Final2025 Week 1
Soldier Field, Chicago, IL|
Minnesota Vikings vs Chicago Bears, Week 1 2025
Minnesota Vikings
AwayWon
27
Chicago Bears
Home
24
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vikings | 0 | 6 | 0 | 21 | 27 |
| Bears | 7 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 24 |
MIN 27 · CHI 24 Final
Passing leader
CHI · QB
24.2PPR pts
21/35, 210 YDS, 1 TD, 1 RUSH TD
Top fantasy scorer
Aaron Jones Sr.
MIN · RB
15.7PPR pts
8 ATT, 23 YDS, 3 REC, 44 REC YDS, 1 REC TD
Bears leader
CHI · WR
15.7PPR pts
6 REC, 37 YDS, 1 TD
Defensive playmaker
Nahshon Wright
CHI
1 INT, 1 TD, 4 TKL
Vikings 27, Bears 24: Minnesota rallies from 4 down at halftime
Minnesota erased a 10–6 halftime deficit, outscoring Chicago 21–14 after the break to win 27–24. Chicago outgained the Vikings 317–254, but the Vikings averaged 5.2 yards per play.
The Bears went 3-for-12 on third down and committed one turnover.
The two teams meet again in Week 18 of 2026. If you roster anyone from either side, run the start/sit call in Redraft Command and it will weigh your lineup, your opponent and your league scoring, not only the player rankings.
Key advantages
- +0.2 yards/play MIN 5.2 · CHI 5.0
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Viking or Bear on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Vikings Won
Minnesota won the efficiency battle.
| Vikings | Stat | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 5.2 | Yards per play | 5.0 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 254 | Total yards | 317 |
| 49 | Plays | 63 |
| 1 | Turnovers | 1 |
| 25% | Third-down conversion | 25% |
| 27:07 | Time of possession | 32:53 |
Scoring Summary
The Vikings scored three touchdowns and two field goals; the Bears scored three touchdowns and one field goal.
| Time | Team | Play | MIN | CHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 7:04 | CHI | Caleb Williams 9-yard TD run Takes leadCairo Santos XP | 0 | 7 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 12:48 | MIN | Will Reichard 31-yard FG | 3 | 7 |
| 0:24 | CHI | Cairo Santos 42-yard FG Extends lead | 3 | 10 |
| 0:06 | MIN | Will Reichard 59-yard FG | 6 | 10 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 12:51 | CHI | Nahshon Wright 74-yard interception return TD Extends leadCairo Santos XP | 6 | 17 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 12:13 | MIN | J.J. McCarthy → Justin Jefferson, 13-yard TD2-pt try failed | 12 | 17 |
| 9:46 | MIN | J.J. McCarthy → Aaron Jones Sr., 27-yard TD Game winnerJ.J. McCarthy → Adam Thielen, 2-pt conversion | 20 | 17 |
| 2:53 | MIN | J.J. McCarthy 14-yard TD run Extends leadWill Reichard XP | 27 | 17 |
| 2:02 | CHI | Caleb Williams → Rome Odunze, 1-yard TDCairo Santos XP | 27 | 24 |
Fantasy Points: Vikings vs Bears, Week 1 2025
Fantasy leaders
- Caleb WilliamsCHI · QB24.2 PTSQB9
- J.J. McCarthyMIN · QB23.2 PTSQB11
- Aaron JonesMIN · RB15.7 PTSRB12
- Rome OdunzeCHI · WR15.7 PTSWR19
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24.2 | QB9 | 21/35 | 210 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 58 | 1 | 86.6 | Start/Sit → | |
| 23.2 | QB11 | 13/20 | 143 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 25 | 1 | 98.5 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15.7 | RB12 | RB | 8 | 23 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 44 | 1 | ||
| 15.7 | WR19 | WR | — | — | — | 9 | 6 | 37 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 14.8 | WR20 | WR | 1 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 44 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 9.5 | RB27 | RB | 17 | 53 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 12 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 8.6 | WR46 | WR | 3 | 8 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 68 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 8.5 | RB29 | RB | 15 | 68 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | ||
