Final2025 Week 12
Soldier Field, Chicago, IL|
Pittsburgh Steelers vs Chicago Bears, Week 12 2025
Pittsburgh Steelers
Away
28
Chicago Bears
HomeWon
31
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steelers | 7 | 14 | 0 | 7 | 28 |
| Bears | 7 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 31 |
PIT 28 · CHI 31 Final
Passing leader
CHI · QB
21.7PPR pts
19/35, 239 YDS, 3 TD
Top fantasy scorer
CHI · WR
23.4PPR pts
5 REC, 64 YDS, 2 TD
Steelers leader
PIT · RB
18.2PPR pts
10 ATT, 92 YDS, 6 REC, 30 REC YDS
Defensive playmaker
Nick Herbig
PIT
1 TD, 2 TKL
Bears 31, Steelers 28: Chicago rallies from 4 down at halftime
Chicago erased a 21–17 halftime deficit, outscoring Pittsburgh 14–7 after the break to win 31–28. Pittsburgh outgained the Bears 345–328, but the Bears averaged 5.4 yards per play.
The Steelers went 8-for-14 on third down and committed two turnovers.
Key advantages
- +0.4 yards/play CHI 5.4 · PIT 5.0
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Steeler or Bear on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Bears Won
Chicago won the efficiency battle.
| Steelers | Stat | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 5.0 | Yards per play | 5.4 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 345 | Total yards | 328 |
| 69 | Plays | 61 |
| 2 | Turnovers | 2 |
| 57% | Third-down conversion | 54% |
| 33:09 | Time of possession | 26:51 |
Scoring Summary
The Bears scored four touchdowns and one field goal; the Steelers scored four touchdowns.
| Time | Team | Play | PIT | CHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 8:28 | CHI | Caleb Williams → DJ Moore, 5-yard TD Takes leadCairo Santos XP | 0 | 7 |
| 0:30 | PIT | DK Metcalf 6-yard TD run Ties gameChris Boswell XP | 7 | 7 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 14:44 | PIT | Nick Herbig fumble recovery TD Takes leadChris Boswell XP | 14 | 7 |
| 3:56 | CHI | Caleb Williams → Colston Loveland, 12-yard TD Ties gameCairo Santos XP | 14 | 14 |
| 1:19 | PIT | Jaylen Warren 1-yard TD run Takes leadChris Boswell XP | 21 | 14 |
| 0:00 | CHI | Cairo Santos 47-yard FG | 21 | 17 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 8:29 | CHI | Caleb Williams → DJ Moore, 25-yard TD Takes leadCairo Santos XP | 21 | 24 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 14:14 | CHI | Kyle Monangai 2-yard TD run Extends leadCairo Santos XP | 21 | 31 |
| 6:27 | PIT | Mason Rudolph → Pat Freiermuth, 3-yard TDChris Boswell XP | 28 | 31 |
Fantasy Points: Steelers vs Bears, Week 12 2025
Fantasy leaders
- DJ MooreCHI · WR23.4 PTSWR7
- Caleb WilliamsCHI · QB21.7 PTSQB6
- Kenny GainwellPIT · RB18.2 PTSRB9
- Colston LovelandCHI · TE14.9 PTSTE3
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21.7 | QB6 | 19/35 | 239 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 21 | 0 | 104.3 | Start/Sit → | |
| 8.5 | QB24 | 24/31 | 171 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 86.9 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23.4 | WR7 | WR | — | — | — | 7 | 5 | 64 | 2 | Start/Sit → | |
| 18.2 | RB9 | RB | 10 | 92 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 30 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 14.9 | TE3 | TE | — | — | — | 5 | 4 | 49 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 14.4 | WR22 | WR | 2 | 12 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 22 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 12.8 | RB18 | RB | 18 | 68 | 1 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 10.9 | TE10 | TE | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 19 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 10.8 | RB24 | RB | 12 | 48 | 1 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 9.1 | WR36 | WR | 1 | 15 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 46 | 0 | ||
