Final2025 Week 6
Lambeau Field, Green Bay, WI|
Cincinnati Bengals vs Green Bay Packers
Cincinnati Bengals
Away
18
Green Bay Packers
HomeWon
27
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bengals | 0 | 0 | 7 | 11 | 18 |
| Packers | 0 | 10 | 0 | 17 | 27 |
CIN 18 · GB 27 Final
Passing leader
GB · QB
16.0PPR pts
19/26, 259 YDS, 1 TD, 1 INT
Top fantasy scorer
GB · RB
32.0PPR pts
18 ATT, 93 YDS, 2 TD, 5 REC, 57 REC YDS
Bengals leader
CIN · WR
25.1PPR pts
10 REC, 94 YDS, 1 TD
Defensive playmaker
Geno Stone
CIN
1 INT, 1 SACK, 3 TKL
Packers 27, Bengals 18: Green Bay beats Cincinnati
Green Bay led 10–0 at halftime and won 27–18, though Cincinnati took the second half 18–17. The Packers finished with a 409–268 edge in total offense and averaged 6.8 yards per play.
Cincinnati didn't get on the board until the third quarter.
The Bengals went 6-for-15 on third down, while the Packers kept the ball for 32:44.
Key advantages
- +2.5 yards/play GB 6.8 · CIN 4.3
- +141 total yards GB 409 · CIN 268
- +5% third-down rate GB 45% · CIN 40%
Game Highlights
Official NFL highlights · Opens from YouTube
Got a Bengal or Packer on your fantasy team?
Check their next matchup with the Start/Sit Tool, compare their value in the Fantasy Trade Calculator, or connect your league for personalized advice in Redraft Command.
Works with Sleeper, ESPN and Fleaflicker. No password needed.
Why the Packers Won
Green Bay won the efficiency, third-down, and time of possession battles.
| Bengals | Stat | Packers |
|---|---|---|
| 4.3 | Yards per play | 6.8 |
| 268 | Total yards | 409 |
| 40% | Third-down conversion | 45% |
| Other team stats | ||
| 62 | Plays | 60 |
| 0 | Turnovers | 1 |
| 27:16 | Time of possession | 32:44 |
Scoring Summary
The Packers scored three touchdowns and two field goals; the Bengals scored two touchdowns and one field goal.
| Time | Team | Play | CIN | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st quarter | ||||
| No scoring | ||||
| 2nd quarter | ||||
| 14:15 | GB | Lucas Havrisik 43-yard FG Takes lead | 0 | 3 |
| 4:05 | GB | Josh Jacobs 3-yard TD run Extends leadLucas Havrisik XP | 0 | 10 |
| 3rd quarter | ||||
| 4:46 | CIN | Joe Flacco → Tanner Hudson, 2-yard TDEvan McPherson XP | 7 | 10 |
| 4th quarter | ||||
| 14:56 | GB | Josh Jacobs 14-yard TD run Extends leadLucas Havrisik XP | 7 | 17 |
| 10:43 | CIN | Evan McPherson 45-yard FG | 10 | 17 |
| 7:33 | GB | Jordan Love → Tucker Kraft, 19-yard TD Extends leadLucas Havrisik XP | 10 | 24 |
| 4:11 | CIN | Joe Flacco → Ja'Marr Chase, 19-yard TDJoe Flacco → Chase Brown, 2-pt conversion | 18 | 24 |
| 1:52 | GB | Lucas Havrisik 39-yard FG Extends lead | 18 | 27 |
Fantasy Points: Bengals vs Packers, Week 6 2025
Fantasy leaders
- Josh JacobsGB · RB32.0 PTSRB3
- Ja'Marr ChaseCIN · WR25.1 PTSWR5
- Joe FlaccoCIN · QB18.8 PTSQB14
- Jordan LoveGB · QB16.0 PTSQB19
Player Stats
Quarterbacks
| Player | FPTS | FIN | CMP/ATT | Pass YDS | TD | INT | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | Rate | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16.0 | QB19 | 19/26 | 259 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 26 | 0 | 101.3 | Start/Sit → | |
| 18.8 | QB14 | 29/45 | 219 | 2 | 0 | — | — | — | 90.9 | Start/Sit → |
WRs, RBs, & TEs
| Player | FPTS | FIN | POS | Rush ATT | Rush YDS | Rush TD | TGT | REC | Rec YDS | Rec TD | Start/Sit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32.0 | RB3 | RB | 18 | 93 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 57 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 25.1 | WR5 | WR | 1 | -3 | 0 | 12 | 10 | 94 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 13.2 | WR22 | WR | 2 | 16 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 86 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 12.3 | TE11 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 43 | 1 | Start/Sit → | |