| 8.2 | WR50 | WR | — | — | — | 7 | 4 | 42 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.5 | TE31 | TE | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 15 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.1 | TE32 | TE | — | — | — | 4 | 1 | 31 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.8 | WR82 | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 28 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.2 | TE37 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.1 | RB59 | RB | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.0 | WR98 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 1.5 | TE50 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | ||
| 0.7 | WR116 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | -3 | 0 |
Fantasy Usage
Minnesota Vikings
Snap Share
Justin JeffersonWR55 snaps98%
Jalen NailorWR49 snaps88%
T.J. HockensonTE45 snaps80%
Adam ThielenWR32 snaps57%
Jordan MasonRB30 snaps54%
Target Share20 targets
- Justin Jefferson35%, 7 targets
- T.J. Hockenson20%, 4 targets
- Aaron Jones15%, 3 targets
- Jalen Nailor15%, 3 targets
- Adam Thielen5%, 1 targets
- Other10%, 2 targets
Carry Share26 carries
- Jordan Mason58%, 15 carries
- Aaron Jones31%, 8 carries
- J.J. McCarthy8%, 2 carries
- Justin Jefferson4%, 1 carries
Chicago Bears
Snap Share
Rome OdunzeWR63 snaps94%
Cole KmetTE60 snaps90%
DJ MooreWR56 snaps84%
D'Andre SwiftRB54 snaps81%
Colston LovelandTE38 snaps57%
Target Share34 targets
- Rome Odunze26%, 9 targets
- Olamide Zaccheaus21%, 7 targets
- DJ Moore15%, 5 targets
- D'Andre Swift15%, 5 targets
- Cole Kmet12%, 4 targets
- Other12%, 4 targets
Carry Share26 carries
- D'Andre Swift65%, 17 carries
- Caleb Williams23%, 6 carries
- DJ Moore12%, 3 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55 | 98% | 7 | 35% | 1 | |
| 63 | 94% | 9 | 26% | 0 | |
| 60 | 90% | 4 | 12% | 0 | |
| 49 | 88% | 3 | 15% | 0 | |
| 56 | 84% | 5 | 15% | 3 | |
| 54 | 81% | 5 | 15% | 17 | |
| 45 | 80% | 4 | 20% | 0 | |
| 32 | 57% | 1 | 5% | 0 | |
| 38 | 57% | 2 | 6% | 0 | |
| 30 | 54% | 1 | 5% | 15 | |
| 28 | 50% | 3 | 15% | 8 | |
| 27 | 48% | 1 | 5% | 0 | |
| 30 | 45% | 7 | 21% | 0 | |
| 18 | 27% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 10 | 18% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 9 | 13% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 7 | 10% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 3 | 5% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+13.0J.J. McCarthy23.2 PTS vs 10.2 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−10.0D'Andre Swift9.5 PTS vs 19.5 xFP
- Highest expected volume19.5 xFPD'Andre Swift9.5 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D'Andre SwiftCHI · RB | 9.5 | 19.5 | −10.0 | 81% | 65% car | — | 0 | 17 | 65% | 5 | 15% |
| Caleb WilliamsCHI · QB | 24.2 | 19.4 | +4.8 | 100% | 35 att | — | 35 | 6 | 23% | 0 | 0% |
| Rome OdunzeCHI · WR | 15.7 | 15.3 | +0.4 | 94% | 26% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 9 | 26% |
| Justin JeffersonMIN · WR | 14.8 | 12.6 | +2.2 | 98% | 35% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 4% | 7 | 35% |
| Olamide ZaccheausCHI · WR | 8.2 | 11.9 | −3.7 | 45% | 21% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 21% |
| Jordan MasonMIN · RB | 8.5 | 11.4 | −2.9 | 54% | 58% car | — | 0 | 15 | 58% | 1 | 5% |
| DJ MooreCHI · WR | 8.6 | 10.5 | −1.9 | 84% | 15% tgt | — | 0 | 3 | 12% | 5 | 15% |
| Aaron Jones Sr.MIN · RB | 15.7 | 10.3 | +5.4 | 50% | 31% car | — | 0 | 8 | 31% | 3 | 15% |
| J.J. McCarthyMIN · QB | 23.2 | 10.2 | +13.0 | 100% | 20 att | — | 20 | 2 | 8% | 0 | 0% |
