Final2024 Week 3
Lucas Oil Stadium, Indianapolis, IN|
Chicago Bears vs Indianapolis Colts
Chicago Bears
Away
16
Indianapolis Colts
HomeWon
21
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bears | 0 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 16 |
| Colts | 0 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 21 |
CHI 16 · IND 21 Final
Passing leader
CHI · QB
19.3PPR pts
33/52, 363 YDS, 2 TD, 2 INT
Top fantasy scorer
IND · RB
26.5PPR pts
23 ATT, 110 YDS, 2 TD, 1 REC, 25 REC YDS
Bears leader
CHI · TE
25.7PPR pts
10 REC, 97 YDS, 1 TD
Defensive playmaker
Jaylon Jones
IND
2 INT, 5 TKL
Colts 21, Bears 16: Indianapolis beats Chicago
Indianapolis led 7–0 at halftime and won 21–16, though Chicago took the second half 16–14. Chicago outgained the Colts 395–306, but the Colts averaged 5.7 yards per play.
Chicago didn't get on the board until the third quarter.
The Bears went 9-for-21 on third down and committed three turnovers.
Key advantages
- +1.0 yards/play IND 5.7 · CHI 4.7
- +1 turnover margin IND 2 · CHI 3 turnovers
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Bear or Colt on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Colts Won
Indianapolis won the efficiency and turnover battles.
| Bears | Stat | Colts |
|---|---|---|
| 4.7 | Yards per play | 5.7 |
| 3 | Turnovers | 2 |
| Other team stats | ||
| 395 | Total yards | 306 |
| 84 | Plays | 54 |
| 43% | Third-down conversion | 25% |
| 35:01 | Time of possession | 24:59 |
Scoring Summary
The Colts scored three touchdowns; the Bears scored two touchdowns and one field goal.
| Time | Team | Play | CHI | IND |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| No scoring | ||||
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 8:19 | IND | Jonathan Taylor 29-yard TD run Takes leadMatt Gay XP | 0 | 7 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 12:51 | CHI | Cairo Santos 53-yard FG | 3 | 7 |
| 0:21 | IND | Trey Sermon 1-yard TD run Extends leadMatt Gay XP | 3 | 14 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 8:21 | CHI | Caleb Williams → Rome Odunze, 1-yard TD2-pt try failed | 9 | 14 |
| 5:22 | IND | Jonathan Taylor 1-yard TD run Extends leadMatt Gay XP | 9 | 21 |
| 2:01 | CHI | Caleb Williams → Cole Kmet, 6-yard TDCairo Santos XP | 16 | 21 |
Fantasy Points: Bears vs Colts, Week 3 2024
Fantasy leaders
- Jonathan TaylorIND · RB26.5 PTSRB5
- Cole KmetCHI · TE25.7 PTSTE2
- Rome OdunzeCHI · WR23.4 PTSWR7
- Caleb WilliamsCHI · QB19.3 PTSQB14
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19.3 | QB14 | 33/52 | 363 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 80.8 | Start/Sit → | |
| 7.1 | QB31 | 10/20 | 167 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 24 | 0 | 39.0 |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26.5 | RB5 | RB | 23 | 110 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 25 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 25.7 | TE2 | TE | — | — | — | 11 | 10 | 97 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 23.4 | WR7 | WR | 1 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 6 | 112 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 15.2 | WR24 | WR | 1 | -6 | 0 | 10 | 8 | 78 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 10.2 | RB26 | RB | 8 | 30 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 32 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 7.6 | RB40 | RB | 2 | 16 | 1 | — | — | — | — | ||
| 7.6 | WR54 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 4 | 36 | 0 | ||
| 6.2 | RB45 | RB | 13 | 20 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 22 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.4 | WR70 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 44 | 0 | ||