| 8.3 | WR39 | WR | — | — | — | 9 | 3 | 53 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 7.6 | WR42 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 4 | 36 | 0 | ||
| 5.8 | TE26 | TE | 2 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 21 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.2 | TE33 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 22 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.1 | WR73 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 21 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.9 | RB54 | RB | 8 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.6 | WR90 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.4 | TE52 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.3 | TE54 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | RB | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
Fantasy Usage
Pittsburgh Steelers
Snap Share
DK MetcalfWR61 snaps85%
Darnell WashingtonTE49 snaps68%
Kenny GainwellRB37 snaps51%
Jaylen WarrenRB36 snaps50%
Jonnu SmithTE35 snaps49%
Target Share31 targets
- DK Metcalf26%, 8 targets
- Kenny Gainwell19%, 6 targets
- Calvin Austin16%, 5 targets
- Jonnu Smith10%, 3 targets
- Pat Freiermuth10%, 3 targets
- Other19%, 6 targets
Carry Share36 carries
- Jaylen Warren50%, 18 carries
- Kenny Gainwell28%, 10 carries
- Mason Rudolph8%, 3 carries
- Jonnu Smith6%, 2 carries
- DK Metcalf6%, 2 carries
- Other3%, 1 carries
Chicago Bears
Snap Share
Rome OdunzeWR51 snaps78%
DJ MooreWR50 snaps77%
Colston LovelandTE42 snaps65%
Cole KmetTE41 snaps63%
Kyle MonangaiRB35 snaps54%
Target Share30 targets
- Rome Odunze30%, 9 targets
- DJ Moore23%, 7 targets
- Colston Loveland17%, 5 targets
- Luther Burden17%, 5 targets
- Durham Smythe3%, 1 targets
- Other10%, 3 targets
Carry Share25 carries
- Kyle Monangai48%, 12 carries
- D'Andre Swift32%, 8 carries
- Caleb Williams16%, 4 carries
- Luther Burden4%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 61 | 85% | 8 | 26% | 2 | |
| 51 | 78% | 9 | 30% | 0 | |
| 50 | 77% | 7 | 23% | 0 | |
| 49 | 68% | 2 | 6% | 0 | |
| 42 | 65% | 5 | 17% | 0 | |
| 41 | 63% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 35 | 54% | 0 | 0% | 12 | |
| 37 | 51% | 6 | 19% | 10 | |
| 33 | 51% | 5 | 17% | 1 | |
| 36 | 50% | 0 | 0% | 18 | |
| 35 | 49% | 3 | 10% | 2 | |
| 34 | 47% | 3 | 10% | 0 | |
| 33 | 46% | 5 | 16% | 0 | |
| 29 | 45% | 1 | 3% | 8 | |
| 26 | 36% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 23 | 35% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 19 | 29% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 20 | 28% | 3 | 10% | 0 | |
| 5 | 7% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 4 | 6% | 0 | 0% | 1 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+11.5DJ Moore23.4 PTS vs 11.9 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−7.2Mason Rudolph8.5 PTS vs 15.7 xFP
- Highest expected volume18.1 xFPCaleb Williams21.7 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caleb WilliamsCHI · QB | 21.7 | 18.1 | +3.6 | 100% | 35 att | — | 35 | 4 | 16% | 0 | 0% |
| Kenny GainwellPIT · RB | 18.2 | 16.7 | +1.5 | 51% | 28% car | — | 0 | 10 | 28% | 6 | 20% |
| Mason RudolphPIT · QB | 8.5 | 15.7 | −7.2 | 100% | 31 att | — | 31 | 3 | 8% | 0 | 0% |
| Rome OdunzeCHI · WR | 8.3 | 15.3 | −7.0 | 78% | 30% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 9 | 30% |
| DK MetcalfPIT · WR | 14.4 | 14.9 | −0.5 | 85% | 27% tgt | — | 0 | 2 | 6% | 8 | 27% |
| DJ MooreCHI · WR | 23.4 | 11.9 | +11.5 | 77% | 23% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 23% |
| Jaylen WarrenPIT · RB | 12.8 | 11.6 | +1.2 | 50% | 50% car | — | 0 | 18 | 50% | 0 | 0% |
| Luther Burden IIICHI · WR | 9.1 | 9.2 | −0.1 | 51% | 17% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 4% | 5 | 17% |
| Calvin Austin IIIPIT · WR | 7.6 | 8.5 | −0.9 | 46% | 17% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 17% |
