Final2026 Week 3
Acrisure Stadium, Pittsburgh, PA|
Cincinnati Bengals vs Pittsburgh Steelers, Week 3 2026
Cincinnati Bengals
Away
27
Pittsburgh Steelers
HomeWon
30
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bengals | 7 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 27 |
| Steelers | 14 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 30 |
CIN 27 · PIT 30 Final
Passing leader
PIT · QB
23.7PPR pts
19/34, 292 YDS, 3 TD, 1 INT
Top fantasy scorer
CIN · WR
24.8PPR pts
9 REC, 98 YDS, 1 TD
Bengals leader
CIN · QB
22.6PPR pts
28/37, 282 YDS, 3 TD
Defensive playmaker
Jordan Battle
CIN
1 INT, 4 TKL
Steelers 30, Bengals 27: Pittsburgh holds off Cincinnati
Pittsburgh broke a 17–17 halftime tie, outscoring Cincinnati 13–10 after the break to win 30–27. The Steelers finished with a 411–352 edge in total offense and averaged 7.0 yards per play.
The gap showed up everywhere. The Bengals went 6-for-12 on third down and committed two turnovers.
The two teams meet again in Week 10 of 2026. If you roster anyone from either side, run the start/sit call in Redraft Command and it will weigh your lineup, your opponent and your league scoring, not only the player rankings.
Key advantages
- +0.7 yards/play PIT 7.0 · CIN 6.3
- +1 turnover margin PIT 1 · CIN 2 turnovers
- +59 total yards PIT 411 · CIN 352
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Bengal or Steeler on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Steelers Won
Pittsburgh won the efficiency, turnover, and third-down battles.
| Bengals | Stat | Steelers |
|---|---|---|
| 6.3 | Yards per play | 7.0 |
| 2 | Turnovers | 1 |
| 352 | Total yards | 411 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 56 | Plays | 59 |
| 50% | Third-down conversion | 58% |
| 30:06 | Time of possession | 29:54 |
Scoring Summary
The Steelers scored three touchdowns and three field goals; the Bengals scored three touchdowns and two field goals.
| Time | Team | Play | CIN | PIT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 13:10 | PIT | Aaron Rodgers → Roman Wilson, 38-yard TD Takes leadChris Boswell XP | 0 | 7 |
| 5:50 | CIN | Joe Burrow → Ja'Marr Chase, 3-yard TD Ties gameEvan McPherson XP | 7 | 7 |
| 0:52 | PIT | Aaron Rodgers → Ben Skowronek, 23-yard TD Takes leadChris Boswell XP | 7 | 14 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 10:16 | CIN | Evan McPherson 50-yard FG | 10 | 14 |
| 7:05 | PIT | Chris Boswell 44-yard FG Extends lead | 10 | 17 |
| 0:34 | CIN | Joe Burrow → Tee Higgins, 28-yard TD Ties gameEvan McPherson XP | 17 | 17 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 8:22 | CIN | Evan McPherson 38-yard FG Takes lead | 20 | 17 |
| 2:43 | PIT | Aaron Rodgers → DK Metcalf, 6-yard TD Takes leadChris Boswell XP | 20 | 24 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 13:29 | CIN | Joe Burrow → Mike Gesicki, 25-yard TD Takes leadEvan McPherson XP | 27 | 24 |
| 8:45 | PIT | Chris Boswell 36-yard FG Ties game | 27 | 27 |
| 2:15 | PIT | Chris Boswell 33-yard FG Game winner | 27 | 30 |
Fantasy Points: Bengals vs Steelers, Week 3 2026
Fantasy leaders
- Ja'Marr ChaseCIN · WR24.8 PTSWR5
- Aaron RodgersPIT · QB23.7 PTSQB8
- Joe BurrowCIN · QB22.6 PTSQB10
- Tee HigginsCIN · WR21.0 PTSWR8
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23.7 | QB8 | 19/34 | 292 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 101.6 | Start/Sit → | |
