 19 | 2 | 9% | 0 | 0% |
| Dalvin CookMIN · RB | 2.7 | 8.7 | −6.0 | 34% | 29% car | — | 0 | 11 | 29% | 1 | 3% |
| Kirk CousinsMIN · QB | 13.0 | 8.5 | +4.5 | 54% | 20 att | — | 20 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Cole KmetCHI · TE | 15.7 | 8.3 | +7.4 | 94% | 19% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 19% |
| Jalen NailorMIN · WR | 10.2 | 8.3 | +1.9 | 46% | 16% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 16% |
| Justin JeffersonMIN · WR | 7.8 | 8.3 | −0.5 | 51% | 16% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 16% |
| Alexander MattisonMIN · RB | 19.0 | 8.1 | +10.9 | 35% | 26% car | — | 0 | 10 | 26% | 1 | 3% |
| Nick MullensMIN · QB | 4.4 | 8.1 | −3.7 | 46% | 13 att | — | 13 | 4 | 11% | 0 | 0% |
| C.J. HamMIN · RB | 8.7 | 6.7 | +2.0 | — | 13% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 13% |
| Adam ThielenMIN · WR | 9.2 | 5.6 | +3.6 | 52% | 9% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 3 | 9% |
| Irv Smith Jr.MIN · TE | 4.4 | 5.0 | −0.6 | 45% | 9% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 9% |
| Kene NwangwuMIN · RB | 3.9 | 4.9 | −1.0 | 14% | 13% car | — | 0 | 5 | 13% | 1 | 3% |
| Tim BoyleCHI · QB | -0.9 | 4.7 | −5.6 | 25% | 8 att | — | 8 | 2 | 9% | 0 | 0% |
| David MontgomeryCHI · RB | 2.1 | 4.5 | −2.4 | 47% | 32% car | — | 0 | 7 | 32% | 0 | 0% |
| Jalen ReagorMIN · WR | 4.2 | 4.0 | +0.2 | 23% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 2 | 6% |
| Velus Jones Jr.CHI · WR | 14.0 | 4.0 | +10.0 | 20% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 5% | 2 | 7% |
| Ty ChandlerMIN · RB | 2.0 | 3.9 | −1.9 | 17% | 16% car | — | 0 | 6 | 16% | 0 | 0% |
| N'Keal HarryCHI · TE | 1.7 | 3.3 | −1.6 | 33% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 7% |
| Trestan EbnerCHI · RB | 0.0 | 3.3 | −3.3 | 16% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 7% |
| Byron PringleCHI · WR | 1.5 | 1.7 | −0.2 | 55% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Equanimeous St. BrownCHI · WR | 1.3 | 1.7 | −0.4 | 8% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| T.J. HockensonMIN · TE | 2.6 | 1.7 | +0.9 | 46% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
Team totals: Vikings 32 targets and 38 carries; Bears 27 targets and 22 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2022 season: 1.67 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.64 per carry and 0.42 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Kirk Cousins
MIN · QB · 13.0 pts on 8.5 expected
17 of 20 passing for 225 yards, 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 8.5 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 11.8, 25.0, 34.4, 24.2, 10.9, 13.0
W13W14W15W16W17W18
No interceptions after 5 in the previous four games.
Nathan Peterman
CHI · QB · 9.3 pts on 9.3 expected
11 of 19 passing for 114 yards, 1 touchdown; 2 carries for 7 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 9.3 expected.
K.J. Osborn Ran hot
MIN · WR · 16.7 pts on 10.0 expected
6 targets (19% of the team's), 5 catches for 117 yards.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 10.0 points; efficiency supplied the rest.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 3.7, 14.8, 31.7, 4.7, 18.9, 16.7
W13W14W15W16W17W18
Dalvin Cook Unlucky
MIN · RB · 2.7 pts on 8.7 expected
1 target (3% of the team's), 1 catch for 0 yards; 11 carries (29% of the team's) for 37 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 8.7 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 16.3, 8.6, 27.0, 10.7, 6.4, 2.7
W13W14W15W16W17W18
Lowest-scoring game of the season.