| Colston LovelandCHI · TE | 14.9 | 8.5 | +6.4 | 65% | 17% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 17% |
| Kyle MonangaiCHI · RB | 10.8 | 7.7 | +3.1 | 54% | 48% car | — | 0 | 12 | 48% | 0 | 0% |
| D'Andre SwiftCHI · RB | 1.9 | 6.9 | −5.0 | 45% | 32% car | — | 0 | 8 | 32% | 1 | 3% |
| Jonnu SmithPIT · TE | 5.8 | 6.4 | −0.6 | 49% | 10% tgt | — | 0 | 2 | 6% | 3 | 10% |
| Pat FreiermuthPIT · TE | 10.9 | 5.1 | +5.8 | 47% | 10% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 10% |
| Darnell WashingtonPIT · TE | 4.2 | 3.4 | +0.8 | 68% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 7% |
| Roman WilsonPIT · WR | 0.0 | 3.4 | −3.4 | 28% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 7% |
| Ben SkowronekPIT · WR | 3.1 | 1.7 | +1.4 | 36% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Cole KmetCHI · TE | 1.3 | 1.7 | −0.4 | 63% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Durham SmytheCHI · TE | 1.4 | 1.7 | −0.3 | 29% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Olamide ZaccheausCHI · WR | 1.6 | 1.7 | −0.1 | 35% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Connor HeywardPIT · RB | 0.0 | 0.6 | −0.6 | 6% | 3% car | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 0 | 0% |
Team totals: Steelers 30 targets and 36 carries; Bears 30 targets and 25 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2025 season: 1.70 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.65 per carry and 0.44 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Mason Rudolph Unlucky
PIT · QB · 8.5 pts on 15.7 expected
24 of 31 passing for 171 yards, 1 touchdown, 1 interception; 3 carries for 7 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 15.7 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 3 games + this one (PPR): 0.5, 0.0, 9.0, 8.5
W2W6W11W12
Caleb Williams
CHI · QB · 21.7 pts on 18.1 expected
19 of 35 passing for 239 yards, 3 touchdowns; 4 carries for 21 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 18.1 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 5.7, 12.8, 38.7, 25.1, 10.3, 21.7
W7W8W9W10W11W12
Kenny Gainwell
PIT · RB · 18.2 pts on 16.7 expected
6 targets (20% of the team's), 6 catches for 30 yards; 10 carries (28% of the team's) for 92 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 16.7 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 3.5, 3.5, 7.4, 2.4, 29.5, 18.2
W7W8W9W10W11W12
DK Metcalf
PIT · WR · 14.4 pts on 14.9 expected
8 targets (27% of the team's), 5 catches for 22 yards; 2 carries (6% of the team's) for 12 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 14.9 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 8.0, 16.5, 2.6, 6.5, 9.9, 14.4
W7W8W9W10W11W12
Best score since Week 8.
Rome Odunze Volume, no payoff
CHI · WR · 8.3 pts on 15.3 expected
9 targets (30% of the team's), 3 catches for 53 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 15.3 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 5.1, 18.4, 0.0, 20.6, 6.1, 8.3
W7W8W9W10W11W12
DJ Moore Ran hot
CHI · WR · 23.4 pts on 11.9 expected
7 targets (23% of the team's), 5 catches for 64 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 11.9 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 8.2, 11.6, 23.0, 0.0, 3.1, 23.4
W7W8W9W10W11W12
Best fantasy game of the season.
Colston Loveland Ran hot
CHI · TE · 14.9 pts on 8.5 expected
5 targets (17% of the team's), 4 catches for 49 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 8.5 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 5.4, 6.8, 29.8, 9.5, 7.0, 14.9
W7W8W9W10W11W12
D'Andre Swift Unlucky
CHI · RB · 1.9 pts on 6.9 expected
1 target (3% of the team's), 1 catch for 14 yards; 8 carries (32% of the team's) for 15 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 6.9 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 25.5, 20.8, 15.1, 14.8, 9.0, 1.9
W6W7W8W10W11W12
Lowest-scoring game of the season.
