Final2022 Week 7
Gillette Stadium, Foxborough, MA|
Chicago Bears vs New England Patriots, Week 7 2022
Chicago Bears
AwayWon
33
New England Patriots
Home
14
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bears | 10 | 10 | 6 | 7 | 33 |
| Patriots | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 14 |
CHI 33 · NE 14 Final
Passing leader
Bailey Zappe
NE · QB
7.3PPR pts
14/22, 185 YDS, 1 TD, 2 INT
Top fantasy scorer
NE · RB
23.8PPR pts
11 ATT, 39 YDS, 1 TD, 8 REC, 59 REC YDS
Patriots leader
NE · WR
11.4PPR pts
2 REC, 34 YDS, 1 TD
Defensive playmaker
Roquan Smith
CHI
1 INT, 1 SACK, 12 TKL
Bears 33, Patriots 14: Chicago leads from start to finish
Chicago led 20–14 at halftime and outscored New England 13–0 after the break to win 33–14. The Bears finished with a 390–260 edge in total offense and averaged 5.6 yards per play.
The gap showed up everywhere. The Patriots went 5-for-10 on third down and committed four turnovers, while the Bears kept the ball for 37:14.
The two teams meet again in Week 7 of 2026. If you roster anyone from either side, run the start/sit call in Redraft Command and it will weigh your lineup, your opponent and your league scoring, not only the player rankings.
Key advantages
- +0.2 yards/play CHI 5.6 · NE 5.4
- +3 turnover margin CHI 1 · NE 4 turnovers
- +130 total yards CHI 390 · NE 260
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Bear or Patriot on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Bears Won
Chicago won the efficiency, turnover, third-down, and time of possession battles.
| Bears | Stat | Patriots |
|---|---|---|
| 5.6 | Yards per play | 5.4 |
| 1 | Turnovers | 4 |
| 390 | Total yards | 260 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 70 | Plays | 48 |
| 61% | Third-down conversion | 50% |
| 37:14 | Time of possession | 22:46 |
Scoring Summary
The Bears scored three touchdowns and four field goals; the Patriots scored two touchdowns.
| Time | Team | Play | CHI | NE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 9:02 | CHI | Cairo Santos 42-yard FG Takes lead | 3 | 0 |
| 2:11 | CHI | Justin Fields 3-yard TD run Extends leadCairo Santos XP | 10 | 0 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 9:43 | NE | Bailey Zappe → Jakobi Meyers, 30-yard TDNick Folk XP | 10 | 7 |
| 6:04 | NE | Rhamondre Stevenson 4-yard TD run Takes leadNick Folk XP | 10 | 14 |
| 1:54 | CHI | Justin Fields → Khalil Herbert, 25-yard TD Takes leadCairo Santos XP | 17 | 14 |
| 0:00 | CHI | Cairo Santos 23-yard FG Extends lead | 20 | 14 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 9:47 | CHI | Cairo Santos 38-yard FG Extends lead | 23 | 14 |
| 3:50 | CHI | Cairo Santos 50-yard FG Extends lead | 26 | 14 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 12:13 | CHI | David Montgomery 1-yard TD run Extends leadCairo Santos XP | 33 | 14 |
Fantasy Points: Bears vs Patriots, Week 7 2022
Fantasy leaders
- Justin FieldsCHI · QB24.4 PTSQB5
- Rhamondre StevensonNE · RB23.8 PTSRB5
- Khalil HerbertCHI · RB15.7 PTSRB18
- David MontgomeryCHI · RB12.2 PTSRB24
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.3 | QB25 | 14/22 | 185 | 1 | 2 | 2 | -1 | 0 | 67.4 | ||
| 24.4 | QB5 | 13/21 | 179 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 82 | 1 | 85.2 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.9 | QB29 | 3/6 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 24 | 0 | 16.7 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23.8 | RB5 | RB | 11 | 39 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 59 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 15.7 | RB18 | RB | 12 | 62 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 25 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 12.2 | RB24 | RB | 15 | 62 | 1 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 11.4 | WR33 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 34 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 9.8 | WR41 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 3 | 68 | 0 | ||
| 8.8 | WR47 | WR | — | — | — | 7 | 4 | 48 | 0 | ||
| 8.3 | WR50 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 3 | 53 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.2 | TE26 | TE | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 32 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.1 | WR71 | WR | 1 | 29 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | ||