| Cole KmetCHI · TE | 4.1 | 6.8 | −2.7 | 90% | 12% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 12% |
| T.J. HockensonMIN · TE | 4.5 | 6.8 | −2.3 | 80% | 20% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 20% |
| Jalen NailorMIN · WR | 3.8 | 5.1 | −1.3 | 88% | 15% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 15% |
| Colston LovelandCHI · TE | 3.2 | 3.4 | −0.2 | 57% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 6% |
| Adam ThielenMIN · WR | 2.0 | 1.7 | +0.3 | 57% | 5% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 5% |
| Josh OliverMIN · TE | 1.5 | 1.7 | −0.2 | 48% | 5% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 5% |
| Kyle MonangaiCHI · RB | 2.1 | 1.7 | +0.4 | 13% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Luther Burden IIICHI · WR | 0.7 | 1.7 | −1.0 | 27% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
Team totals: Vikings 20 targets and 26 carries; Bears 34 targets and 26 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2025 season: 1.70 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.65 per carry and 0.44 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
J.J. McCarthy Ran hot
MIN · QB · 23.2 pts on 10.2 expected
13 of 20 passing for 143 yards, 2 touchdowns, 1 interception; 2 carries for 25 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 10.2 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Start/Sit: J.J. McCarthy →Caleb Williams
CHI · QB · 24.2 pts on 19.4 expected
21 of 35 passing for 210 yards, 1 touchdown; 6 carries for 58 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 19.4 expected.
Start/Sit: Caleb Williams →Justin Jefferson Strong role
MIN · WR · 14.8 pts on 12.6 expected
7 targets (35% of the team's), 4 catches for 44 yards and 1 touchdown; 1 carry (4% of the team's) for 4 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 12.6 expected.
Start/Sit: Justin Jefferson →Jordan Mason
MIN · RB · 8.5 pts on 11.4 expected
1 target (5% of the team's), 1 catch for 7 yards; 15 carries (58% of the team's) for 68 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 11.4 expected.
D'Andre Swift Volume, no payoff
CHI · RB · 9.5 pts on 19.5 expected
5 targets (15% of the team's), 3 catches for 12 yards; 17 carries (65% of the team's) for 53 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 19.5 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Start/Sit: D'Andre Swift →Rome Odunze
CHI · WR · 15.7 pts on 15.3 expected
9 targets (26% of the team's), 6 catches for 37 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 15.3 expected.
Start/Sit: Rome Odunze →Aaron Jones Sr. Ran hot
MIN · RB · 15.7 pts on 10.3 expected
3 targets (15% of the team's), 3 catches for 44 yards and 1 touchdown; 8 carries (31% of the team's) for 23 yards.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 10.3 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2025 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Vikings D | Bears D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 11.5 | 19.1 |
| RBs | 19.0 | 21.7 |
| WRs | 23.5 | 35.5 |
| TEs | 10.7 | 13.1 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Chicago opened at 50% win probability, climbed as high as 96%, then lost.
Bears win probability
Key Swings
- +21Williams 9-yd TD run50% → 71%Q1 7:04
- +22Wright 74-yd pick-six67% → 88%Q3 12:51
- −17McCarthy → Jefferson, 13-yd TD96% → 79%Q4 12:13
- −53McCarthy → Jones, 27-yd TD82% → 29%Q4 9:46
- −15McCarthy 14-yd TD run16% → <1%Q4 2:53
Swing in Bears win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Minnesota Vikings | Measure | Chicago Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 49 | Plays | 63 |
| 47% | Pass rate | 59% |
| 5.8 | Yds / dropback | 5.4 |
| 4.6 | Yds / carry | 4.6 |
| 3/12 | Third downs | 3/12 |
Efficiency edge Minnesota ran 14 fewer plays than Chicago.