| 11.2 | WR28 | WR | — | — | — | 8 | 5 | 62 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 11.0 | TE14 | TE | — | — | — | 5 | 4 | 10 | 1 | ||
| 10.5 | WR30 | WR | — | — | — | 9 | 5 | 55 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 8.9 | RB22 | RB | 9 | 42 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 6.7 | TE25 | TE | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | 27 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 5.2 | RB40 | RB | 6 | 16 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 16 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 3.5 | WR80 | WR | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.7 | RB59 | RB | 3 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -4 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.7 | TE48 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 7 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 1.5 | WR96 | WR | — | — | — | 4 | 1 | 5 | 0 | ||
| 0.8 | TE58 | TE | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | -2 | 0 | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.3 | WR99 | WR | 1 | 3 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → | |
| 0.3 | WR100 | WR | 1 | 3 | 0 | — | — | — | — | ||
| 0.1 | RB69 | RB | 1 | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | — | Start/Sit → |
Fantasy Usage
Cincinnati Bengals
Snap Share
Ja'Marr ChaseWR65 snaps100%
Andrei IosivasWR61 snaps94%
Tee HigginsWR52 snaps80%
Chase BrownRB35 snaps54%
Noah FantTE32 snaps49%
Target Share40 targets
- Ja'Marr Chase30%, 12 targets
- Tee Higgins20%, 8 targets
- Tanner Hudson13%, 5 targets
- Noah Fant10%, 4 targets
- Andrei Iosivas10%, 4 targets
- Other18%, 7 targets
Carry Share16 carries
- Chase Brown56%, 9 carries
- Samaje Perine38%, 6 carries
- Ja'Marr Chase6%, 1 carries
Green Bay Packers
Snap Share
Tucker KraftTE56 snaps92%
Romeo DoubsWR52 snaps85%
Josh JacobsRB48 snaps79%
Matthew GoldenWR42 snaps69%
Malik HeathWR28 snaps46%
Target Share26 targets
- Romeo Doubs35%, 9 targets
- Josh Jacobs19%, 5 targets
- Matthew Golden19%, 5 targets
- Luke Musgrave8%, 2 targets
- Tucker Kraft8%, 2 targets
- Other12%, 3 targets
Carry Share33 carries
- Josh Jacobs55%, 18 carries
- Jordan Love21%, 7 carries
- Emanuel Wilson9%, 3 carries
- Matthew Golden6%, 2 carries
- Bo Melton3%, 1 carries
- Other6%, 2 carries
View full usage tableHide full usage table
| Player | SNAPS | SNAP % | TGT | TGT % | CAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 65 | 100% | 12 | 30% | 1 | |
| 61 | 94% | 4 | 10% | 0 | |
| 56 | 92% | 2 | 8% | 0 | |
| 52 | 85% | 9 | 35% | 0 | |
| 52 | 80% | 8 | 20% | 0 | |
| 48 | 79% | 5 | 19% | 18 | |
| 42 | 69% | 5 | 19% | 2 | |
| 35 | 54% | 2 | 5% | 9 | |
| 32 | 49% | 4 | 10% | 0 | |
| 30 | 46% | 3 | 8% | 6 | |
| 28 | 46% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 21 | 34% | 2 | 8% | 0 | |
| 21 | 34% | 2 | 8% | 0 | |
| 22 | 34% | 2 | 5% | 0 | |
| 16 | 25% | 5 | 13% | 0 | |
| 12 | 20% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 11 | 18% | 1 | 4% | 3 | |
| 10 | 15% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 7 | 11% | 0 | 0% | 1 | |
| 5 | 8% | 0 | 0% | 1 | |
| 2 | 3% | 0 | 0% | 0 | |
| 1 | 2% | 0 | 0% | 1 | |
| 1 | 2% | 0 | 0% | 0 |
Fantasy Points vs Expected
Expected points (xFP) are what a player's pass attempts, carries and targets are worth at the league's average rates; the difference is what the player made of them.