| 2.9 | WR77 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 1 | 19 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.4 | TE36 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 14 | 0 | ||
| 2.2 | TE38 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 12 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.0 | RB54 | RB | 3 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | ||
| 1.5 | TE46 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | ||
| 1.4 | TE48 | TE | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.8 | RB60 | RB | 3 | 8 | 0 | — | — | — | — | ||
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fantasy Usage
Chicago Bears
Snap Share
Cole KmetTE68 snaps96%
Darnell MooneyWR57 snaps80%
Equanimeous St. BrownWR42 snaps59%
David MontgomeryRB40 snaps56%
N'Keal HarryTE30 snaps42%
Target Share21 targets
- Equanimeous St. Brown33%, 7 targets
- Darnell Mooney29%, 6 targets
- Cole Kmet14%, 3 targets
- Khalil Herbert10%, 2 targets
- Ryan Griffin5%, 1 targets
- Other10%, 2 targets
Carry Share45 carries
- David Montgomery33%, 15 carries
- Justin Fields31%, 14 carries
- Khalil Herbert27%, 12 carries
- Trestan Ebner7%, 3 carries
- Dante Pettis2%, 1 carries
New England Patriots
Snap Share
Jakobi MeyersWR52 snaps100%
DeVante ParkerWR48 snaps92%
Hunter HenryTE44 snaps85%
Tyquan ThorntonWR44 snaps85%
Rhamondre StevensonRB40 snaps77%
Target Share28 targets
- Rhamondre Stevenson29%, 8 targets
- DeVante Parker18%, 5 targets
- Tyquan Thornton18%, 5 targets
- Jonnu Smith11%, 3 targets
- Hunter Henry7%, 2 targets
- Other18%, 5 targets
Carry Share19 carries
- Rhamondre Stevenson58%, 11 carries
- Damien Harris16%, 3 carries
- Mac Jones16%, 3 carries
- Bailey Zappe11%, 2 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52 | 100% | 2 | 7% | 0 | |
| 68 | 96% | 3 | 14% | 0 | |
| 48 | 92% | 5 | 18% | 0 | |
| 44 | 85% | 2 | 7% | 0 | |
| 44 | 85% | 5 | 18% | 0 | |
| 57 | 80% | 6 | 29% | 0 | |
| 40 | 77% | 8 | 29% | 11 | |
| 42 | 59% | 7 | 33% | 0 | |
| 40 | 56% | 0 | 0% | 15 | |
| 30 | 42% | 1 | 5% | 0 | |
| 29 | 41% | 2 | 10% | 12 | |
| 17 | 33% | 3 | 11% | 0 | |
| 22 | 31% | 1 | 5% | 1 | |
| 20 | 28% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 13 | 18% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 9 | 17% | 2 | 7% | 3 | |
| 11 | 15% | 1 | 5% | 0 | |
| 8 | 11% | 0 | 0% | 3 | |
| 3 | 6% | 1 | 4% | 0 | |
| 3 | 6% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+8.1Jakobi Meyers11.4 PTS vs 3.3 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−5.4Tyquan Thornton2.9 PTS vs 8.3 xFP
- Highest expected volume20.4 xFPRhamondre Stevenson23.8 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rhamondre StevensonNE · RB | 23.8 | 20.4 | +3.4 | 77% | 58% car | — | 0 | 11 | 58% | 8 | 29% |
| Justin FieldsCHI · QB | 24.4 | 17.9 | +6.5 | 100% | 21 att | — | 21 | 14 | 31% | 0 | 0% |
| Equanimeous St. BrownCHI · WR | 8.8 | 11.7 | −2.9 | 59% | 33% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 33% |
| Khalil HerbertCHI · RB | 15.7 | 11.1 | +4.6 | 41% | 27% car | — | 0 | 12 | 27% | 2 | 10% |
| Bailey ZappeNE · QB | 7.3 | 10.6 | −3.3 | 65% | 22 att | — | 22 | 2 | 11% | 0 | 0% |
| Darnell MooneyCHI · WR | 8.3 | 10.0 | −1.7 | 80% | 29% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 29% |
| David MontgomeryCHI · RB | 12.2 | 9.7 | +2.5 | 56% | 33% car | — | 0 | 15 | 33% | 0 | 0% |
| DeVante ParkerNE · WR | 9.8 | 8.3 | +1.5 | 92% | 18% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 18% |
| Tyquan ThorntonNE · WR | 2.9 | 8.3 | −5.4 | 85% | 18% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 18% |
| Damien HarrisNE · RB | 2.0 | 5.3 | −3.3 | 17% | 16% car | — | 0 | 3 | 16% | 2 | 7% |
| Cole KmetCHI · TE | 5.2 | 5.0 | +0.2 | 96% | 14% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 14% |
| Jonnu SmithNE · TE | 1.4 | 5.0 | −3.6 | 33% | 11% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 11% |
| Mac JonesNE · QB | 1.9 | 4.5 | −2.6 | 35% | 6 att | — | 6 | 3 | 16% | 0 | 0% |
| Hunter HenryNE · TE | 2.2 | 3.3 | −1.1 | 85% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 7% |