- Top targets
- MIN Jefferson 35% · Hockenson 20% · Jones 15%
- CHI Odunze 26% · Zaccheaus 21% · Swift 15%
Possession Results
| Result | MIN | CHI |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 3 | 2 |
| Field goals | 2 | 1 |
| Punts | 7 | 6 |
| Turnovers | 1 | 1 |
| Turnovers on downs | 0 | 1 |
| Missed field goals | 0 | 1 |
- The Bears opened the scoring on their first possession, a 10-play, 61-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
All 26 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIN | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 7 | 2:15 | Punt |
| CHI | Q1 12:45 | 10 | 61 | 5:41 | Touchdown |
| MIN | Q1 7:04 | 3 | 4 | 2:13 | Punt |
| CHI | Q1 4:51 | 5 | 17 | 3:53 | Punt |
| MIN | Q1 0:58 | 7 | 67 | 3:10 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q2 12:48 | 5 | 37 | 3:53 | Downs |
| MIN | Q2 8:55 | 3 | 9 | 2:03 | Punt |
| CHI | Q2 6:52 | 3 | 2 | 1:00 | Punt |
| MIN | Q2 5:52 | 3 | -8 | 1:23 | Punt |
| CHI | Q2 4:29 | 9 | 35 | 4:05 | Field goal |
| MIN | Q2 0:24 | 2 | 28 | 0:18 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q2 0:06 | 0 | 0 | 0:06 | End of half |
| CHI | Q3 15:00 | 3 | 0 | 0:32 | Punt |
| MIN | Q3 14:28 | 3 | 17 | 1:37 | Interception |
| MIN | Q3 12:51 | 3 | -10 | 2:43 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 10:08 | 5 | 23 | 2:54 | Punt |
| MIN | Q3 7:14 | 3 | 8 | 1:28 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 5:46 | 11 | 44 | 5:51 | Missed FG |
| MIN | Q4 14:55 | 6 | 60 | 2:42 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q4 12:13 | 3 | -9 | 1:36 | Punt |
| MIN | Q4 10:37 | 3 | 50 | 0:51 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q4 9:46 | 5 | 8 | 2:22 | Punt |
| MIN | Q4 7:24 | 9 | 68 | 4:31 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q4 2:53 | 5 | 65 | 0:51 | Touchdown |
| MIN | Q4 2:02 | 3 | 5 | 1:53 | Punt |
| CHI | Q4 0:09 | 1 | 14 | 0:09 | Fumble |
About these numbers
The Bears' interception touchdown is counted as a Vikings interception, not as a Bears possession. Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Vikings vs Bears Head-to-Head
The Vikings and Bears first met in 1961 and have played 131 times since. They have been NFC North rivals since 1970.
- All-time series
- 70–59–2Vikings lead, 131 meetings since 1961
- Postseason
- 1–0Bears won in 1994
- Largest Vikings win
- 31–01969
- Largest Bears win
- 38–71989
Since 2021
9–2 Vikings lead
11 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- V
- V
- V
- V
- V
- B
- V
- V
- V
- B
- V
Oldest to newest. V = Vikings win, B = Bears win, outlined = this game.
2026 Meetings
- Week 18 Bears at Vikings Upcoming
Recent Meetings
- 2026 Wk 2 Vikings at Bears, 2026 Wk 2 recap MIN 9 CHI 3 MIN W
- 2025 Wk 11 Bears at Vikings, 2025 Wk 11 recap CHI 19 MIN 17 CHI W
- 2025 Wk 1 Vikings at Bears MIN 27 CHI 24 MIN W
- 2024 Wk 15 Bears at Vikings, 2024 Wk 15 recap MIN 30 CHI 12 MIN W
- 2024 Wk 12 Vikings at Bears, 2024 Wk 12 recap MIN 30 CHI 27 MIN W
- 2023 Wk 12 Bears at Vikings, 2023 Wk 12 recap CHI 12 MIN 10 CHI W
- 2023 Wk 6 Vikings at Bears, 2023 Wk 6 recap MIN 19 CHI 13 MIN W
- 2022 Wk 18 Vikings at Bears, 2022 Wk 18 recap MIN 29 CHI 13 MIN W
- 2022 Wk 5 Bears at Vikings, 2022 Wk 5 recap MIN 29 CHI 22 MIN W
- 2021 Wk 18 Bears at Vikings, 2021 Wk 18 recap MIN 31 CHI 17 MIN W
- 2021 Wk 15 Vikings at Bears, 2021 Wk 15 recap MIN 17 CHI 9 MIN W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2025 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Vikings | Stat | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 9-8 | Record | 11-6 |
| 20.2 | Points per game | 25.9 |
| 275.0 | Yards per game | 369.5 |
| 4.9 | Yards per play | 5.7 |
| 19.6 | Points allowed per game | 24.4 |
| 282.6 | Yards allowed per game | 361.8 |
Vikings vs Bears Fantasy Outlook for 2026
One meeting is left on the 2026 schedule: Week 18 in Minnesota. Here's how to decide who to play in your league.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Vikings or Bears player start in Week 18? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Vikings and Bears players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Vikings and Bears defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere this matchup falls in each team's fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2025 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Vikings vs Bears Game FAQ
Who won the 2025 Vikings vs Bears Week 1 game?
