Final2026 Week 2
Gillette Stadium, Foxborough, MA|
New England Patriots vs Pittsburgh Steelers
Pittsburgh Steelers
Away
3
New England Patriots
HomeWon
20
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steelers | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Patriots | 7 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 20 |
PIT 3 · NE 20 Final
Passing leader
NE · QB
9.0PPR pts
14/22, 208 YDS, 1 INT
Top fantasy scorer
NE · RB
13.6PPR pts
16 ATT, 76 YDS, 1 TD
Steelers leader
PIT · RB
9.7PPR pts
11 ATT, 43 YDS, 2 REC, 34 REC YDS
Defensive playmaker
Elijah Ponder
NE
1 TD, 1 SACK, 5 TKL
Patriots 20, Steelers 3: New England leads from start to finish
New England led 10–3 at halftime and outscored Pittsburgh 10–0 after the break to win 20–3. The Patriots finished with a 327–235 edge in total offense and averaged 6.2 yards per play.
The Steelers went 2-for-12 on third down and committed two turnovers.
Key advantages
- +2.7 yards/play NE 6.2 · PIT 3.5
- +92 total yards NE 327 · PIT 235
- +16% third-down rate NE 33% · PIT 17%
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Steeler or Patriot on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Patriots Won
New England won the efficiency and third-down battles.
| Steelers | Stat | Patriots |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5 | Yards per play | 6.2 |
| 235 | Total yards | 327 |
| 17% | Third-down conversion | 33% |
| Other team stats | ||
| 67 | Plays | 53 |
| 2 | Turnovers | 2 |
| 32:47 | Time of possession | 27:13 |
Scoring Summary
The Patriots scored two touchdowns and two field goals; the Steelers scored one field goal.
| Time | Team | Play | PIT | NE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| 8:22 | NE | TreVeyon Henderson 39-yard TD run Takes leadAndy Borregales XP | 0 | 7 |
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 14:14 | NE | Andy Borregales 30-yard FG Extends lead | 0 | 10 |
| 0:00 | PIT | Chris Boswell 56-yard FG | 3 | 10 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 0:43 | NE | Andy Borregales 45-yard FG Extends lead | 3 | 13 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 13:37 | NE | Elijah Ponder 19-yard fumble return TD Extends leadAndy Borregales XP | 3 | 20 |
Fantasy Points: Steelers vs Patriots, Week 2 2026
Fantasy leaders
- TreVeyon HendersonNE · RB13.6 PTSRB14
- Romeo DoubsNE · WR12.6 PTSWR23
- Jaylen WarrenPIT · RB9.7 PTSRB26
- Drake MayeNE · QB9.0 PTSQB25
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.0 | QB25 | 14/22 | 208 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 17 | 0 | 75.6 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.0 | QB31 | 23/39 | 187 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 60.5 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.3 | QB37 | 0/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 39.6 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13.6 | RB14 | RB | 16 | 76 | 1 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 12.6 | WR23 | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 96 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 9.7 | RB26 | RB | 11 | 43 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 34 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 7.8 | WR47 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 5 | 28 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 7.5 | WR48 | WR | — | — | — | 8 | 4 | 35 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 7.4 | TE21 | TE | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 32 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 7.0 | TE22 | TE | — | — | — | 5 | 3 | 40 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.7 | WR56 | WR | — | — | — | 9 | 4 | 27 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.4 | RB40 | RB | 7 | 22 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 22 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 4.0 | TE28 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 30 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.8 | WR81 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 18 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.6 | RB52 | RB | 6 | 43 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 2.0 | WR98 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 10 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.9 | WR101 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 9 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.7 | TE49 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 7 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.6 | RB67 | RB | 2 | 16 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.4 | RB69 | RB | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.2 | WR115 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.8 | WR117 | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | -2 | 0 | ||