- Biggest overperformer+11.9Josh Jacobs32.0 PTS vs 20.1 xFP
- Biggest underperformer−5.3Andrei Iosivas1.5 PTS vs 6.8 xFP
- Highest expected volume21.1 xFPJa'Marr Chase25.1 PTS scored
| Player | PTS | xFP | vs xFP | Snap% | Usage | Rte% | Pass att | Car | Car% | Tgt | Tgt% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ja'Marr ChaseCIN · WR | 25.1 | 21.1 | +4.0 | 100% | 30% tgt | — | 0 | 1 | 6% | 12 | 30% |
| Josh JacobsGB · RB | 32.0 | 20.1 | +11.9 | 79% | 55% car | — | 0 | 18 | 55% | 5 | 19% |
| Joe FlaccoCIN · QB | 18.8 | 20.0 | −1.2 | 100% | 45 att | — | 45 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Jordan LoveGB · QB | 16.0 | 16.1 | −0.1 | 100% | 26 att | — | 26 | 7 | 21% | 0 | 0% |
| Romeo DoubsGB · WR | 10.5 | 15.3 | −4.8 | 85% | 35% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 9 | 35% |
| Tee HigginsCIN · WR | 11.2 | 13.6 | −2.4 | 80% | 20% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 8 | 20% |
| Matthew GoldenGB · WR | 13.2 | 9.8 | +3.4 | 69% | 19% tgt | — | 0 | 2 | 6% | 5 | 19% |
| Chase BrownCIN · RB | 8.9 | 9.2 | −0.3 | 54% | 56% car | — | 0 | 9 | 56% | 2 | 5% |
| Samaje PerineCIN · RB | 5.2 | 9.0 | −3.8 | 46% | 38% car | — | 0 | 6 | 38% | 3 | 8% |
| Tanner HudsonCIN · TE | 11.0 | 8.5 | +2.5 | 25% | 13% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 13% |
| Andrei IosivasCIN · WR | 1.5 | 6.8 | −5.3 | 94% | 10% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 10% |
| Noah FantCIN · TE | 6.7 | 6.8 | −0.1 | 49% | 10% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 10% |
| Emanuel WilsonGB · RB | 1.7 | 3.6 | −1.9 | 18% | 9% car | — | 0 | 3 | 9% | 1 | 4% |
| Dontayvion WicksGB · WR | 3.5 | 3.4 | +0.1 | 34% | 8% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 8% |
| Drew SampleCIN · TE | 0.8 | 3.4 | −2.6 | 34% | 5% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 5% |
| Luke MusgraveGB · TE | 1.7 | 3.4 | −1.7 | 34% | 8% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 8% |
| Tucker KraftGB · TE | 12.3 | 3.4 | +8.9 | 92% | 8% tgt | — | 0 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 8% |
| Bo MeltonGB · WR | 0.3 | 0.6 | −0.3 | 2% | 3% car | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 0 | 0% |
| Chris BrooksGB · RB | 0.1 | 0.6 | −0.5 | 8% | 3% car | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 0 | 0% |
| Savion WilliamsGB · WR | 0.3 | 0.6 | −0.3 | 11% | 3% car | — | 0 | 1 | 3% | 0 | 0% |
Team totals: Bengals 40 targets and 16 carries; Packers 26 targets and 33 carries. Shares are from the box score. Snap counts are from the weekly player logs (Sleeper), and include plays wiped out by penalties. Route counts, air yards and red-zone touches appear when the tracking feed is connected. League-average rates from the 2025 season: 1.70 PPR points per target (67% catch rate), 0.65 per carry and 0.44 per pass attempt. They don't adjust for field position or target depth.
Fantasy Verdicts
Joe Flacco
CIN · QB · 18.8 pts on 20.0 expected
29 of 45 passing for 219 yards, 2 touchdowns.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 20.0 expected.