The Minnesota Vikings beat the Chicago Bears 27–24 in Week 1 of the 2025 season. The game was played at Soldier Field in Chicago, IL, on September 8, 2025. See the Vikings' 2025 schedule.
What was the final score of Vikings vs Bears?
The final score was Vikings 27, Bears 24. The Bears led 10–6 at halftime, and the second half went Vikings 21, Bears 14.
What happened in the Vikings vs Bears game?
Minnesota erased a 10–6 halftime deficit, outscoring Chicago 21–14 after the break to win 27–24. Chicago outgained the Vikings 317–254, but the Vikings averaged 5.2 yards per play. Caleb Williams led all players with 21 of 35 passing for 210 yards and a touchdown, plus 6 carries for 58 rushing yards and a touchdown.
What was the game-winning score in Vikings vs Bears?
J.J. McCarthy's 27-yard touchdown pass to Aaron Jones Sr. with 9:46 left in the fourth quarter gave the Vikings a 20–17 lead they never gave up.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Vikings vs Bears?
Caleb Williams led the game with 24.2 PPR fantasy points, the QB9 of Week 1, on 21 of 35 passing for 210 yards and a touchdown, plus 6 carries for 58 rushing yards and a touchdown. J.J. McCarthy was next with 23.2 (QB11). See Caleb Williams's 2025 game log.
Who led Vikings vs Bears in passing, rushing and receiving?
Caleb Williams (CHI) led all passers with 21 of 35 for 210 yards and a touchdown. Jordan Mason (MIN) led in rushing with 15 carries for 68 yards. DJ Moore (CHI) led in receiving with 3 catches for 68 yards.
How many fantasy points did Caleb Williams score against the Vikings?
Caleb Williams scored 24.2 fantasy points against the Vikings in Week 1 of the 2025 season, the same in PPR, half-PPR and standard scoring because he had no catches, on 21 of 35 passing for 210 yards and a touchdown, plus 6 carries for 58 rushing yards and a touchdown.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Vikings vs Bears?
J.J. McCarthy outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 23.2 PPR points on 10.2 xFP (+13.0). D'Andre Swift fell furthest short, with 9.5 points on 19.5 xFP (−10.0). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Vikings vs Bears?
D'Andre Swift had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 19.5 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 9.5. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the Vikings come back to beat the Bears?
The Vikings' chances of winning fell as low as 4% in the fourth quarter. J.J. McCarthy's 27-yard touchdown pass to Aaron Jones Sr. in the fourth quarter was the biggest swing of the game. J.J. McCarthy's 27-yard touchdown pass to Aaron Jones Sr. then put them ahead for good.
What was the turning point of Vikings vs Bears?
J.J. McCarthy's 27-yard touchdown pass to Aaron Jones Sr. with 9:46 left in the fourth quarter was the biggest swing of the game, moving the Bears' win probability from 82% to 29%.
What is the all-time Vikings vs Bears record?
The Vikings lead the all-time series 70–59–2 across 131 meetings since 1961, including a 0–1 record in the postseason.
When did the Vikings and Bears last play before this game?
Before Week 1 of 2025, they last met in the 2024 season on December 16, 2024, when the Vikings beat the Bears 30–12.
Have the Vikings and Bears met in the playoffs?
Yes, 1 time, most recently in the 1994 playoffs. The Vikings are 0–1 against the Bears in the postseason.
What is the Vikings vs Bears record since 2021?
The Vikings lead 9–2 across 11 meetings since the 2021 season, including this game.