Chase Claypool Unlucky
CHI · WR · 4.9 pts on 10.0 expected
6 targets (22% of the team's), 2 catches for 29 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 10.0 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 1.8, 3.1, 7.1, 5.8, 0.0, 4.9
W10W11W12W13W17W18
Dante Pettis Unlucky
CHI · WR · 3.9 pts on 10.0 expected
6 targets (22% of the team's), 2 catches for 19 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 10.0 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 2.2, 2.4, 2.3, 9.1, 0.0, 3.9
W12W13W15W16W17W18
Cole Kmet Ran hot
CHI · TE · 15.7 pts on 8.3 expected
5 targets (19% of the team's), 4 catches for 57 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 8.3 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 5.7, 13.2, 6.5, 7.7, 10.7, 15.7
W12W13W15W16W17W18
Best score since Week 10.
Alexander Mattison Ran hot
MIN · RB · 19.0 pts on 8.1 expected
1 target (3% of the team's), 1 catch for 6 yards; 10 carries (26% of the team's) for 54 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 8.1 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 9.8, -0.1, 0.1, 1.7, 5.5, 19.0
W13W14W15W16W17W18
Season high in carries (10). Best fantasy game of the season.
Stock Up, Stock Down
Minnesota Vikings
- ▲Stock up: Alexander Mattison led the backfield with 35% of the snaps after trailing Dalvin Cook before this game.
- ▲Stock up: Jalen Nailor played 46% of the snaps, up from a 8% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Dalvin Cook lost the backfield lead: 34% of the snaps to Alexander Mattison's 35%.
Chicago Bears
- ▼Stock down: David Montgomery played 47% of the snaps, down from a 66% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Equanimeous St. Brown played 8% of the snaps, down from a 60% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2022 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Vikings D | Bears D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 18.8 | 18.5 |
| RBs | 22.1 | 27.3 |
| WRs | 39.2 | 32.7 |
| TEs | 11.7 | 9.0 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Chicago opened at 32% win probability and fell below 2% in the third quarter.
Bears win probability
Key Swings
- −14Cousins → Thielen, 4-yd TD32% → 18%Q1 10:12
- −12Mattison 1-yd TD run17% → 6%Q2 9:20
- +6Jones 42-yd TD run3% → 9%Q2 3:31
- −6Mattison 1-yd TD run7% → 1%Q3 9:25
- +5Peterman → Kmet, 11-yd TD1% → 6%Q3 4:07
Swing in Bears win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Minnesota Vikings | Measure | Chicago Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 71 | Plays | 50 |
| 46% | Pass rate | 56% |
| 10.3 | Yds / dropback | 5.0 |
| 3.7 | Yds / carry | 5.4 |
| 6/11 | Third downs | 2/9 |
Efficiency edge Minnesota ran 21 more plays and gained 5.3 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- MIN Osborn 19% · Nailor 16% · Jefferson 16%
- CHI Claypool 22% · Pettis 22% · Kmet 19%
Possession Results
| Result | MIN | CHI |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 3 | 2 |
| Field goals | 3 | 0 |
| Punts | 1 | 3 |
| Turnovers | 2 | 2 |
| Turnovers on downs | 0 | 2 |
- The Vikings opened the scoring on their first possession, a 4-play, 73-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
- The Vikings scored touchdowns on two of their first three drives, then drained the clock with two second-half drives of four to six minutes.
