Final2026 Week 2
Soldier Field, Chicago, IL|
Minnesota Vikings vs Chicago Bears, Week 2 2026
Minnesota Vikings
AwayWon
9
Chicago Bears
Home
3
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vikings | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9 |
| Bears | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
MIN 9 · CHI 3 Final
Passing leader
MIN · QB
6.3PPR pts
11/20, 143 YDS
Top fantasy scorer
CHI · RB
12.9PPR pts
16 ATT, 45 YDS, 5 REC, 54 REC YDS
Bears leader
CHI · WR
9.0PPR pts
5 REC, 40 YDS
Defensive playmaker
Byron Murphy Jr.
MIN
1 INT, 7 TKL
Vikings 9, Bears 3: Minnesota beats Chicago
Minnesota led 6–3 at halftime and outscored Chicago 3–0 after the break to win 9–3. Chicago outgained the Vikings 297–246, but the Vikings averaged 4.8 yards per play.
The Bears went 5-for-15 on third down and committed two turnovers, while the Vikings finished without a giveaway.
The two teams meet again in Week 18 of 2026. If you roster anyone from either side, run the start/sit call in Redraft Command and it will weigh your lineup, your opponent and your league scoring, not only the player rankings.
Key advantages
- +0.6 yards/play MIN 4.8 · CHI 4.2
- +2 turnover margin MIN 0 turnovers
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Viking or Bear on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Vikings Won
Minnesota won the efficiency and turnover battles.
| Vikings | Stat | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 4.8 | Yards per play | 4.2 |
| 0 | Turnovers | 2 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 246 | Total yards | 297 |
| 51 | Plays | 70 |
| 23% | Third-down conversion | 33% |
| 27:19 | Time of possession | 32:41 |
Scoring Summary
The Vikings scored three field goals; the Bears scored one field goal.
| Time | Team | Play | MIN | CHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 11:03 | MIN | Will Reichard 35-yard FG Takes lead | 3 | 0 |
| 5:03 | CHI | Cairo Santos 50-yard FG Ties game | 3 | 3 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 8:18 | MIN | Will Reichard 49-yard FG Takes lead | 6 | 3 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| No scoring | ||||
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 1:09 | MIN | Will Reichard 39-yard FG Extends lead | 9 | 3 |
Fantasy Points: Vikings vs Bears, Week 2 2026
Fantasy leaders
- D'Andre SwiftCHI · RB12.9 PTSRB16
- Aaron JonesMIN · RB10.5 PTSRB22
- Kalif RaymondCHI · WR9.0 PTSWR37
- Caleb WilliamsCHI · QB8.7 PTSQB27
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.3 | QB30 | 11/20 | 143 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 77.7 | Start/Sit → | |
| 8.7 | QB27 | 15/26 | 138 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 42 | 0 | 56.2 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.2 | QB33 | 5/9 | 54 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | 73.4 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.9 | RB16 | RB | 16 | 45 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 54 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 10.5 | RB22 | RB | 23 | 105 | 0 | — | — | — | — | ||
| 9.0 | WR37 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 5 | 40 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 8.5 | WR43 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 3 | 55 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 7.8 | RB35 | RB | 10 | 47 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 7.3 | WR49 | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 43 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.2 | WR63 | WR | — | — | — | 7 | 3 | 32 | 0 | ||
| 5.9 | TE23 | TE | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 29 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.1 | WR78 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 2 | 21 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.4 | TE34 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 24 | 0 | ||
| 3.0 | RB57 | RB | 2 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.9 | TE46 | TE | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 9 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.3 | TE55 | TE | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.2 | RB72 | RB | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
Fantasy Usage
Minnesota Vikings
Snap Share
Justin JeffersonWR52 snaps100%
Jordan AddisonWR46 snaps88%
Aaron JonesRB42 snaps81%
T.J. HockensonTE36 snaps69%
Josh OliverTE31 snaps60%
Target Share19 targets
- Justin Jefferson32%, 6 targets
- Jordan Addison26%, 5 targets
- T.J. Hockenson21%, 4 targets
- Josh Oliver5%, 1 targets
- DeeJay Dallas5%, 1 targets
- Other11%, 2 targets
Carry Share28 carries
- Aaron Jones82%, 23 carries
- Carson Wentz11%, 3 carries