| 5.2 | WR72 | WR | — | — | — | 6 | 3 | 22 | 0 | ||
| 5.2 | WR74 | WR | — | — | — | 5 | 3 | 22 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.0 | TE26 | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 40 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.9 | RB69 | RB | 4 | 9 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | TE | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.0 | — | WR | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Start/Sit → |
Fantasy Usage
Chicago Bears
Snap Share
Rome OdunzeWR89 snaps99%
DJ MooreWR86 snaps96%
Cole KmetTE73 snaps81%
DeAndre CarterWR57 snaps63%
D'Andre SwiftRB48 snaps53%
Target Share48 targets
- Cole Kmet23%, 11 targets
- Rome Odunze23%, 11 targets
- DJ Moore21%, 10 targets
- DeAndre Carter13%, 6 targets
- Roschon Johnson10%, 5 targets
- Other10%, 5 targets
Carry Share28 carries
- D'Andre Swift46%, 13 carries
- Roschon Johnson29%, 8 carries
- Khalil Herbert14%, 4 carries
- DJ Moore4%, 1 carries
- Caleb Williams4%, 1 carries
- Other4%, 1 carries
Indianapolis Colts
Snap Share
Jonathan TaylorRB49 snaps88%
Michael PittmanWR47 snaps84%
Alec PierceWR43 snaps77%
Josh DownsWR32 snaps57%
Mo Alie-CoxTE31 snaps55%
Target Share18 targets
- Michael Pittman28%, 5 targets
- Josh Downs28%, 5 targets
- Jonathan Taylor11%, 2 targets
- Alec Pierce11%, 2 targets
- Mo Alie-Cox6%, 1 targets
- Other17%, 3 targets
Carry Share33 carries
- Jonathan Taylor70%, 23 carries
- Anthony Richardson24%, 8 carries
- Trey Sermon6%, 2 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89 | 99% | 11 | 23% | 1 | |
| 86 | 96% | 10 | 21% | 1 | |
| 49 | 88% | 2 | 11% | 23 | |
| 47 | 84% | 5 | 28% | 0 | |
| 73 | 81% | 11 | 23% | 0 | |
| 43 | 77% | 2 | 11% | 0 | |
| 57 | 63% | 6 | 13% | 0 | |
| 32 | 57% | 5 | 28% | 0 | |
| 31 | 55% | 1 | 6% | 0 | |
| 48 | 53% | 4 | 8% | 13 | |
| 27 | 48% | 1 | 6% | 0 | |
| 33 | 37% | 5 | 10% | 8 | |
| 20 | 36% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 30 | 33% | 1 | 2% | 0 | |
| 14 | 25% | 1 | 6% | 0 | |
| 21 | 23% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 7 | 13% | 1 | 6% | 0 | |
| 9 | 10% | 0 | 0% | 4 | |
| 5 | 9% | 0 | 0% | 2 | |
| 3 | 5% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 2 | 4% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 2 | 2% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 2 | 2% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+8.1Jonathan Taylor26.5 PTS vs 18.4 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−9.1D'Andre Swift6.2 PTS vs 15.3 xFP
- Highest expected volume23.8 xFPCaleb Williams19.3 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caleb WilliamsCHI · QB | 19.3 | 23.8 | −4.5 | 100% | 52 att | — | 52 | 1 | 4% | 0 | 0% |
| Rome OdunzeCHI · WR | 23.4 | 19.5 | +3.9 | 99% | 23% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 4% | 11 | 23% |
| Cole KmetCHI · TE | 25.7 | 18.9 | +6.8 | 81% | 23% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 11 | 23% |
| Jonathan TaylorIND · RB | 26.5 | 18.4 | +8.1 | 88% | 70% car | — | 0 | 23 | 70% | 2 | 11% |
| DJ MooreCHI · WR | 15.2 | 17.8 | −2.6 | 96% | 21% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 4% | 10 | 21% |
| D'Andre SwiftCHI · RB | 6.2 | 15.3 | −9.1 | 53% | 46% car | — | 0 | 13 | 46% | 4 | 8% |
| Anthony Richardson Sr.IND · QB | 7.1 | 14.1 | −7.0 | 100% | 20 att | — | 20 | 8 | 24% | 0 | 0% |
| Roschon JohnsonCHI · RB | 10.2 | 13.8 | −3.6 | 37% | 29% car | — | 0 | 8 | 29% | 5 | 10% |
| DeAndre CarterCHI · WR | 5.2 | 10.3 | −5.1 | 63% | 13% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 6 | 13% |