Last 4 games + this one (PPR): 14.2, 9.8, 4.7, 3.3, 18.8
W1W2W3W4W6
No interceptions after 6 in the previous four games. Best fantasy game of the season.
Jordan Love
GB · QB · 16.0 pts on 16.1 expected
19 of 26 passing for 259 yards, 1 touchdown, 1 interception; 7 carries for 26 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 16.1 expected.
Last 4 games + this one (PPR): 15.9, 20.9, 12.1, 26.3, 16.0
W1W2W3W4W6
Ja'Marr Chase Strong role
CIN · WR · 25.1 pts on 21.1 expected
12 targets (30% of the team's), 10 catches for 94 yards and 1 touchdown; 1 carry (6% of the team's) for -3 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 21.1 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 4.6, 36.5, 8.9, 7.3, 29.0, 25.1
W1W2W3W4W5W6
Tee Higgins
CIN · WR · 11.2 pts on 13.6 expected
8 targets (20% of the team's), 5 catches for 62 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 13.6 expected.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 6.3, 14.6, 2.5, 6.2, 11.2, 11.2
W1W2W3W4W5W6
Josh Jacobs Ran hot
GB · RB · 32.0 pts on 20.1 expected
5 targets (19% of the team's), 5 catches for 57 yards; 18 carries (55% of the team's) for 93 yards and 2 touchdowns.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 20.1 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 4 games + this one (PPR): 14.0, 14.4, 12.4, 31.7, 32.0
W1W2W3W4W6
Best fantasy game of the season.
Romeo Doubs Volume, no payoff
GB · WR · 10.5 pts on 15.3 expected
9 targets (35% of the team's), 5 catches for 55 yards.
Verdict: The points matched the role, 15.3 expected.
Last 4 games + this one (PPR): 8.8, 11.8, 4.5, 29.8, 10.5
W1W2W3W4W6
Season high in targets (9).
Andrei Iosivas Unlucky
CIN · WR · 1.5 pts on 6.8 expected
4 targets (10% of the team's), 1 catch for 5 yards.
Verdict: The role was there, worth 6.8 points at league-average rates; the production wasn't.
Last 5 games + this one (PPR): 0.0, 2.2, 0.0, 3.7, 13.2, 1.5
W1W2W3W4W5W6
Tucker Kraft Ran hot
GB · TE · 12.3 pts on 3.4 expected
2 targets (8% of the team's), 2 catches for 43 yards and 1 touchdown.
Verdict: The opportunities were worth 3.4 points; the touchdowns supplied the rest, and they are the part least likely to repeat.
Last 4 games + this one (PPR): 9.9, 24.4, 5.9, 10.6, 12.3
W1W2W3W4W6
Stock Up, Stock Down
Cincinnati Bengals
- ▲Stock up: Tanner Hudson played 25% of the snaps, up from a 2% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Andrei Iosivas played 94% of the snaps, up from a 78% season average.
- ▲Stock up: Noah Fant played 49% of the snaps, up from a 33% season average.
Green Bay Packers
- ▼Stock down: Dontayvion Wicks played 34% of the snaps, down from a 61% season average.
Fantasy Matchups
Fantasy points allowed per game by position, 2025 through Week 18.
| Points allowed to | Bengals D | Packers D |
|---|---|---|
| QBs | 18.8 | 15.2 |
| RBs | 28.4 | 21.1 |
| WRs | 25.4 | 31.0 |
| TEs | 20.7 | 12.1 |
Regular season, summed from each game's box score and scored with this page's rules.
How the Game Swung
Green Bay opened at 50% win probability and passed 98% in the fourth quarter on the way to the win.