All 20 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 9 | 2:31 | Punt |
| MIN | Q1 12:29 | 4 | 73 | 2:17 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q1 10:12 | 5 | 32 | 3:05 | Punt |
| MIN | Q1 7:07 | 7 | 49 | 2:55 | Fumble |
| CHI | Q1 4:12 | 8 | 37 | 3:23 | Downs |
| MIN | Q1 0:49 | 12 | 66 | 6:29 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q2 9:20 | 3 | 3 | 1:01 | Interception |
| MIN | Q2 8:19 | 6 | 25 | 3:22 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q2 4:57 | 3 | 75 | 1:26 | Touchdown |
| MIN | Q2 3:31 | 10 | 64 | 3:31 | End of half |
| MIN | Q3 15:00 | 11 | 75 | 5:35 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q3 9:25 | 10 | 75 | 5:18 | Touchdown |
| MIN | Q3 4:07 | 8 | 43 | 4:12 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q4 14:55 | 5 | 13 | 3:23 | Punt |
| MIN | Q4 11:32 | 4 | 23 | 2:14 | Interception |
| CHI | Q4 9:18 | 7 | 12 | 2:04 | Downs |
| MIN | Q4 7:14 | 9 | 36 | 3:35 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q4 3:39 | 4 | 0 | 0:26 | Interception |
| MIN | Q4 3:13 | 3 | 3 | 2:26 | Punt |
| CHI | Q4 0:47 | 2 | -2 | 0:47 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Vikings vs Bears Head-to-Head
The Vikings and Bears first met in 1961 and have played 131 times since. They have been NFC North rivals since 1970.
- All-time series
- 70–59–2Vikings lead, 131 meetings since 1961
- Postseason
- 1–0Bears won in 1994
- Largest Vikings win
- 31–01969
- Largest Bears win
- 38–71989
Since 2021
9–2 Vikings lead
11 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- V
- V
- V
- V
- V
- B
- V
- V
- V
- B
- V
Oldest to newest. V = Vikings win, B = Bears win, outlined = this game.
2026 Meetings
- Week 18 Bears at Vikings Upcoming
Recent Meetings
- 2026 Wk 2 Vikings at Bears, 2026 Wk 2 recap MIN 9 CHI 3 MIN W
- 2025 Wk 11 Bears at Vikings, 2025 Wk 11 recap CHI 19 MIN 17 CHI W
- 2025 Wk 1 Vikings at Bears, 2025 Wk 1 recap MIN 27 CHI 24 MIN W
- 2024 Wk 15 Bears at Vikings, 2024 Wk 15 recap MIN 30 CHI 12 MIN W
- 2024 Wk 12 Vikings at Bears, 2024 Wk 12 recap MIN 30 CHI 27 MIN W
- 2023 Wk 12 Bears at Vikings, 2023 Wk 12 recap CHI 12 MIN 10 CHI W
- 2023 Wk 6 Vikings at Bears, 2023 Wk 6 recap MIN 19 CHI 13 MIN W
- 2022 Wk 18 Vikings at Bears MIN 29 CHI 13 MIN W
- 2022 Wk 5 Bears at Vikings, 2022 Wk 5 recap MIN 29 CHI 22 MIN W
- 2021 Wk 18 Bears at Vikings, 2021 Wk 18 recap MIN 31 CHI 17 MIN W
- 2021 Wk 15 Vikings at Bears, 2021 Wk 15 recap MIN 17 CHI 9 MIN W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2022 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Vikings | Stat | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 13-4 | Record | 3-14 |
| 24.9 | Points per game | 19.2 |
| 361.5 | Yards per game | 307.8 |
| 5.5 | Yards per play | 5.3 |
| 25.1 | Points allowed per game | 27.2 |
| 388.7 | Yards allowed per game | 375.9 |
Vikings vs Bears Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- MIN −6.5Vikings covered by 9.5
- Total
- 42.5Under: 42 points scored (by 0.5)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vikings | 24.5 | 29 | +4.5 |
| Bears | 18.0 | 13 | −5.0 |
The Vikings beat their implied total and the Bears fell short of theirs; the Fantasy tab has the player lines behind it.
Betting Trends
Last 4 meetings: Vikings 3–1 ATS, overs and unders 2–2.