- DeeJay Dallas7%, 2 carries
Chicago Bears
Snap Share
Colston LovelandTE64 snaps86%
Rome OdunzeWR62 snaps84%
Cole KmetTE51 snaps69%
D'Andre SwiftRB50 snaps68%
Kalif RaymondWR46 snaps62%
Target Share31 targets
- Luther Burden23%, 7 targets
- D'Andre Swift19%, 6 targets
- Kalif Raymond16%, 5 targets
- Rome Odunze13%, 4 targets
- Colston Loveland10%, 3 targets
- Other19%, 6 targets
Carry Share31 carries
- D'Andre Swift52%, 16 carries
- Kyle Monangai32%, 10 carries
- Caleb Williams16%, 5 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52 | 100% | 6 | 32% | 0 | |
| 46 | 88% | 5 | 26% | 0 | |
| 64 | 86% | 3 | 10% | 0 | |
| 62 | 84% | 4 | 13% | 0 | |
| 42 | 81% | 0 | 0% | 23 | |
| 36 | 69% | 4 | 21% | 0 | |
| 51 | 69% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 50 | 68% | 6 | 19% | 16 | |
| 46 | 62% | 5 | 16% | 0 | |
| 31 | 60% | 1 | 5% | 0 | |
| 42 | 57% | 7 | 23% | 0 | |
| 26 | 50% | 1 | 5% | 0 | |
| 25 | 34% | 2 | 6% | 10 | |
| 17 | 33% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 20 | 27% | 3 | 10% | 0 | |
| 8 | 15% | 1 | 5% | 2 | |
| 7 | 9% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 2 | 4% | 1 | 5% | 0 | |
| 2 | 3% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 1 | 1% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+1.7Josh Oliver3.4 PTS vs 1.7 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−7.2D'Andre Swift12.9 PTS vs 20.1 xFP
- Highest expected volume20.1 xFPD'Andre Swift12.9 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D'Andre SwiftCHI · RB | 12.9 | 20.1 | −7.2 | 68% | 52% car | — | 0 | 16 | 52% | 6 | 19% |
| Caleb WilliamsCHI · QB | 8.7 | 15.2 | −6.5 | 86% | 26 att | — | 26 | 5 | 16% | 0 | 0% |
| Aaron Jones Sr.MIN · RB | 10.5 | 13.9 | −3.4 | 81% | 82% car | — | 0 | 23 | 82% | 0 | 0% |
| Luther Burden IIICHI · WR | 6.2 | 12.2 | −6.0 | 57% | 23% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 23% |
| Carson WentzMIN · QB | 6.3 | 11.1 | −4.8 | 100% | 20 att | — | 20 | 3 | 11% | 0 | 0% |
| Justin JeffersonMIN · WR | 8.5 | 10.5 | −2.0 | 100% | 32% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 32% |
| Kyle MonangaiCHI · RB | 7.8 | 9.5 | −1.7 | 34% | 32% car | — | 0 | 10 | 32% | 2 | 6% |
| Jordan AddisonMIN · WR | 4.1 | 8.7 | −4.6 | 88% | 26% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 26% |
| Kalif RaymondCHI · WR | 9.0 | 8.7 | +0.3 | 62% | 16% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 16% |
| Rome OdunzeCHI · WR | 7.3 | 7.0 | +0.3 | 84% | 13% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 13% |
| T.J. HockensonMIN · TE | 5.9 | 7.0 | −1.1 | 69% | 21% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 21% |
| Colston LovelandCHI · TE | 1.3 | 5.2 | −3.9 | 86% | 10% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 10% |
| Sam RoushCHI · TE | 1.9 | 5.2 | −3.3 | 27% | 10% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 10% |
| Tyson BagentCHI · QB | 2.2 | 4.2 | −2.0 | 14% | 9 att | — | 9 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| DeeJay DallasMIN · RB | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 15% | 7% car | — | 0 | 2 | 7% | 1 | 5% |
| Cole KmetCHI · TE | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 69% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Demond ClaiborneMIN · RB | 1.2 | 1.7 | −0.5 | 4% | 5% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 5% |
| Josh OliverMIN · TE | 3.4 | 1.7 | +1.7 | 60% | 5% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 5% |
| Myles PriceMIN · WR | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 50% | 5% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 5% |
Team totals: Vikings 19 targets and 28 carries; Bears 31 targets and 31 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2026 season: 1.75 PPR points per target (68% catch rate), 0.60 per carry and 0.47 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Carson Wentz
MIN · QB · 6.3 pts on 11.1 expected
11 of 20 passing for 143 yards; 3 carries for 6 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 11.1 expected. Next up: Week 4 against the Dolphins. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Carson Wentz →Caleb Williams Unlucky
CHI · QB · 8.7 pts on 15.2 expected
15 of 26 passing for 138 yards, 1 interception; 5 carries for 42 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 15.2 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't. Next up: Week 4 against the Jets. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Caleb Williams →Aaron Jones Sr. Volume, no payoff
MIN · RB · 10.5 pts on 13.9 expected
23 carries (82% of the team's) for 105 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 13.9 expected. Next up: Week 4 against the Dolphins. Bet on the role more than the result.