| 22.6 | QB10 | 28/37 | 282 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 123.9 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24.8 | WR5 | WR | — | — | — | 12 | 9 | 98 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 21.0 | WR8 | WR | — | — | — | 7 | 6 | 90 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 20.6 | RB8 | RB | 17 | 127 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 49 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 15.0 | WR24 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 3 | 60 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 12.7 | TE12 | TE | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 37 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 12.1 | WR35 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 3 | 31 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 10.3 | WR43 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 23 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 9.7 | TE18 | TE | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 67 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 8.9 | RB33 | RB | 13 | 61 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.9 | WR68 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 3 | 29 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.1 | TE34 | TE | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 30 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.6 | WR88 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 2 | 16 | 0 | ||
| 3.3 | TE41 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 | ||
| 2.4 | RB60 | RB | 3 | 9 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.4 | WR101 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 14 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.2 | TE60 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.2 | WR112 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.0 | TE62 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | RB | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | RB | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → |
Fantasy Usage
Cincinnati Bengals
Snap Share
Ja'Marr ChaseWR57 snaps100%
Tee HigginsWR53 snaps93%
Chase BrownRB40 snaps70%
Dohnte MeyersWR32 snaps56%
Mike GesickiTE29 snaps51%
Target Share37 targets
- Ja'Marr Chase32%, 12 targets
- Tee Higgins19%, 7 targets
- Dohnte Meyers14%, 5 targets
- Samaje Perine8%, 3 targets
- Mike Gesicki8%, 3 targets
- Other19%, 7 targets
Carry Share18 carries
- Chase Brown72%, 13 carries
- Samaje Perine17%, 3 carries
- Joe Burrow11%, 2 carries
Pittsburgh Steelers
Snap Share
DK MetcalfWR59 snaps95%
Jaylen WarrenRB56 snaps90%
Darnell WashingtonTE47 snaps76%
Michael PittmanWR45 snaps73%
Pat FreiermuthTE37 snaps60%
Target Share31 targets
- Roman Wilson19%, 6 targets
- DK Metcalf16%, 5 targets
- Michael Pittman16%, 5 targets
- Pat Freiermuth13%, 4 targets
- Jaylen Warren13%, 4 targets
- Other23%, 7 targets
Carry Share23 carries
- Jaylen Warren74%, 17 carries
- Aaron Rodgers13%, 3 carries
- Travis Homer4%, 1 carries
- Pat Freiermuth4%, 1 carries
- Lew Nichols4%, 1 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57 | 100% | 12 | 32% | 0 | |
| 59 | 95% | 5 | 16% | 0 | |
| 53 | 93% | 7 | 19% | 0 | |
| 56 | 90% | 4 | 13% | 17 | |
| 47 | 76% | 4 | 13% | 0 | |
| 45 | 73% | 5 | 16% | 0 | |
| 40 | 70% | 2 | 5% | 13 | |
| 37 | 60% | 4 | 13% | 1 | |
| 32 | 56% | 5 | 14% | 0 | |
| 29 | 51% | 3 | 8% | 0 | |
| 29 | 51% | 2 | 5% | 0 | |
| 24 | 39% | 6 | 19% | 0 | |
| 18 | 32% | 3 | 8% | 3 | |
| 17 | 27% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 13 | 23% | 2 | 5% | 0 | |
| 12 | 21% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 11 | 18% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 4 | 6% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 4 | 6% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 3 | 5% | 0 | 0% | 1 | |
| 3 | 5% | 0 | 0% | 1 | |
| 1 | 2% | 1 | 3% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+8.8Tee Higgins21.0 PTS vs 12.2 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−5.1Michael Pittman Jr.3.6 PTS vs 8.7 xFP
- Highest expected volume21.0 xFPJa'Marr Chase24.8 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ja'Marr ChaseCIN · WR | 24.8 | 21.0 | +3.8 | 100% | 32% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 12 | 32% |
| Joe BurrowCIN · QB | 22.6 | 18.5 | +4.1 | 100% | 37 att | — | 37 | 2 | 11% | 0 | 0% |