Packers win probability
Key Swings
- +10Havrisik 43-yd FG50% → 60%Q2 14:15
- +22Jacobs 3-yd TD run62% → 84%Q2 4:05
- −25Flacco → Hudson, 2-yd TD90% → 65%Q3 4:46
- +26Jacobs 14-yd TD run67% → 93%Q4 14:56
- −7McPherson 45-yd FG96% → 89%Q4 10:43
Swing in Packers win probability, in points
Play Calling and Possessions
| Cincinnati Bengals | Measure | Green Bay Packers |
|---|---|---|
| 62 | Plays | 60 |
| 74% | Pass rate | 45% |
| 4.6 | Yds / dropback | 9.5 |
| 3.4 | Yds / carry | 4.6 |
| 6/15 | Third downs | 5/11 |
Efficiency edge Green Bay ran 2 fewer plays but gained 4.9 more yards per dropback.
- Top targets
- CIN Chase 30% · Higgins 20% · Hudson 13%
- GB Doubs 35% · Jacobs 19% · Golden 19%
Possession Results
| Result | CIN | GB |
|---|---|---|
| Touchdowns | 2 | 3 |
| Field goals | 1 | 2 |
| Punts | 4 | 2 |
| Turnovers | 0 | 1 |
| Missed field goals | 2 | 0 |
CIN turnover edge: +1
- The Packers opened the scoring on their second possession, a 12-play, 71-yard drive that ended in a field goal.
All 18 possessions, drive by drive
| Team | Start | Plays | Yards | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GB | Q1 15:00 | 11 | 47 | 6:21 | Interception |
| CIN | Q1 8:39 | 3 | 1 | 2:00 | Punt |
| GB | Q1 6:39 | 12 | 71 | 7:24 | Field goal |
| CIN | Q2 14:15 | 5 | 17 | 1:49 | Punt |
| GB | Q2 12:26 | 3 | 4 | 2:08 | Punt |
| CIN | Q2 10:18 | 3 | 5 | 2:06 | Punt |
| GB | Q2 8:12 | 8 | 80 | 4:07 | Touchdown |
| CIN | Q2 4:05 | 3 | -2 | 1:15 | Punt |
| GB | Q2 2:50 | 5 | 41 | 1:44 | Punt |
| CIN | Q2 1:06 | 9 | 44 | 1:06 | Missed FG |
| CIN | Q3 15:00 | 17 | 78 | 10:14 | Touchdown |
| GB | Q3 4:46 | 9 | 66 | 4:50 | Touchdown |
| CIN | Q4 14:56 | 9 | 50 | 4:13 | Field goal |
| GB | Q4 10:43 | 6 | 62 | 3:10 | Touchdown |
| CIN | Q4 7:33 | 10 | 65 | 3:22 | Touchdown |
| GB | Q4 4:11 | 7 | 41 | 2:19 | Field goal |
| CIN | Q4 1:52 | 6 | 27 | 1:11 | Missed FG |
| GB | Q4 0:41 | 1 | 0 | 0:41 | End of game |
About these numbers
Possessions that ended with the clock running out at the half or the end of the game aren't counted.
Personnel groupings, average depth of target and pass rate over expected appear when the tracking feed is connected.
Bengals vs Packers Head-to-Head
The Bengals and Packers first met in 1971 and have played 15 times since.
- All-time series
- 8–7Packers lead, 15 meetings since 1971
- Postseason
- 0No playoff meetings
- Largest Bengals win
- 28–71976
- Largest Packers win
- 24–101995
Since 2021
2–0 Packers lead
2 meetings since the 2021 season, regular season and playoffs.
- P
- P
Oldest to newest. P = Packers win, B = Bengals win, outlined = this game.
Recent Meetings
- 2025 Wk 6 Bengals at Packers, 2025 Wk 6 recap GB 27 CIN 18 GB W
- 2021 Wk 5 Packers at Bengals, 2021 Wk 5 recap GB 25 CIN 22 GB W
Season to Date (Through Week 18)
The 2025 regular season, from each game's box score.
| Bengals | Stat | Packers |
|---|---|---|
| 6-11 | Record | 9-7-1 |
| 24.4 | Points per game | 23.0 |
| 329.2 | Yards per game | 332.6 |
| 5.3 | Yards per play | 5.6 |
| 28.9 | Points allowed per game | 21.2 |
| 380.9 | Yards allowed per game | 311.8 |
Bengals and Packers in Fantasy
The two teams don't meet again this season. If you roster a Bengal or a Packer, these answer the week-to-week question.