Trend: Season high in carries (23).
Justin Jefferson Volume, no payoff
MIN · WR · 8.5 pts on 10.5 expected
6 targets (32% of the team's), 3 catches for 55 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 10.5 expected. Next up: Week 4 against the Dolphins. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Justin Jefferson →D'Andre Swift Unlucky
CHI · RB · 12.9 pts on 20.1 expected
6 targets (19% of the team's), 5 catches for 54 yards; 16 carries (52% of the team's) for 45 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 20.1 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't. Next up: Week 4 against the Jets. Bet on the role more than the result.
Trend: Season high in targets (6).
Luther Burden III Unlucky
CHI · WR · 6.2 pts on 12.2 expected
7 targets (23% of the team's), 3 catches for 32 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 12.2 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't. Next up: Week 4 against the Jets. Bet on the role more than the result.
Trend: Season high in targets (7).
Myles Price
MIN · WR · 0.0 pts on 1.7 expected
1 target (5% of the team's), 0 catches for 0 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 1.7 expected. Next up: Week 4 against the Dolphins. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Myles Price →Rome Odunze
CHI · WR · 7.3 pts on 7.0 expected
4 targets (13% of the team's), 3 catches for 43 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 7.0 expected. Next up: Week 4 against the Jets. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Rome Odunze →Start/Sit Decisions
Stock Up, Stock Down
Minnesota Vikings
- ▲Stock up: Aaron Jones Sr. played 81% of the snaps, up from a 46% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Myles Price played 50% of the snaps, up from a 5% season average.
Chicago Bears
- ▲Stock up: Rome Odunze played 84% of the snaps, up from a 48% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Luther Burden III played 57% of the snaps, down from a 73% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2026 through Week 3.
| Points allowed to | Vikings D | Bears D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 14.5 | 17.9 |
| RBs | 12.7 | 19.7 |
| WRs | 35.7 | 26.2 |
| TEs | 9.4 | 8.3 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Chicago opened at 63% win probability and fell below 2% in the fourth quarter.
Bears win probability
Key Swings
- −9Reichard 35-yd FG63% → 54%Q1 11:03
- +10Santos 50-yd FG52% → 62%Q1 5:03
- −11Reichard 49-yd FG61% → 50%Q2 8:18
- −6Reichard 39-yd FG6% → <1%Q4 1:09
Swing in Bears win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Minnesota Vikings | Measure | Chicago Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 51 | Plays | 70 |
| 45% | Pass rate | 56% |
| 5.5 | Yds / dropback | 4.2 |
| 4.3 | Yds / carry | 4.3 |
| 3/13 | Third downs | 5/15 |
Efficiency edge Minnesota ran 19 fewer plays but gained 1.3 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- MIN Jefferson 32% · Addison 26% · Hockenson 21%
- CHI Burden 23% · Swift 19% · Raymond 16%
Possession Results
| Result | MIN | CHI |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 0 | 0 |
| Field goals | 3 | 1 |
| Punts | 6 | 4 |
| Turnovers | 0 | 2 |
| Turnovers on downs | 0 | 1 |
| Missed field goals | 0 | 1 |
MIN turnover edge: +2
- The Vikings opened the scoring on their first possession, a 9-play, 55-yard drive that ended in a field goal.