| Josh DownsIND · WR | 5.2 | 8.6 | −3.4 | 57% | 28% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 28% |
| Michael Pittman Jr.IND · WR | 7.6 | 8.6 | −1.0 | 84% | 28% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 28% |
| Alec PierceIND · WR | 5.4 | 3.4 | +2.0 | 77% | 11% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 11% |
| Khalil HerbertCHI · RB | 0.9 | 2.6 | −1.7 | 10% | 14% car | — | 0 | 4 | 14% | 0 | 0% |
| Adonai MitchellIND · WR | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 13% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 6% |
| Ashton DulinIND · WR | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 25% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 6% |
| Gerald EverettCHI · TE | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 33% | 2% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 2% |
| Kylen GransonIND · TE | 5.0 | 1.7 | +3.3 | 48% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 6% |
| Mo Alie-CoxIND · TE | 0.0 | 1.7 | −1.7 | 55% | 6% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 6% |
| Trey SermonIND · RB | 7.6 | 1.3 | +6.3 | 9% | 6% car | — | 0 | 2 | 6% | 0 | 0% |
Team totals: Bears 48 targets and 28 carries; Colts 18 targets and 33 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2024 season: 1.71 PPR points per target (68% catch rate), 0.65 per carry and 0.44 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Caleb Williams
CHI · QB · 19.3 pts on 23.8 expected
33 of 52 passing for 363 yards, 2 touchdowns, 2 interceptions; 1 carry for 8 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 23.8 expected.
Start/Sit: Caleb Williams →Anthony Richardson Sr. Unlucky
IND · QB · 7.1 pts on 14.1 expected
10 of 20 passing for 167 yards, 2 interceptions; 8 carries for 24 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 14.1 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Rome Odunze
CHI · WR · 23.4 pts on 19.5 expected
11 targets (23% of the team's), 6 catches for 112 yards and 1 touchdown; 1 carry (4% of the team's) for 2 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 19.5 expected.
Trend: Season high in targets (11).
Cole Kmet Ran hot
CHI · TE · 25.7 pts on 18.9 expected
11 targets (23% of the team's), 10 catches for 97 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 18.9 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Trend: Season high in targets (11).
Jonathan Taylor Ran hot
IND · RB · 26.5 pts on 18.4 expected
2 targets (11% of the team's), 1 catch for 25 yards; 23 carries (70% of the team's) for 110 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 18.4 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Trend: Season high in carries (23).
Josh Downs
IND · WR · 5.2 pts on 8.6 expected
5 targets (28% of the team's), 3 catches for 22 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 8.6 expected.
Start/Sit: Josh Downs →D'Andre Swift Unlucky
CHI · RB · 6.2 pts on 15.3 expected
4 targets (8% of the team's), 2 catches for 22 yards; 13 carries (46% of the team's) for 20 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 15.3 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Start/Sit: D'Andre Swift →DeAndre Carter Unlucky
CHI · WR · 5.2 pts on 10.3 expected
6 targets (13% of the team's), 3 catches for 22 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 10.3 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Trend: Season high in targets (6).
Stock Up, Stock Down
Chicago Bears
- ▲Stock up: Cole Kmet played 81% of the snaps, up from a 63% season average.
- ▲Stock up: DeAndre Carter played 63% of the snaps, up from a 47% season average.
Indianapolis Colts
- ▲Stock up: Mo Alie-Cox played 55% of the snaps, up from a 36% season average.