| 0.0 | — | RB | 2 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → |
Fantasy Usage
Pittsburgh Steelers
Snap Share
DK MetcalfWR68 snaps97%
Roman WilsonWR55 snaps79%
Germie BernardWR55 snaps79%
Jaylen WarrenRB50 snaps71%
Pat FreiermuthTE46 snaps66%
Target Share37 targets
- DK Metcalf24%, 9 targets
- Germie Bernard22%, 8 targets
- Roman Wilson16%, 6 targets
- Pat Freiermuth14%, 5 targets
- Jaylen Warren11%, 4 targets
- Other14%, 5 targets
Carry Share23 carries
- Jaylen Warren48%, 11 carries
- Rico Dowdle30%, 7 carries
- Travis Homer9%, 2 carries
- Aaron Rodgers4%, 1 carries
- Mason Rudolph4%, 1 carries
- Other4%, 1 carries
New England Patriots
Snap Share
Hunter HenryTE50 snaps91%
Mack HollinsWR39 snaps71%
Romeo DoubsWR37 snaps67%
TreVeyon HendersonRB33 snaps60%
DeMario DouglasWR26 snaps47%
Target Share21 targets
- Hunter Henry24%, 5 targets
- Romeo Doubs19%, 4 targets
- Mack Hollins10%, 2 targets
- Reggie Gilliam10%, 2 targets
- Rhamondre Stevenson10%, 2 targets
- Other29%, 6 targets
Carry Share28 carries
- TreVeyon Henderson57%, 16 carries
- Rhamondre Stevenson21%, 6 carries
- Drake Maye14%, 4 carries
- Corey Kiner7%, 2 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 68 | 97% | 9 | 24% | 0 | |
| 50 | 91% | 5 | 24% | 0 | |
| 55 | 79% | 6 | 16% | 0 | |
| 55 | 79% | 8 | 22% | 0 | |
| 50 | 71% | 4 | 11% | 11 | |
| 39 | 71% | 2 | 10% | 0 | |
| 37 | 67% | 4 | 19% | 0 | |
| 46 | 66% | 5 | 14% | 1 | |
| 33 | 60% | 0 | 0% | 16 | |
| 37 | 53% | 2 | 5% | 0 | |
| 26 | 47% | 2 | 10% | 0 | |
| 20 | 36% | 2 | 10% | 0 | |
| 20 | 36% | 2 | 10% | 6 | |
| 18 | 26% | 2 | 5% | 7 | |
| 14 | 25% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 15 | 21% | 1 | 3% | 0 | |
| 11 | 20% | 2 | 10% | 0 | |
| 11 | 20% | 1 | 5% | 0 | |
| 10 | 18% | 1 | 5% | 0 | |
| 4 | 7% | 0 | 0% | 2 | |
| 2 | 3% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 2 | 3% | 0 | 0% | 2 | |
| 2 | 3% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+5.6Romeo Doubs12.6 PTS vs 7.0 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−13.8Aaron Rodgers5.0 PTS vs 18.8 xFP
- Highest expected volume18.8 xFPAaron Rodgers5.0 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aaron RodgersPIT · QB | 5.0 | 18.8 | −13.8 | 96% | 39 att | — | 39 | 1 | 4% | 0 | 0% |
| DK MetcalfPIT · WR | 6.7 | 15.7 | −9.0 | 97% | 24% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 9 | 24% |
| Germie BernardPIT · WR | 7.5 | 14.0 | −6.5 | 79% | 22% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 8 | 22% |
| Jaylen WarrenPIT · RB | 9.7 | 13.6 | −3.9 | 71% | 48% car | — | 0 | 11 | 48% | 4 | 11% |
| Drake MayeNE · QB | 9.0 | 12.7 | −3.7 | 100% | 22 att | — | 22 | 4 | 14% | 0 | 0% |
| Roman WilsonPIT · WR | 7.8 | 10.5 | −2.7 | 79% | 16% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 16% |
| TreVeyon HendersonNE · RB | 13.6 | 9.6 | +4.0 | 60% | 57% car | — | 0 | 16 | 57% | 0 | 0% |
| Pat FreiermuthPIT · TE | 7.4 | 9.3 | −1.9 | 66% | 14% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 4% | 5 | 14% |
| Hunter HenryNE · TE | 7.0 | 8.7 | −1.7 | 91% | 24% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 24% |
| Rico DowdlePIT · RB | 6.4 | 7.7 | −1.3 | 26% | 30% car | — | 0 | 7 | 30% | 2 | 5% |
| Rhamondre StevensonNE · RB | 3.6 | 7.1 | −3.5 | 36% | 21% car | — | 0 | 6 | 21% | 2 | 10% |
| Romeo DoubsNE · WR | 12.6 | 7.0 | +5.6 | 67% | 19% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 19% |
| Darnell WashingtonPIT · TE | 1.7 | 3.5 | −1.8 | 53% | 5% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 5% |
| DeMario DouglasNE · WR | 1.9 | 3.5 | −1.6 | 47% | 10% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 10% |
| Kyle WilliamsNE · — | 2.0 | 3.5 | −1.5 | 20% | 10% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 10% |
| Mack HollinsNE · WR | 3.8 | 3.5 | +0.3 | 71% | 10% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 10% |
| Reggie GilliamNE · RB | 1.4 | 3.5 | −2.1 | 36% | 10% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 10% |