Each team's 2022 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
Minnesota Vikings
- Against the spread
- 7–9–1
- Over/under
- 11–6
- ATS as favorite
- 6–5–1
- ATS as underdog
- 1–4
- ATS on the road
- 3–4–1
Chicago Bears
- Against the spread
- 5–11–1
- Over/under
- 10–7
- ATS as favorite
- 0–1–1
- ATS as underdog
- 5–10
- ATS at home
- 3–5–1
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Vikings vs Bears Fantasy Outlook for 2026
One meeting is left on the 2026 schedule: Week 18 in Minnesota. Here's how to decide who to play in your league.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Vikings or Bears player start in Week 18? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Vikings and Bears players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Vikings and Bears defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere this matchup falls in each team's fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2022 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Vikings vs Bears Game FAQ
Who won the 2022 Vikings vs Bears Week 18 game?
The Minnesota Vikings beat the Chicago Bears 29–13 in Week 18 of the 2022 season. The game was played at Soldier Field in Chicago, IL, on January 8, 2023. See the Vikings' 2022 schedule.
What was the final score of Vikings vs Bears?
The final score was Vikings 29, Bears 13. The Vikings led 16–6 at halftime, and the second half went Vikings 13, Bears 7.
What happened in the Vikings vs Bears game?
Minnesota led 16–6 at halftime and outscored Chicago 13–7 after the break to win 29–13. The Vikings finished with a 482–259 edge in total offense and averaged 6.8 yards per play. Alexander Mattison led all players with a catch for 6 yards, plus 10 carries for 54 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Vikings vs Bears?
Alexander Mattison led the game with 19.0 PPR fantasy points, the RB4 of Week 18, on a catch for 6 yards, plus 10 carries for 54 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns. K.J. Osborn was next with 16.7 (WR12).
Who led Vikings vs Bears in passing, rushing and receiving?
Kirk Cousins (MIN) led all passers with 17 of 20 for 225 yards and a touchdown. Alexander Mattison (MIN) led in rushing with 10 carries for 54 yards and 2 touchdowns. K.J. Osborn (MIN) led in receiving with 5 catches for 117 yards.
How many fantasy points did Alexander Mattison score against the Bears?
Alexander Mattison scored 19.0 points in PPR leagues, 18.5 in half-PPR and 18.0 in standard scoring against the Bears in Week 18 of the 2022 season, on a catch for 6 yards, plus 10 carries for 54 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Vikings vs Bears?
Alexander Mattison outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 19.0 PPR points on 8.1 xFP (+10.9). Dante Pettis fell furthest short, with 3.9 points on 10.0 xFP (−6.1). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Vikings vs Bears?
Chase Claypool had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 10.0 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 4.9. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the Vikings beat the Bears?
The Vikings beat the Bears 29–13 because they averaged 6.8 yards per play to 5.2 and outgained them 482–259.
What is the all-time Vikings vs Bears record?
The Vikings lead the all-time series 70–59–2 across 131 meetings since 1961, including a 0–1 record in the postseason.
When did the Vikings and Bears last play before this game?
Before Week 18 of 2022, they last met in the 2022 season on October 9, 2022, when the Vikings beat the Bears 29–22.
Have the Vikings and Bears met in the playoffs?
Yes, 1 time, most recently in the 1994 playoffs. The Vikings are 0–1 against the Bears in the postseason.
What was the closing spread for Vikings vs Bears?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Vikings −6.5, making the Minnesota Vikings 6.5-point favorites, with a closing total of 42.5. That implied about 24.5 points for the Vikings and 18.0 for the Bears.
Did Vikings vs Bears go over or under the total?
The game went under. The consensus closing total was 42.5, and the teams combined for 42 points, 0.5 under the number.
Who covered the spread in Vikings vs Bears?
The Vikings covered by 9.5 against the closing line of Vikings −6.5. The final margin was 16 points.