| Jakobi MeyersNE · WR | 11.4 | 3.3 | +8.1 | 100% | 7% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 7% |
| Dante PettisCHI · WR | 4.1 | 2.3 | +1.8 | 31% | 5% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 2% | 1 | 5% |
| Trestan EbnerCHI · RB | 0.8 | 1.9 | −1.1 | 11% | 7% car | — | 0 | 3 | 7% | 0 | 0% |
| N'Keal HarryCHI · TE | 2.4 | 1.7 | +0.7 | 42% | 5% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 5% |
| Nelson AgholorNE · WR | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 6% | 4% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4% |
| Ryan GriffinCHI · — | 1.5 | 1.7 | −0.2 | 15% | 5% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 5% |
Team totals: Bears 21 targets and 45 carries; Patriots 28 targets and 19 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2022 season: 1.67 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.64 per carry and 0.42 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Justin Fields Ran hot
CHI · QB · 24.4 pts on 17.9 expected
13 of 21 passing for 179 yards, 1 touchdown, 1 interception; 14 carries for 82 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 17.9 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 8.8, 4.9, 10.2, 17.0, 19.4, 24.4
W2W3W4W5W6W7
Best fantasy game of the season.
Bailey Zappe
NE · QB · 7.3 pts on 10.6 expected
14 of 22 passing for 185 yards, 1 touchdown, 2 interceptions; 2 carries for -1 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 10.6 expected.
Last 3 games + this one (PPR): 6.0, 11.0, 18.4, 7.3
W4W5W6W7
Equanimeous St. Brown Volume, no payoff
CHI · WR · 8.8 pts on 11.7 expected
7 targets (33% of the team's), 4 catches for 48 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 11.7 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 5.9, 7.3, 0.9, 4.4, 0.1, 8.8
W2W3W4W5W6W7
Season high in targets (7). Best score since Week 1.
Khalil Herbert
CHI · RB · 15.7 pts on 11.1 expected
2 targets (10% of the team's), 1 catch for 25 yards and 1 touchdown; 12 carries (27% of the team's) for 62 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 11.1 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 5.1, 30.9, 11.1, 1.1, 7.4, 15.7
W2W3W4W5W6W7
Best score since Week 3.
Rhamondre Stevenson
NE · RB · 23.8 pts on 20.4 expected
8 targets (29% of the team's), 8 catches for 59 yards; 11 carries (58% of the team's) for 39 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 20.4 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 6.1, 20.1, 12.9, 19.5, 25.1, 23.8
W2W3W4W5W6W7
Season high in targets (8).
DeVante Parker
NE · WR · 9.8 pts on 8.3 expected
5 targets (18% of the team's), 3 catches for 68 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 8.3 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 0.0, 20.6, 10.4, 0.0, 10.4, 9.8
W2W3W4W5W6W7
Tyquan Thornton Unlucky
NE · WR · 2.9 pts on 8.3 expected
5 targets (18% of the team's), 1 catch for 19 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 8.3 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Start/Sit: Tyquan Thornton →Jakobi Meyers Ran hot
NE · WR · 11.4 pts on 3.3 expected
2 targets (7% of the team's), 2 catches for 34 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 3.3 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 4 games + this one (PPR): 10.2, 18.5, 24.1, 10.0, 11.4
W1W2W5W6W7
Stock Up, Stock Down
Chicago Bears
- ▼Stock down: Equanimeous St. Brown played 59% of the snaps, down from a 76% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Dante Pettis played 31% of the snaps, down from a 55% season average.
New England Patriots
- ▲Stock up: Tyquan Thornton played 85% of the snaps, up from a 49% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Jakobi Meyers played 100% of the snaps, up from a 83% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Damien Harris played 17% of the snaps, down from a 34% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2022 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Bears D | Patriots D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 18.5 | 17.3 |
| RBs | 27.3 | 18.1 |
| WRs | 32.7 | 33.3 |
| TEs | 9.0 | 12.3 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
New England opened at 74% win probability, climbed as high as 81%, then lost.