| Ben SkowronekPIT · WR | 1.2 | 1.7 | −0.5 | 21% | 3% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3% |
| Efton Chism IIINE · WR | 0.8 | 1.7 | −0.9 | 18% | 5% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 5% |
| Eli RaridonNE · TE | 4.0 | 1.7 | +2.3 | 20% | 5% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 5% |
| Corey KinerNE · RB | 0.0 | 1.2 | −1.2 | 7% | 7% car | — | 0 | 2 | 7% | 0 | 0% |
| Travis HomerPIT · RB | 1.6 | 1.2 | +0.4 | 3% | 9% car | — | 0 | 2 | 9% | 0 | 0% |
| Mason RudolphPIT · QB | 0.3 | 1.1 | −0.8 | 4% | 1 att | — | 1 | 1 | 4% | 0 | 0% |
Team totals: Steelers 37 targets and 23 carries; Patriots 21 targets and 28 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2026 season: 1.75 PPR points per target (68% catch rate), 0.60 per carry and 0.47 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Aaron Rodgers Unlucky
PIT · QB · 5.0 pts on 18.8 expected
23 of 39 passing for 187 yards, 1 interception; 1 carry for 5 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 18.8 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't. Next up: Week 5 against the Colts. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Aaron Rodgers →Drake Maye
NE · QB · 9.0 pts on 12.7 expected
14 of 22 passing for 208 yards, 1 interception; 4 carries for 17 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 12.7 expected. Next up: Week 4 against the Bills. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Drake Maye →DK Metcalf Unlucky
PIT · WR · 6.7 pts on 15.7 expected
9 targets (24% of the team's), 4 catches for 27 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 15.7 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't. Next up: Week 5 against the Colts. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: DK Metcalf →Germie Bernard Unlucky
PIT · WR · 7.5 pts on 14.0 expected
8 targets (22% of the team's), 4 catches for 35 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 14.0 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't. Next up: Week 5 against the Colts. Bet on the role more than the result.
Trend: Season high in targets (8).
TreVeyon Henderson
NE · RB · 13.6 pts on 9.6 expected
16 carries (57% of the team's) for 76 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 9.6 expected. Next up: Week 4 against the Bills. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: TreVeyon Henderson →Hunter Henry
NE · TE · 7.0 pts on 8.7 expected
5 targets (24% of the team's), 3 catches for 40 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 8.7 expected. Next up: Week 4 against the Bills. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Hunter Henry →Romeo Doubs Ran hot
NE · WR · 12.6 pts on 7.0 expected
4 targets (19% of the team's), 3 catches for 96 yards.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 7.0 points; efficiency supplied the rest. Next up: Week 4 against the Bills. Bet on the role more than the result.
Start/Sit: Romeo Doubs →Jaylen Warren
PIT · RB · 9.7 pts on 13.6 expected
4 targets (11% of the team's), 2 catches for 34 yards; 11 carries (48% of the team's) for 43 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 13.6 expected. Next up: Week 5 against the Colts. Bet on the role more than the result.
Trend: Season high in carries (11).
Start/Sit Decisions
Stock Up, Stock Down
Pittsburgh Steelers
- ▲Stock up: Jaylen Warren led the backfield with 71% of the snaps after trailing Rico Dowdle before this game.
- ▲Stock up: Germie Bernard played 79% of the snaps, up from a 4% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Roman Wilson played 79% of the snaps, up from a 55% season average.
New England Patriots
- ▲Stock up: TreVeyon Henderson led the backfield with 60% of the snaps after trailing Rhamondre Stevenson before this game.
- ▲Stock up: Reggie Gilliam played 36% of the snaps, up from a 18% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Rhamondre Stevenson lost the backfield lead: 36% of the snaps to TreVeyon Henderson's 60%.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2026 through Week 4.
| Points allowed to | Steelers D | Patriots D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 13.3 | 13.1 |
| RBs | 24.6 | 20.8 |
| WRs | 28.0 | 32.9 |
| TEs | 9.9 | 6.2 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
New England opened at 63% win probability and passed 98% in the fourth quarter on the way to the win.