- ▼Stock down: Adonai Mitchell played 13% of the snaps, down from a 62% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2024 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Bears D | Colts D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 13.8 | 18.0 |
| RBs | 25.2 | 23.8 |
| WRs | 28.9 | 33.1 |
| TEs | 12.3 | 14.9 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Indianapolis opened at 50% win probability and passed 98% in the fourth quarter on the way to the win.
Colts win probability
Key Swings
- +24Taylor 29-yd TD run50% → 74%Q2 8:19
- −11Santos 53-yd FG78% → 67%Q3 12:51
- +23Sermon 1-yd TD run72% → 95%Q3 0:21
- −15Williams → Odunze, 1-yd TD99% → 84%Q4 8:21
- +11Taylor 1-yd TD run89% → >99%Q4 5:22
Swing in Colts win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Chicago Bears | Measure | Indianapolis Colts |
|---|---|---|
| 84 | Plays | 54 |
| 67% | Pass rate | 39% |
| 5.9 | Yds / dropback | 7.4 |
| 2.3 | Yds / carry | 4.5 |
| 9/21 | Third downs | 3/12 |
Efficiency edge Indianapolis ran 30 fewer plays but gained 1.5 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- CHI Kmet 23% · Odunze 23% · Moore 21%
- IND Downs 28% · Pittman 28% · Pierce 11%
Possession Results
| Result | CHI | IND |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 2 | 3 |
| Field goals | 1 | 0 |
| Punts | 3 | 5 |
| Turnovers | 3 | 2 |
| Turnovers on downs | 1 | 1 |
| Missed field goals | 1 | 0 |
IND turnover edge: +1
- The Colts opened the scoring on their fourth possession, a 3-play, 70-yard drive that ended in a touchdown.
All 24 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | Q1 15:00 | 11 | 32 | 5:27 | Missed FG |
| IND | Q1 9:33 | 3 | 0 | 1:06 | Punt |
| CHI | Q1 8:27 | 4 | 37 | 1:53 | Punt |
| IND | Q1 6:34 | 6 | 16 | 3:29 | Punt |
| CHI | Q1 3:05 | 5 | 12 | 3:05 | Punt |
| IND | Q2 15:00 | 7 | 58 | 3:57 | Interception |
| CHI | Q2 11:03 | 4 | 53 | 1:28 | Interception |
| IND | Q2 9:35 | 3 | 70 | 1:16 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q2 8:19 | 16 | 58 | 6:39 | Downs |
| IND | Q2 1:40 | 5 | 18 | 0:49 | Punt |
| CHI | Q2 0:51 | 8 | 81 | 0:51 | End of half |
| IND | Q3 15:00 | 1 | 0 | 0:08 | Interception |
| CHI | Q3 14:52 | 5 | 18 | 2:01 | Field goal |
| IND | Q3 12:51 | 3 | 6 | 1:29 | Punt |
| CHI | Q3 11:22 | 4 | 7 | 1:36 | Interception |
| IND | Q3 9:46 | 4 | 8 | 2:21 | Downs |
| CHI | Q3 7:25 | 3 | 6 | 1:34 | Punt |
| IND | Q3 5:51 | 9 | 80 | 5:30 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q3 0:21 | 13 | 70 | 7:00 | Touchdown |
| IND | Q4 8:21 | 4 | 11 | 1:29 | Punt |
| CHI | Q4 6:52 | 1 | -6 | 0:06 | Fumble |
| IND | Q4 6:46 | 4 | 16 | 1:24 | Touchdown |
| CHI | Q4 5:22 | 12 | 70 | 3:21 | Touchdown |
| IND | Q4 2:01 | 5 | 13 | 2:01 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Bears vs Colts Head-to-Head
The Bears and Colts first met in 1953 and have played 45 times since.