All 19 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIN | Q1 15:00 | 9 | 55 | 3:57 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q1 11:03 | 9 | 37 | 6:00 | Field goal |
| MIN | Q1 5:03 | 3 | -14 | 2:06 | Punt |
| CHI | Q1 2:57 | 3 | -2 | 1:22 | Interception |
| MIN | Q1 1:35 | 3 | 7 | 1:32 | Punt |
| CHI | Q1 0:03 | 3 | 2 | 1:00 | Punt |
| MIN | Q2 14:03 | 11 | 33 | 5:45 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q2 8:18 | 13 | 33 | 6:33 | Punt |
| MIN | Q2 1:45 | 5 | 16 | 1:25 | Punt |
| CHI | Q2 0:20 | 2 | -10 | 0:20 | End of half |
| CHI | Q3 15:00 | 11 | 64 | 5:22 | Fumble |
| MIN | Q3 9:38 | 5 | 30 | 3:08 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 6:30 | 6 | 21 | 2:29 | Punt |
| MIN | Q3 4:01 | 4 | 21 | 2:23 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 1:38 | 5 | 13 | 1:49 | Punt |
| MIN | Q4 14:49 | 3 | 9 | 1:51 | Punt |
| CHI | Q4 12:58 | 12 | 62 | 6:37 | Missed FG |
| MIN | Q4 6:21 | 11 | 67 | 5:12 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q4 1:09 | 8 | 44 | 1:09 | Downs |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Vikings vs Bears Head-to-Head
The Vikings and Bears first met in 1961 and have played 131 times since. They have been NFC North rivals since 1970.
- All-time series
- 70–59–2Vikings lead, 131 meetings since 1961
- Postseason
- 1–0Bears won in 1994
- Largest Vikings win
- 31–01969
- Largest Bears win
- 38–71989
Since 2021
9–2 Vikings lead
11 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- V
- V
- V
- V
- V
- B
- V
- V
- V
- B
- V
Oldest to newest. V = Vikings win, B = Bears win, outlined = this game.
2026 Meetings
- Week 18 Bears at Vikings Upcoming
Recent Meetings
- 2026 Wk 2 Vikings at Bears MIN 9 CHI 3 MIN W
- 2025 Wk 11 Bears at Vikings, 2025 Wk 11 recap CHI 19 MIN 17 CHI W
- 2025 Wk 1 Vikings at Bears, 2025 Wk 1 recap MIN 27 CHI 24 MIN W
- 2024 Wk 15 Bears at Vikings, 2024 Wk 15 recap MIN 30 CHI 12 MIN W
- 2024 Wk 12 Vikings at Bears, 2024 Wk 12 recap MIN 30 CHI 27 MIN W
- 2023 Wk 12 Bears at Vikings, 2023 Wk 12 recap CHI 12 MIN 10 CHI W
- 2023 Wk 6 Vikings at Bears, 2023 Wk 6 recap MIN 19 CHI 13 MIN W
- 2022 Wk 18 Vikings at Bears, 2022 Wk 18 recap MIN 29 CHI 13 MIN W
- 2022 Wk 5 Bears at Vikings, 2022 Wk 5 recap MIN 29 CHI 22 MIN W
- 2021 Wk 18 Bears at Vikings, 2021 Wk 18 recap MIN 31 CHI 17 MIN W
- 2021 Wk 15 Vikings at Bears, 2021 Wk 15 recap MIN 17 CHI 9 MIN W
Season to Date (Through Week 3)
The 2026 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Vikings | Stat | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 3-0 | Record | 2-1 |
| 23.7 | Points per game | 29.7 |
| 238.3 | Yards per game | 408.0 |
| 4.3 | Yards per play | 5.9 |
| 13.7 | Points allowed per game | 17.7 |
| 319.7 | Yards allowed per game | 324.0 |
Vikings vs Bears Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- CHI −4.5Bears failed to cover by 10.5
- Total
- 46.5Under: 12 points scored (by 34.5)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bears | 25.5 | 3 | −22.5 |
| Vikings | 21.0 | 9 | −12.0 |
Both offenses finished under the market's expectation, which matches the low fantasy output in the Fantasy tab.