Patriots win probability
Key Swings
- −23Fields 3-yd TD run62% → 39%Q1 2:11
- +25Zappe → Meyers, 30-yd TD35% → 59%Q2 9:43
- +23Stevenson 4-yd TD run58% → 81%Q2 6:04
- −25Fields → Herbert, 25-yd TD81% → 56%Q2 1:54
- −12Santos 23-yd FG55% → 43%Q2 0:00
Swing in Patriots win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Chicago Bears | Measure | New England Patriots |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Plays | 48 |
| 36% | Pass rate | 60% |
| 5.9 | Yds / dropback | 6.6 |
| 5.4 | Yds / carry | 3.7 |
| 11/18 | Third downs | 5/10 |
Efficiency edge Chicago ran 22 more plays and gained 1.7 more yards per carry.
- Top targets
- CHI Brown 33% · Mooney 29% · Kmet 14%
- NE Stevenson 29% · Parker 18% · Thornton 18%
Possession Results
| Result | CHI | NE |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 3 | 2 |
| Field goals | 4 | 0 |
| Punts | 2 | 4 |
| Turnovers | 1 | 4 |
| Turnovers on downs | 1 | 0 |
CHI turnover edge: +3
- The Bears opened the scoring on their first possession, a 8-play, 42-yard drive that ended in a field goal.
- The Bears drained the clock with three second-half drives of four to six minutes.
All 22 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NE | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 5 | 2:06 | Punt |
| CHI | Q1 12:54 | 8 | 42 | 3:52 | Field goal |
| NE | Q1 9:02 | 3 | 5 | 2:33 | Punt |
| CHI | Q1 6:29 | 7 | 56 | 4:18 | Touchdown |
| NE | Q1 2:11 | 10 | 41 | 4:03 | Interception |
| CHI | Q2 13:08 | 3 | -9 | 1:13 | Punt |
| NE | Q2 11:55 | 4 | 55 | 2:12 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q2 9:43 | 4 | 20 | 2:09 | Interception |
| NE | Q2 7:34 | 3 | 50 | 1:30 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q2 6:04 | 9 | 75 | 4:10 | Touchdown |
| NE | Q2 1:54 | 3 | 10 | 0:22 | Fumble |
| CHI | Q2 1:32 | 7 | 32 | 1:32 | Field goal |
| CHI | Q3 15:00 | 10 | 56 | 5:13 | Field goal |
| NE | Q3 9:47 | 3 | -4 | 1:30 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 8:17 | 10 | 46 | 4:27 | Field goal |
| NE | Q3 3:50 | 3 | 8 | 1:49 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 2:01 | 8 | 39 | 4:48 | Touchdown |
| NE | Q4 12:13 | 8 | 28 | 4:23 | Interception |
| CHI | Q4 7:50 | 4 | 17 | 3:17 | Punt |
| NE | Q4 4:33 | 7 | 36 | 1:53 | Interception |
| CHI | Q4 2:40 | 4 | 7 | 2:15 | Downs |
| NE | Q4 0:25 | 1 | -1 | 0:25 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Bears vs Patriots Head-to-Head
The Bears and Patriots first met in 1973 and have played 16 times since.
- All-time series
- 11–5Patriots lead, 16 meetings since 1973
- Postseason
- 1–0Bears won in 1985
- Largest Bears win
- 46–101985
- Largest Patriots win
- 36–72010
Since 2021
1–1 Series tied
2 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- B
- P
Oldest to newest. B = Bears win, P = Patriots win, outlined = this game.
2026 Meetings
- Week 7 Patriots at Bears Upcoming
Recent Meetings
- 2024 Wk 10 Patriots at Bears, 2024 Wk 10 recap NE 19 CHI 3 NE W
- 2022 Wk 7 Bears at Patriots CHI 33 NE 14 CHI W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2022 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Bears | Stat | Patriots |
|---|---|---|
| 3-14 | Record | 8-9 |
| 19.2 | Points per game | 21.4 |
| 307.8 | Yards per game | 314.6 |
| 5.3 | Yards per play | 5.3 |
| 27.2 | Points allowed per game | 20.4 |
| 375.9 | Yards allowed per game | 322.0 |
Bears vs Patriots Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- NE −8.5Patriots failed to cover by 27.5
- Total
- 40Over: 47 points scored (by 7)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patriots | 24.3 | 14 | −10.3 |
| Bears | 15.8 | 33 | +17.3 |
The Bears beat their implied total and the Patriots fell short of theirs; the Fantasy tab has the player lines behind it.