| Aaron RodgersPIT · QB | 23.7 | 17.7 | +6.0 | 100% | 34 att | — | 34 | 3 | 13% | 0 | 0% |
| Jaylen WarrenPIT · RB | 20.6 | 17.2 | +3.4 | 90% | 74% car | — | 0 | 17 | 74% | 4 | 13% |
| Tee HigginsCIN · WR | 21.0 | 12.2 | +8.8 | 93% | 19% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 19% |
| Chase BrownCIN · RB | 8.9 | 11.3 | −2.4 | 70% | 72% car | — | 0 | 13 | 72% | 2 | 5% |
| Roman WilsonPIT · WR | 15.0 | 10.5 | +4.5 | 39% | 19% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 19% |
| DK MetcalfPIT · WR | 12.1 | 8.7 | +3.4 | 95% | 16% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 16% |
| Dohnte MeyersCIN · WR | 5.9 | 8.7 | −2.8 | 56% | 14% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 14% |
| Michael Pittman Jr.PIT · WR | 3.6 | 8.7 | −5.1 | 73% | 16% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 16% |
| Pat FreiermuthPIT · TE | 5.1 | 7.6 | −2.5 | 60% | 13% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 4% | 4 | 13% |
| Samaje PerineCIN · RB | 2.4 | 7.1 | −4.7 | 32% | 17% car | — | 0 | 3 | 17% | 3 | 8% |
| Darnell WashingtonPIT · TE | 9.7 | 7.0 | +2.7 | 76% | 13% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 13% |
| Mike GesickiCIN · TE | 12.7 | 5.2 | +7.5 | 51% | 8% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 3 | 8% |
| Drew SampleCIN · TE | 1.0 | 3.5 | −2.5 | 51% | 5% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 5% |
| Tanner HudsonCIN · TE | 3.3 | 3.5 | −0.2 | 23% | 5% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 5% |
| Ben SkowronekPIT · WR | 9.3 | 1.7 | +7.6 | 18% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Colbie YoungCIN · WR | 1.2 | 1.7 | −0.5 | 2% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Germie BernardPIT · WR | 2.4 | 1.7 | +0.7 | 27% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Robert TonyanPIT · TE | 1.2 | 1.7 | −0.5 | 6% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Lew NicholsPIT · RB | 0.0 | 0.6 | −0.6 | 5% | 4% car | — | 0 | 1 | 4% | 0 | 0% |
| Travis HomerPIT · RB | 0.0 | 0.6 | −0.6 | 5% | 4% car | — | 0 | 1 | 4% | 0 | 0% |
Team totals: Bengals 37 targets and 18 carries; Steelers 31 targets and 23 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2026 season: 1.75 PPR points per target (68% catch rate), 0.60 per carry and 0.47 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Joe Burrow
CIN · QB · 22.6 pts on 18.5 expected
28 of 37 passing for 282 yards, 3 touchdowns; 2 carries for 13 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 18.5 expected. Next up: Week 4 against the Jaguars. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Joe Burrow →Aaron Rodgers Ran hot
PIT · QB · 23.7 pts on 17.7 expected
19 of 34 passing for 292 yards, 3 touchdowns, 1 interception; 3 carries for 10 yards.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 17.7 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat. Next up: Week 5 against the Colts. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Aaron Rodgers →Ja'Marr Chase Strong role
CIN · WR · 24.8 pts on 21.0 expected
12 targets (32% of the team's), 9 catches for 98 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 21.0 expected. Next up: Week 4 against the Jaguars. Bet on the role more than the result.
Trend: Season high in targets (12).
Tee Higgins Ran hot
CIN · WR · 21.0 pts on 12.2 expected
7 targets (19% of the team's), 6 catches for 90 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 12.2 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat. Next up: Week 4 against the Jaguars. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Tee Higgins →Jaylen Warren Strong role
PIT · RB · 20.6 pts on 17.2 expected
4 targets (13% of the team's), 3 catches for 49 yards; 17 carries (74% of the team's) for 127 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 17.2 expected. Next up: Week 5 against the Colts. Bet on the role more than the result.