Stock Up, Stock Down
Pittsburgh Steelers
- ▲Stock up: Kenny Gainwell led the backfield with 51% of the snaps after trailing Jaylen Warren before this game.
- ▲Stock up: Ben Skowronek played 36% of the snaps, up from a 18% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Jaylen Warren lost the backfield lead: 50% of the snaps to Kenny Gainwell's 51%.
Chicago Bears
- ▲Stock up: Kyle Monangai led the backfield with 54% of the snaps after trailing D'Andre Swift before this game.
- ▲Stock up: Luther Burden III played 51% of the snaps, up from a 29% season average.
- ▼Stock down: D'Andre Swift lost the backfield lead: 45% of the snaps to Kyle Monangai's 54%.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2025 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Steelers D | Bears D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 19.4 | 19.1 |
| RBs | 18.1 | 21.7 |
| WRs | 34.7 | 35.5 |
| TEs | 16.6 | 13.1 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Chicago opened at 50% win probability and passed 98% in the fourth quarter on the way to the win.
Bears win probability
Key Swings
- +25Williams → Loveland, 12-yd TD25% → 50%Q2 3:56
- −26Warren 1-yd TD run50% → 24%Q2 1:19
- +32Williams → Moore, 25-yd TD32% → 64%Q3 8:29
- +26Monangai 2-yd TD run68% → 94%Q4 14:14
- −24Rudolph → Freiermuth, 3-yd TD99% → 75%Q4 6:27
Swing in Bears win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Pittsburgh Steelers | Measure | Chicago Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 69 | Plays | 61 |
| 48% | Pass rate | 59% |
| 4.8 | Yds / dropback | 6.4 |
| 5.2 | Yds / carry | 4.0 |
| 8/14 | Third downs | 7/13 |
Efficiency edge Chicago ran 8 fewer plays but gained 1.6 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- PIT Metcalf 27% · Gainwell 20% · Austin 17%
- CHI Odunze 30% · Moore 23% · Loveland 17%
Possession Results
| Result | PIT | CHI |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 3 | 4 |
| Field goals | 0 | 1 |
| Punts | 3 | 4 |
| Turnovers | 2 | 2 |
| Turnovers on downs | 2 | 0 |
- The Bears opened the scoring on their second possession, a 8-play, 56-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
All 22 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 4 | 1:41 | Punt |
| PIT | Q1 13:19 | 2 | 9 | 0:44 | Interception |
| CHI | Q1 12:35 | 8 | 56 | 4:07 | Touchdown |
| PIT | Q1 8:28 | 13 | 95 | 7:58 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q1 0:30 | 2 | -20 | 0:46 | Fumble |
| CHI | Q2 14:44 | 5 | 26 | 2:57 | Fumble |
| PIT | Q2 11:47 | 5 | 22 | 3:01 | Downs |
| CHI | Q2 8:46 | 11 | 70 | 4:50 | Touchdown |
| PIT | Q2 3:56 | 7 | 80 | 2:37 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q2 1:19 | 9 | 35 | 1:19 | Field goal |
| PIT | Q3 15:00 | 6 | 1 | 3:44 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 11:16 | 5 | 60 | 2:47 | Touchdown |
| PIT | Q3 8:29 | 3 | 7 | 2:06 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 6:23 | 3 | 9 | 1:15 | Punt |
| PIT | Q3 5:08 | 3 | 21 | 1:16 | Fumble |
| CHI | Q3 3:52 | 9 | 54 | 4:38 | Touchdown |
| PIT | Q4 14:14 | 17 | 73 | 7:47 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q4 6:27 | 3 | 8 | 1:50 | Punt |
| PIT | Q4 4:37 | 6 | 12 | 2:44 | Punt |
| CHI | Q4 1:53 | 3 | 3 | 0:24 | Punt |
| PIT | Q4 1:29 | 7 | 33 | 1:12 | Downs |
| CHI | Q4 0:17 | 1 | -1 | 0:17 | End of game |
About these numbers
The Steelers' fumble touchdown is counted as a Bears lost fumble, not as a Steelers possession. Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Steelers vs Bears Head-to-Head
The Steelers and Bears first met in 1934 and have played 30 times since.