Betting Trends
Last 5 meetings: Vikings 4–1 ATS, unders 3–2.
Each team's 2026 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
Minnesota Vikings
- Against the spread
- 2–0
- Over/under
- 1–1
- ATS as favorite
- 1–0
- ATS as underdog
- 1–0
- ATS on the road
- 1–0
Chicago Bears
- Against the spread
- 1–1
- Over/under
- 1–1
- ATS as favorite
- 1–1
- ATS at home
- 0–1
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Vikings vs Bears Fantasy Outlook for 2026
One meeting is left on the 2026 schedule: Week 18 in Minnesota. Here's how to decide who to play in your league.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Vikings or Bears player start in Week 18? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Vikings and Bears players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Vikings and Bears defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere this matchup falls in each team's fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2026 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Vikings vs Bears Game FAQ
Who won the 2026 Vikings vs Bears Week 2 game?
The Minnesota Vikings beat the Chicago Bears 9–3 in Week 2 of the 2026 season. The game was played at Soldier Field in Chicago, IL, on September 20, 2026. See the Vikings' 2026 schedule.
What was the final score of Vikings vs Bears?
The final score was Vikings 9, Bears 3. The Vikings led 6–3 at halftime, and the second half went Vikings 3, Bears 0.
What happened in the Vikings vs Bears game?
Minnesota led 6–3 at halftime and outscored Chicago 3–0 after the break to win 9–3. Chicago outgained the Vikings 297–246, but the Vikings averaged 4.8 yards per play. D'Andre Swift led all players with 5 catches for 54 yards, plus 16 carries for 45 rushing yards. The Bears committed 2 turnovers, the Vikings none.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Vikings vs Bears?
D'Andre Swift led the game with 12.9 PPR fantasy points, the RB16 of Week 2, on 5 catches for 54 yards, plus 16 carries for 45 rushing yards. Aaron Jones was next with 10.5 (RB22). See D'Andre Swift's 2026 game log.
Who led Vikings vs Bears in passing, rushing and receiving?
Carson Wentz (MIN) led all passers with 11 of 20 for 143 yards. Aaron Jones (MIN) led in rushing with 23 carries for 105 yards. Justin Jefferson (MIN) led in receiving with 3 catches for 55 yards.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Vikings vs Bears?
Josh Oliver outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 3.4 PPR points on 1.7 xFP (+1.7). D'Andre Swift fell furthest short, with 12.9 points on 20.1 xFP (−7.2). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Vikings vs Bears?
D'Andre Swift had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 20.1 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 12.9. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the Vikings beat the Bears?
The Vikings beat the Bears 9–3 because they averaged 4.8 yards per play to 4.2 and won the turnover battle 2–0.
Which team won the turnover battle in Vikings vs Bears?
The Vikings won the turnover battle 2–0: the Bears gave the ball away 2 times and the Vikings not at all. The Vikings won the game.
What is the all-time Vikings vs Bears record?
The Vikings lead the all-time series 70–59–2 across 131 meetings since 1961, including a 0–1 record in the postseason.
When did the Vikings and Bears last play before this game?
Before Week 2 of 2026, they last met in the 2025 season on November 16, 2025, when the Bears beat the Vikings 19–17.
Have the Vikings and Bears met in the playoffs?
Yes, 1 time, most recently in the 1994 playoffs. The Vikings are 0–1 against the Bears in the postseason.
What was the closing spread for Vikings vs Bears?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Bears −4.5, making the Chicago Bears 4.5-point favorites, with a closing total of 46.5. That implied about 25.5 points for the Bears and 21.0 for the Vikings.
Did Vikings vs Bears go over or under the total?
The game went under. The consensus closing total was 46.5, and the teams combined for 12 points, 34.5 under the number.
Who covered the spread in Vikings vs Bears?
The Vikings covered as 4.5-point underdogs against the closing line of Bears −4.5. The final margin was 6 points.