Trend: Season high in carries (17).
Roman Wilson Short-yardage role
PIT · WR · 15.0 pts on 10.5 expected
6 targets (19% of the team's), 3 catches for 60 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 10.5 expected. Next up: Week 5 against the Colts. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Roman Wilson →Michael Pittman Jr. Unlucky
PIT · WR · 3.6 pts on 8.7 expected
5 targets (16% of the team's), 2 catches for 16 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 8.7 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't. Next up: Week 5 against the Colts. Bet on the role more than the result.
Mike Gesicki Ran hot
CIN · TE · 12.7 pts on 5.2 expected
3 targets (8% of the team's), 3 catches for 37 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 5.2 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat. Next up: Week 4 against the Jaguars. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Mike Gesicki →Stock Up, Stock Down
Cincinnati Bengals
- ▲Stock up: Tee Higgins played 93% of the snaps, up from a 72% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Dohnte Meyers played 56% of the snaps, up from a 17% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Mike Gesicki played 51% of the snaps, up from a 34% season average.
Pittsburgh Steelers
- ▲Stock up: Jaylen Warren played 90% of the snaps, up from a 54% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Darnell Washington played 76% of the snaps, up from a 59% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Roman Wilson played 39% of the snaps, down from a 67% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2026 through Week 4.
| Points allowed to | Bengals D | Steelers D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 17.4 | 13.3 |
| RBs | 18.9 | 24.6 |
| WRs | 30.8 | 28.0 |
| TEs | 17.7 | 9.9 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Pittsburgh opened at 40% win probability and passed 98% in the fourth quarter on the way to the win.
Steelers win probability
Key Swings
- +23Rodgers → Skowronek, 23-yd TD41% → 64%Q1 0:52
- −28Burrow → Higgins, 28-yd TD71% → 43%Q2 0:34
- +37Rodgers → Metcalf, 6-yd TD29% → 66%Q3 2:43
- −42Burrow → Gesicki, 25-yd TD69% → 28%Q4 13:29
- +38Boswell 33-yd FG48% → 86%Q4 2:15
Swing in Steelers win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Cincinnati Bengals | Measure | Pittsburgh Steelers |
|---|---|---|
| 56 | Plays | 59 |
| 68% | Pass rate | 61% |
| 7.1 | Yds / dropback | 7.6 |
| 4.6 | Yds / carry | 6.0 |
| 6/12 | Third downs | 7/12 |
Efficiency edge Pittsburgh ran 3 more plays and gained 0.5 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- CIN Chase 32% · Higgins 19% · Meyers 14%
- PIT Wilson 19% · Metcalf 16% · Pittman 16%
Possession Results
| Result | CIN | PIT |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 3 | 3 |
| Field goals | 2 | 3 |
| Punts | 2 | 1 |
| Turnovers | 1 | 1 |
- The Steelers opened the scoring on their first possession, a 4-play, 73-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
- The Steelers scored touchdowns on two of their first three drives, then drained the clock with two second-half drives of five to six minutes.