Patriots win probability
Key Swings
- +18Henderson 39-yd TD run62% → 81%Q1 8:22
- +6Borregales 30-yd FG81% → 87%Q2 14:14
- −7Boswell 56-yd FG90% → 83%Q2 0:00
- +7Borregales 45-yd FG88% → 95%Q3 0:43
- +4Ponder 19-yd TD96% → >99%Q4 13:37
Swing in Patriots win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Pittsburgh Steelers | Measure | New England Patriots |
|---|---|---|
| 67 | Plays | 53 |
| 66% | Pass rate | 47% |
| 3.3 | Yds / dropback | 7.6 |
| 4.0 | Yds / carry | 4.9 |
| 2/12 | Third downs | 4/12 |
Efficiency edge New England ran 14 fewer plays but gained 4.3 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- PIT Metcalf 24% · Bernard 22% · Wilson 16%
- NE Henry 24% · Doubs 19% · Douglas 10%
Possession Results
| Result | PIT | NE |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 0 | 1 |
| Field goals | 1 | 2 |
| Punts | 8 | 4 |
| Turnovers | 2 | 2 |
| Missed field goals | 1 | 1 |
- The Patriots opened the scoring on their second possession, a 4-play, 49-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
All 23 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIT | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 3 | 1:40 | Punt |
| NE | Q1 13:20 | 4 | 46 | 2:03 | Fumble |
| PIT | Q1 11:17 | 3 | 4 | 1:00 | Punt |
| NE | Q1 10:17 | 4 | 49 | 1:55 | Touchdown |
| PIT | Q1 8:22 | 8 | 35 | 4:12 | Missed FG |
| NE | Q1 4:10 | 9 | 41 | 4:56 | Field goal |
| PIT | Q2 14:14 | 12 | 12 | 6:50 | Punt |
| NE | Q2 7:24 | 4 | 29 | 2:19 | Punt |
| PIT | Q2 5:05 | 7 | 27 | 3:17 | Punt |
| NE | Q2 1:48 | 3 | 0 | 1:08 | Punt |
| PIT | Q2 0:40 | 6 | 27 | 0:40 | Field goal |
| NE | Q3 15:00 | 4 | 34 | 2:11 | Interception |
| PIT | Q3 12:49 | 7 | 29 | 3:44 | Punt |
| NE | Q3 9:05 | 10 | 56 | 5:15 | Missed FG |
| PIT | Q3 3:50 | 3 | 7 | 1:38 | Punt |
| NE | Q3 2:12 | 5 | 65 | 1:29 | Field goal |
| PIT | Q3 0:43 | 3 | -9 | 2:06 | Fumble |
| PIT | Q4 13:37 | 3 | -6 | 1:34 | Punt |
| NE | Q4 12:03 | 5 | 12 | 2:10 | Punt |
| PIT | Q4 9:53 | 11 | 75 | 4:44 | Interception |
| NE | Q4 5:09 | 3 | 5 | 1:46 | Punt |
| PIT | Q4 3:23 | 3 | 8 | 1:22 | Punt |
| NE | Q4 2:01 | 5 | 14 | 2:01 | End of game |
About these numbers
The Patriots' fumble touchdown is counted as a Steelers lost fumble, not as a Patriots possession. Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Steelers vs Patriots Head-to-Head
The Steelers and Patriots first met in 1972 and have played 37 times since.
- All-time series
- 20–17Patriots lead, 37 meetings since 1972
- Postseason
- 4–1Split 4–1
- Largest Steelers win
- 33–31972
- Largest Patriots win
- 34–01986
Since 2021
3–1 Patriots lead
4 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- P
- P
- S
- P
Oldest to newest. P = Patriots win, S = Steelers win, outlined = this game.
Recent Meetings
- 2026 Wk 2 Steelers at Patriots NE 20 PIT 3 NE W
- 2025 Wk 3 Steelers at Patriots, 2025 Wk 3 recap PIT 21 NE 14 PIT W
- 2023 Wk 14 Patriots at Steelers, 2023 Wk 14 recap NE 21 PIT 18 NE W
- 2022 Wk 2 Patriots at Steelers, 2022 Wk 2 recap NE 17 PIT 14 NE W
Season to Date (Through Week 4)
The 2026 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Steelers | Stat | Patriots |
|---|---|---|
| 2-2 | Record | 1-2 |
| 19.3 | Points per game | 12.0 |
| 317.8 | Yards per game | 307.0 |
| 5.0 | Yards per play | 5.1 |
| 21.8 | Points allowed per game | 17.0 |
| 322.3 | Yards allowed per game | 278.3 |
Steelers vs Patriots Odds and Results
How this game finished against the betting lines.