- Start/Sit ToolShould your Bengals or Packers player start this week? Compare the decision against your other options.
- Fantasy Football ProjectionsSee the latest weekly and rest-of-season projections for Bengals and Packers players.
- Fantasy Points Allowed by PositionHow the Bengals and Packers defenses have treated QBs, RBs, WRs and TEs.
- Strength of ScheduleWhere each team's remaining games fall in your fantasy playoff run.
- Redraft CommandConnect your league for personalized lineup, trade and roster advice.
Keep Exploring
2025 Game Logs for Players in This Game
Bengals vs Packers Game FAQ
Who won the 2025 Bengals vs Packers Week 6 game?
The Green Bay Packers beat the Cincinnati Bengals 27–18 in Week 6 of the 2025 season. The game was played at Lambeau Field in Green Bay, WI, on October 12, 2025. See the Packers' 2025 schedule.
What was the final score of Bengals vs Packers?
The final score was Packers 27, Bengals 18. The Packers led 10–0 at halftime, and the second half went Bengals 18, Packers 17.
What happened in the Bengals vs Packers game?
Green Bay led 10–0 at halftime and won 27–18, though Cincinnati took the second half 18–17. The Packers finished with a 409–268 edge in total offense and averaged 6.8 yards per play. Josh Jacobs led all players with 5 catches for 57 yards, plus 18 carries for 93 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns. The Packers committed 1 turnover, the Bengals none.
Who scored the most fantasy points in Bengals vs Packers?
Josh Jacobs led the game with 32.0 PPR fantasy points, the RB3 of Week 6, on 5 catches for 57 yards, plus 18 carries for 93 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns. Ja'Marr Chase was next with 25.1 (WR5). See Josh Jacobs's 2025 game log.
Who led Bengals vs Packers in passing, rushing and receiving?
Jordan Love (GB) led all passers with 19 of 26 for 259 yards, a touchdown and an interception. Josh Jacobs (GB) led in rushing with 18 carries for 93 yards and 2 touchdowns. Ja'Marr Chase (CIN) led in receiving with 10 catches for 94 yards and a touchdown.
How many fantasy points did Josh Jacobs score against the Bengals?
Josh Jacobs scored 32.0 points in PPR leagues, 29.5 in half-PPR and 27.0 in standard scoring against the Bengals in Week 6 of the 2025 season, on 5 catches for 57 yards, plus 18 carries for 93 rushing yards and 2 touchdowns. He handled 55% of his team's carries.
Who outperformed and underperformed expected fantasy points in Bengals vs Packers?
Josh Jacobs outperformed his expected fantasy points the most, scoring 32.0 PPR points on 20.1 xFP (+11.9). Andrei Iosivas fell furthest short, with 1.5 points on 6.8 xFP (−5.3). A gap either way reflects efficiency and touchdowns in one game; it is not a forecast. For matchups ahead, see fantasy points allowed by position.
Who had the highest expected fantasy points in Bengals vs Packers?
Ja'Marr Chase had the most fantasy opportunity in the game, worth 21.1 expected PPR points (xFP) at league-average rates, and scored 25.1. Expected points measure the volume of a player's pass attempts, carries and targets, not how well he used them.
How did the Packers beat the Bengals?
The Packers beat the Bengals 27–18 because they averaged 6.8 yards per play to 4.3 and outgained them 409–268.
Which team won the turnover battle in Bengals vs Packers?
The Bengals won the turnover battle 1–0: the Packers gave the ball away 1 time and the Bengals not at all. The Packers won the game anyway.
What was the turning point of Bengals vs Packers?
Josh Jacobs' 14-yard touchdown run with 14:56 left in the fourth quarter was the biggest swing of the game, moving the Packers' win probability from 67% to 93%.
What is the all-time Bengals vs Packers record?
The Packers lead the all-time series 8–7 across 15 meetings since 1971.
When did the Bengals and Packers last play before this game?
Before Week 6 of 2025, they last met in the 2021 season on October 10, 2021, when the Packers beat the Bengals 25–22.
What is the Bengals vs Packers record since 2021?
The Packers lead 2–0 across 2 meetings since the 2021 season, including this game.