All 18 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIT | Q1 15:00 | 4 | 73 | 1:50 | Touchdown |
| CIN | Q1 13:10 | 11 | 73 | 7:20 | Touchdown |
| PIT | Q1 5:50 | 11 | 86 | 4:58 | Touchdown |
| CIN | Q1 0:52 | 9 | 32 | 5:36 | Field goal |
| PIT | Q2 10:16 | 6 | 40 | 3:11 | Field goal |
| CIN | Q2 7:05 | 5 | 18 | 2:35 | Punt |
| PIT | Q2 4:30 | 7 | 37 | 2:50 | Interception |
| CIN | Q2 1:40 | 5 | 53 | 1:06 | Touchdown |
| PIT | Q2 0:34 | 3 | 12 | 0:34 | End of half |
| CIN | Q3 15:00 | 12 | 65 | 6:38 | Field goal |
| PIT | Q3 8:22 | 11 | 74 | 5:39 | Touchdown |
| CIN | Q3 2:43 | 8 | 64 | 4:14 | Touchdown |
| PIT | Q4 13:29 | 6 | 11 | 2:37 | Punt |
| PIT | Q4 10:52 | 4 | -4 | 2:07 | Field goal |
| CIN | Q4 8:45 | 3 | 8 | 1:06 | Punt |
| PIT | Q4 7:39 | 8 | 77 | 5:24 | Field goal |
| CIN | Q4 2:15 | 5 | 19 | 1:31 | Fumble |
| PIT | Q4 0:44 | 2 | -2 | 0:44 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Bengals vs Steelers Head-to-Head
The Bengals and Steelers first met in 1970 and have played 114 times since. They have been AFC North rivals since 1970.
- All-time series
- 73–41Steelers lead, 114 meetings since 1970
- Postseason
- 2–0Steelers won in 2005 and 2015
- Largest Bengals win
- 42–71988
- Largest Steelers win
- 35–72011
Since 2021
6–5 Steelers lead
11 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- B
- B
- S
- B
- S
- S
- S
- B
- B
- S
- S
Oldest to newest. S = Steelers win, B = Bengals win, outlined = this game.
2026 Meetings
- Week 10 Steelers at Bengals Upcoming
Recent Meetings
- 2026 Wk 3 Bengals at Steelers PIT 30 CIN 27 PIT W
- 2025 Wk 11 Bengals at Steelers, 2025 Wk 11 recap PIT 34 CIN 12 PIT W
- 2025 Wk 7 Steelers at Bengals, 2025 Wk 7 recap CIN 33 PIT 31 CIN W
- 2024 Wk 18 Bengals at Steelers, 2024 Wk 18 recap CIN 19 PIT 17 CIN W
- 2024 Wk 13 Steelers at Bengals, 2024 Wk 13 recap PIT 44 CIN 38 PIT W
- 2023 Wk 16 Bengals at Steelers, 2023 Wk 16 recap PIT 34 CIN 11 PIT W
- 2023 Wk 12 Steelers at Bengals, 2023 Wk 12 recap PIT 16 CIN 10 PIT W
- 2022 Wk 11 Bengals at Steelers, 2022 Wk 11 recap CIN 37 PIT 30 CIN W
- 2022 Wk 1 Steelers at Bengals, 2022 Wk 1 recap PIT 23 CIN 20 PIT W
- 2021 Wk 12 Steelers at Bengals, 2021 Wk 12 recap CIN 41 PIT 10 CIN W
- 2021 Wk 3 Bengals at Steelers, 2021 Wk 3 recap CIN 24 PIT 10 CIN W
Season to Date (Through Week 4)
The 2026 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Bengals | Stat | Steelers |
|---|---|---|
| 2-1 | Record | 2-2 |
| 26.7 | Points per game | 19.3 |
| 323.3 | Yards per game | 317.8 |
| 5.4 | Yards per play | 5.0 |
| 21.0 | Points allowed per game | 21.8 |
| 355.7 | Yards allowed per game | 322.3 |
Bengals vs Steelers Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- CIN −3.5Bengals failed to cover by 6.5
- Total
- 42.5Over: 57 points scored (by 14.5)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bengals | 23.0 | 27 | +4.0 |
| Steelers | 19.5 | 30 | +10.5 |
Both offenses beat the market's expectation, and the Fantasy tab shows who cashed in.
Betting Trends
Last 5 meetings: Bengals 3–2 ATS, overs 3–2.