- All-time series
- 26–19Colts lead, 45 meetings since 1953
- Postseason
- 1–0Colts won in 2006
- Largest Bears win
- 57–01962
- Largest Colts win
- 52–01964
Since 2021
1–0 Colts lead
1 meeting since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- C
Oldest to newest. C = Colts win, B = Bears win, outlined = this game.
Recent Meetings
- 2024 Wk 3 Bears at Colts, 2024 Wk 3 recap IND 21 CHI 16 IND W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2024 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Bears | Stat | Colts |
|---|---|---|
| 5-12 | Record | 8-9 |
| 18.2 | Points per game | 22.2 |
| 283.5 | Yards per game | 334.8 |
| 4.5 | Yards per play | 5.5 |
| 21.8 | Points allowed per game | 25.1 |
| 354.2 | Yards allowed per game | 361.2 |
Bears and Colts in Fantasy
The two teams don't meet again this season. If you roster a Bear or a Colt, these answer the week-to-week question.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Bears or Colts player start this week? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Bears and Colts players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Bears and Colts defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere each team's remaining games fall in your fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2024 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Bears vs Colts Game FAQ
Who won the 2024 Bears vs Colts Week 3 game?
The Indianapolis Colts beat the Chicago Bears 21–16 in Week 3 of the 2024 season. The game was played at Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis, IN, on September 22, 2024. See the Colts' 2024 schedule.
What was the final score of Bears vs Colts?
The final score was Colts 21, Bears 16. The Colts led 7–0 at halftime, and the second half went Bears 16, Colts 14.
What happened in the Bears vs Colts game?
Indianapolis led 7–0 at halftime and won 21–16, though Chicago took the second half 16–14. Chicago outgained the Colts 395–306, but the Colts averaged 5.7 yards per play. Jonathan Taylor led all players with a catch for 25 yards, plus 23 carries for 110 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns. The Bears committed 3 turnovers, the Colts 2.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Bears vs Colts?
Jonathan Taylor led the game with 26.5 PPR fantasy points, the RB5 of Week 3, on a catch for 25 yards, plus 23 carries for 110 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns. Cole Kmet was next with 25.7 (TE2). See Jonathan Taylor's 2024 game log.
Who led Bears vs Colts in passing, rushing and receiving?
Caleb Williams (CHI) led all passers with 33 of 52 for 363 yards, 2 touchdowns and 2 interceptions. Jonathan Taylor (IND) led in rushing with 23 carries for 110 yards and 2 touchdowns. Rome Odunze (CHI) led in receiving with 6 catches for 112 yards and a touchdown.
How many fantasy points did Jonathan Taylor score against the Bears?
Jonathan Taylor scored 26.5 points in PPR leagues, 26.0 in half-PPR and 25.5 in standard scoring against the Bears in Week 3 of the 2024 season, on a catch for 25 yards, plus 23 carries for 110 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns. He handled 70% of his team's carries.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Bears vs Colts?
Jonathan Taylor outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 26.5 PPR points on 18.4 xFP (+8.1). D'Andre Swift fell furthest short, with 6.2 points on 15.3 xFP (−9.1). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Bears vs Colts?
Caleb Williams had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 23.8 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 19.3. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the Colts beat the Bears?
The Colts beat the Bears 21–16 because they averaged 5.7 yards per play to 4.7 and won the turnover battle 3–2.
Which team won the turnover battle in Bears vs Colts?
The Colts won the turnover battle 3–2: the Bears gave the ball away 3 times and the Colts 2 times. The Colts won the game.
What is the all-time Bears vs Colts record?
The Colts lead the all-time series 26–19 across 45 meetings since 1953, including a 1–0 record in the postseason.
Have the Bears and Colts played in the Super Bowl?
Yes, once: the Colts won Super Bowl XLI 29–17 over the Bears after the 2006 season.
When did the Bears and Colts last play before this game?
Before Week 3 of 2024, they last met in the 2020 season on October 4, 2020, when the Colts beat the Bears 19–11.