- Spread
- NE −4.5Patriots covered by 12.5
- Total
- 41.5Under: 23 points scored (by 18.5)
Expected vs Actual Scoring
| Team | Implied | Actual | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patriots | 23.0 | 20 | −3.0 |
| Steelers | 18.5 | 3 | −15.5 |
Both offenses finished under the market's expectation, which matches the low fantasy output in the Fantasy tab.
Betting Trends
Last 2 meetings: Patriots 1–0–1 ATS, unders 2–0.
Each team's 2026 season through this game. Over/under is overs first.
Pittsburgh Steelers
- Against the spread
- 1–1
- Over/under
- 0–2
- ATS as favorite
- 1–0
- ATS as underdog
- 0–1
- ATS on the road
- 0–1
New England Patriots
- Against the spread
- 1–0–1
- Over/under
- 0–2
- ATS as favorite
- 1–0
- ATS as underdog
- 0–0–1
- ATS at home
- 1–0
Lines: ESPN's consensus, captured at kickoff. Individual sportsbooks varied.
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Betting availability depends on your state.
Steelers and Patriots in Fantasy
The two teams don't meet again this season. If you roster a Steeler or a Patriot, these answer the week-to-week question.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Steelers or Patriots player start this week? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Steelers and Patriots players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Steelers and Patriots defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere each team's remaining games fall in your fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2026 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Steelers vs Patriots Game FAQ
Who won the 2026 Steelers vs Patriots Week 2 game?
The New England Patriots beat the Pittsburgh Steelers 20–3 in Week 2 of the 2026 season. The game was played at Gillette Stadium in Foxborough, MA, on September 20, 2026. See the Patriots' 2026 schedule.
What was the final score of Steelers vs Patriots?
The final score was Patriots 20, Steelers 3. The Patriots led 10–3 at halftime, and the second half went Steelers 0, Patriots 10.
What happened in the Steelers vs Patriots game?
New England led 10–3 at halftime and outscored Pittsburgh 10–0 after the break to win 20–3. The Patriots finished with a 327–235 edge in total offense and averaged 6.2 yards per play. TreVeyon Henderson led all players with 16 carries for 76 rushing yards and a touchdown.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Steelers vs Patriots?
TreVeyon Henderson led the game with 13.6 PPR fantasy points, the RB14 of Week 2, on 16 carries for 76 rushing yards and a touchdown. Romeo Doubs was next with 12.6 (WR23). See TreVeyon Henderson's 2026 game log.
Who led Steelers vs Patriots in passing, rushing and receiving?
Drake Maye (NE) led all passers with 14 of 22 for 208 yards and an interception. TreVeyon Henderson (NE) led in rushing with 16 carries for 76 yards and a touchdown. Romeo Doubs (NE) led in receiving with 3 catches for 96 yards.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Steelers vs Patriots?
Romeo Doubs outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 12.6 PPR points on 7.0 xFP (+5.6). Aaron Rodgers fell furthest short, with 5.0 points on 18.8 xFP (−13.8). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Steelers vs Patriots?
Aaron Rodgers had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 18.8 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 5.0. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the Patriots beat the Steelers?
The Patriots beat the Steelers 20–3 because they averaged 6.2 yards per play to 3.5 and outgained them 327–235.
What is the all-time Steelers vs Patriots record?
The Patriots lead the all-time series 20–17 across 37 meetings since 1972, including a 4–1 record in the postseason.
When did the Steelers and Patriots last play before this game?
Before Week 2 of 2026, they last met in the 2025 season on September 21, 2025, when the Steelers beat the Patriots 21–14.
Have the Steelers and Patriots met in the playoffs?
Yes, 5 times, most recently in the 2016 playoffs. The Steelers are 1–4 against the Patriots in the postseason.
What is the Steelers vs Patriots record since 2021?
The Patriots lead 3–1 across 4 meetings since the 2021 season, including this game.
What was the closing spread for Steelers vs Patriots?
The consensus closing spread at kickoff was Patriots −4.5, making the New England Patriots 4.5-point favorites, with a closing total of 41.5. That implied about 23.0 points for the Patriots and 18.5 for the Steelers.
Did Steelers vs Patriots go over or under the total?
The game went under. The consensus closing total was 41.5, and the teams combined for 23 points, 18.5 under the number.
Who covered the spread in Steelers vs Patriots?
The Patriots covered by 12.5 against the closing line of Patriots −4.5. The final margin was 17 points.