Each team's 2026 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
Cincinnati Bengals
- Against the spread
- 2–1
- Over/under
- 2–1
- ATS as favorite
- 1–1
- ATS as underdog
- 1–0
- ATS on the road
- 1–1
Pittsburgh Steelers
- Against the spread
- 2–1
- Over/under
- 1–2
- ATS as favorite
- 1–0
- ATS as underdog
- 1–1
- ATS at home
- 2–0
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Bengals vs Steelers Fantasy Outlook for 2026
One meeting is left on the 2026 schedule: Week 10 in Cincinnati. Here's how to decide who to play in your league.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Bengals or Steelers player start in Week 10? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Bengals and Steelers players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Bengals and Steelers defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere this matchup falls in each team's fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2026 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Bengals vs Steelers Game FAQ
Who won the 2026 Bengals vs Steelers Week 3 game?
The Pittsburgh Steelers beat the Cincinnati Bengals 30–27 in Week 3 of the 2026 season. The game was played at Acrisure Stadium in Pittsburgh, PA, on September 27, 2026. See the Steelers' 2026 schedule.
What was the final score of Bengals vs Steelers?
The final score was Steelers 30, Bengals 27. The teams were tied 17–17 at halftime, and the second half went Bengals 10, Steelers 13.
What happened in the Bengals vs Steelers game?
Pittsburgh broke a 17–17 halftime tie, outscoring Cincinnati 13–10 after the break to win 30–27. The Steelers finished with a 411–352 edge in total offense and averaged 7.0 yards per play. Ja'Marr Chase led all players with 9 catches for 98 yards and a touchdown. The Bengals committed 2 turnovers, the Steelers 1.
What was the game-winning score in Bengals vs Steelers?
Chris Boswell's 33-yard field goal with 2:15 left in the fourth quarter gave the Steelers a 30–27 lead they never gave up. It was the final score of the game.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Bengals vs Steelers?
Ja'Marr Chase led the game with 24.8 PPR fantasy points, the WR5 of Week 3, on 9 catches for 98 yards and a touchdown. Aaron Rodgers was next with 23.7 (QB8). See Ja'Marr Chase's 2026 game log.
Who led Bengals vs Steelers in passing, rushing and receiving?
Aaron Rodgers (PIT) led all passers with 19 of 34 for 292 yards, 3 touchdowns and an interception. Jaylen Warren (PIT) led in rushing with 17 carries for 127 yards. Ja'Marr Chase (CIN) led in receiving with 9 catches for 98 yards and a touchdown.
How many fantasy points did Ja'Marr Chase score against the Steelers?
Ja'Marr Chase scored 24.8 points in PPR leagues, 20.3 in half-PPR and 15.8 in standard scoring against the Steelers in Week 3 of the 2026 season, on 9 catches for 98 yards and a touchdown. He drew 32% of his team's targets.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Bengals vs Steelers?
Tee Higgins outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 21.0 PPR points on 12.2 xFP (+8.8). Michael Pittman Jr. fell furthest short, with 3.6 points on 8.7 xFP (−5.1). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
How did the Steelers come back to beat the Bengals?
The Steelers' chances of winning fell as low as 25% in the fourth quarter. Chris Boswell's 33-yard field goal then put them ahead for good.
What is the all-time Bengals vs Steelers record?
The Steelers lead the all-time series 73–41 across 114 meetings since 1970, including a 2–0 record in the postseason.
When did the Bengals and Steelers last play before this game?
Before Week 3 of 2026, they last met in the 2025 season on November 16, 2025, when the Steelers beat the Bengals 34–12.
Have the Bengals and Steelers met in the playoffs?
Yes, 2 times, most recently in the 2015 playoffs. The Bengals are 0–2 against the Steelers in the postseason.
What was the closing spread for Bengals vs Steelers?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Bengals −3.5, making the Cincinnati Bengals 3.5-point favorites, with a closing total of 42.5. That implied about 23.0 points for the Bengals and 19.5 for the Steelers.
Did Bengals vs Steelers go over or under the total?
The game went over. The consensus closing total was 42.5, and the teams combined for 57 points, 14.5 over the number.
Who covered the spread in Bengals vs Steelers?
The Steelers covered as 3.5-point underdogs against the closing line of Bengals −3.5. The final margin was 3 points.