- All-time series
- 21–8–1Bears lead, 30 meetings since 1934
- Postseason
- 0No playoff meetings
- Largest Steelers win
- 38–31980
- Largest Bears win
- 49–71947
Since 2021
1–1 Series tied
2 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- S
- B
Oldest to newest. S = Steelers win, B = Bears win, outlined = this game.
Recent Meetings
- 2025 Wk 12 Steelers at Bears CHI 31 PIT 28 CHI W
- 2021 Wk 9 Bears at Steelers, 2021 Wk 9 recap PIT 29 CHI 27 PIT W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2025 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Steelers | Stat | Bears |
|---|---|---|
| 10-7 | Record | 11-6 |
| 23.4 | Points per game | 25.9 |
| 305.6 | Yards per game | 369.5 |
| 5.3 | Yards per play | 5.7 |
| 22.8 | Points allowed per game | 24.4 |
| 356.9 | Yards allowed per game | 361.8 |
Steelers and Bears in Fantasy
The two teams don't meet again this season. If you roster a Steeler or a Bear, these answer the week-to-week question.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Steelers or Bears player start this week? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Steelers and Bears players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Steelers and Bears defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere each team's remaining games fall in your fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2025 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Steelers vs Bears Game FAQ
Who won the 2025 Steelers vs Bears Week 12 game?
The Chicago Bears beat the Pittsburgh Steelers 31–28 in Week 12 of the 2025 season. The game was played at Soldier Field in Chicago, IL, on November 23, 2025. See the Bears' 2025 schedule.
What was the final score of Steelers vs Bears?
The final score was Bears 31, Steelers 28. The Steelers led 21–17 at halftime, and the second half went Steelers 7, Bears 14.
What happened in the Steelers vs Bears game?
Chicago erased a 21–17 halftime deficit, outscoring Pittsburgh 14–7 after the break to win 31–28. Pittsburgh outgained the Bears 345–328, but the Bears averaged 5.4 yards per play. DJ Moore led all players with 5 catches for 64 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Steelers vs Bears?
DJ Moore led the game with 23.4 PPR fantasy points, the WR7 of Week 12, on 5 catches for 64 yards and 2 touchdowns. Caleb Williams was next with 21.7 (QB6). See DJ Moore's 2025 game log.
Who led Steelers vs Bears in passing, rushing and receiving?
Caleb Williams (CHI) led all passers with 19 of 35 for 239 yards and 3 touchdowns. Kenny Gainwell (PIT) led in rushing with 10 carries for 92 yards. DJ Moore (CHI) led in receiving with 5 catches for 64 yards and 2 touchdowns.
How many fantasy points did DJ Moore score against the Steelers?
DJ Moore scored 23.4 points in PPR leagues, 20.9 in half-PPR and 18.4 in standard scoring against the Steelers in Week 12 of the 2025 season, on 5 catches for 64 yards and 2 touchdowns. He drew 23% of his team's targets.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Steelers vs Bears?
DJ Moore outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 23.4 PPR points on 11.9 xFP (+11.5). Mason Rudolph fell furthest short, with 8.5 points on 15.7 xFP (−7.2). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Steelers vs Bears?
Caleb Williams had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 18.1 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 21.7. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the Bears come back to beat the Steelers?
The Bears' chances of winning fell as low as 23% in the third quarter. Caleb Williams' 25-yard touchdown pass to DJ Moore in the third quarter was the biggest swing of the game. They finished the comeback with a 31–28 win.
What was the turning point of Steelers vs Bears?
Caleb Williams' 25-yard touchdown pass to DJ Moore with 8:29 left in the third quarter was the biggest swing of the game, moving the Bears' win probability from 32% to 64%.
What is the all-time Steelers vs Bears record?
The Bears lead the all-time series 21–8–1 across 30 meetings since 1934.
When did the Steelers and Bears last play before this game?
Before Week 12 of 2025, they last met in the 2021 season on November 8, 2021, when the Steelers beat the Bears 29–27.
What is the Steelers vs Bears record since 2021?
The series is tied 1–1 across 2 meetings since the 2021 season, including this game.