Betting Trends
Each team's 2022 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
Chicago Bears
- Against the spread
- 3–3–1
- Over/under
- 3–4
- ATS as favorite
- 0–0–1
- ATS as underdog
- 3–3
- ATS on the road
- 2–2
New England Patriots
- Against the spread
- 3–3–1
- Over/under
- 4–3
- ATS as favorite
- 1–1–1
- ATS as underdog
- 2–2
- ATS at home
- 1–2
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Bears vs Patriots Fantasy Outlook for 2026
One meeting is left on the 2026 schedule: Week 7 in Chicago. Here's how to decide who to play in your league.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Bears or Patriots player start in Week 7? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Bears and Patriots players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Bears and Patriots defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere this matchup falls in each team's fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2022 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Bears vs Patriots Game FAQ
Who won the 2022 Bears vs Patriots Week 7 game?
The Chicago Bears beat the New England Patriots 33–14 in Week 7 of the 2022 season. The game was played at Gillette Stadium in Foxborough, MA, on October 24, 2022. See the Bears' 2022 schedule.
What was the final score of Bears vs Patriots?
The final score was Bears 33, Patriots 14. The Bears led 20–14 at halftime, and the second half went Bears 13, Patriots 0.
What happened in the Bears vs Patriots game?
Chicago led 20–14 at halftime and outscored New England 13–0 after the break to win 33–14. The Bears finished with a 390–260 edge in total offense and averaged 5.6 yards per play. Justin Fields led all players with 13 of 21 passing for 179 yards and a touchdown, plus 14 carries for 82 rushing yards and a touchdown. The Patriots committed 4 turnovers, the Bears 1.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Bears vs Patriots?
Justin Fields led the game with 24.4 PPR fantasy points, the QB5 of Week 7, on 13 of 21 passing for 179 yards and a touchdown, plus 14 carries for 82 rushing yards and a touchdown. Rhamondre Stevenson was next with 23.8 (RB5). See Justin Fields's 2022 game log.
Who led Bears vs Patriots in passing, rushing and receiving?
Bailey Zappe (NE) led all passers with 14 of 22 for 185 yards, a touchdown and 2 interceptions. Justin Fields (CHI) led in rushing with 14 carries for 82 yards and a touchdown. DeVante Parker (NE) led in receiving with 3 catches for 68 yards.
How many fantasy points did Justin Fields score against the Patriots?
Justin Fields scored 24.4 fantasy points against the Patriots in Week 7 of the 2022 season, the same in PPR, half-PPR and standard scoring because he had no catches, on 13 of 21 passing for 179 yards and a touchdown, plus 14 carries for 82 rushing yards and a touchdown.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Bears vs Patriots?
Jakobi Meyers outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 11.4 PPR points on 3.3 xFP (+8.1). Tyquan Thornton fell furthest short, with 2.9 points on 8.3 xFP (−5.4). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
How did the Bears come back to beat the Patriots?
The Bears' chances of winning fell as low as 19% in the first half. They finished the comeback with a 33–14 win.
Which team won the turnover battle in Bears vs Patriots?
The Bears won the turnover battle 4–1: the Patriots gave the ball away 4 times and the Bears 1 time. The Bears won the game.
What is the all-time Bears vs Patriots record?
The Patriots lead the all-time series 11–5 across 16 meetings since 1973, including a 0–1 record in the postseason.
Have the Bears and Patriots played in the Super Bowl?
Yes, once: the Bears won Super Bowl XX 46–10 over the Patriots after the 1985 season.
When did the Bears and Patriots last play before this game?
Before Week 7 of 2022, they last met in the 2018 season on October 21, 2018, when the Patriots beat the Bears 38–31.
What was the closing spread for Bears vs Patriots?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Patriots −8.5, making the New England Patriots 8.5-point favorites, with a closing total of 40. That implied about 24.3 points for the Patriots and 15.8 for the Bears.
Did Bears vs Patriots go over or under the total?
The game went over. The consensus closing total was 40, and the teams combined for 47 points, 7 over the number.
Who covered the spread in Bears vs Patriots?
The Bears covered as 8.5-point underdogs against the closing line of Patriots −8.5. The final margin was 19 points.
